scholarly journals Nebulin Interacts with CapZ and Regulates Thin Filament Architecture within the Z-Disc

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1837-1847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Pappas ◽  
Nandini Bhattacharya ◽  
John A. Cooper ◽  
Carol C. Gregorio
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Thin Filament ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Striated Muscle ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Molecular Model ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Tryptophan Fluorescence ◽  
Actin Binding

The barbed ends of actin filaments in striated muscle are anchored within the Z-disc and capped by CapZ; this protein blocks actin polymerization and depolymerization in vitro. The mature lengths of the thin filaments are likely specified by the giant “molecular ruler” nebulin, which spans the length of the thin filament. Here, we report that CapZ specifically interacts with the C terminus of nebulin (modules 160–164) in blot overlay, solid-phase binding, tryptophan fluorescence, and SPOTs membrane assays. Binding of nebulin modules 160–164 to CapZ does not affect the ability of CapZ to cap actin filaments in vitro, consistent with our observation that neither of the two C-terminal actin binding regions of CapZ is necessary for its interaction with nebulin. Knockdown of nebulin in chick skeletal myotubes using small interfering RNA results in a reduction of assembled CapZ, and, strikingly, a loss of the uniform alignment of the barbed ends of the actin filaments. These data suggest that nebulin restricts the position of thin filament barbed ends to the Z-disc via a direct interaction with CapZ. We propose a novel molecular model of Z-disc architecture in which nebulin interacts with CapZ from a thin filament of an adjacent sarcomere, thus providing a structural link between sarcomeres.

scholarly journals Analysis of myofibrillar structure and assembly using fluorescently labeled contractile proteins.

1984 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 825-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
J W Sanger ◽  
B Mittal ◽  
J M Sanger
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Striated Muscle ◽  
Contractile Proteins ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Thin Filaments ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Cross Bridges

To study how contractile proteins become organized into sarcomeric units in striated muscle, we have exposed glycerinated myofibrils to fluorescently labeled actin, alpha-actinin, and tropomyosin. In this in vitro system, alpha-actinin bound to the Z-bands and the binding could not be saturated by prior addition of excess unlabeled alpha-actinin. Conditions known to prevent self-association of alpha-actinin, however, blocked the binding of fluorescently labeled alpha-actinin to Z-bands. When tropomyosin was removed from the myofibrils, alpha-actinin then added to the thin filaments as well as the Z-bands. Actin bound in a doublet pattern to the regions of the myosin filaments where there were free cross-bridges i.e., in that part of the A-band free of interdigitating native thin filaments but not in the center of the A-band which lacks cross-bridges. In the presence of 0.1-0.2 mM ATP, no actin binding occurred. When unlabeled alpha-actinin was added first to myofibrils and then labeled actin was added fluorescence occurred not in a doublet pattern but along the entire length of the myofibril. Tropomyosin did not bind to myofibrils unless the existing tropomyosin was first removed, in which case it added to the thin filaments in the l-band. Tropomyosin did bind, however, to the exogenously added tropomyosin-free actin that localizes as a doublet in the A-band. These results indicate that the alpha-actinin present in Z-bands of myofibrils is fully complexed with actin, but can bind exogenous alpha-actinin and, if actin is added subsequently, the exogenous alpha-actinin in the Z-band will bind the newly formed fluorescent actin filaments. Myofibrillar actin filaments did not increase in length when G-actin was present under polymerizing conditions, nor did they bind any added tropomyosin. These observations are discussed in terms of the structure and in vivo assembly of myofibrils.

scholarly journals An interaction between alpha-actinin and the beta 1 integrin subunit in vitro.

1990 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Otey ◽  
F M Pavalko ◽  
K Burridge
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Cytoplasmic Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Integrin Subunit ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Beta 1 Integrin ◽  
Domain Peptide

A number of cytoskeletal-associated proteins that are concentrated in focal contacts, namely alpha-actinin, vinculin, talin, and integrin, have been shown to interact in vitro such that they suggest a potential link between actin filaments and the membrane. Because some of these interactions are of low affinity, we suspect the additional linkages also exist. Therefore, we have used a synthetic peptide corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 integrin and affinity chromatography to identify additional integrin-binding proteins. Here we report our finding of an interaction between the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 integrin and the actin-binding protein alpha-actinin. Beta 1-integrin cytoplasmic domain peptide columns bound several proteins from Triton extracts of chicken embryo fibroblasts. One protein at approximately 100 kD was identified by immunoblot analysis as alpha-actinin. Solid phase binding assays indicated that alpha-actinin bound specifically and directly to the beta 1 peptide with relatively high affinity. Using purified heterodimeric chicken smooth muscle integrin (a beta 1 integrin) or the platelet integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex (a beta 3 integrin), binding of alpha-actinin was also observed in similar solid phase assays, albeit with a lower affinity than was seen using the beta 1 peptide. alpha-Actinin also bound specifically to phospholipid vesicles into which glycoprotein IIb/IIIa had been incorporated. These results lead us to suggest that this integrin-alpha-actinin linkage may contribute to the attachment of actin filaments to the membrane in certain locations.

scholarly journals Identification and characterization of an actin-binding site of CapZ.

