scholarly journals Rescue of Munc18-1 and -2 Double Knockdown Reveals the Essential Functions of Interaction between Munc18 and Closed Syntaxin in PC12 Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 4962-4975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Han ◽  
Tiandan Jiang ◽  
Gayoung A. Han ◽  
Nancy T. Malintan ◽  
Li Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Mode ◽  
Neurosecretory Cells ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Syntaxin 1A ◽  
Stimulatory Action ◽  
Regulated Secretion ◽  
Closed Conformation ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Sensitive Factor

Munc18-1 binds to syntaxin-1A via two distinct sites referred to as the “closed” conformation and N terminus binding. The latter has been shown to stimulate soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor-mediated exocytosis, whereas the former is believed to be inhibitory or dispensable. To precisely define the contributions of each binding mode, we have engineered Munc18-1/-2 double knockdown neurosecretory cells and show that not only syntaxin-1A and -1B but also syntaxin-2 and -3 are significantly reduced as a result of Munc18-1 and -2 knockdown. Syntaxin-1 was mislocalized and the regulated secretion was abolished. We next examined the abilities of Munc18-1 mutants to rescue the defective phenotypes. Mutation (K46E/E59K) of Munc18-1 that selectively prevents binding to closed syntaxin-1 was unable to restore syntaxin-1 expression, localization, or secretion. In contrast, mutations (F115E/E132A) of Munc18-1 that selectively impair binding to the syntaxin-1 N terminus could still rescue the defective phenotypes. Our results indicate that Munc18-1 and -2 act in concert to support the expression of a broad range of syntaxins and to deliver syntaxin-1 to the plasma membrane. Our studies also indicate that the binding to the closed conformation of syntaxin is essential for Munc18-1 stimulatory action, whereas the binding to syntaxin N terminus plays a more limited role in neurosecretory cells.

scholarly journals SNARE phosphorylation: a control mechanism for insulin-stimulated glucose transport and other regulated exocytic events

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1271-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamilla M.E. Laidlaw ◽  
Rachel Livingstone ◽  
Mohammed Al-Tobi ◽  
Nia J. Bryant ◽  
Gwyn W. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Membrane Receptors ◽  
Multivesicular Bodies ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Plasma Membrane Receptors ◽  
Regulated Trafficking ◽  
Receptor Family

Trafficking within eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process; events such as recycling of plasma membrane receptors, formation of multivesicular bodies, regulated release of hormones and delivery of proteins to membranes all require directionality and specificity. The underpinning processes, including cargo selection, membrane fusion, trafficking flow and timing, are controlled by a variety of molecular mechanisms and engage multiple families of lipids and proteins. Here, we will focus on control of trafficking processes via the action of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) family of proteins, in particular their regulation by phosphorylation. We will describe how these proteins are controlled in a range of regulated trafficking events, with particular emphasis on the insulin-stimulated delivery of glucose transporters to the surface of adipose and muscle cells. Here, we focus on a few examples of SNARE phosphorylation which exemplify distinct ways in which SNARE machinery phosphorylation may regulate membrane fusion.

S-nitrosylation of syntaxin 1 at Cys145 is a regulatory switch controlling Munc18-1 binding

2008 ◽  
Vol 413 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoë J. Palmer ◽  
Rory R. Duncan ◽  
James R. Johnson ◽  
Lu-Yun Lian ◽  
Luciane V. Mello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Release Kinetics ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Syntaxin 1A ◽  
Dynamic Simulations ◽  
Closed Conformation ◽  
Quantal Size ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Protein Attachment

Exocytosis is regulated by NO in many cell types, including neurons. In the present study we show that syntaxin 1a is a substrate for S-nitrosylation and that NO disrupts the binding of Munc18-1 to the closed conformation of syntaxin 1a in vitro. In contrast, NO does not inhibit SNARE {SNAP [soluble NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein) attachment protein] receptor} complex formation or binding of Munc18-1 to the SNARE complex. Cys145 of syntaxin 1a is the target of NO, as a non-nitrosylatable C145S mutant is resistant to NO and novel nitrosomimetic Cys145 mutants mimic the effect of NO on Munc18-1 binding in vitro. Furthermore, expression of nitrosomimetic syntaxin 1a in living cells affects Munc18-1 localization and alters exocytosis release kinetics and quantal size. Molecular dynamic simulations suggest that NO regulates the syntaxin–Munc18 interaction by local rearrangement of the syntaxin linker and H3c regions. Thus S-nitrosylation of Cys145 may be a molecular switch to disrupt Munc18-1 binding to the closed conformation of syntaxin 1a, thereby facilitating its engagement with the membrane fusion machinery.

scholarly journals Multiple ER–Golgi SNARE transmembrane domains are dispensable for trafficking but required for SNARE recycling

