PS01.041: REMOVAL OF ESOPHAGEAL HEMANGIOMA USING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
Yukiko Tani ◽  
Masanobu Nakajima ◽  
Hiroto Muroi ◽  
Junki Fujita

Abstract Background Esophageal hemangiomas are rare, representing around 3% of all benign esophageal tumors. Esophagectomy or tumor enucleation has been performed to treat esophageal hemangiomas, but recently the use of endoscopic therapy, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, is increasing. We describe removal of a hemangioma using endoscopic submucosal dissection. Methods A 59-year-old woman underwent endoscopic examination after an esophageal lesion was found during a general health examination. Endoscopy identified a broad-based, elevated, dark purple lesion located 17 cm distal from the incisor teeth. It measured approximately 25 mm and was rounded and soft.Endoscopic ultrasonography using a 20-MHz catheter probe and the water filling method identified a tumor 25 mm in diameter located in the mucosal and submucosal layers. The border was unclear, but the bottom of the tumor was demarcated from the adjacent normal muscle layer. Compared with the adjacent muscle layer, the tumor was hyperechoic. On the basis of these endoscopic findings, the lesion was diagnosed as a hemangioma. Because the tumor was broad-based and relatively large, we thought that polypectomy or EMR should be avoided to prevent incomplete resection and postoperative hemorrhage from the residual stump. We therefore decided that ESD was the best treatment modality for this lesion. Results Approximately 2 mL of the solution was injected into the submucosal layer at intervals, which was repeated until the mucosa became elevated. After lifting the lesion, the mucosa including the tumor was gently cut with the Flush knife using the Endocut mode. The submucosal layer was highly fibrous, so lifting the lesion was somewhat difficult. The histopathological findings showed formation of a vascular lumen with irregular dilatation just below the lamina muscularis mucosa, suggesting a cavernous hemangioma. The patient was discharged 5 days after surgery without complications. Conclusion Until quite recently, large or broad-based esophageal hemangiomas had been treated by esophagectomy or sclerotherapy. Esophagectomy is associated with a high mortality rate [19], and endoscopic sclerotherapy may cause hemorrhage upon puncture, side effects due to the infused agents, and other complications. Endoscopic resection is less invasive than sclerotherapy, and further advances in endoscopic treatment and instruments may reduce the risk of several complications. ESD has being established as a safer, less invasive therapy than esophagectomy, it is perhaps the best therapeutic option for treating large or broad-based submucosal esophageal hemangiomas. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Pil Hun Song ◽  
Hyun Sung ◽  
Jeonghun Lee ◽  
Won Jae Yoon ◽  
You Sun Kim ◽  
...  

