Private Investment in Human Capital and Industrial Development

Author(s):  
Ashish Arora ◽  
Surendrakumar Bagde
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keijiro Otsuka ◽  
Tetsushi Sonobe

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (18) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Chuwuemeka Ogugua AGBO ◽  

This study aims to examine the impact of human capital on economic growth in Nigeria. Despite all effort to improve education condition in Nigeria, there hasn’t been much encouraging improvement. This has caused a large number of the population to move abroad for studies. Most conducive tertiary institutions are owned by private individuals, the government owned universities have been overlooked and recklessly abandoned. In this study OLS multiple regression was adopted to analyze the time series data for the period of 1985-2018 to test if Average Year of Schooling (AVYS), Private Investment in Telecommunication (PIT), Capital Expenditure on Education (CEE), and Recurrent Expenditure on Education (REE) have an impact on growth in Nigeria or not. The data was derived from CBN statistical Bulletin (2018). Result showed that all the four explanatory variables have significant impact on Economic growth. However, it is therefore important for government to increase education budget annually.


Author(s):  
Fiona Tregenna ◽  
Kevin Nell ◽  
Chris Callaghan

Global evidence suggests that, for many countries, manufacturing typically has an inverted U-shaped relationship with development. But unlike the historical experience of most developed countries, for most developing countries the turning point of this relationship is occurring sooner in the development process, and at substantially lower levels of income. This is termed ‘premature deindustrialization’. The consequences of this may be particularly important if such countries can no longer rely on manufacturing-led development. Why are some countries more industrialized, or more deindustrialized, than other comparable countries? To explore these issues, this chapter uses panel-data econometric techniques to analyse the determinants of the share of manufacturing in GDP, across countries and across time. Domestic determinants include investment, government consumption, population size, human capital, democracy, and natural resource endowments. External determinants include trade openness, capital account liberalization, and exchange rate depreciation.


Author(s):  
A. CHARINA ◽  
V. SOKOV

The article considers theoretical aspects of innovation management in countries with transitive economy on a way to post-industrial development model according to the structural crisis caused by their specificity. The ways of solving the emerging problems are proposed. The role of human capital and social-functional innovations is emphasized in the transition to "knowledge economy”.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 600-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torben Iversen ◽  
John D. Stephens

The authors propose a synthesis of power resources theory and welfare production regime theory to explain differences in human capital formation across advanced democracies. Emphasizing the mutually reinforcing relationships between social insurance, skill formation, and spending on public education, they distinguish three distinct worlds of human capital formation: one characterized by redistribution and heavy investment in public education and industry-specific and occupation-specific vocational skills; one characterized by high social insurance and vocational training in firm-specific and industry-specific skills but less spending on public education; and one characterized by heavy private investment in general skills but modest spending on public education and redistribution. They trace the three worlds to historical differences in the organization of capitalism, electoral institutions, and partisan politics, emphasizing the distinct character of political coalition formation underpinning each of the three models. They also discuss the implications for inequality and labor market stratification across time and space.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-598
Author(s):  
John Mayanja Bbale ◽  
John Bosco Nnyanzi

Developing countries have continued to experience an unprecedented increase in direct foreign investment (FDI) inflows for the past two decades. However, the quantitative impact of the same on private domestic investment (PDI) is still imprecise. Using a system GMM approach and panel data from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) for the period 1996–2013, we provide evidence in support of the crowding out role of FDI on PDI but the observed nexus is precipitated by the presence of liberalization, human capital development and institutional quality. Interestingly, when we consider the latter variables uninteracted, the improvement of each appears to significantly benefit PDI. In addition, the substitution role of FDI in PDI appears to be stronger in resource-rich than in the resource-poor countries. Additionally, we find that public investment crowds out private investment whereas infrastructure development, past private investment, credit depth, and GDP per capita are supportive of the PDI. However, we document mixed evidence for sub-samples of the East African Community, the Southern Africa Development Corporation, the Economic Community and West African States, and the Economic Community of Central African States. Overall, our study underscores the urgent need for well-directed policies in line with improving institutions, school enrolment, financial systems, infrastructure, and the government prioritization of productive investment that is supportive of the private as well as foreign sector. We advocate for reviews of incentive packages to foreign firms that discourage fair competition if the PDI-FDI complementarity and consequential positive spillovers to other sectors are to be realized for economic development in SSA.


