scholarly journals P-120 Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective study

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ii35
Author(s):  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
H. Ueno ◽  
M. Sasaki ◽  
Y. Sakamoto ◽  
S. Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel as first-line regimen for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective study

Pancreatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S64
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Mitsuhito Sasaki ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line

scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

The predictive role of CA 19–9 kinetics for time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving palliative first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15637-e15637
Author(s):  
M. Haas ◽  
S. Boeck ◽  
P. Stieber ◽  
R. P. Laubender ◽  
H. Buchner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Predictive Role ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15637 Background: Previous studies showed contradictory results for a predictive role of CA 19–9 kinetics during chemotherapy in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study in order to evaluate the role of CA 19–9 as a biomarker for TTP and OS in PC. Main inclusion criteria: histological confirmed diagnosis of PC, treatment with first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease, pre-treatment CA 19–9 level of > 5.2 U/ml. As CA 19–9 measurements were conducted in different laboratories using different commercial assays, we defined a subgroup of pts where CA 19–9 was assessed exclusively by the Elecsys assay (Roche Diagnostics). For the analysis of CA 19–9 kinetics, at least one follow-up measurement between day 20 and 64 during first-line chemotherapy had to be available. Pts were divided into two subgroups of CA 19–9 responders and non-responders by cut-offs of a 25% and 50% decline, respectively. OS and TTP were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier-Method, differences between the subgroups were analyzed by using the log-rank test. Results: One hundred and eighty-six pts were included, 83 of them were tested with the Elecsys method. Median age was 63 years, 90 % of the pts were treated within prospective clinical trials. Median pre-treatment CA 19–9 was 1076 U/ml (range 5.7–100,000 U/ml), the median bilirubin was 0.6 mg/dl. Median OS and TTP were 9.8 months (mo) and 5.4 mo, respectively. In univariate analysis, pts with a CA 19–9 decline of at least 25% during chemotherapy lived significantly longer (11.9 mo vs. 8.2 mo, p=0.003) and had a significantly prolonged TTP (5.8 mo vs. 4.4 mo, p=0.018) than those with a lower decline or even CA 19–9 increase. Data for the Elecsys-measurements were comparable (OS: 13.4 mo vs. 8.6 mo, p=0.004; TTP: 7.0 mo vs. 2.6 mo, p=0.003). None of the analyses demanding a CA 19–9 drop of at least 50% reached the level of statistical significance. Conclusion: An early CA 19–9 decline of 25% during first-line chemotherapy may predict OS and TTP in pts with advanced PC. Innovative statistical methods are required to improve our understanding of the utility of CA 19–9 as a predictive biomarker in PC. [Table: see text]

Chemotherapy choice in advanced pancreatic cancer: What patient and disease factors influence prescription patterns?

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
William Raskin ◽  
Helen Guo ◽  
Jaclyn Marie Beca ◽  
Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai ◽  
Lucy Qiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Funding Program ◽  
Baseline Factors ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

327 Background: FOLFIRINOX (FFX), gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem)) are universally funded as first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) in Ontario, Canada. However, there is scarce real-world data on factors that may influence choice of chemotherapy regimens in APC. Methods: Patients who received first-line chemotherapy for APC between April 2015-March 2016 in Ontario were identified from CCO’s New Drug Funding Program database and linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry and other provincial databases to ascertain baseline factors. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between the prescribed chemotherapy regimen and baseline factors. Results: 546 patients were identified, with a mean age of 65 and 43.6% female. 9.9% and 9.7% had received adjuvant gemcitabine and radiation treatment respectively. 17.6% had previous pancreatic resection. 68.3% had zero Charlson score and 30.6% had ECOG performance status (PS) of 0. 72.7% had metastatic disease. The majority of the patients received FFX (52.4%) compared to GnP (35.7%) and Gem (11.9%). Age and ECOG PS were strongly associated with choice of chemotherapy regimens. (See Table) Conclusions: In Ontario, increased patient age and worse ECOG PS are strongly associated with choice of Gem compared to GnP and FFX. Previous treatments and stage of disease also impact chemotherapy choice. Understanding how providers choose chemotherapy in APC aids in comprehending our practices. Odds ratio (OR) and p value from multinomial logistic regressions. [Table: see text]

Clinical outcomes of pancreas cancer patients with peritoneal spread: Results from the chord consortium.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19268-e19268
Author(s):  
Mehrnoosh Pauls ◽  
Abdulaziz AlJassim AlShareef ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Rachel Anne Goodwin ◽  
Brandon M. Meyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e19268 Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that clonal cells that give rise to pancreatic peritoneal metastases (PM) are geographically and genetically distinct from clonal cells, giving rise to lung and liver metastases. The objective of this study was to assess if there is a distinct difference in prognosis and therapeutic response among patients with pancreatic cancer with (PM compared to the lung/liver. Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design, medical records from adult patients diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas at five Canadian academic cancer centers (2014 - 2019) were reviewed. Prognostic variables including age, Charlson comorbidity index, ECOG, cigarette smoking, nodal status, sites of metastases, and first line chemotherapy were collected. Cox proportional hazards model (MVA) was used to examine the association between peritoneal involvement and survival, adjusted for measured confounders. Analyses were completed using SAS, where alpha of 0.05 was defined as the level of significance. Results: A total of 1161 patients were included. Metastatic sites included peritoneum (n = 170, 14.6%), lung (n = 145, 12.5%) and liver (n = 563, 48.5%). Patients with PM received first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX, n = 31), Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (G/N, n = 20), Gemcitabine (G, n = 18), and no treatment (n = 97). In univariate analyses, worse ECOG PS was associated with PM (p = 0.002). The majority of patients died (89%), with a median overall survival (OS) of 3 vs 7 months for patients with PM and those without PM (p < 0.001), respectively. The median OS in patient whom receive first-line chemotherapy was 7 months in FFX group (95% CI 1.66-12.33), 6 months in G/N (95% CI 4.54-7.45) and 2 months in G group (95% CI 1.42-2.57). Patients had significantly better OS when treated with FFX or G/N compared to G alone (p = 0.002). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter among patient treated with G alone compare to patients treated with FFX and G/N (P < 0.005). Conclusions: In the setting of combination chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer, patients with PM continue to have a poor prognosis. This may be due to the impact of PM on PS and the inability to administer palliative chemotherapy. For eligible patients, FFX or G/N results in a higher OS than G monotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document