22 Background: The treatment of stomach neoplasm was determined by the identification on of invasion extent and perigastric lymph node through endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). In this study, we investigated diagnostic accuracy of EUS examination before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to both EUS and ESD for stomach neoplasms that were performed at Seoul Paik Hospital between January 2006 and July 2015. We compared the accuracy of EUS according to the location of lesion, tumor size and ulcer presence or absence on lesion. Results: 49 patients were enrolled in this study; their mean age was 64.14 ± 11.33 years. There were 40 male (81.6%) and 9 female (18.4%) patients. The cases of confined to the mucosa on pathology finding were 41 (83.6%) and involved to submucosal layer(sm) 1 were 3 (6.1%) and sm2 were 2 (4%) and sm3 were 1 (2%) and proper muscle layer were 2 (4%). The cases of lymphatic invasion were 2 (4%). The sensitivity and accuracy of antrum were 91.6 % (95% CI: 0.81-1.03) and 83.3 % (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), body of stomach were 92.3 % (CI: 0.78-1.07) and 83.3% (CI: 0.66-1.00), respectively. Whether lesions were no significant differences in any location. The tumor size was divided by smaller than 20 mm group, 20-30 mm group and more than 30 mm group. The smaller than 20 mm group, 20-30 mm group and more than 30 mm group were 36, 9, 2 patients. The remaining 2 patients were not described. The sensitivity and accuracy of smaller than 20 mm group were 96.6 % (95% CI: 0.90-1.03) and 83.3 % (CI: 0.71-0.95) and 2-30 mm group were 66.7 % (CI: 0.29-1.04) and 77.8 % (CI: 0.51-1.04), respectively. All patients were divided by ulcer presence or not. 27 patients were ulcer presence and 22 patients were not. The sensitivity and accuracy of ulcer presence group were 77.3 % (CI : 0.60-0.95) and 74 % (CI : 0.57-0.90), ulcer absence group were 95 % (CI : 0.85-1.04) and 91 % (CI : 0.79-1.02). Conclusions: The EUS for stomach neoplasm was reliable of lesion without ulcerous finding, smaller than 20 mm in diameter and irrespective of stomach neoplasm location.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Taniguchi ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyazaki ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We sometimes experience cases of cervical esophageal cancer which requires laryngectomy due to spread of cancer to larynx. We report a case of esophageal cancer resection with preservation of larynx using intraoperative endoscopic submucosal dissection. Methods The patient was a 59-year-old woman who had dysphagia. She had received total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer in 2001, chemoradiation (61.2Gy) for esophageal cancer in 2008. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) was performed for the carcinoma in situ of cervical esophagus in 2016. This time superficial 0-IIc tumor was observed at the same site of the scar of APC, and a biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma. An endoscopic findings revealed two 0-IIc lesions at distance of 18–22 cm, and 32–34 cm from the incisors, and biopsy resulted in a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Since tumor was close to the esophageal orifice, the tumor invasion to the larynx was suspected. On the other hand, there were no obvious findings of the submucosal layer invasion, and the both tumor were thought to be limited to the epithelium or lamina propria mucosae (EP/LPM). We performed mediastinoscopic and thoracoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy, subcutaneous ileocolic reconstruction. Results After confirming the tumor invasion to the esophageal orifice by chromoendoscopy with 1% Lugol's iodine solution, we dissected the whole circumference of esophagus in submucosal layer just above the tumor by ESD, put an incision outside of esophageal wall, and resected the esophagus. We preserved short length of muscle layer and performed reconstruction with hypopharynx-ileum anastomosis. Pathological examination revealed squamous cell carcinoma, pT1a-EP, ly0, v0, pPM0, pDM0, pIM0, and curative resection was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusion There were no reports of successful larynx-preserving surgery for cervical esophageal cancer using intraoperative ESD. When the tumor was limited in the mucosa, esophagectomy with intraoperative ESD may enable larynx preservation even if the tumor invaded to the esophageal orifice. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2671
Author(s):  
Naminatsu Takahara ◽  
Yosuke Tsuji ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Yukari Suzuki ◽  
Akiyuki Inokuma ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) carries a potential risk of procedure-related adverse events and incomplete resection. Since hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) had been established as an alternative option for relatively large and difficult gastrointestinal tumors, we evaluated a novel EP with hybrid ESD (hybrid ESD-EP) for curative safe margin in this proof-of-concept study. Methods: A total of eight cases who underwent hybrid ESD-EP between 2018 and 2020 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Hybrid ESD-EP involved a (sub)circumferential incision with partial submucosal dissection, and subsequent snare resection of ampullary tumors, which was performed by two endoscopists with expertise in ESD or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Demographic data and clinicopathological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Results: En bloc resection was achieved by hybrid ESD-EP in all eight cases, with the median procedure time of 112 (range: 65–170) minutes. The median diameters of the resected specimens and tumors were 18 and 12 mm, respectively. All lateral margins were clear, whereas vertical margin was uncertain in three (38%), resulting in the complete resection rate of 63%. Postoperative bleeding and pancreatitis developed in each one (13%). No tumor recurrence was observed even in those cases with uncertain vertical margin, after a median follow-up of 244 (range, 97–678) days. Conclusions: Hybrid ESD-EP seems to be feasible and promising in ensuring the lateral resection margin. However, further investigations, especially to secure the vertical margin and to shorten the procedure time, should be required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. E664-E671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Jimenez-Garcia ◽  
Masayoshi Yamada ◽  
Hiroaki Ikematsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamaru ◽  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Surgery is the standard treatment for colon tumors associated with diverticulum. Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat such tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of ESD in treating superficial colorectal tumors situated near or involving diverticulum. Patients and methods Consecutive patients from two referral centers who had colorectal tumors near or involving diverticulum treated by ESD were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 12 patients studied, six had tumors near diverticulum and six had tumors involving diverticulum. The overall en-bloc R0 resection rate, median tumor size and procedure time were 67 %, 26.5 mm (range, 15 – 80 mm) and 110 minutes (range, 50 – 220 minutes), respectively. For tumors near diverticulum group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was 100 % and no adverse events (AEs) or residual/recurrent tumors were observed. In contrast, for intradiverticular tumors group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was low at 33 %, and one AE (perforation) was observed. The diverticula were ≥ 6 mm in diameter in the patients with incomplete resection. However, all but one diverticulum was unrecognized before ESD. Two residual tumors were detected at the 12-month surveillance and one required surgery. Conclusions This case series indicates that ESD is safe and feasible for treating colorectal tumors near a diverticulum and might be feasible for tumors involving a diverticulum smaller than 6 mm. Selection for smaller diverticulum size may contribute to higher en-bloc R0 resection rates.


