scholarly journals Repressed synthesis of ribosomal proteins generates protein-specific cell cycle and morphological phenotypes

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 3620-3633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamata Thapa ◽  
Ananth Bommakanti ◽  
Md. Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Brian Gregory ◽  
Leigh Samsel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Physical Structure ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

The biogenesis of ribosomes is coordinated with cell growth and proliferation. Distortion of the coordinated synthesis of ribosomal components affects not only ribosome formation, but also cell fate. However, the connection between ribosome biogenesis and cell fate is not well understood. To establish a model system for inquiries into these processes, we systematically analyzed cell cycle progression, cell morphology, and bud site selection after repression of 54 individual ribosomal protein (r-protein) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that repression of nine 60S r-protein genes results in arrest in the G2/M phase, whereas repression of nine other 60S and 22 40S r-protein genes causes arrest in the G1 phase. Furthermore, bud morphology changes after repression of some r-protein genes. For example, very elongated buds form after repression of seven 60S r-protein genes. These genes overlap with, but are not identical to, those causing the G2/M cell cycle phenotype. Finally, repression of most r-protein genes results in changed sites of bud formation. Strikingly, the r-proteins whose repression generates similar effects on cell cycle progression cluster in the ribosome physical structure, suggesting that different topological areas of the precursor and/or mature ribosome are mechanistically connected to separate aspects of the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Coupling Between Cell Cycle Progression and the Nuclear RNA Polymerases System

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Delgado-Román ◽  
Mari Cruz Muñoz-Centeno
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Rna

Eukaryotic life is possible due to the multitude of complex and precise phenomena that take place in the cell. Essential processes like gene transcription, mRNA translation, cell growth, and proliferation, or membrane traffic, among many others, are strictly regulated to ensure functional success. Such systems or vital processes do not work and adjusts independently of each other. It is required to ensure coordination among them which requires communication, or crosstalk, between their different elements through the establishment of complex regulatory networks. Distortion of this coordination affects, not only the specific processes involved, but also the whole cell fate. However, the connection between some systems and cell fate, is not yet very well understood and opens lots of interesting questions. In this review, we focus on the coordination between the function of the three nuclear RNA polymerases and cell cycle progression. Although we mainly focus on the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, different aspects and similarities in higher eukaryotes are also addressed. We will first focus on how the different phases of the cell cycle affect the RNA polymerases activity and then how RNA polymerases status impacts on cell cycle. A good example of how RNA polymerases functions impact on cell cycle is the ribosome biogenesis process, which needs the coordinated and balanced production of mRNAs and rRNAs synthesized by the three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. Distortions of this balance generates ribosome biogenesis alterations that can impact cell cycle progression. We also pay attention to those cases where specific cell cycle defects generate in response to repressed synthesis of ribosomal proteins or RNA polymerases assembly defects.

scholarly journals Loss of Melanopsin (OPN4) Leads to a Faster Cell Cycle Progression and Growth in Murine Melanocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 1436-1450
Author(s):  
Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis ◽  
Maria Nathália Moraes ◽  
Davi Mendes ◽  
Matheus Molina Silva ◽  
Carlos Frederico Martins Menck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Population Analysis ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Significant Modification ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Gene And Protein Expression ◽  
Independent Functions

Skin melanocytes harbor a complex photosensitive system comprised of opsins, which were shown, in recent years, to display light- and thermo-independent functions. Based on this premise, we investigated whether melanopsin, OPN4, displays such a role in normal melanocytes. In this study, we found that murine Opn4KO melanocytes displayed a faster proliferation rate compared to Opn4WT melanocytes. Cell cycle population analysis demonstrated that OPN4KO melanocytes exhibited a faster cell cycle progression with reduced G0–G1, and highly increased S and slightly increased G2/M cell populations compared to the Opn4WT counterparts. Expression of specific cell cycle-related genes in Opn4KO melanocytes exhibited alterations that corroborate a faster cell cycle progression. We also found significant modification in gene and protein expression levels of important regulators of melanocyte physiology. PER1 protein level was higher while BMAL1 and REV-ERBα decreased in Opn4KO melanocytes compared to Opn4WT cells. Interestingly, the gene expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) was upregulated in Opn4KO melanocytes, which is in line with a higher proliferative capability. Taken altogether, we demonstrated that OPN4 regulates cell proliferation, cell cycle, and affects the expression of several important factors of the melanocyte physiology; thus, arguing for a putative tumor suppression role in melanocytes.

scholarly journals Akt/Protein Kinase B-Dependent Phosphorylation and Inactivation of WEE1Hu Promote Cell Cycle Progression at G2/M Transition

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 5725-5737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Katayama ◽  
Naoya Fujita ◽  
Takashi Tsuruo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Cytoplasmic Localization ◽  
M Cell ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Promote Cell Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT The serine/threonine kinase Akt is known to promote cell growth by regulating the cell cycle in G1 phase through activation of cyclin/Cdk kinases and inactivation of Cdk inhibitors. However, how the G2/M phase is regulated by Akt remains unclear. Here, we show that Akt counteracts the function of WEE1Hu. Inactivation of Akt by chemotherapeutic drugs or the phosphatidylinositide-3-OH kinase inhibitor LY294002 induced G2/M arrest together with the inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2. Because the increased Cdc2 phosphorylation was completely suppressed by wee1hu gene silencing, WEE1Hu was associated with G2/M arrest induced by Akt inactivation. Further analyses revealed that Akt directly bound to and phosphorylated WEE1Hu during the S to G2 phase. Serine-642 was identified as an Akt-dependent phosphorylation site. WEE1Hu kinase activity was not affected by serine-642 phosphorylation. We revealed that serine-642 phosphorylation promoted cytoplasmic localization of WEE1Hu. The nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation was mediated by phosphorylation-dependent WEE1Hu binding to 14-3-3θ but not 14-3-3β or -σ. These results indicate that Akt promotes G2/M cell cycle progression by inducing phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3θ binding and cytoplasmic localization of WEE1Hu.

