Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use Near the End of Life: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 977-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad Glisch ◽  
Seyedehtanaz Saeidzadeh ◽  
Travis Snyders ◽  
Stephanie Gilbertson-White ◽  
Yuya Hagiwara ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Xinchen Sun ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Haiqing Hua ◽  
Xiufeng Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A495-A495
Author(s):  
David Saltman ◽  
Nicole Croteau ◽  
Heather Lockyer ◽  
Rob Seitz ◽  
Frank McMahon ◽  
...  

BackgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The advent of ICIs specifically targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), or its ligand (PD-L1) represents a major therapeutic advance that is now included in standard of care regimens for non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 expression measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is the current gold standard predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in NSCLC, however many factors beyond PD-L1 expression alone affect the outcome of ICI therapy. Evaluation of other factors to better inform clinical practice will reduce both the potential for adverse immune-related toxicities and expenditure on ineffective costly therapies while potentially identifying patients otherwise missed by PD-L1 staining. The 27-gene IO assay is a RT-qPCR based gene expression panel1 that was developed to classify the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). It has been shown to be associated with response to ICI therapy in multiple tumor types including triple negative breast cancer, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and NSCLC where the association was independent of PD-L1 status in patients treated either with monotherapy or combination therapy.2 Currently, BC Cancer measures PD-L1 status by IHC using the PD-L1 22C3 PharmDx assay and reports the tumor proportional score (TPS) to inform clinical decision. Patients with a TPS ≥ 50% may be eligible for first-line treatment with ICI monotherapy and those with < 50% TPS are eligible for second line or later ICI monotherapy. We established this retrospective study of ICI monotherapy treated NSCLC patients to assess the 27-gene IO assay as an informative biomarker for NSCLC ICI treatment decisions.MethodsThis retrospective study is utilizing the BC Cancer Study Database to select approximately 150 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC treated with single-agent ICI therapy across four BC Cancer centers from 2017 forward (figure 1). Patients are selected based on availability of adequate biopsy specimens (FFPE with at least 20% tumor content), availability of PD-L1 IHC results or sufficient tissue to conduct staining, and for whom outcome data is available via chart review. RNA from patient samples is isolated from FFPE biopsies (either primary or metastatic sites) and those that yield ≥50ng RNA will be analyzed by the 27-gene IO assay 1 to derive IO scores (IO positive or IO negative) based on previously defined thresholds.3 The association between patient outcomes on ICI monotherapy and IO scores and PD-L1 IHC will be reported and compared.Abstract 466 Figure 1Schematic representation of patient workflow forReferencesSaltman, A, et al. Prostate cancer biomarkers and multiparametric MRI: is there a role for both in prostate cancer management? Ther Adv Urol 2021;13: 1756287221997186.Ranganath HJA, Smith JR, et al. One-year progression-free survival in lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors is significantly associated with a novel immunomodulatory signature but not PD-L1 staining. in SITC. Journal Immunotherapy Cancer. 2019.Nielsen, TJ, et al. A novel immuno-oncology algorithm measuring tumor microenvironment to predict response to immunotherapies. Heliyon 2021;7(3):e06438.Ethics ApprovalThe University of British Columba BC Cancer Research Ethics Board Chair, Vice-Chair or second Vice-Chair, has reviewed the above described research project, including associated documentation, and finds the research project acceptable on ethical grounds for research involving human subjects. All participants have provided informed consent before taking part in the study. REB Number H20-02635.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad Glisch ◽  
Yuya Hagiwara ◽  
Stephanie Gilbertson-White ◽  
Yubo Gao ◽  
Laurel Lyckholm

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the landscape of cancer care by increasing progression-free and overall survival in some patients with cancer. We evaluated use and variables contributing to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment near the end of life. Methods: We studied 157 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and died between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients had a palliative care consult any time between starting an immune checkpoint inhibitor and death. Univariate and multivariate models were used to examine variables related to immune checkpoint inhibitor use near the end of life. Results: Among 157 patients studied, 42 (27%) received a dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. Those who received treatment in the last 30 days of life had lower hospice enrollment (19 [45%] vs 78 [69%], P = .007) and higher rates of dying in the hospital (23 [56%] vs 33 [29%], P = .002). The percentage of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥3 at the time of last immune checkpoint inhibitor dose was higher in the group that received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in the last 30 days of life (11 [26%] vs 9 [8%], P = .003). Lack of traditional chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor, ECOG ≥3, and lack of hospice enrollment were independently associated with receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the last 30 days of life is common and associated with poor performance status, lower hospice enrollment, and dying in the hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document