Alteration in Synaptic Junction Proteins following Traumatic Brain Injury

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (16) ◽  
pp. 1375-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Merlo ◽  
Francesco Cimino ◽  
Filippo Flavio Angileri ◽  
Domenico La Torre ◽  
Alfredo Conti ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 205873922110108
Author(s):  
Bingbin Wang ◽  
Wendong Lin ◽  
Haiping Zhu

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a clinical emergency with a very high incidence, disability, and fatality rate. Minocycline, a widely used semisynthetic second-generation tetracycline antibiotic, has anti-inflammatory and bactericidal effects. However, minocycline has not been explored as a therapeutic drug in TBI and if effective, the related molecular mechanism is also unclear. In this study, we examined the neuroprotective effect and possible mechanism of minocycline, in mice TBI model by studying the trauma-related functional and morphological changes. Also, in vitro cell studies were carried out to verify the animal model data. We found that minocycline significantly improved the neurobehavioral score, inhibited apoptosis, repaired the blood-brain barrier, and reduced the levels of inflammatory factors Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in TBI mice. In vitro, upon oxygen and glucose deprivation, minocycline reduced the levels of cellular inflammatory factors and increased the levels of tight junction and adherens junction proteins, thereby significantly improving the cell viability. Moreover, Mino treatment prevented the loss of tight junction and adherens junction proteins which were markedly reversed by an ER stress activator (tunicamycin) both in vivo and in vitro. Our findings set an effective basis for the clinical use of Mino to treat Traumatic brain injury-induced neurological deficits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Liu ◽  
Junchi He ◽  
Yue Wu ◽  
Yang Du ◽  
Yinghua Jiang ◽  
...  

Background and TargetFollowing brain trauma, blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption and inflammatory response are critical pathological steps contributing to secondary injury, leading to high mortality and morbidity. Both pathologies are closely associated with endothelial remodeling. In the present study, we concentrated on annexin A1 (ANXA1) as a novel regulator of endothelial function after traumatic brain injury.MethodsAfter establishing controlled cortical impact (CCI) model in male mice, human recombinant ANXA1 (rANXA1) was administered intravenously, followed by assessments of BBB integrity, brain edema, inflammatory response, and neurological deficits.ResultAnimals treated with rANXA1 (1 μg/kg) at 1 h after CCI exhibited optimal BBB protection including alleviated BBB disruption and brain edema, as well as endothelial junction proteins loss. The infiltrated neutrophils and inflammatory cytokines were suppressed by rANXA1, consistent with decreased adhesive and transmigrating molecules from isolated microvessels. Moreover, rANXA1 attenuated the neurological deficits induced by CCI. We further found that the Ras homolog gene family member A (RhoA) inhibition has similar effect as rANXA1 in ameliorating brain injuries after CCI, whereas rANXA1 suppressed CCI-induced RhoA activation.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the endothelial remodeling by exogenous rANXA1 corrects BBB disruption and inflammatory response through RhoA inhibition, hence improving functional outcomes in CCI mice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (48) ◽  
pp. 32638-32652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra Adhikari ◽  
Ardeshir Goliaei ◽  
Max L. Berkowitz

Shock wave induced cavitation denaturates blood–brain barrier tight junction proteins; this may result in various neurological complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
G. Gayle Kelley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document