Within-Colony Transmission of Microsporidian and Trypanosomatid Parasites in Honey Bee and Bumble Bee Colonies

Abstract Parasites are commonly cited as one of the causes of population declines for both managed and wild bees. Epidemiological models sometimes assume that increasing the proportion of infected individuals in a group should increase transmission. However, social insects exhibit behaviors and traits which can dampen the link between parasite pressure and disease spread. Understanding patterns of parasite transmission within colonies of social bees has important implications for how to control diseases within those colonies, and potentially the broader pollinator community. We used bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and western honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infected with the gut parasites Crithidia bombi (Lipa & Triggiani) (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae) and Nosema ceranae (Fries et al.) (Dissociodihaplophasida: Nosematidae), respectively, to understand how the initial proportion of infected individuals impacts within-colony spread and intensity of infection of the parasites. In bumble bees, we found that higher initial parasite prevalence increased both the final prevalence and intensity of infection of C. bombi. In honey bees, higher initial prevalence increased the intensity of infection in individual bees, but not the final prevalence of N. ceranae. Measures that reduce the probability of workers bringing parasites back to the nest may have implications for how to control transmission and/or severity of infection and disease outbreaks, which could also have important consequences for controlling disease spread back into the broader bee community.

Download Full-text

Landscape structure affects the sunflower visiting frequency of insect pollinators

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-87650-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Károly Lajos ◽

Ferenc Samu ◽

Áron Domonkos Bihaly ◽

Dávid Fülöp ◽

Miklós Sárospataki

Keyword(s):

Landscape Structure ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Agricultural Landscape ◽

Edge Density ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Natural Habitats ◽

Mass Flowering ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Pollinator Community ◽

Foraging Ranges

AbstractMass-flowering crop monocultures, like sunflower, cannot harbour a permanent pollinator community. Their pollination is best secured if both managed honey bees and wild pollinators are present in the agricultural landscape. Semi-natural habitats are known to be the main foraging and nesting areas of wild pollinators, thus benefiting their populations, whereas crops flowering simultaneously may competitively dilute pollinator densities. In our study we asked how landscape structure affects major pollinator groups’ visiting frequency on 36 focal sunflower fields, hypothesising that herbaceous semi-natural (hSNH) and sunflower patches in the landscape neighbourhood will have a scale-dependent effect. We found that an increasing area and/or dispersion of hSNH areas enhanced the visitation of all pollinator groups. These positive effects were scale-dependent and corresponded well with the foraging ranges of the observed bee pollinators. In contrast, an increasing edge density of neighbouring sunflower fields resulted in considerably lower visiting frequencies of wild bees. Our results clearly indicate that the pollination of sunflower is dependent on the composition and configuration of the agricultural landscape. We conclude that an optimization of the pollination can be achieved if sufficient amount of hSNH areas with good dispersion are provided and mass flowering crops do not over-dominate the agricultural landscape.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Selected Ornamental Asteraceae as a Pollen Source for Urban Bees

Journal of Apicultural Science ◽

10.1515/jas-2016-0031 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 60 (2) ◽

pp. 179-192 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Anna Wróblewska ◽

Ernest Stawiarz ◽

Marzena Masierowska

Keyword(s):

Honey Bees ◽

Pollen Grains ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Floral Resources ◽

Tagetes Patula ◽

Single Plant ◽

Calendula Officinalis ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Se Poland ◽

Urban Conditions

Abstract Offering more floral resources for urban bees can be achieved by growing ornamental bee plants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate selected Asteraceae (Calendula officinalis ‘Persimmon Beauty’ and ‘Santana’, Centaurea macrocephala, Cosmos sulphureus, Dahlia pinnata, Tagetes patula, Tithonia rotundifolia, and Zinnia elegans) as pollen sources for pollinators. Under urban conditions in Lublin, SE Poland, the investigated plants flowered from late June to the end of October. The mass of pollen produced in florets and capitula was found to be species-related. The highest pollen amounts per 10 florets (10.1 mg) as well as per capitulum (249.7 mg) were found for C. macrocephala. The mass of pollen yielded by a single plant depended on both the pollen mass delivered per disk florets and the proportion of disk florets in capitulum, and the flowering abundance of the plants. A single plant of D. pinnata and a single plant of T. rotundifolia each produced the largest pollen mass. Mean pollen yield per 1m2 of a plot ranged from 6.2 g (Z. elegans) to 60.7 g (D. pinnata). Pollen grains are tricolporate, with echinate exine, medium or small in size. They can be categorised as oblatespherical, spherical, and prolatespherical. The principal visitors to C. macrocephala, C. sulphureus, and C. officinalis were honey bees, whereas bumble bees dominated on T. rotundifolia and D. pinnata. A magnet plant for butterflies was Z. elegans. Among the investigated species, D. pinnata, C. macrocephala, and T. rotundifolia were found to be the most valuable sources of pollen flow for managed and wild bees.

Download Full-text

Bumble bees influence berry size in commercial Vaccinium spp. cultivation in British Columbia

The Canadian Entomologist ◽

10.4039/n07-065 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 140 (3) ◽

pp. 348-363 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Claudia M. Ratti ◽

Heather A. Higo ◽

Terry L. Griswold ◽

Mark L. Winston

Keyword(s):

British Columbia ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Vaccinium Corymbosum ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Wild Bee ◽

Berry Size ◽

Dispersion Patterns ◽

Potential Alternative ◽

Fraser Valley

AbstractWe studied the abundance, diversity, and dispersion patterns of managed and wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) populations in commercial highbush blueberry and cranberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium corymbosum L., Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) fields in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia, and assessed their potential as pollinators of these crops by determining which groups of bees had the greatest impact on percent yield and mass of berries. Bumble bees were evenly distributed within both crops. Other wild bee species were well distributed in blueberry fields but generally remained at edges of cranberry fields. Percent berry yield was not related to bee abundance for any group of bees, nor was species diversity correlated with berry mass. Blueberry mass and cranberry mass were related to abundance of bumble bees but not to that of honey bees or other wild bees. Bumble bees are recommended as potential alternative pollinators of these crops.

