scholarly journals Unification of Newtonian Physics with Einstein Relativity Theory by using Generalized Metrics of Complex Spacetime and application to the Motions of Planets and Stars, eliminating Dark Matter

2018 ◽  
Vol 1141 ◽  
pp. 012128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon Vossos ◽  
Elias Vossos
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Generalized Metrics

scholarly journals ‘G-d’s Physics’ (CUFT) New “Atom” & Purposeful Universe!

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Computational Formula ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Unified Field Theory ◽  
Unified Field ◽  
The Universe

Note: Dr. Bentovish (Bentwich) is seeking scientific collaboration and validation of this New ‘G-d’s Physics’ (Computational Unified Field Theory) Paradigm’s Empirical “Critical Predictions” involving precise Astronomical/Cosmological Measurements, as well as time-sensitive Accelerators validations. Twenty-first Century Theoretical Physics is at a state of crisis akin to pre-Einstein’s 1905 Relativistic “Paradigmatic Shift: its two primary “pillars”, Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) seem contradictory and up to 95% of all mass and energy in the universe is unaccounted for (termed: “dark-matter” and “dark-energy”); A New “Computational Unified Field Theory” (CUFT) discovered over the past eight years – also called: “G-d’s Physics’ Paradigm was shown to resolve this apparent RT-QM inconsistency and discard “dark-matter”, “dark-energy” as “superfluous” (i.e., non-existent)! This article delineates this New ‘G-d’s Physics’ Paradigm’s new “Atom”, e.g., basic “building-block” of the physical universe associated with its discovery of the singular (higherordered) “Universal Computational Principle” (UCP) which simultaneously computes every exhaustive spatial pixel in the universe at the incredible rate of “c2 /h”=1.36-50 sec! This New ‘G-d’s Physics’ Paradigm “Atom” is shown to challenge and negate some of the basic assumptions of RT’s & QM’s Old ‘Material-Causal’ Paradigm, including: the “Big-Bang” Model, Einstein’s Equations, the “Speed of Light Barrier” and opens new exciting possibilities including “time-reversal”, and a complete integration of “space”, “time”, “energy” and “mass” within a new exhaustive “Universal Computational Formula” (which integrates and transcends key components of RT & QM); The New ‘G-d’s Physics Paradigm reveals a new Purposeful Universe which possesses multiple possible “future/s” associated with the “Moral Choices” of Human-beings, and which is directed towards an ultimate “Perfected State” (Morally, Spiritually and Physically)!

Is dark matter and black hole cosmology an effect of Born’s reciprocal relativity theory?

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Castro Perelman
Keyword(s):  
Black Hole ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Phase Space ◽  
Lorentz Invariance ◽  
Finsler Geometry ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Accelerated Expansion ◽  
Full Detail ◽  
Density Parameter ◽  
De Sitter

Born’s reciprocal relativity theory (BRRT), based on a maximal proper-force, maximal speed of light, and inertial and non-inertial observers, is re-examined in full detail. Relativity of locality and chronology are natural consequences of this theory, even in flat phase space. The advantage of BRRT is that Lorentz invariance is preserved and there is no need to introduce Hopf algebraic deformations of the Poincaré algebra, de Sitter algebra, nor non-commutative space–times. After a detailed study of the notion of generalized force, momentum, and mass in phase space, we explain that what one may interpret as “dark matter” in galaxies, for example, is just an effect of observing ordinary galactic matter in different accelerating frames of reference than ours. Explicit calculations are provided that explain these novel relativistic effects due to the accelerated expansion of the Universe, and which may generate the present-day density parameter value ΩDM ∼ 0.25 of dark matter. The physical origins behind the numerical coincidences in black hole cosmology are also explored. We finalize with a rigorous study of the curved geometry of (co)tangent bundles (phase space) within the formalism of Finsler geometry, and provide a short discussion on Hamilton spaces.

Causation in Spacetime Theories

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Hoefer
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Causal Relations ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Special Relativity Theory

Although Russell maintained that causation was not to be found in advanced physical theories (which is described in this article), even he would have admitted that, if one must talk of cause–effect relations between events, then spacetime theories may well place constraints on what sorts of causal relations may exist and how they may be arranged in time. They may also imply the possibility of surprising and unexpected causal relations, and even serious causal anomalies. This article looks at what the three most important spacetime theories imply about causation. It starts with a brief look at Newtonian physics, looks at how important changes are introduced by Special Relativity theory, and finally turns to the rich causal fields of General Relativity models.

scholarly journals Relativistic astrometry and astrometric relativity

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (S248) ◽  
pp. 356-362
Author(s):  
S. A. Klioner
Keyword(s):  
Relativistic Effects ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
Time Space ◽  
Suitable Combination ◽  
General Relativistic ◽  
Standard Set

