scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2142 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
High Performance ◽  
English Language ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
State University ◽  
Academic English ◽  
Senior Lecturer ◽  
Volume Editor

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two program committee members with the mandatory spell and style check • Conference submission management system: : submissions were received and handled via e-mail W [email protected]. • Number of submissions received: 53 • Number of submissions sent for review: 42 • Number of submissions accepted: 25 (2 retracted by the authors) • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 50% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 13 • Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round. • Prior to the conference, preliminary texts (in Russian or in English) and slides (in English) were reviewed by one of the co-chairs of the program committee, who is responsible for this particular session. • After the conference, authors of the reported studies were encouraged to submit full texts in English for publication in this volume. The independent referees (at least one per paper) reviewed all texts. The review process was supervised by the volume editor and by the review coordinator. The editor communicated to the authors all suggestions and comments from the referees. After the revision, the editor may submit the revised document to the reviewer to get the confirmation of successful revision. • Reviewers of the scientific journal on High-performance computing systems and technologies (http://journal.asu.ru/hpcst/about) contributed to the process. • Spell and style check was applied for all accepted papers. Specialists from the academic English language departments of Tomsk State University, Altai State University, and Tomsk Polytechnic University were invited. • Contact person for queries: Vladimir Faerman, Senior lecturer, Faculty of Security, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (Tomsk, Russia), [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 879 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
English Language ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
English Grammar ◽  
Review Editor ◽  
Sustainable Landscape

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. The 5th International Symposium of Sustainable Landscape Development (The 5th ISSLD) was held on 22-23 September 2020 in Bogor, Indonesia. All papers published in this proceeding have been peer-reviewed through a process managed by the Editor by involving reviewers from academics and professionals in the field of landscape architecture. • Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers were uploaded through the organizer’s website http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium. All papers passed a basic check of writing format, including size, margins, font type and size, manuscript structure, compliance with submission instructions, quality of English grammar, and plagiarism checks. Reviewers provided opportunities to Authors for correction of discrepancies in the writing format and English grammar and plagiarism. Papers that still did not meet the minimum 25% of plagiarism checks were rejected. We used a double-blind system for peer-review while keeping the identity of reviewers and authors anonymous. One external reviewer and one review editor staff member reviewed each paper using professional and scientific standards. The review process took approximately 30 days. The reviewers decided to accept or reject the paper along with the reasons. Editor sent forms of correction, acceptance, and rejection to the appropriate authors. • Submission management system: The submission was made through the ISSLD website management system at the address http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium developed by the ISSLD Operator. The submission, review, and acceptance systems were carried out through the website. Management of the website also includes: 1. Managing access of reviewers and editors to papers; 2. Automatic registration for ISSLD 3. Papers submission; 4. List of ISSLD every year; 4. Program book schedule of events, materials for Keynote and Invited Speakers, the title of the presentation, and presenter’s name. 5. Communication via email between the program committee, reviewers, and authors; 6. Preparation and Publication of conference programs; 7. All authors who submit papers are assumed to have accepted the terms of Publication License; 8. All requirements for papers, templates, and sample papers can be accessed for Author or aspiring writer. • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 56 • Number of submissions accepted: 46 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 82,14 • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 14 • Any additional info on the review process: All papers have passed the English language check using Grammarly and plagiarism check using Turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name : Akhmad Arifin Hadi Affiliation: IPB University [email protected] [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 845 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Programme Committee ◽  
Volume Editor ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two committee members • Conference submission management system: Submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected]. The initial submission were handled by the secretary of the committee Ivan Krivolapov or his affiliates. Further correspondence with the authors and reviewers was handled via the same email under the supervision of the volume editor Galina Korotkova. • Number of submissions received: 237 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 161 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2,5 • Total number of reviewers involved: 50 • Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round. • Prior to the conference, preliminary texts (in Russian or in English) and slides (in English) were reviewed by one of programme committee members, who are responsible for this particular session. • After the conference, authors of the reported studies were encouraged to submit full texts in English for publication in this volume. The independent referees (at least one per paper) reviewed all texts. The review process was supervised by the volume editor. The editor communicated to the authors all suggestions and comments from the referees. After the revision, the editor may submit the revised document to the reviewer to get the confirmation of successful revision. • Reviewers of the scientific journal “Vestnik Michurinskogo Gossudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta” contributed to the process. • Spell and style check was applied for all accepted papers. The specialist from the language and publishing departments of Michurinsk State Agricultural University were involved in this process. • Contact person for queries: Galina Korotkova, Ph.D., Vice-rector for Research and Development of Michurinsk State Agrarian University, co-editor of Vestnik of MGAU (Michurinsk, Russia), [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2061 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Technical Information ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
State University ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
E Mail

