Epidemiology, Disposition, and Treatment of Ambulatory Veterans With Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie L W Rhoads ◽  
Tina M Willson ◽  
Jesse D Sutton ◽  
Emily S Spivak ◽  
Matthew H Samore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Poor Adherence ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Time Treatment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Most skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are managed in the outpatient setting, but data are lacking on treatment patterns outside the emergency department (ED). Available data suggest that there is poor adherence to SSTI treatment guidelines. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans diagnosed with SSTIs in the ED or outpatient clinics from 1 January 2005 through 30 June 2018. The incidence of SSTIs over time was modeled using Poisson regression using robust standard errors. Antibiotic selection and incision and drainage (I&D) were described and compared between ambulatory settings. Anti–methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotic use was compared to SSTI treatment guidelines. Results There were 1 740 992 incident SSTIs in 1 156 725 patients during the study period. The incidence of SSTIs significantly decreased from 4.58 per 1000 patient-years in 2005 to 3.27 per 1000 patient-years in 2018 (P < .001). There were lower rates of β-lactam prescribing (32.5% vs 51.7%) in the ED compared to primary care (PC), and higher rates of anti-MRSA therapy (51.4% vs 35.1%) in the ED compared to PC. The I&D rate in the ED was 8.1% compared to 2.6% in PC. Antibiotic regimens without MRSA activity were prescribed in 24.9% of purulent SSTIs. Anti-MRSA antibiotics were prescribed in 40.1% of nonpurulent SSTIs. Conclusions We found a decrease in the incidence of SSTIs in the outpatient setting over time. Treatment of SSTIs varied depending on the presenting ambulatory location. There is poor adherence to guidelines in regard to use of anti-MRSA therapies. Further study is needed to understand the impact of guideline nonadherence on patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Population-Based Study of the Increased Incidence of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Associated Antimicrobial Use

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 6243-6249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fawziah Marra ◽  
David M. Patrick ◽  
Mei Chong ◽  
Rachel McKay ◽  
Linda Hoang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Physician Visits ◽  
Physician Billing ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTCommunity-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(CA-MRSA) has spread rapidly throughout the world in the last decade. We sought to demonstrate the impact of the emergence of CA-MRSA in Western Canada on physician visits, incision-and-drainage procedures, and antibiotic prescribing for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). We used the provincial physician billing system to determine the rate of physician visits (per 1,000 population per year) of SSTI and incision-and-drainage procedures. A database capturing all outpatient prescriptions in the province was anonymously linked to associated physician billing codes to quantify prescriptions associated with SSTI. Antibiotic prescriptions (overall and class specific) were expressed as their defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 inhabitants per day. Between 1996 and 2008, the rate of visits for all SSTI increased by 15%, and the majority of visits did not include an incision-and-drainage procedure. The rate of antibiotic prescribing for SSTI increased by 49%. The majority of this increase was attributable to the higher rates of use of clindamycin (627%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (380%), cephalosporins (160%), and amoxicillin-clavulanate (627%). Health care utilization and antibiotic prescribing rates for SSTI, but not incision-and-drainage procedures, have increased in association with the CA-MRSA epidemic. While much of the increase in antibiotic use reflects an appropriate change to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, there is room for education regarding the limitations of cephalosporins and clindamycin, given current susceptibility profiles.

scholarly journals Description of the methods for describing and assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing and adherence to published treatment guidelines in an academic medical clinic

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E Klepser ◽  
Ashley Altom ◽  
Colleen MacCallum ◽  
Eric Nordquist ◽  
Donald G Klepser
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Electronic Medical Record System ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Therapeutic Regimen ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Dose Frequency ◽  
Record System ◽  
The Impact

