scholarly journals Recommendations For Metrics For Multidrug-Resistant Organisms In Healthcare Settings: SHEA/HICPAC Position Paper

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 901-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L. Cohen ◽  
David Calfee ◽  
Scott K. Fridkin ◽  
Susan S. Huang ◽  
John A. Jernigan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Vulnerable Patient ◽  
Trends Over Time ◽  
And Control

Monitoring multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and the infections they cause in a healthcare setting is important to detect newly emerging antimicrobial resistance profiles, to identify vulnerable patient populations, and to assess the need for and effectiveness of interventions; however, it is unclear which metrics are the best, because most of the metrics are not standardized. This document describes useful and practical metrics and surveillance considerations for measuring MDROs and the infections they cause in the practice of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. These metrics are designed to aid healthcare workers in documenting trends over time within their facility and should not be used for interfacility comparison.

scholarly journals Status Update on Infection Prevention and Control at Deployed Medical Treatment Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 451-460
Author(s):  
Alice E Barsoumian ◽  
Steffanie L Solberg ◽  
Ashley S Hanhurst ◽  
Amanda L Roth ◽  
Tamara S Funari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Treatment Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control

Abstract Introduction Infections with multidrug resistant organisms that spread through nosocomial transmission complicate the care of combat casualties. Missions conducted to review infection prevention and control (IPC) practices at deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) previously showed gaps in best practices and saw success with targeted interventions. An IPC review has not been conducted since 2012. Recently, an IPC review was requested in response to an outbreak of multidrug resistant organisms at a deployed facility. Materials and Methods A Joint Service team conducted onsite IPC reviews of MTFs in the U.S. Central Command area of operations. Self-assessments were completed by MTF personnel in anticipation of the onsite assessment, and feedback was given individually and at monthly IPC working group teleconferences. Goals of the onsite review were to assist MTF teams in conducting assessments, review practices for challenges and successes, provide on the spot education or risk mitigation, and identify common trends requiring system-wide action. Results Nine deployed MTFs participated in the onsite assessments, including four Role 3, three Role 2 capable of surgical support, and two Role 1 facilities. Seventy-eight percent of sites had assigned IPC officers although only 43% underwent required predeployment training. Hand hygiene and healthcare associated infection prevention bundles were monitored at 67% and 29% of MTFs, respectively. Several challenges including variability in practices with turnover of deployed teams were noted. Successes highlighted included individual team improvements in healthcare associated infections and mentorship of untrained personnel. Conclusions Despite successes, ongoing challenges with optimal deployed IPC were noted. Recommendations for improvement include strengthening IPC culture, accountability, predeployment training, and stateside support for deployed IPC assets. Variability in IPC practices may occur from rotation to rotation, and regular reassessment is required to ensure that successes are sustained through times of turnover.

scholarly journals Using Audit and Feedback and the Benchmark to Enhance Infection Prevention and Control of Multidrug Resistant Organisms: a Quasi-experiment Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhou ◽  
Xiaoquan Lai ◽  
Xinping Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Multimodal Intervention ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
And Control

Abstract BackgroundInfection prevention and control (IPC) is important to prevent the spread of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs). We aimed to enhance and explore the implementation of preventing and controlling MDROs using audit and feedback and the benchmark. MethodsThis quasi-experimental design was conducted in three hospitals from 1st March 2018 to 30th September 2019. A multimodal intervention treated audit and feedback and benchmark as key components for MDROs IPC was conducted in Wuhan, China. A checklist of 40 implementation indicators based on IPC measures was formed to guide the audit twice a week. Immediate feedback was verbally given after each audit on the spot, and written feedbacks containing benchmark and individual implementation levels were delivered monthly or quarterly in three hospitals. The intervention effect was evaluated by Chi-square and Poisson segmented linear regression. Impacts of implementation of indicators on the incidence were modeled by mixed-effect regressions. ResultsThe incidence of nosocomial MDROs decreased by 19.39%, 20.55%, and 24.03% in A, B, and C hospital, respectively. The lowest implementation compliance of indicators was the use of personal protective equipment of doctors (50.24%). The highest was isolated warning signs of nurses (96.46%). The implementation on hand hygiene of doctors (Coef. = -27.87, p=0.001) and nurses (Coef. = -35.44, p=0.001), clean of surrounding instruments and bed unit (Coef. = -4.84, p=0.030), education to patients and relatives (Coef. = -59.51, p=0.031), and sending of specimen inspection timely (Coef. = -9.95, p<0.001) were negatively associated with the incidence of nosocomial MDROs infection. Conclusions The multimodal intervention by strengthening the implementation of audit and feedback and the benchmark is feasible and effective in China. The checklist is an effective and practical tool to measure the level of implementation. Education to patients and relatives, hand hygiene, clean of surrounding instruments and bed unit, and sending of specimen inspection timely are especially crucial.

