P-O10 Mortality and Morbidity Reporting Quality
Abstract Background Mortality and morbidity (M&M) meetings in surgery are an important quality assurance process. These meetings contribute to learning, education and improvements in patient care. In order to achieve these outcomes effectively, M&M meeting require robust structure and process including accurate documentation of complications. Our hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) unit conducts and records weekly M&M meetings based on consultant reported complications. However as there was no standardized documentation method of complications there was possible under-reporting. This realisation acted as a basis to investigate the robustness of our current reporting methodology of surgical complications and recommend changes in practice to achieve quality improvement. Methods Patients were selected retrospectively (May 20 - Sep 20) from M&M recording excel sheet which is maintained through our weekly meetings. Patient undergoing major HPB cancer resections were included. Day case procedures were excluded. Complications reported on excel sheet were compared against any additional mis-reported complications through review of online discharge letters, discharge summaries & investigations. The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to identify mis-reported complications. The secondary aims were to compare any change in Comprehensive complication Index (CCI) following addition of mis-reported complications. Results Total number of patients included in the study were n = 46. Postoperative surgical complications were recorded for n = 27 patients. 19 patients were identified to have unreported complications. Total number of unreported complications were 34. This amounted to average unreported complication per case at 1.78. Average CCI score was 14.4 before inclusion of unreported complications. There was a significant rise in average CCI score to 35.8; an increase of 21.6 CCI score after inclusion of unreported complications. Conclusions Unreported complications following major HPB cancer resection impact the quality of learning and education process in M&M meetings. It is essential to make complications reporting a robust process to prevent mis-reporting. We recommended use of Clavein-Dindo complications grading form as part of surgical clerking. This would help real time recording of surgical complications during postoperative journey of patients, help capture even minor complications. It would also be recommended to get these forms countersigned by responsible consultants before discharge of patients.