1966 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Tilly

At the close of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 Prussia was an industrial backwater. By the mid 1860's Prussia had achieved a considerable degree of industrialization. In a sense, her economy had “taken off.” The turning point dates from around 1840 and was closely related to railroad building. Before 1840 industrial investment grew haltingly. The combination of inadequate markets and the lack of supporting enterprise made industrial investment—particularly in those lines in which Europe's industrial leader, England, was already specialized—too risky and/or its anticipated yields too low for most potential investors, who preferred to invest in real estate, commerce, and in foreign government bonds. As leading Prussian entrepreneurs argued, the country's industrial development required public investment in river improvements, roads, canals, railroads, banks, and other facilities which would generate external economies and make private investment, for example in metalworking enterprise, more profitable. Theoretically, such public investment could have been financed by curtailing other governmental expenditures, by taxing unproductive consumption, and/or by borrowing. The technical proficiency required by such investments was either domestically available or could be readily borrowed from abroad. Even Prussian political economy, through its interpretation of the Classicists, reflected these conditions and called for state assistance. The will, the means, and a rationale for a program of public investment were at hand: one could truly speak of an abundance of “advantages of backwardness” in Prussia after 1815.


2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Minh Hang Le ◽  
Ali Ataullah

This paper reviews the trends of two types of foreign capital inflows, namely foreign aid and foreign private investment, to Pakistan. Like other developing countries, the volume of foreign aid to Pakistan has been decreasing. Meanwhile foreign private investment to Pakistan has increased, though not as sharply as that to other developing Asian countries. The study finds that the impacts of foreign capital, aid and private investment on the economic performance of Pakistan have been insignificant. This paper suggests that these consequences are due to the inadequate development of domestic institutional structure, human capital, and indigenous entrepreneurship.


2018 ◽  
pp. 295-304
Author(s):  
Myroslava Bublyk ◽  
Alyona Shakhno

The article deals with the issues of socialization of human capital development. The emphasis is placed on the fact that modern globalization puts forward new demands on the person from the point of view of its educational level, acquired competences, mobility, since the "human factor" is a key element of a new model of post-industrial development. Accents are shifted from "economic rights" to "social rights". In the conditions of globalization of national economies, the key factor in the economic growth of any country is the formation of a highly developed and competitive human capital. Unlike other types of resources, human creative abilities are the core of the innovative potential of the individual and are inexhaustible in nature. The problem under investigation is particularly popular for Ukraine in view of the current geopolitical and socio-economic transformation. In the article the modern specificity of development of human capital in the conditions of economic socialization and under the influence of global tendencies is considered. The main quantitative indicators of human capital development, changes in the structure of employment, the level of state support of the educational sphere and scientific researches are analyzed, and their trend models are constructed. The place of Ukraine according to the indicator of human development index among other countries of the world is determined. The SWOT analysis of the educational system of Ukraine is provided, which gives an opportunity to assess the existing situation and the prospects for its improvement. The mechanism of the influence of socialization on the formation of qualitative human capital is formed and graphically reflected. The basic problems of reproduction of human capital are determined and a set of measures aimed at increasing the efficiency of its use and development is proposed, among which: development of an innovative model of the state policy of development of human capital; involvement of the private sector in the process of investing in human development; optimization of the mechanism of distribution of public funds allocated to education; increasing the accessibility and adaptation of educational services in accordance with market requirements; the inclusion in international programs of quality assessment and competitiveness of human capital, etc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document