1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 923-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Hug ◽  
T M Miller ◽  
M A Torres ◽  
J F Casella ◽  
J A Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Primary Structure ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Beta Subunit ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Actin Binding Site

A mAb (1E5) that binds the COOH-terminal region of the beta subunit of chicken CapZ inhibits the ability of CapZ to bind the barbed ends of actin filaments and nucleate actin polymerization. CapZ prepared as fusion proteins in bacteria or nonfusion proteins by in vitro translation has activity similar to that of CapZ purified from muscle. Deletion of the COOH-terminus of the beta subunit of CapZ leads to a loss of CapZ's ability to bind the barbed ends of actin filaments. A peptide corresponding to the COOH-terminal region of CapZ beta, expressed as a fusion protein, binds actin monomers. The mAb 1E5 also inhibits the binding of this peptide to actin. These results suggest that the COOH-terminal region of the beta subunit of CapZ is an actin-binding site. The primary structure of this region is not similar to that of potential actin-binding sites identified in other proteins. In addition, the primary structure of this region is not conserved across species.

Evidence of direct interaction between actin and membrane lipids

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique St-Onge ◽  
Claude Gicquaud
Keyword(s):  
Cell Membrane ◽  
Cell Motility ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Membrane Lipids ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Direct Association ◽  
Regular Patterns

Actin is a protein component of the cystoskeleton and is involved in cell motility. It is believed generally that actin filaments are attached to the cell membrane through an interaction with membranous actin-binding proteins. By using an in vitro system composed of liposomes and actin, we have shown that actin may also interact directly with the phospholipids of the membrane. Actin deposited at the surface of the liposome is organized in two regular patterns: a paracrystalline sheet of parallel filaments in register, or a netlike organization. These interactions of actin with membrane lipids occur only in the presence of millimolar concentrations of Mg2+. These results suggest that the interaction of the cytoskeleton with the membrane involves, at least in part, a direct association of actin with phospholipids.Key words: actin, membrane, liposome.

Orientation of actin filaments during motion in motility assay

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
J. Borejdo ◽  
S. Burlacu
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Thin Filament ◽  
Striated Muscle ◽  
Myosin Head ◽  
Classical Method ◽  
Polarization Of Fluorescence ◽  
Single Protein ◽  
Intracellular Organelles ◽  
Change Orientation ◽  
Active Entity

Polarization of fluorescence is a classical method to assess orientation or mobility of macromolecules. It has been a common practice to measure polarization of fluorescence through a microscope to characterize orientation or mobility of intracellular organelles, for example anisotropic bands in striated muscle. Recently, we have extended this technique to characterize single protein molecules. The scientific question concerned the current problem in muscle motility: whether myosin heads or actin filaments change orientation during contraction. The classical view is that the force-generating step in muscle is caused by change in orientation of myosin head (subfragment-1 or SI) relative to the axis of thin filament. The molecular impeller which causes this change resides at the interface between actin and SI, but it is not clear whether only the myosin head or both SI and actin change orientation during contraction. Most studies assume that observed orientational change in myosin head is a reflection of the fact that myosin is an active entity and actin serves merely as a passive "rail" on which myosin moves.

scholarly journals Actin-binding protein promotes the bipolar and perpendicular branching of actin filaments.

1980 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 841-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
J H Hartwig ◽  
J Tyler ◽  
T P Stossel
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Branch Points ◽  
Heavy Meromyosin ◽  
Actin Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Dimers ◽  
Protein Molecules

Branching filaments with striking perpendicularity form when actin polymerizes in the presence of macrophage actin-binding protein. Actin-binding protein molecules are visible at the branch points. Compared with actin polymerized in the absence of actin-binding proteins, not only do the filaments branch but the average length of the actin filaments decreases from 3.2 to 0.63 micrometer. Arrowhead complexes formed by addition of heavy meromyosin molecules to the branching actin filaments point toward the branch points. Actin-binding protein also accelerates the onset of actin polymerization. All of these findings show that actin filaments assemble from nucleating sites on actin-binding protein dimers. A branching polymerization of actin filaments from a preexisting lattice of actin filaments joined by actin-binding protein molecules could generate expansion of cortical cytoplasm in amoeboid cells.

