scholarly journals Prevalence of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations detected by massive parallel sequencing and differential clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients (pts) treated with first line FIr-B/FOx adding bevacizumab (BEV) to triplet chemotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. vi14
Author(s):  
G. Bruera ◽  
F. Pepe ◽  
U. Malapelle ◽  
P. Pisapia ◽  
A. Dal Mas ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Marc Ychou ◽  
Frank Hermann ◽  
Antonieta Salud ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7717
Author(s):  
Guido Giordano ◽  
Pietro Parcesepe ◽  
Giuseppina Bruno ◽  
Annamaria Piscazzi ◽  
Vincenzo Lizzi ◽  
...  

Target-oriented agents improve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) survival in combination with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment and are eligible for second-line approaches. In such a context, antiangiogenic and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as second-line options, and RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite status represent the molecular drivers that guide therapeutic choices. Patients harboring K- and N-RAS mutations are not eligible for anti-EGFR treatments, and bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent that improves survival in combination with chemotherapy in first-line, regardless of RAS mutational status. Thus, the choice of an appropriate therapy after the progression to a bevacizumab or an EGFR-based first-line treatment should be evaluated according to the patient and disease characteristics and treatment aims. The continuation of bevacizumab beyond progression or its substitution with another anti-angiogenic agents has been shown to increase survival, whereas anti-EGFR monoclonals represent an option in RAS wild-type patients. In addition, specific molecular subgroups, such as BRAF-mutated and Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) mCRCs represent aggressive malignancies that are poorly responsive to standard therapies and deserve targeted approaches. This review provides a critical overview about the state of the art in mCRC second-line treatment and discusses sequential strategies according to key molecular biomarkers.


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Javier Martinez-Useros ◽  
Weiyao Li ◽  
Alberto Orta ◽  
Nuria Perez ◽  
...  

KRAS mutation is a confirmed predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy response for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its prognosis impact and the predictive potential for first-line standard chemotherapy remains unclear. On the other hand, V600E mutation is the most frequent and studied mutation in the BRAF gene, and it has been associated with a poor outcome of patients and a low response to anti-EGFR treatment. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the role of KRAS and BRAF mutations as prognosis factors and predictive biomarkers for 1st line standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. KRAS mutations and BRAF V600E mutations exhibited a poor outcome (p = 0.021 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastasis (HR = 1.595; 95% CI: 1.086–2.343; p = 0.017), KRAS mutation (HR = 1.643; 95% CI: 1.110–2.431; p = 0.013) and BRAF V600E mutation (HR = 5.861; 95% CI: 2.531–13.570; p < 0.0001) were statistically significant co-variables for progression-free survival. Interestingly, patients with KRAS mutations were associated with a poor response to first line standard chemotherapy (p = 0.008). In contrast, the BRAF V600E mutation did not have any impact on the first line standard chemotherapy response (p = 0.540). Therefore, in the present study, we provide new insight on the role of KRAS and BRAF, not only as prognosis biomarkers, but also as first line standard chemotherapy response biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 635-635
Author(s):  
Satoshi Matsusaka ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Shu Cao ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
...  

635 Background: The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 promote angiogenesis and the migration of tumor cells into the metastatic sites in many cancers. CXCR4 expression on tumor cells is upregulated by hypoxia and angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor. Therefore, we analyzed the association between CXCR4/CXCL12 polymorphisms and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients underwent bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Methods: This study included 144 Japanese patients (pts) for evaluation set and 424 patients from two clinical trials (204 of TRIBE arm A and 220 of PROVETTA) for validation set, with mCRC treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy as first line. A total of 144 Japanese pts with (male/female; 81/63, median age 61 years, median follow-up 4.2 years) and 424 pts (male/female; 252/172, median age 62 years; median follow-up time; 2.8 years) were enrolled in a pharmacogenomics translational study. Genomic DNA was extracted from the pts’ blood or tissue. One CXCR4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (rs2228014) and two CXCL12 SNPs (rs1801157, rs3740085) were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. All candidate SNPs were analyzed for association with the clinical outcome. Results: In univariate analysis, CXCR4 rs2228014 showed a significant difference in PFS [(G/G 15.3 months, any A allele 13.7 months, HR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.01-2.68), p=0.036)]. After multivariate analysis, CXCR4 rs2228014 remained to be a significant for PFS [HR (95% CI) 1.67 (1.01-2.78), p =0.046]. However, this polymorphism was not associated with tumor response and survival. In the validation cohort, pts with GG genotype had significantly longer PFS compared to those with any A allele (10.5 vs 9.6 months, HR (95% CI) 1.40 (1.02-1.93), p =0.035). CXCL12 polymorphisms were not associated with the clinical outcome. Conclusions: This study shows for the first time that CXCR4 rs2228014 may serve as a predictive marker in patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document