Overuse and inappropriate use of antibiotics have been associated with increased rates of antimicrobial resistance and increased healthcare expenditures. Tracking inpatient antimicrobial use has helped quantify the value of stewardship programs aimed at improving the rational use of antibiotics among hospitalized patients. Unfortunately, similar methods for tracking and assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting have not been well described. We developed a novel method to capture trends and assess appropriateness of antibiotic usage. This strategy is based on identification of antimicrobial prescriptions in an electronic medical record system, linking prescribing to patient data, and capturing information regarding dosing and indications for use. Using information on dose, frequency, and duration of the antibiotic prescribed, a parameter to quantify antibiotic exposure (Prescribed Therapeutic Regimen, PTR) is calculated. This parameter is compared to a database of information on agents recommended in published guidelines (Recommended Therapeutic Regimen, RTR). By linking an ICD-9 code and the prescribed antibiotic we determine the appropriateness of the PTR by comparing it to the RTR for a given indication. Data are used to establish a baseline pattern of antibiotic use in the clinic to gauge the impact of future stewardship activities. Additionally, individual clinics and prescribers are given a snapshot of their antibiotic use compared to other clinics and prescribers. This is a novel means of describing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting that could serve as a standardized model for various adult and pediatric outpatient practices.   Type: Original Research

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 152. Applying A Difference-in-Difference Analysis to Assess Effect of Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies on Changes in Antimicrobial Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S86
Author(s):  
Ann F Chou ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Makoto M Jones ◽  
Christopher J Graber ◽  
Matthew B Goetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacist ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Time Points ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background About 30–50% of inpatient antimicrobial therapy is sub-optimal. Health care facilities have utilized various antimicrobial stewardship (AS) strategies to optimize appropriate antimicrobial use, improve health outcomes, and promote patient safety. However, little evidence exists to assess relationships between AS strategies and antimicrobial use. This study examined the impact of changes in AS strategies on antimicrobial use over time. Methods This study used data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare Analysis & Informatics Group (HAIG) AS survey, administered at 130 VA facilities in 2012 and 2015, and antimicrobial utilization from VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Four AS strategies were examined: having an AS team, feedback mechanism on antimicrobial use, infectious diseases (ID) attending physicians, and clinical pharmacist on wards. Change in AS strategies were computed by taking the difference in the presence of a given strategy in a facility between 2012–2015. The outcome was the difference between antimicrobial use per 1000 patient days in 2012–2013 and 2015–2016. Employing multiple regression analysis, changes in antimicrobial use was estimated as a function of changes in AS strategies, controlling for ID human resources in and organizational complexity. Results Of the 4 strategies, only change in availability of AS teams had an impact on antimicrobial use. Compared to facilities with no AS teams at both time points, antibiotic use decreased by 63.9 uses per 1000 patient days in facilities that did not have a AS team in 2012 but implemented one in 2015 (p=0.0183). Facilities that had an AS team at both time points decreased use by 62.2 per 1000 patient days (p=0.0324). Conclusion The findings showed that AS teams reduced inpatient antibiotic use over time. While changes in having feedback on antimicrobial use and clinical pharmacist on wards showed reduced antimicrobial use between 2012–2015, the differences were not statistically significant. These strategies may already be a part of a comprehensive AS program and employed by AS teams. In further development of stewardship programs within healthcare organizations, the association between AS teams and antibiotic use should inform program design and implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 2057. Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship “Bundles up” in Winter with Peer Comparison, URI Order Set and Education: Is It Enough to Weather the Storm?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S693-S693
Author(s):  
Okan I Akay ◽  
Rohini Dave ◽  
Amit Khosla ◽  
CherylAnn Kraska ◽  
Brian J Hopkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Upper Respiratory Infection ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Order Set

