scholarly journals 543 Improving the Management of Acute Ureteric Colic in A Multi-Centre District General Hospital: A Closed-Loop Audit

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Desai ◽  
A Bruce ◽  
S A Ehsanullah ◽  
U Otite ◽  
S Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Sustainable Change ◽  
Average Wait Time ◽  
Ureteric Colic ◽  
Optimum Management

Abstract Introduction The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) released guidance in 2018 regarding the optimum management of acute ureteric colic: a condition which can present as a surgical emergency. Our aim was to review the current practice at our hospital in diagnosing and managing acute ureteric colic and ultimately, implement sustainable change to address any areas of limitations. Method The following data was retrospectively collected for of all patients admitted with acute ureteric colic: investigations performed, medications administered, details of surgical intervention and follow-up. 1st Cycle: March 2017 to February 2018. Intervention: Teaching sessions delivered to staff (including doctors and nurses) in the A&E and urology department. 2nd Cycle: January 2019 to December 2019. Results 268 patients presented to A&E with ureteric colic – 18% increase from previous year. On admission: 60.4% of patients had serum calcium checked, 97.7% had a CT KUB performed within 24 hours and 67.2% were given NSAIDs; this is a 20.4%, 0.4% and 5.2% increase from the previous year, respectively. Only 31.3% of patients had an acute surgical intervention. The average wait time for clinic follow-up was reduced to 41 days following departmental education, but only 26.4% of patients were seen within the BAUS advised 4-week timeframe. Conclusions Re-audit showed distinct improvement in the management of acute ureteric colic. Thus, departmental education strategies have had a positive impact. It is recommended that the reservation of one daily elective theatre slot for an emergency operation and a computerised clinic booking system will further optimise our management in line with BAUS guidance.

scholarly journals P012: Why did you leave? Contacting left without being seen patients to understand their emergency department experience

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S61-S61
Author(s):  
B. Brar ◽  
J. Stempien ◽  
D. Goodridge
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Average Wait Time ◽  
Left Without Being Seen ◽  
Care Processes ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Initial Interaction ◽  
Improving Health Care

Introduction: As experienced in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Canada, Saskatoon EDs have a percentage of patients that leave before being assessed by a physician. This Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) group is well documented and we follow the numbers closely as a marker of quality, what happens after they leave is not well documented. In Saskatoon EDs, if a CTAS 3 patient that has not been assessed by a physician decides to leave the physician working in the ED is notified. The ED physician will: try to talk to the patient and convince them to stay, can assess the patient immediately if required, or discuss other appropriate care options for the patient. In spite of this plan patients with a CTAS score of 3 or higher (more acute) still leave Saskatoon EDs without ever being seen by a physician. Our desire was to follow up with the LWBS patients and try to understand why they left the ED. Methods: Daily records from one of the three EDs in Saskatoon documenting patients with a CTAS of 3 or more acute who left before being seen by a physician were reviewed over an eight-month period. A nurse used a standardized questionnaire to call patients within a few days of their ED visit to ask why they left. If the patients declined to take part in the quality initiative the interaction ended, but if they agreed a series of questions was asked. These included: how long they waited, reasons why they left, if they went somewhere else for care and suggestions for improvement. Descriptive statistics were obtained and analyzed to answer the above questions. Results: We identified 322 LWBS patients in an eight-month time period as CTAS 3 or more acute. We were able to contact 41.6% of patients. The average wait time was 2 hours and 18 minutes. The shortest wait time was 11 minutes, whereas the longest wait time was 8 hours and 39 minutes. It was found that 49.1% of patients went to another health care option (Medi-Clinic or another ED in Saskatoon) within 24hrs of leaving the ED. Long wait times were cited as the number one reason for leaving. Lack of better communication from triage staff regarding wait time expectations was cited as the top response for perceived roadblocks to care. Reducing wait times was cited as the number one improvement needed to increase the likelihood of staying. Conclusion: The Saskatoon ED LWBS patient population reports long wait times as the main reason for leaving. In order to improve the LWBS rates, improving communication and expectations regarding perceived wait times is necessary. The patient perception of the ED experience is largely intertwined with wait times, their initial interaction with triage staff, and how easily they navigate our very busy departments. Therefore, it is vital that we integrate the patient voice in future initiatives geared towards improving health care processes.