AbstractThe interplay between modern astrometry and gravitational physics is very important for the progress in both these fields. Below some threshold of accuracy, Newtonian physics fails to describe observational data and the Einstein's relativity theory must be used to model the data adequately. Many high-accuracy astronomical techniques have already passed this threshold. Moreover, modern astronomical observations cannot be adequately modeled if relativistic effects are considered as small corrections to Newtonian models. The whole way of thinking must be made compatible with relativity: this starts with the concepts of time, space and reference systems.An overview of the standard general-relativistic framework for modeling of high-accuracy astronomical observations is given. Using this framework one can construct a standard set of building blocks for relativistic models. A suitable combination of these building blocks can be used to formulate a model for any given type of astronomical observations. As an example the problem of four dimensional solar system ephemerides is exposed in more detail. The limits of the present relativistic formulation are also briefly summarized.On the other hand, high-accuracy astronomical observations play important role for gravitational physics itself, providing the latter with crucial observational tests. Perspectives for these astronomical tests for the next 15 years are summarized.

scholarly journals A theory with consolidation: Linking everything to explain everything

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Biraris
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Standard Model ◽  
Quantum Theories ◽  
Weak Charge ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Energy Mechanism ◽  
Wave Particle Duality ◽  
Modern Physics ◽  
The Universe

The paper reports a theory which gives explicit (ontic) understanding of the abstract (epistemic) mechanisms spanning many branches of physics. It results to most modern physics starting from Newtonian physics by abandoning progress in twentieth century. The theory assumes consolidation of points in 4-balls of specific radius in the universe. Thus the 4-balls are fundamental elements of the universe. Analogue of momentum defined as soul vector is assumed to be induced on the 4-balls at the beginning of the universe. Then with progression of local time, collisions happen leading to different rotations of CNs. For such rotations, the consolidation provides centripetal binding. By using general terminologies of force and work, the mass energy mechanism gets revealed. The theory provides explicit interpretation of intrinsic properties of mass, electric charge, color charge, weak charge, spin etc. It also provides explicit understanding of the wave-particle duality & quantum mechanics. Epistemic study of the universe with the consolidation results to conventional quantum theories. Elementary mechanism of the field interactions is evident due to conservation of the soul vectors, and its epistemic expectation results to the gauge theories. The theory predicts that four types of interaction would exist in the universe along with the acceptable relative strengths; it provides fundamental interpretation of the physical forces. Further, it explains the basic mechanisms which can be identified with dark energy & dark matter. It also results to (or explains) entanglement, chirality, excess of matter, 4-component spinor, real-abstract (ontic-epistemic) correspondence etc. The theory is beyond standard model and results to the standard model, relativity, dark energy & dark matter, starting by simple assumptions.

scholarly journals RECONSTRUCTING f(R, T) GRAVITY FROM HOLOGRAPHIC DARK ENERGY

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 1250024 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. S. HOUNDJO ◽  
OLIVER F. PIATTELLA
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Holographic Dark Energy ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Ricci Scalar ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
General Relativity Theory ◽  
Theories Of Gravity

We consider cosmological scenarios based on f(R, T) theories of gravity (R is the Ricci scalar and T is the trace of the energy–momentum tensor) and numerically reconstruct the function f(R, T) which is able to reproduce the same expansion history generated, in the standard General Relativity theory, by dark matter and holographic dark energy. We consider two special f(R, T) models: in the first instance, we investigate the modification R + 2f(T), i.e. the usual Einstein–Hilbert term plus a f(T) correction. In the second instance, we consider a f(R) + λT theory, i.e. a T correction to the renown f(R) theory of gravity.

PHYSICS: ITS DEVELOPMENT AND PHILOSOPHY

1989 ◽  
Vol 04 (18) ◽  
pp. 4643-4733
Author(s):  
TA-YOU WU
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Particle Physics ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Classical Dynamics ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Elementary Particle Physics ◽  
Thermodynamics And Statistical Mechanics

We attempt to review the development of physics in its historical order: classical dynamics; optics and electromagnetic theory followed naturally by the special theory of relativity; the general theory of relativity; from another direction, the kinetic theory of gases, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics which led to the discovery of the quantum theory; atomic physics that led to quantum mechanics; the theoretical and experimental studies of elementary particle physics. Some efforts were made to bring out the basic concepts in these theories and their changes, namely, the abandoning of the absolute time and simultaneity, simultaneous exact knowledge of position and momentum of a particle and determinism of Newtonian physics in the relativity theory and quantum mechanics; the concept of quantized field and unified fields. The interplay between experiments and theories in the development of physics was summarized by a table at the end of the article.

3. Relativity and its philosophy

2021 ◽  
pp. 42-72
Author(s):  
David Wallace
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Speed Of Light ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Time And Motion ◽  
The Relationship

This chapter discusses how relativity theory affects our ideas about space, time, and motion. The special theory of relativity does not introduce the idea that motion is relative: it combines that idea, already present in Newtonian physics, with the idea that the speed of light does not depend on the motion of the source. This combination has surprising consequences: that moving clocks run slow; that moving rods shrink. This is apparently in flat contradiction with the relativity principle. The resolution of this paradox looks very different depending on one’s view of what spacetime is: is it simply a codification of physics, or can it do explanatory work in its own right. Thus the paradox lets us get clearer on what is at stake in these questions about the nature of spacetime. Relativity also imperils the idea that simultaneity—the relationship between two events when they occur at the same time—is relative and/or conventional. The epilogue of the chapter briefly discusses the general theory of relativity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document