Abstract Background Inappropriate antibiotic use is a growing problem in the outpatient setting. Approximately 90% of all antibiotics are prescribed in outpatient practices. Nonetheless, 30–70% of antibiotic prescriptions (ARx) are unnecessary. Outpatient antimicrobial stewardship (AS) is much needed and the best approach is unknown. We used a bundle approach to outpatient AS during the winter months, by implementing a peer comparison (PC) report, upper respiratory infection (URI) order set and broad education. Methods This is a quasi-experimental project during the period October 2018 to March 2019 (FY19) to evaluate the impact of a bundled intervention in primary care clinics at the VA Maryland Health Care System. A historical control group from the same period the previous year (FY18) was used for comparison. The intervention included an AS directed didactic and URI order set followed by an email in 1/2019 with: (1) censored PC report (ARx/1,000 encounters) with outliers defined as above 1.5 × interquartile range, (2) URI order set reminder, and (3) education. The primary outcome was total ARx per 1,000 encounters in primary care clinics. A random sampling of 200 charts was done to compare proportion of antibiotic appropriateness and number of emergency department (ED) visits and adverse drug events (ADEs) in FY19 Q1 and FY19 Q2. Poisson regression was carried out, in addition to Χ2-statistic. Results There were 3,799 vs. 3,429 ARx in FY18 and FY19, respectively, with a rate difference of 3.3 ARx per 1,000 encounters (P = 0.0056). Q1 to Q2 ARx rate increased by 7.8 and 8.0 ARx per 1,000 encounters in FY18 and FY19, respectively. Forty-eight percent (28/58) of the providers confirmed receipt of email. There were 3 and 4 outliers in FY19 Q1 and Q2, respectively. Appropriate ARx for FY19 Q1 and Q2 was found to be 45% and 35% (P = 0.44), respectively. The most common indications were URI (18% vs. 18%), urinary tract infection (13% vs. 21%). ED visits (10% vs. 6%) were uncommon and there were no ADEs. Conclusion E-mail communication with bundled approach had no effect on ARx or antibiotic appropriateness; however general AS presence and URI order set tempered some use. Removing peer censoring, providing face-to-face education and intensifying antibiotic order sets are additional interventions to be implemented. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Outcomes of β-Hemolytic Streptococcal Necrotizing Skin and Soft-tissue Infections and the Impact of Clindamycin Resistance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara L Horn ◽  
Emma A Roberts ◽  
Jolie Shen ◽  
Jeannie D Chan ◽  
Eileen M Bulger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background β-Hemolytic streptococci are frequently implicated in necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs). Clindamycin administration may improve outcomes in patients with serious streptococcal infections. However, clindamycin resistance is growing worldwide, and resistance patterns in NSTIs and their impact on outcomes are unknown. Methods Between 2015 and 2018, patients with NSTI at a quaternary referral center were followed up for the outcomes of death, limb loss, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Surgical wound cultures and resistance data were obtained within 48 hours of admission as part of routine care. Risk ratios for the association between these outcomes and the presence of β-hemolytic streptococci or clindamycin-resistant β-hemolytic streptococci were calculated using log-binomial regression, controlling for age, transfer status, and injection drug use–related etiology. Results Of 445 NSTIs identified, 85% had surgical wound cultures within 48 hours of admission. β-Hemolytic streptococci grew in 31%, and clindamycin resistance was observed in 31% of cultures. The presence of β-hemolytic streptococci was associated with greater risk of amputation (risk ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–3.01), as was the presence of clindamycin resistance among β-hemolytic streptococci infections (1.86; 1.10–3.16). Conclusions β-Hemolytic streptococci are highly prevalent in NSTIs, and in our population clindamycin resistance was more common than previously described. Greater risk of limb loss among patients with β-hemolytic streptococci—particularly clindamycin-resistant strains—may portend a more locally aggressive disease process or may represent preexisting patient characteristics that predispose to both infection and limb loss. Regardless, these findings may inform antibiotic selection and surgical management to maximize the potential for limb salvage.

Utility of Diagnostic Tests during Hospitalizations for Incision and Drainage of Pediatric Soft Tissue Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 376-378
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Bonasso ◽  
Richard A. Vaughan ◽  
Gerald R. Hobbs ◽  
Nicholas A. Shorter ◽  
Don K. Nakayama
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Incision And Drainage

Management of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Before and After Clinical Pathway Implementation

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney E. Nelson ◽  
Aaron Chen ◽  
Lisa McAndrew ◽  
Khoon-Yen Tay ◽  
Fran Balamuth
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

We evaluated if the introduction of a clinical pathway for skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) would reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-directed therapy for simple cellulitis and antibiotic use for simple abscess after drainage. We compared the treatment of SSTI during a 3-month prepathway and 11-month postpathway period. We included patients 57 days to 18 years old discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of cellulitis or abscess. Balancing measures included 72-hour revisit rate and ED length of stay (LOS). A total of 291 patients prepathway and 781 patients postpathway were included. The proportion of patients with simple cellulitis prescribed MRSA-directed therapy decreased from 81% to 54% postpathway. The proportion of patients with a drained abscess prescribed systemic antibiotics decreased from 88% to 75%. There was no increase in 72-hour revisit rates (3.8% vs 3.2%, P = .64) or ED LOS (2.8 vs 2.7 hours, P = .05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document