572 Utility of Split Night Polysomnograms in Children

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A225-A226
Author(s):  
Harish Rao
Keyword(s):  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Sleep Efficiency ◽  
Sleep Architecture ◽  
Diagnostic Study ◽  
Average Wait Time ◽  
Titration Study ◽  
Fair Degree

Abstract Introduction Overnight in-lab polysomnograms (PSG) are the gold standard for diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in children. As the wait time for adenotonsillectomy (T & A) at our institution was several months, we implemented split night PSGs with positive airway pressure (PAP) during the initial diagnostic PSG if AHI>30 (Emergency SNPSG). Planned SNPSG were performed on children who are undergoing PSG after T & A, eliminating follow-up titration PSG if the PSG is positive for OSA (residual AHI>10/hour). We present data on the outcomes of the SNPSG. Methods Retrospective chart review of consecutive SNPSGs done over last 2 years at our institution was performed. Data on SNPSGs (planned or emergency), age, sex, diagnostic study duration, diagnostic study AHI, PAP pressure and subsequent PAP adherence were collected. Data on sleep efficiency, arousal, sleep architecture, REM sleep were compared between diagnostic and titration part of the SNPSG. Study was considered successful if patient was able to tolerate PAP during titration and also if adherent to PAP at follow up. Results 48 studies met the criteria for SNPSG, with 60% of SNPSG being emergency SNPSG with AHI>30. Our cohort’s age ranged from 2–18 years (median age 8 years); 33 were males. Majority of the emergency SNPSG were in younger children (80% < 5 years), 75% of them continued to use PAP (mostly CPAP) until T & A with wait time being more than 3 months. Average wait time for T & A was 4 months. 25% of patients continued to use PAP following T & A as residual AHI was >10/hour. 98% of the patients were able to tolerate PAP during titration section with restoration of sleep architecture including REM with reduction in AHI, arousals and improved sleep efficiency. Bilevel PAP was used in 10% of patients in mostly planned SNPSG. Conclusion SNPSG can be implemented with fair degree of success during initial PSG with PAP used until T & A is performed. Planned SNPSG are also useful with residual severe OSA eliminating need for subsequent titration study. When indicated, 75% of our cohort continued to use PAP with fair adherence (>70% nightly use) following SNPSG. Support (if any):

Effectiveness of the Chiari Health Index for Pediatrics instrument in measuring postoperative health-related quality of life in pediatric patients with Chiari malformation type I

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Georgina E. Sellyn ◽  
Alan R. Tang ◽  
Shilin Zhao ◽  
Madeleine Sherburn ◽  
Rachel Pellegrino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Type I ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Health Index ◽  
Chiari Malformation Type I ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Over Time

OBJECTIVEThe authors’ previously published work validated the Chiari Health Index for Pediatrics (CHIP), a new instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for pediatric Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) patients. In this study, the authors further evaluated the CHIP to assess HRQOL changes over time and correlate changes in HRQOL to changes in symptomatology and radiological factors in CM-I patients who undergo surgical intervention. Strong HRQOL evaluation instruments are currently lacking for pediatric CM-I patients, creating the need for a standardized HRQOL instrument for this patient population. This study serves as the first analysis of the CHIP instrument’s effectiveness in measuring short-term HRQOL changes in pediatric CM-I patients and can be a useful tool in future CM-I HRQOL studies.METHODSThe authors evaluated prospectively collected CHIP scores and clinical factors of surgical intervention in patients younger than 18 years. To be included, patients completed a baseline CHIP captured during the preoperative visit, and at least 1 follow-up CHIP administered postoperatively. CHIP has 2 domains (physical and psychosocial) comprising 4 components, the 3 physical components of pain frequency, pain severity, and nonpain symptoms, and a single psychosocial component. Each CHIP category is scored on a scale, with 0 indicating absent and 1 indicating present, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL. Wilcoxon paired tests, Spearman correlations, and linear regression models were used to evaluate and correlate HRQOL, symptomatology, and radiographic factors.RESULTSSixty-three patients made up the analysis cohort (92% Caucasian, 52% female, mean age 11.8 years, average follow-up time 15.4 months). Dural augmentation was performed in 92% of patients. Of the 63 patients, 48 reported preoperative symptoms and 42 had a preoperative syrinx. From baseline, overall CHIP scores significantly improved over time (from 0.71 to 0.78, p < 0.001). Significant improvement in CHIP scores was seen in patients presenting at baseline with neck/back pain (p = 0.015) and headaches (p < 0.001) and in patients with extremity numbness trending at p = 0.064. Patients with syringomyelia were found to have improvement in CHIP scores over time (0.75 to 0.82, p < 0.001), as well as significant improvement in all 4 components. Additionally, improved CHIP scores were found to be significantly associated with age in patients with cervical (p = 0.009) or thoracic (p = 0.011) syrinxes.CONCLUSIONSThe study data show that the CHIP is an effective instrument for measuring HRQOL over time. Additionally, the CHIP was found to be significantly correlated to changes in symptomatology, a finding indicating that this instrument is a clinically valuable tool for the management of CM-I.