Abstract All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind peer review • Review criteria: Consistency with the conference scope and JPCS fields of interests; Technical content; Presentation style and clarity; Academic value. Each position was assessed with the following scale: Unsatisfactory, To be Improved, Good Enough. All papers marked as unsatisfactory by two referees were declined, all other papers were either accepted as is or send for the revision. Editorial board is responsible for the final decision regarding the publishing of manuscripts. • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via e-mail • Number of submissions received: 262 • Number of submissions sent for review: 181 • Number of submissions accepted: 153 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 29 • Any additional info on review process: three independent peers, one of whom invited from outside the committee were assigned to each paper. The editors supervised the review process. Contact person for queries: Igor Boychuk , co-chairman of the organizing committee, co-editor, associate professor of Admiral Ushakov State Maritime University, Novorossiysk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Sergey Bakhmutov , co-chairman of the program committee, co-editor, vice executive office for research and development of Central Scientific Research Automobile and Automotive Engines Institute (FSUE “NAMI”), Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Artyom Butsanets , secretary of the editorial board, head of the department of intellectual property and technical information, Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping, Saint Petersburg, Russia, [email protected].

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2056 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
State University ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Organizations ◽  
Virtual Conference ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Morressier virtual conference and publishing platform • Number of submissions received: 76 • Number of submissions sent for review: 76 • Number of submissions accepted: 71 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 93.4 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 8 • Any additional info on review process: Typical review questionnaire like in leading scientific journals and detailed review about value and novelty of the publications reviewed. The Referees are from universities and scientific organizations from Russia, Byelorussia, China, Canada, India. • Contact person for queries: Name : Professor Victor Belyaev Affiliation: Moscow Region State University (MRSU) Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2140 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
State University ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
System Information ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Information System “Conference” • Number of submissions received: 84 • Number of submissions sent for review: 65 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46,4% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 4 • Any additional info on review process: uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Yurchenko Alexey Affiliation: Professor, National Research Tomsk State University, 36, Lenin Avenue Tomsk RUSSIA Email : [email protected] ([email protected])

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2131 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Peter The Great ◽  
Scientific Organizations ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) An international scientific committee selected papers corresponding to the following criteria: a paper should have more than 8 pages and contain new scientific results, which are in the thematic area of the conference. Next, each selected paper underwent scientific peer review and technical check. The type of peer review was double-blind scientific peer review. At least 3 reviewers from different scientific organizations participated in the review of one paper. In case of disagreement between the reviewers, additional reviewers were involved. All papers are also checked for plagiarism, image quality and quality of the English language. • Conference submission management system: Open Journal System • Number of submissions received: 1240 • Number of submissions sent for review: 1157 • Number of submissions accepted: 493 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 39.75 • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 132 • Any additional info on review process: Contact person for queries: Name: Vera Murgul Affiliation: Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 875 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
State University ◽  
Advance Research ◽  
Primary Hypothesis ◽  
Scientific Station ◽  
E Mail

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The submission processing had no a software system. Call-for-paper was placed on the Conference web page, the papers were submitted via e-mail. The reviews were asked and received via e-mails. • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 104 • Number of submissions accepted: 93 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 79% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 1,433 • Any additional info on review process: The consideration of the submitted manuscript included independent peer review process. At least two reviewers gave their view and remarks for each paper. All reviewers were asked to provide a detailed review with comments for authors and editors and evaluate paper taking into account the questions list (Is this work novel? Is this work scientifically correct (the experimental procedure and sequence)? Does the subject significantly advance research in the fields of research? Does it have high scientific quality? Does this work have significant proof to verify the primary hypothesis? Is this work incremental? Is the paper clearly written, concise and understandable? Should the English be improved? Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading?). All reviewers also were asked to provide their recommendations about paper acceptance (to publish the paper “as is”; to publish the paper after minor revision; to publish the paper after major revision; to reject the paper). • Contact person for queries: Dr. Anna Godymchuk, Tobolsk Complex Scientific Station, [email protected] Prof. Svetlana Morkovina, Vice-rector of Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Reviewer Acknowledgements for World Journal of English Language, Vol. 11, No. 1

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Joe Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
World Journal ◽  
Foreign Languages ◽  
Michigan State University ◽  
State University ◽  
Application Form ◽  
College Of Business

World Journal of English Language wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal are greatly appreciated.World Journal of English Language is recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please contact us for the application form at: [email protected] for Volume 11, Number 1Cheryl Caesar, Michigan State University, USDaniel Ginting, Universitas Ma Chung, IndonesiaLi Ping Chang, Department of Applied Foreign Languages, National Taipei College of Business, TaiwanÖzkanal, Ümit, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Foreign Languages Department, TurkeyŞenel, Müfit, 19 Mayıs University , TurkeySoufiane Rachid Trabelsi, Sohar University, Oman

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 890 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Marine Science ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. The review processes were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) Double-blind: All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and the ethics of scientific writing including a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism were rejected directly. The initial technical criteria check by the editors. The accepted papers came through peer review process by two professional experts in the related subject area. After the peer review process was complete, the editors decide that the papers will be accepted for publication. • Conference submission management system: Email 2nd International Conference on Fisheries and Marine submission on https://unkhair.ac.id/ • Number of submissions received: 150 • Number of submissions sent for review: 88 • Number of submissions accepted: 73 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 48% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 35 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: [email protected] Dr. Najamuddin Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Khairun University, Indonesia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document