Barriers to infection prevention and control practice among Amhara region teaching hospitals in Ethiopia: Qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walelegn Worku Yallew ◽  
Abera Kumie ◽  
Feleke Moges Yehuala
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Worker ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Amhara Region ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Control Practice ◽  
And Control

Healthcare workers have good perception towards infection prevention, but there has been a poor practice towards it. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore barriers to practice of infection prevention and control practice in teaching hospitals in Amhara region. A phenomenological approach used to explore the lived experience of healthcare workers and management staffs towards infection prevention practice and control. The data was collected from ten in-depth interviews and 23 focus group discussion participants, by face to face interview using open ended interview performed in safe and quiet places. Data was managed using OpenCode software version 4.03 and contents were analyzed thematically. Totally ten different barriers were identified, such as availability of facilities, shortage of material supply, lack of maintenance of facilities and equipment, high patient flow, experience, emergency situation, healthcare worker behaviour and healthcare worker’s information about infection prevention, low awareness of patients and visitors and overflow of families and visitors to the hospital. For effective infection prevention practice implementation, barriers should be considered via identifying specific organizational, healthcare worker, patients and visitors as targets.

scholarly journals Improving knowledge, attitudes and practice to prevent COVID-19 transmission in healthcare workers and the public in Thailand

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rapeephan R. Maude ◽  
Monnaphat Jongdeepaisal ◽  
Sumawadee Skuntaniyom ◽  
Thanomvong Muntajit ◽  
Stuart D. Blacksell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Public ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
Educational Videos ◽  
Prevention And Control Measures ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Key infection prevention and control measures to limit transmission of COVID-19 include social distancing, hand hygiene, use of facemasks and personal protective equipment. However, these have limited or no impact if not applied correctly through lack of knowledge, inappropriate attitude or incorrect practice. In order to maximise the impact of infection prevention and control measures on COVID-19 spread, we undertook a study to assess and improve knowledge, attitudes and practice among 119 healthcare workers and 100 general public in Thailand. The study setting was two inpatient hospitals providing COVID-19 testing and treatment. Detailed information on knowledge, attitudes and practice among the general public and healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 transmission and its prevention were obtained from a combination of questionnaires and observations. Results Knowledge of the main transmission routes, commonest symptoms and recommended prevention methods was mostly very high (> 80%) in both groups. There was lower awareness of aerosols, food and drink and pets as sources of transmission; of the correct duration for handwashing; recommended distance for social/physical distancing; and about recommended types of face coverings. Information sources most used and most trusted were the workplace, work colleagues, health workers and television. The results were used to produce a set of targeted educational videos which addressed many of these gaps with subsequent improvements on retesting in a number of areas. This included improvements in handwashing practice with an increase in the number of areas correctly washed in 65.5% of the public, and 57.9% of healthcare workers. The videos were then further optimized with feedback from participants followed by another round of retesting. Conclusions Detailed information on gaps in knowledge, attitudes and practice among the general public and healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 transmission and its prevention were obtained from a combination of questionnaires and observations. This was used to produce targeted educational videos which addressed these gaps with subsequent improvements on retesting. The resulting videos were then disseminated as a resource to aid in efforts to fight COVID-19 in Thailand and worldwide.