Evaluating Virtual Care Experiences for Patients with Covid-19 Chief Complaints: Best-Practices Recommendations (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saif Khairat ◽  
Malvika Pillai ◽  
Barbara Edson ◽  
Robert Gianforcaro
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experience ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Major Drawback ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Average Wait Time ◽  
Adherence To Medication ◽  
Virtual Care ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Virtual Visits

BACKGROUND Importance: Positive patient experiences are associated with illness recovery and adherence to medication. The shift toward virtual visits creates a need to understand the opportunities and challenges in providing a patient experience that is at least as positive as in-person visits. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the virtual care experience for patients with Covid-19 as their chief complaints. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of the first cohort of patients with Covid-19 concerns in a virtual clinic. We collected data on all virtual visits between March 20-29, 2020. Outcomes: The main endpoints of this study were patient diagnosis, prescriptions received, referrals, wait time and duration, and satisfaction. The secondary outcome was the reported choice of alternative care options. RESULTS Of the 358 total virtual visits, 42 patients marked “Covid-19 Concern” as their chief complaint. Of those patients, 23 (54.8%) female patients, the average age of patients was 33.9 years, and 41 (97.7%) patients were seeking care for themselves and one (3.3%) visit was for a dependent. For all virtual visits, the average wait time (SD) was 157.2 (181.7) minutes and the average wait time (SD) for Covid-19 Concern visits was 177.4 (186.5) minutes. Covid-19 Concern phone visits had an average wait time (SD) of 180.1 (187.2), compared to 63.4 (34.4) minutes for Covid-19 Concern video visits. Thirteen (65%) patients rated their provider as “Excellent” with similar proportions among phone (64.3%) and video (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated the virtual experiences of patients with Covid-19 concerns. There were different experiences for patients depending on their choice of communication. Long wait times were a major drawback in the patient experience. We have learned from evaluating the experience of our first cohort of Covid-19 Concern patients.

scholarly journals Perforation of the atrial wall and aortic sinus after closure of an atrial septal defect with an Atriasept occluder: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zai-Qiang Zhang ◽  
Jia-Wang Ding
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
Atrial Wall ◽  
Aortic Sinus ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Lethal Complications ◽  
Life Threatening

Abstract Background While the perforation of the atrial wall and aortic sinus after closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) is rare, it’s life-threatening, with rapid progress and high mortality. To the best of our knowledge, 21 similar cases have been reported since 1976. Case presentation We report a 16-year-old male whose atrial septal defect (ASD) was closed using a 12-mm Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO). Atrial wall and aortic sinus perforation occurred 3 months after transcatheter closure, and the patient was discharged after emergency operation. He was discharged on the 12th postoperative day in good overall condition. Conclusions With this case report, we want to illustrate that although percutaneous closure of ASD is regarded as a routine procedure, we should not forget the potentially lethal complications, especially cardiac erosion. Therefore, we should carefully evaluate the risk of erosion before surgery, and careful lifelong follow-up is needed.

scholarly journals The Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Cystine Stones: A Single-Center Experience for 13 Years

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1336
Author(s):  
Toshifumi Takahashi ◽  
Shinya Somiya ◽  
Katsuhiro Ito ◽  
Toru Kanno ◽  
Yoshihito Higashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Cystine Stones

Introduction: Cystine stone development is relatively uncommon among patients with urolithiasis, and most studies have reported only on small sample sizes and short follow-up periods. We evaluated clinical courses and treatment outcomes of patients with cystine stones with long-term follow-up at our center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients diagnosed with cystine stones between January 1989 and May 2019. Results: The median follow-up was 160 (range 6–340) months, and the median patient age at diagnosis was 46 (range 12–82) years. All patients underwent surgical interventions at the first visit (4 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, 5 ureteroscopy, and 13 percutaneous nephrolithotripsy). The median number of stone events and surgical interventions per year was 0.45 (range 0–2.6) and 0.19 (range 0–1.3) after initial surgical intervention. The median time to stone events and surgical intervention was 2 years and 3.25 years, respectively. There was a significant difference in time to stone events and second surgical intervention when patients were divided at 50 years of age at diagnosis (p = 0.02, 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: Only age at a diagnosis under 50 was significantly associated with recurrent stone events and intervention. Adequate follow-up and treatment are needed to manage patients with cystine stones safely.