Digestion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Kaku ◽  
Takashi Toyonaga ◽  
Shinwa Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Takihara ◽  
Shinichi Baba ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recognized as a minimally invasive and curative treatment for superficial gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, ESD is still challenging and time-consuming with a high risk of adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. Various traction methods have been explored for maintaining good visualization of the submucosal layer during ESD. We developed a novel traction device (the EndoTrac) which can easily tie the thread and has the ability to change the towing direction. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and feasibility of ESD using the EndoTrac for GI neoplasms. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients (45 lesions) with esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and colorectal neoplasms who had undergone ESD using the EndoTrac device between June 2018 and May 2019. Primary outcome measures were preparation time, procedural success using the EndoTrac device, and ease of ability to change towing direction. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean preparation time was 2 (2–5) min in esophagus, 3 (1–5) min in stomach, 6 (5–9) min in duodenum, and 4 (2–8) min in colorectum. The procedural success rate was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 100% (4/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. The rate of successful towing to both proximal and distal sides was 100% (8/8) in esophagus, 100% (21/21) in stomach, 0% (0/4) in duodenum, and 100% (12/12) in colorectum. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Use of the EndoTrac device appears to be a feasible approach to ESD for GI neoplasms.


Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hamada ◽  
Yoshinori Horikawa ◽  
Yoshiki Shiwa ◽  
Kae Techigawara ◽  
Takayuki Nagahashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESD using a multibending endoscope to treat superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods Patients with a single early gastric cancer who met the absolute or expanded indications for ESD according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using a conventional endoscope (C-ESD) or a multibending endoscope (M-ESD). Randomization was stratified by ESD operator experience and tumor location. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time, calculated as the time from the start of submucosal injection to complete removal of the tumor. Results 60 patients were analyzed (30 C-ESD, 30 M-ESD). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ESD procedure times for M-ESD and C-ESD were 34.6 (SD 17.2) and 47.2 (SD 26.7) minutes, respectively (P = 0.03). Muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently with M-ESD (0.2 [SD 0.7] vs. 0.7 [SD 1.0]; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in procedure time or damage to muscle layers for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach. Conclusions ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with the multibending endoscope and fewer muscles were damaged. We recommend multibending endoscopy for ESD in the upper and middle thirds of the stomach to reduce procedure time and incidence of complications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong Gu Song ◽  
Gwang Ha Kim ◽  
Bong Eun Lee ◽  
Hye Kyung Jeon ◽  
Dong Hoon Baek ◽  
...  

Aims. To investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric epithelial neoplasms in the remnant stomach (GEN-RS) after various types of partial gastrectomy. Methods. This study included 29 patients (31 lesions) who underwent ESD for GEN-RS between March 2006 and August 2016. Clinicopathologic data were retrieved retrospectively to assess the therapeutic ESD outcomes, including en bloc and complete resection rates and procedure-related adverse events. Results. The en bloc, complete, and curative resection rates were 90%, 77%, and 71%, respectively. The types of previous gastrectomy, tumor size, macroscopic type, and tumor histology were not associated with incomplete resection. Only tumors involving the suture lines from the prior partial gastrectomy were significantly associated with incomplete resection. The procedure-related bleeding and perforation rates were 6% and 3%, respectively; none of the adverse events required surgical intervention. During a median follow-up period of 25 months (range, 6–58 months), there was no recurrence in any case. Conclusions. ESD is a safe and feasible treatment for GEN-RS regardless of the previous gastrectomy type. However, the complete resection rate decreases for lesions involving the suture lines.


2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Hayashi ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
Soki Nishiyama ◽  
Motomi Terasaki ◽  
Koichi Nakadoi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document