A-99 Influence of TBI on Rate of Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1147-1147
Author(s):  
Jessica Bove ◽  
Breton M Asken ◽  
Joel H Kramer ◽  
Russell M Bauer

Abstract Objective History of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a potential risk factor for cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disease later in life, but findings have been inconsistent. We evaluate if past history of TBI affects rate of cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults. Method Participants were 190 cognitively normal (CDR < 0.5) older adults (age at baseline: M = 71.6, SD = 7.0) with positive history of TBI (TBI+; n = 83) or no history of TBI (TBI-; n = 107). A comprehensive neuropsychological battery of attention, memory, language, and executive functioning measures as well as functional questionnaires were administered longitudinally (number of visits: M = 3.4, SD = 1.3). Linear mixed effects models assessed the interaction between longitudinal health outcomes and TBI history. Results TBI+ showed a faster rate of decline in executive functioning (Stroop interference: p = 0.04), and a faster increase in functional impairment (Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) total: p < 0.001; Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total: p = 0.002). Baseline performance on these tests did not distinguish TBI+ from TBI- (Stroop interference, p = 0.4; PASE, p = 0.5; and UPDRS, p = 0.1). TBI+ was not significantly different from TBI- on measures in other cognitive domains. Conclusions History of TBI was associated with faster rate of executive functioning decline and more rapid increase in objective and subjective functional impairment in cognitively normal older adults. Findings suggest that sustaining a TBI earlier in life could accelerate cognitive and functional changes even among clinically normal older adults.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E Lacy ◽  
Paola Gilsanz ◽  
Chloe Eng ◽  
Michal S Beeri ◽  
Andrew J Karter ◽  
...  

Introduction: Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) coupled with increasing life expectancy have resulted in an unprecedented number of older adults living with T1D. However, little is known about the burden of aging and diabetes-related complications in this unique group. We hypothesized that older adults with T1D would have greater diabetes and aging-related burden compared to an age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education-matched group of older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We compared the following characteristics by diabetes type among older adults (aged ≥60) with T1D (n=805) and T2D (n=249) from the Study of Longevity in Diabetes (SOLID) using chi-squared tests: diabetes history (age of onset, diabetes duration); diabetes-related complications (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, severe hypo- and hyperglycemia resulting in hospitalization/emergency department utilization), cardiovascular disease (stroke, MI, coronary bypass), and geriatric syndromes (depression, incontinence, memory problems and functional impairment). Results: Average age at diagnosis and duration of diabetes, respectively, were 28 years old and 40 years duration for T1D and 56 years old and 13 years duration for T2D (Table 1). Compared to T2D, participants with T1D were more likely to report history of retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, lifetime hypo- and hyperglycemic events resulting in hospitalization/emergency department utilization, and history of a coronary bypass. By contrast, those with T2D were more likely to be incontinent and have functional impairment. Conclusions: Our results show that diabetes-related complications are more prevalent in those with T1D than in comparable adults with T2D, while certain geriatric syndromes were more prevalent in those with T2D. Older adults with T1D are a growing population with unique diabetes-specific and aging-related considerations. Additional research is needed to understand the interplay of aging and diabetes in this group to inform patient care .


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Haroon Burhanullah ◽  
JoAnn T. Tschanz ◽  
Matthew E. Peters ◽  
Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos ◽  
Joshua Matyi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odelia Elkana ◽  
Noy Tal ◽  
Noga Oren ◽  
Shani Soffer ◽  
Elissa L. Ash

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used to evaluate cognitive decline in older individuals. Although, age and education-related norms have been published, the vast majority of diagnostic clinicians use the MoCA cutoff score to identify patients with cognitive impairment. Aim: To identify whether the MoCA cutoff is too stringent for cognitively normal older adults. Methods: Twenty-seven participants aged 68 to 83 (mean = 75.07, standard deviation [SD] = 4.62), with high education level (mean = 17.14 years, SD = 3.21) underwent cognitive assessment once a year for 5 consecutive years. The cognitive assessment included MoCA; Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure test; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Information and Digit Span Subtest; Trail Making Test; Verbal Fluency Test; and Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze all standardized scores as well as MoCA standardized and raw scores across all years. Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA for MoCA raw scores yielded significant decline across the years ( P < .05). From the second year and forward, the average MoCA total score was below the cutoff of 26/30. However, in substantial contrast, all other neuropsychological scores and the MoCA standardized scores were within the normal range and even above in all years. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the currently used MoCA cutoff is too high even for highly educated, cognitively normal older adults. Therefore, it is crucial to use the age- and education-related norms for the MoCA in order to avoid misdiagnosis of cognitive decline.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Scott ◽  
Aaron P. Schultz ◽  
Rachel F. Buckley ◽  
Hsiang‐Chin Lori Chou ◽  
Olivia L Hampton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Danielle Piña‐Escudero ◽  
Roberto de Jesús García Aviles ◽  
Anna H. Chodos ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie ◽  
Jose Alberto Avila

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. P308-P308
Author(s):  
Kate V. Papp ◽  
Elizabeth C. Mormino ◽  
Rebecca Amariglio ◽  
Reisa A. Sperling ◽  
Dorene M. Rentz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_16) ◽  
pp. P766-P767
Author(s):  
Robyn A. Honea ◽  
Jeffrey M. Burns ◽  
Russell H. Swerdlow

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document