scholarly journals Seroprevalence of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayat Mushcab ◽  
Jaffar Al-Tawfiq ◽  
Mohammed Ghamdi ◽  
Amani Babgi ◽  
Abdulrazack Amir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Seroconversion Rate ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
World Health ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
And Control ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract Background The nature of the healthcare workers' jobs standing at the frontline against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) puts them at a higher risk of unknowingly contracting the disease and potentially contributing to the spread. This study aims to assess the overall positive seroconversion prevalence of SARS-CoV-2. Methods This is a longitudinal cohort study of healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital serving patients in several districts in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited between June - December 2020. Each participant had a serology blood test and completed the World Health Organization's risk factors assessment questionnaire. Results This study included 682 participants working in any capacity at a tertiary hospital, representing 15.7% of our population. Only 87 participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, a prevalence of 12.7% of all participants. Of the 87 participants, 17 participants never tested positive for COVID-19 rt-PCR before the study, a prevalence of 2.9%. Moreover, the improper technique of using alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water after the risk of body fluid exposure and wearing personal protective equipment when indicated were found to be statistically significant to having positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay with P=0.02, P=0.03, and CI: 95% respectively. Conclusion Positive seroconversion rate was considerably low during the first wave of COVID-19 amongst our healthcare workers and similar to other healthcare organizations in Saudi Arabia. Seropositivity correlated significantly with adherence to infection prevention and control recommendations.

scholarly journals Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Staffing: A National Survey of Home Health Agencies in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s301-s301
Author(s):  
Jingjing Shang ◽  
Ashley Chastain ◽  
U. Gayani Perera ◽  
Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz ◽  
Patricia Stone
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Staff Member ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
And Control

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a national priority in all healthcare settings, and IPC staffing characteristics have been linked to patient safety outcomes. However, there is a lack of knowledge about IPC in home healthcare (HHC), the fastest growing healthcare sector. Our aim was to better understand the current state of IPC in HHC, as well as the HHC staff involved with IPC policy implementation. Methods: A national survey was conducted between October 2018 and November 2019. The participants included (1) agencies recruited from a national HHC conference and (2) a national random sample of 1,501 agencies stratified by census region, ownership status, and rural or urban location. Survey items included staff influenza vaccination policies, antibiotic stewardship, infection surveillance, and IPC staffing. Descriptive statistics were computed, and differences by ownership were calculated using 2 and Student t tests. Results: Of the 535 HHC agencies that responded to the survey (response rate, 33%), 64% were for-profit agencies. Overall, 30.8% of the agencies (17.9% for-profit, 57.6% nonprofit; P < .01) required staff influenza vaccination. Most nonprofit agencies (84.1%) and about half of the for-profit agencies (48.1%) offered free influenza vaccinations to staff (P < .01). During the past influenza season, 62.6% of agencies (81.5% nonprofit vs 51.6% for-profit; P < .01) had 75% of their employees vaccinated for influenza, and 9.3% (2% nonprofit vs 13.5% for-profit; P < .01) reported that they did not track this data. Only 17.9% of HHC agencies used antibiotic prescribing guidelines, and 33.3% reported that they reviewed cases to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic administration and/or indication. Most HHC agencies (86%) reported collecting and reviewing infection data to identify trends, which was often done quarterly or more frequently. Almost every responding agency reported that the staff member in charge of IPC had other responsibilities including administrative, education/training, or quality improvement, and 33.5% of those personnel had received no specific IPC training. Also, ~6% of agencies (12.5% of government-owned agencies) reported that they currently did not have a staff member in charge of IPC. Conclusions: This is the first national study of IPC in HHC, which can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement initiatives in the home care environment. Compared to other healthcare settings, HHC agencies have substantial challenges related to IPC. Most HHC agencies do not have a staff member exclusively dedicated to IPC, and staff training is inadequate. Furthermore, a significant number of agencies have no staff influenza vaccination or antibiotic stewardship policies in place. The situation is worse at for-profit agencies, which dominate the current US HHC industry.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document