scholarly journals First reported case of penile prosthesis infection from brucellosis: case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil Nabil Moohialdin ◽  
Ahmad Shamsodini ◽  
Steven K. Wilson ◽  
Osama Abdeljaleel ◽  
Ibrahim Alnadhari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Prosthesis Infection ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
First Case ◽  
Milk Ingestion

Abstract Background Infection after the penile prosthesis can be devastating to both the patient and surgeon with various complications and consequences. After introduction of antibiotic-coated implants, the rate of infection has dramatically decreased, but still we see uncommon organisms causing infection. We present a first case report of penile prosthesis infection by brucellosis due to raw milk ingestion. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of brucellosis penile prosthesis infection. Case presentation We present a first case report of penile prosthesis infection by brucellosis due to raw milk ingestion. A 75-year-old, diabetic male patient presented with penile prosthesis infection 5 months post-penile exchange surgery due to mechanical malfunctioning of 2-piece penile prosthesis which was inserted 11 years ago. The initial treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics did not subside the infection. After diagnosis of brucellosis, the antibiotic was changed to anti-brucellosis (Rifampicin + Tetracycline). The patient improved dramatically and was discharged home with smooth follow-up course. Conclusion Brucellosis can cause infection of penile prosthesis and can be treated with anti-brucellosis antibiotics without necessitating surgical intervention and removal of prosthesis.

scholarly journals Can We Extrapolate SINS Score to Evaluate Instability in Spinal Tuberculosis?

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110308
Author(s):  
Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa ◽  
Vikrant Sinha Roy
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Structural Instability ◽  
Stable Group ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Helpful Tool ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

Study Design: Prospective Observational Study. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of utilizing SINS score, originally suggested for neoplastic conditions, to assess structural instability in spinal tuberculosis. Methods: Patients with an established diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis were included in the study. Based on SINS scoring, patients classified as those with “indeterminate stability” were managed with or without surgery based on other parameters including neurological status, severity of pain, medical comorbidities, etc. Results: Eighty [39 males, 41 females] patients prospectively evaluated with mean age 46.74 ± 17.3 years. Classification done into stable [n = 7], indeterminate [n = 45] and unstable [n = 28] groups based on SINS scoring. All the patients in unstable group were treated with surgical stabilization whereas none in the stable group required surgical stabilization. In the indeterminate group, 26 patients underwent surgical stabilization, while 19 treated non-operatively. Major determinants predisposing to surgical intervention in “indeterminate group” were pain [14 of 26 patients] and neurological status [11 of 26 patients]. Mean follow-up 38.5 ± 22.61 months with minimum follow-up being 24 months. Preoperative VAS score for pain improved from median of 9/10 to 1/10 following surgery [ P < .0001]. In the non-operative group, the improvement was from median score of 6/10 to 1/10 [ P < .0001]. Preoperative ODI improved in non-operative and operative group from median of 42% and 70%, respectively to 10% and 12%, respectively in the postoperative period [ P < .0001 for both groups]. Conclusions: SINS scoring can be a helpful tool in surgical decision-making even in spinal tuberculosis. Further refinement of the score can be done with a larger, multicenter study.

scholarly journals Behind the clock: elucidating factors contributing to longer clinic appointment duration and patient wait time

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Jonathan Kagedan ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
Kazuaki Takabe
Keyword(s):  
Wait Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Clinic Appointment ◽  
Nurse Assessment ◽  
Patient Wait Time ◽  
Encounter Time ◽  
Examination Room