Abstract 958: Cardiac MyBP-C Modulates Actomyosin Interactions: Evidence From Cardiac MyBP-c−/ − Mice

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Lecarpentier ◽  
Nicolas Vignier ◽  
Patricia Oliviero ◽  
Miguel Cortes-Morichetti ◽  
Lucie Carrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thin Filament ◽  
Isometric Force ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Power Stroke ◽  
Shortening Velocity

The precise role of cardiac myosin binding protein C (cMyBP-C) on actomyosin interaction (AMI) remains unknown. We hypothesized that the lack of cMyBP-C impaired cardiac AMI. Experiments were performed on 16 weeks old cMyBP-C −/− (KO) and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice (n=20/group). In vitro mechanical and energetics properties were performed on left ventricular (LV) papillary muscles and Huxley’s equations were used to characterize AMI. In vitro motility assays were performed using myosin purified from LV. Myosin-based sliding velocities of actin filaments were analyzed at baseline, after pretreatment of the myosin solution with 10 umol of the catalytic subunit of PKA and/or in the presence of increasing amount of α-actinin, an actin-binding protein that acts as an internal load thereby providing an index of relative isometric force. Western-blot analysis was used to quantify cMyBP-C and phosphorylated cMyBP-C in myosin solutions. Compared to WT, both total tension and maximum shortening velocity were lower in KO (p<0.001). The probability for myosin to be weakly bound to actin was higher in KO than in WT (8.6±0.3 vs. 5.4±0.2%, p<0.05), whereas the number of strongly bound, high-force generated state cross-bridges was lower in KO (6.4±0.9 vs. 11.6±1.0 10 9 /mm 2 , p<0.001). The unitary force per AMI was lower in KO than in WT (p<0.01). At baseline, myosin-based velocities of actin were slower in KO than in WT (1.65±0.01 vs. 1.98±0.01 um/s, p<0.01). The minimum amount of α-actinin needed to completely arrest the thin filament motility was significantly higher in WT than in KO (73.3±1.1 vs 29.1±0.1 ug/l, p<0.001). As expected, cMyBP-C was present in WT myosin solution whereas cMyBP-C was not detected in KO. In WT, PKA induced a 1.6-fold increased in cMyBP-C phosphorylation (p<0.01) associated with a 53±1% increase in the amount of α-actinin required to arrest thin filament motility (p<0.001). PKA did not modify sliding velocity in WT. In KO, PKA had no effect on myosin sliding. We conclude that cMyBP-C regulates AMI by limiting inefficient cross-bridge formation and by enhancing the power stroke step. Phosphorylation status of cMyBP-C appears to play a critical role on cardiac contractility through a direct effect on the myosin molecular motor.

scholarly journals Myosin and gelsolin cooperate in actin filament severing and actomyosin motor activity

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.015863
Author(s):  
Venukumar Vemula ◽  
Tamás Huber ◽  
Marko Ušaj ◽  
Beáta Bugyi ◽  
Alf Mansson
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
In Vitro Motility Assay ◽  
Cooperative Effects ◽  
Myosin Motor ◽  
Filament Dynamics

Actin is a major intracellular protein with key functions in cellular motility, signaling and structural rearrangements. Its dynamic behavior, such as polymerisation and depolymerisation of actin filaments in response to intra- and extracellular cues, is regulated by an abundance of actin binding proteins. Out of these, gelsolin is one of the most potent for filament severing. However, myosin motor activity also fragments actin filaments through motor induced forces, suggesting that these two proteins could cooperate to regulate filament dynamics and motility. To test this idea, we used an in vitro motility assay, where actin filaments are propelled by surface-adsorbed heavy meromyosin (HMM) motor fragments. This allows studies of both motility and filament dynamics using isolated proteins. Gelsolin, at both nanomolar and micromolar Ca2+ concentration, appreciably enhanced actin filament severing caused by HMM-induced forces at 1 mM MgATP, an effect that was increased at higher HMM motor density. This finding is consistent with cooperativity between actin filament severing by myosin-induced forces and by gelsolin. We also observed reduced sliding velocity of the HMM-propelled filaments in the presence of gelsolin, providing further support of myosin-gelsolin cooperativity. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy based single molecule studies corroborated that the velocity reduction was a direct effect of gelsolin-binding to the filament and revealed different filament severing pattern of stationary and HMM propelled filaments. Overall, the results corroborate cooperative effects between gelsolin-induced alterations in the actin filaments and changes due to myosin motor activity leading to enhanced F-actin severing of possible physiological relevance.

scholarly journals Direct Visualization of Actin Filaments and Actin-Binding Proteins in Neuronal Cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minkyo Jung ◽  
Doory Kim ◽  
Ji Young Mun
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Light And Electron Microscopy ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Actin Binding Proteins ◽  
Synapse Plasticity

Actin networks and actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are most abundant in the cytoskeleton of neurons. The function of ABPs in neurons is nucleation of actin polymerization, polymerization or depolymerization regulation, bundling of actin through crosslinking or stabilization, cargo movement along actin filaments, and anchoring of actin to other cellular components. In axons, ABP–actin interaction forms a dynamic, deep actin network, which regulates axon extension, guidance, axon branches, and synaptic structures. In dendrites, actin and ABPs are related to filopodia attenuation, spine formation, and synapse plasticity. ABP phosphorylation or mutation changes ABP–actin binding, which regulates axon or dendritic plasticity. In addition, hyperactive ABPs might also be expressed as aggregates of abnormal proteins in neurodegeneration. Those changes cause many neurological disorders. Here, we will review direct visualization of ABP and actin using various electron microscopy (EM) techniques, super resolution microscopy (SRM), and correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) with discussion of important ABPs in neuron.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document