scholarly journals Cycling in a crowd: coordination of plant cell division, growth, and cell fate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sablowski ◽  
Crisanto Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Plant Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Major Player

Abstract The reiterative organogenesis that drives plant growth relies on the constant production of new cells, which remain encased by interconnected cell walls. For these reasons, plant morphogenesis strictly depends on the rate and orientation of both cell division and cell growth. Important progress has been made in recent years in understanding how cell cycle progression and the orientation of cell divisions are coordinated with cell and organ growth and with the acquisition of specialized cell fates. We review basic concepts and players in plant cell cycle and division, and then focus on their links to growth-related cues, such as metabolic state, cell size, cell geometry, and cell mechanics, and on how cell cycle progression and cell division are linked to specific cell fates. The retinoblastoma pathway has emerged as a major player in the coordination of the cell cycle with both growth and cell identity, while microtubule dynamics are central in the coordination of oriented cell divisions. Future challenges include clarifying feedbacks between growth and cell cycle progression, revealing the molecular basis of cell division orientation in response to mechanical and chemical signals, and probing the links between cell fate changes and chromatin dynamics during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Cdk1-Mediated Phosphorylation of Human ATF7 at Thr-51 and Thr-53 Promotes Cell-Cycle Progression into M Phase

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e116048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitomi Hasegawa ◽  
Kenichi Ishibashi ◽  
Shoichi Kubota ◽  
Chihiro Yamaguchi ◽  
Ryuzaburo Yuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Growth Factor-Induced Cell Signaling

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3327
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Growth Factor Signaling ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

The cell cycle is the series of events that take place in a cell, which drives it to divide and produce two new daughter cells. The typical cell cycle in eukaryotes is composed of the following phases: G1, S, G2, and M phase. Cell cycle progression is mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and their regulatory cyclin subunits. However, the driving force of cell cycle progression is growth factor-initiated signaling pathways that control the activity of various Cdk–cyclin complexes. While the mechanism underlying the role of growth factor signaling in G1 phase of cell cycle progression has been largely revealed due to early extensive research, little is known regarding the function and mechanism of growth factor signaling in regulating other phases of the cell cycle, including S, G2, and M phase. In this review, we briefly discuss the process of cell cycle progression through various phases, and we focus on the role of signaling pathways activated by growth factors and their receptor (mostly receptor tyrosine kinases) in regulating cell cycle progression through various phases.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle-Dependence of Autophagic Activity and Inhibition of Autophagosome Formation at M Phase in Tobacco BY-2 Cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 9166
Author(s):  
Shigeru Hanamata ◽  
Takamitsu Kurusu ◽  
Kazuyuki Kuchitsu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Plant Cells ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Autophagosome Formation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Dependence ◽  
Cycle Dependence

Autophagy is ubiquitous in eukaryotic cells and plays an essential role in stress adaptation and development by recycling nutrients and maintaining cellular homeostasis. However, the dynamics and regulatory mechanisms of autophagosome formation during the cell cycle in plant cells remain poorly elucidated. We here analyzed the number of autophagosomes during cell cycle progression in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells expressing YFP-NtATG8a as a marker for the autophagosomes. Autophagosomes were abundant in the G2 and G1 phases of interphase, though they were much less abundant in the M and S phases. Autophagosomes drastically decreased during the G2/M transition, and the CDK inhibitor roscovitine inhibited the G2/M transition and the decrease in autophagosomes. Autophagosomes were rapidly increased by a proteasome inhibitor, MG-132. MG-132-induced autophagosome formation was also markedly lower in the M phases than during interphase. These results indicate that the activity of autophagosome formation is differently regulated at each cell cycle stage, which is strongly suppressed during mitosis.

scholarly journals Cyclin E and CDK-2 regulate proliferative cell fate and cell cycle progression in the C. elegans germline

Development ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 138 (11) ◽  
pp. 2223-2234 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Fox ◽  
V. E. Vought ◽  
M. Hanazawa ◽  
M.-H. Lee ◽  
E. M. Maine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Proliferative Cell

Regulatory effect of thromboxane A2 on proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells from rats

1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (5) ◽  
pp. H1331-H1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nagata ◽  
Y. Uehara ◽  
A. Numabe ◽  
T. Ishimitsu ◽  
N. Hirawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Thromboxane A2 ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Rapid Transition

We investigated the regulatory effects of the vasoconstrictor thromboxane A2 on the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) from Wistar-Kyoto rats using 9,11-epithio-11,12-methano-thromboxane A2 (STA2), a stable analogue of thromboxane A2. STA2 dose dependently increased incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA in randomly cycling VSMC and significantly shortened the doubling time. Cell cycle analysis revealed that the increased cell cycle progression was primarily due to a rapid transition from the DNA synthetic (S) to the G2/mitotic (M) phase. Moreover, STA2 enhanced protein synthesis in VSMC during the G2/M phase, whereas the protein synthesis was unaffected in the G0/G1 period. In fact, STA2 prompted the cells in G2/M phase to synthesize actin, a major cytoskeleton protein. Conversely, inhibition of protein synthesis by puromycin retarded the transition from S to G2/M. In addition, depolymerization of the actin molecules by cytochalasin D offset the quick progression to the G2/M phase by STA2. These data indicate that thromboxane A2 stimulates the cell cycle progression in VSMC primarily through a rapid transition from S to G2/M. This enhanced progression is attributable partly to a rapid buildup of the cytoskeleton proteins during the G2/M period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document