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2633-2641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Chen ◽  
Martin S. Y. Lau ◽  
David K. Banfield
Keyword(s):  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Retrograde Transport ◽  
Steady State Distribution ◽  
State Distribution ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Strict Requirement ◽  
Membrane Tether ◽  
Essential Prerequisite

The formation of soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes between opposing membranes is an essential prerequisite for fusion between vesicles and their target compartments. The composition and length of a SNARE’s transmembrane domain (TMD) is also an indicator for their steady-state distribution in cells. The evolutionary conservation of the SNARE TMD, together with the strict requirement of this feature for membrane fusion in biochemical studies, implies that the TMD represents an essential protein module. Paradoxically, we find that for several essential ER- and Golgi-localized SNAREs, a TMD is unnecessary. Moreover, in the absence of a covalent membrane tether, such SNAREs can still support ER–Golgi vesicle transport and recapitulate established genetic interactions. Transport anomalies appear to be restricted to retrograde trafficking, but these defects are overcome by the attachment of a C-terminal lipid anchor to the SNARE. We conclude that the TMD functions principally to support the recycling of Qb-, Qc-, and R-SNAREs and, in so doing, retrograde transport.

Distinct Initial SNARE Configurations Underlying the Diversity of Exocytosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 1915-1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruo Kasai ◽  
Noriko Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Tokumaru
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Trafficking ◽  
Synaptic Vesicles ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Snare Proteins ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Large Dense Core Vesicles ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
The Common ◽  
Kinetics Of

The dynamics of exocytosis are diverse and have been optimized for the functions of synapses and a wide variety of cell types. For example, the kinetics of exocytosis varies by more than five orders of magnitude between ultrafast exocytosis in synaptic vesicles and slow exocytosis in large dense-core vesicles. However, in all cases, exocytosis is mediated by the same fundamental mechanism, i.e., the assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins. It is often assumed that vesicles need to be docked at the plasma membrane and SNARE proteins must be preassembled before exocytosis is triggered. However, this model cannot account for the dynamics of exocytosis recently reported in synapses and other cells. For example, vesicles undergo exocytosis without prestimulus docking during tonic exocytosis of synaptic vesicles in the active zone. In addition, epithelial and hematopoietic cells utilize cAMP and kinases to trigger slow exocytosis of nondocked vesicles. In this review, we summarize the manner in which the diversity of exocytosis reflects the initial configurations of SNARE assembly, including trans-SNARE, binary-SNARE, unitary-SNARE, and cis-SNARE configurations. The initial SNARE configurations depend on the particular SNARE subtype (syntaxin, SNAP25, or VAMP), priming proteins (Munc18, Munc13, CAPS, complexin, or snapin), triggering proteins (synaptotagmins, Doc2, and various protein kinases), and the submembraneous cytomatrix, and they are the key to determining the kinetics of subsequent exocytosis. These distinct initial configurations will help us clarify the common SNARE assembly processes underlying exocytosis and membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells.

scholarly journals Syntaxin 7 and VAMP-7 are SolubleN-Ethylmaleimide–sensitive Factor Attachment Protein Receptors Required for Late Endosome–Lysosome and Homotypic Lysosome Fusion in Alveolar Macrophages

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2327-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane McVey Ward ◽  
Jonathan Pevsner ◽  
Matthew A. Scullion ◽  
Michael Vaughn ◽  
Jerry Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Macrophages ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Late Endosome ◽  
Endocytic Pathway ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Early Endosomes ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Protein Receptors

Endocytosis in alveolar macrophages can be reversibly inhibited, permitting the isolation of endocytic vesicles at defined stages of maturation. Using an in vitro fusion assay, we determined that each isolated endosome population was capable of homotypic fusion. All vesicle populations were also capable of heterotypic fusion in a temporally specific manner; early endosomes, isolated 4 min after internalization, could fuse with endosomes isolated 8 min after internalization but not with 12-min endosomes or lysosomes. Lysosomes fuse with 12-min endosomes but not with earlier endosomes. Using homogenous populations of endosomes, we have identified Syntaxin 7 as a soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) required for late endosome–lysosome and homotypic lysosome fusion in vitro. A bacterially expressed human Syntaxin 7 lacking the transmembrane domain inhibited homotypic late endosome and lysosome fusion as well as heterotypic late endosome–lysosome fusion. Affinity-purified antibodies directed against Syntaxin 7 also inhibited lysosome fusion in vitro but had no affect on homotypic early endosome fusion. Previous work suggested that human VAMP-7 (vesicle-associated membrane protein-7) was a SNARE required for late endosome–lysosome fusion. A bacterially expressed human VAMP-7 lacking the transmembrane domain inhibited both late endosome–lysosome fusion and homotypic lysosome fusion in vitro. These studies indicate that: 1) fusion along the endocytic pathway is a highly regulated process, and 2) two SNARE molecules, Syntaxin 7 and human VAMP-7, are involved in fusion of vesicles in the late endocytic pathway in alveolar macrophages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document