Abstract Background Longer wait time in ambulatory clinics can disrupt schedules and decrease satisfaction. We investigated factors associated with patient wait time (WT, check-in to examination room placement), approximate clinician time (ACT, completion of nurse assessment to check-out), and total appointment length (TAL, check-in to check-out). Methods A single-institution retrospective study was conducted of breast surgery clinic patients, 2017–2019, using actual encounter times. A before/after analysis compared a five-day 8 hour/day (from a four-day 10 hour/day) advanced practice provider (APP) work-week. Non-parametric tests were used, and medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) reported. Results 15,265 encounters were identified. Overall WT was 15.0 minutes (IQR:6.0–32.0), ACT 49.0 minutes (IQR:31.0–79.0) and TAL 84.0 minutes (IQR:57.0-124.0). Trainees were associated with 30.0 minutes longer ACT (p < 0.0001); this increased time was greatest for follow-up appointments, least for new patients. Patients arriving > 5 minutes late (versus on-time) experienced shorter WT (11.0 vs. 15.0 minutes, p < 0.0001) and ACT (43.0 vs. 53.0 minutes, p < 0.0001). Busier days (higher encounter volume:APP ratios) demonstrated increased encounter times. After transitioning to a five-day APP work-week, ACT decreased. Conclusions High-volume clinics and trainee involvement prolong ambulatory encounters. Increasing APP assistance, altering work schedules, and assigning follow-up appointments to non-trainees may decrease encounter time.

scholarly journals Relative Efficacy of Three of Nonsurgical Treatments for Calcific Tendinitis: Physical Therapy vs Steroid Injection vs Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0021
Author(s):  
Mauricio Drummond ◽  
Caroline Ayinon ◽  
Albert Lin ◽  
Robin Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Calcific Tendinitis ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Calcium Deposits

Objectives: Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder is a painful condition characterized by the presence of calcium deposits within the tendons of the rotator cuff (RTC) that accounts for up to 7% of cases of shoulder pain1. The most common conservative treatments typically include physical therapy (PT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), or ultrasound-guided aspiration (USA). When conservative management fails, the patient may require arthroscopic surgery to remove the calcium with concomitant rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to characterize the failure rates, defined as the need for surgery, of each of these three methods of conservative treatment, as well as to compare post-operative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) – including subjective shoulder values (SSV) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores – based on the type of pre-operative conservative intervention provided. A secondary aim was to compare post-operative range of motion (ROM) outcomes between groups that failed conservative management. We hypothesized that all preoperative conservative treatments would have equivalent success rates, PROs, and ROM. Bosworth B. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12122 shoulders. JAMA. 1941;116(22):2477-2489. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who were diagnosed with calcific tendinitis at our institution treated among 3 fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons between 2009 and 2019 was performed. VAS, SSV, and ROM in forward flexion (FF) and external rotation (ER) was abstracted from the medical records. Scores were recorded at the initial presentation as well as final post-operative follow-up visit for those who underwent surgery. The conservative treatment method utilized by each patient was recorded and included PT, CSI, or USA. Failure of conservative management was defined as eventual progression to surgical intervention. Statistical analysis included chi-square, independent t test and ANOVA. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. A p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 239 patients diagnosed with calcific tendinitis were identified in the study period with mean age of 54 years and follow up of at least 6 months. In all, 206 (86.2%) patients underwent a method of conservative treatment. Of these patients, 71/239 (29.7%) underwent PT, 67/239 (28%) attempted CSI, and 68/239 (28.5%) underwent USA. The overall failure rate across all treatment groups was 29.1%, with injections yielding the highest success rate of 54/67 (80.6%). Physical therapy saw the highest failure rate, with 26/71 (36.7%) proceeding to surgical intervention. Patients undergoing physical therapy were statistically more likely to require surgery compared to those undergoing corticosteroid injection (RR 1.88, p= 0.024). Of all 93 patients who underwent surgery, VAS, SSV, ROM improved significantly in all groups. On average, VAS decreased by 4.02 points (6.3 to 2.3), SSV increased by 33 points (51 to 84), FF improved by 13.8º, and ER improved 8.4º between the pre- and post-operative visits (p<0.05). The 33 patients who did not attempt a conservative pre-operative treatment demonstrated the largest post-operative improvement in VAS (-6.00), which was significantly greater than those who previously attempted PT (-3.33, p<0.05). There was a trend towards greater improvement in SSV in the pre-operative PT group (45 to 81) compared to others, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.47). Range of motion was not significantly affected by the method of pre-operative conservative intervention. Conclusions: Conservative treatment in the form of physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and ultrasound-guided aspiration is largely successful in managing calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Of these, PT demonstrated the highest rate of failure in terms of requiring surgical management. PRO improvement varied among the conservative modalities used, however patients who did not attempt conservative management experienced the greatest improvements following surgery. If surgery is necessary following failed conservative treatment, excellent outcomes can be expected with significant improvements in ROM and PROs. This information should be considered by the surgeon when deciding whether to recommend conservative treatment for the management of calcific tendinitis, as well as which specific method to employ.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document