External quality assessment in primary health care by using fresh whole blood

1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 2223-2226 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Raabo ◽  
L Odum

Abstract Desktop analyzers and single-test meters used in primary healthcare are mainly calibrated to measure whole blood. To minimize matrix effects of control materials in external quality assessment schemes, we stabilized fresh human EDTA-treated blood with sodium iodoacetate (1.8 mmol/L). The whole-blood based control material was useful for control of hemoglobin and glucose, the two most common analyses in primary care, even after storage at room temperature for at least 10 days and at 5 degrees C for 3 weeks. The material was also useful for control of cholesterol and creatinine analyses for samples stored as long as 3 days at ambient temperature.

1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1517-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Taylor ◽  
R J Briggs ◽  
C Cevik

Abstract The analytical performance of laboratories participating in the dialysis fluids and water aluminum program of the Guildford External Quality Assessment Scheme over the period 1986-1993 has been reviewed. For aluminum concentrations > 3.33 mumol/L in dialysis fluids, the between-laboratory CV has fallen from approximately 36% to 23%, whereas for specimens of water the reduction was from 36% to approximately 18%. Improvements at lower concentrations were less impressive. Performance of individual participants varied; only a few consistently provided accurate results. Many of the participants are able to measure serum aluminum well, so lack of expertise is not responsible for poor results. We suggest that matrix effects associated with different specimen types have a significant influence on performance and that due account is not always taken of these factors. Resolution of these problems would be aided by appropriate reference materials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (02) ◽  
pp. 239-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Favaloro ◽  
Roslyn Bonar

Platelet function testing is an essential component of comprehensive hemostasis evaluation within the framework of bleeding and/or bruising investigations, and it may also be performed to evaluate antiplatelet medication effects. Globally, the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 (Siemens Healthcare, Marburg, Germany) is the most used primary hemostasis-screening instrument and has also been recently remodeled/upgraded to the PFA-200. The PFA-100 is sensitive to a wide range of associated disorders, including platelet function defects and von Willebrand disease (VWD), as well as to various antiplatelet medications. The PFA-100 is also useful in therapy monitoring, especially in VWD. External quality assessment (EQA) (or proficiency testing) and internal quality control (IQC) are critical to ensuring quality of test practice, inclusive of all hemostasis tests. However, both EQA and IQC for platelet function testing, including the PFA-100, is logistically challenging, given theoretical requirements for production, storage, and shipment of large volumes of “stabilized” normal and pathological blood/platelets covering both normal function plus a wide variety of potential defects. We accordingly describe the development and testing of novel feasible approaches to both EQA and IQC of PFA-100/PFA-200 instruments, whereby a range of formulated “platelet function antagonist” materials are utilized. For EQA purposes, these are distributed to participants, and citrated normal whole blood collected on site is then added locally, thereby creating test material that can be locally evaluated. Several exercises have been conducted by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) over the past 6 years. A total of 26 challenges, with most designed to mimic moderate to severe primary hemostasis defects, have been tested in 26 to 50 laboratories depending on the year of dispatch. Numerical results for PFA-100/PFA-200 closure times (CTs) and interpretive comments supplied by participants are analyzed by the RCPAQAP. During this period, reported CTs for each challenge were within limits of expectation and good reproducibility was evidenced by repeated challenges. Coefficients of variation (CVs) generated for challenges using the two major PFA-100/PFA-200 cartridge types (collagen/adenosine diphosphate and collagen/epinephrine) are always similar to those obtained using native whole blood, and in general range from 15 to 25%. Interpretations are also in general consistent with expectations and test data provided by laboratories. The EQA created material has also been assessed within the context of possible IQC material. In conclusion, EQA and IQC processes for the PFA-100/PFA-200 have been developed that include highly reproducible test challenge processes, not only supporting the concept that EQA/IQC is possible for platelet function testing but also providing a valuable mechanism for monitoring and improving laboratory performance in this area.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 1183-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Cas Weykamp ◽  
W Garry John ◽  
Emma English ◽  
Rajiv T Erasmus ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND A major objective of the IFCC Committee on Education and Use of Biomarkers in Diabetes is to generate awareness and improvement of HbA1c assays through evaluation of the performance by countries and manufacturers. METHODS Fresh whole blood and lyophilized hemolysate specimens manufactured from the same pool were used by 17 external quality assessment organizers to evaluate analytical performance of 2166 laboratories. Results were evaluated per country, per manufacturer, and per manufacturer and country combined according to criteria of the IFCC model for quality targets. RESULTS At the country level with fresh whole blood specimens, 6 countries met the IFCC criterion, 2 did not, and 2 were borderline. With lyophilized hemolysates, 5 countries met the criterion, 2 did not, and 3 were borderline. At the manufacturer level using fresh whole blood specimens, 13 manufacturers met the criterion, 8 did not, and 3 were borderline. Using lyophilized hemolysates, 7 manufacturers met the criterion, 6 did not, and 3 were borderline. In both country and manufacturer groups, the major contribution to total error derived from between-laboratory variation. There were no substantial differences in performance between groups using fresh whole blood or lyophilized hemolysate samples. CONCLUSIONS The state of the art is that 1 of 20 laboratories does not meet the IFCC criterion, but there are substantial differences between country and between manufacturer groups. Efforts to further improve quality should focus on reducing between-laboratory variation. With some limitations, fresh whole blood and well-defined lyophilized specimens are suitable for purpose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document