Download Full-text

Metabolism of Toxic Sugars by Strains of the Bee Gut Symbiont Gilliamella apicola

mBio ◽

10.1128/mbio.01326-16 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 7 (6) ◽

Cited By ~ 72

Author(s):

Hao Zheng ◽

Alex Nishida ◽

Waldan K. Kwong ◽

Hauke Koch ◽

Philipp Engel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Transfer ◽

Horizontal Gene Transfer ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Bacterial Species ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Rrna Gene ◽

Phosphotransferase System ◽

Metabolic Potential ◽

Social Bees ◽

Gene Similarity

ABSTRACT Social bees collect carbohydrate-rich food to support their colonies, and yet, certain carbohydrates present in their diet or produced through the breakdown of pollen are toxic to bees. The gut microbiota of social bees is dominated by a few core bacterial species, including the Gram-negative species Gilliamella apicola . We isolated 42 strains of G. apicola from guts of honey bees and bumble bees and sequenced their genomes. All of the G. apicola strains share high 16S rRNA gene similarity, but they vary extensively in gene repertoires related to carbohydrate metabolism. Predicted abilities to utilize different sugars were verified experimentally. Some strains can utilize mannose, arabinose, xylose, or rhamnose (monosaccharides that can cause toxicity in bees) as their sole carbon and energy source. All of the G. apicola strains possess a manO -associated mannose family phosphotransferase system; phylogenetic analyses suggest that this was acquired from Firmicutes through horizontal gene transfer. The metabolism of mannose is specifically dependent on the presence of mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (MPI). Neither growth rates nor the utilization of glucose and fructose are affected in the presence of mannose when the gene encoding MPI is absent from the genome, suggesting that mannose is not taken up by G. apicola strains which harbor the phosphotransferase system but do not encode the MPI. Given their ability to simultaneously utilize glucose, fructose, and mannose, as well as the ability of many strains to break down other potentially toxic carbohydrates, G. apicola bacteria may have key roles in improving dietary tolerances and maintaining the health of their bee hosts. IMPORTANCE Bees are important pollinators of agricultural plants. Our study documents the ability of Gilliamella apicola , a dominant gut bacterium in honey bees and bumble bees, to utilize several sugars that are harmful to bee hosts. Using genome sequencing and growth assays, we found that the ability to metabolize certain toxic carbohydrates is directly correlated with the presence of their respective degradation pathways, indicating that metabolic potential can be accurately predicted from genomic data in these gut symbionts. Strains vary considerably in their range of utilizable carbohydrates, which likely reflects historical horizontal gene transfer and gene deletion events. Unlike their bee hosts, G. apicola bacteria are not detrimentally affected by growth on mannose-containing medium, even in strains that cannot metabolize this sugar. These results suggest that G. apicola may be an important player in modulating nutrition in the bee gut, with ultimate effects on host health.

Download Full-text

Possible Spillover of Pathogens between Bee Communities Foraging on the Same Floral Resource

Insects ◽

10.3390/insects12020122 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 122

Author(s):

Anne Dalmon ◽

Virgine Diévart ◽

Maxime Thomasson ◽

Romain Fouque ◽

Bernard E. Vaissière ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Honey Bee ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Population Decline ◽

Virus Transmission ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Deformed Wing Virus ◽

Wild Bee ◽

Pollinator Community ◽

Floral Resource ◽

Paralysis Virus

Viruses are known to contribute to bee population decline. Possible spillover is suspected from the co-occurrence of viruses in wild bees and honey bees. In order to study the risk of virus transmission between wild and managed bee species sharing the same floral resource, we tried to maximize the possible cross-infections using Phacelia tanacetifolia, which is highly attractive to honey bees and a broad range of wild bee species. Virus prevalence was compared over two years in Southern France. A total of 1137 wild bees from 29 wild bee species (based on COI barcoding) and 920 honey bees (Apis mellifera) were checked for the seven most common honey bee RNA viruses. Halictid bees were the most abundant. Co-infections were frequent, and Sacbrood virus (SBV), Black queen cell virus (BQCV), Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV) were widespread in the hymenopteran pollinator community. Conversely, Deformed wing virus (DWV) was detected at low levels in wild bees, whereas it was highly prevalent in honey bees (78.3% of the samples). Both wild bee and honey bee virus isolates were sequenced to look for possible host-specificity or geographical structuring. ABPV phylogeny suggested a specific cluster for Eucera bees, while isolates of DWV from bumble bees (Bombus spp.) clustered together with honey bee isolates, suggesting a possible spillover.

Download Full-text

A56 Visualization of recombination in deformed wing virus infecting bees

Virus Evolution ◽

10.1093/ve/vez002.055 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Diane Bigot ◽

Andreas Gogol-Döring ◽

Peter Koch ◽

Robert J Paxton

Keyword(s):

Honey Bees ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Next Generation Sequencing Data ◽

Sequencing Data ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Deformed Wing Virus ◽

The Impact ◽

Detection And Quantification

Abstract Honey bees suffer increasing colony mortality worldwide, partially caused by the spread of viral pathogens. Among these pathogens, deformed wing virus (DWV) is one of the major, widespread viruses of honey bees resulting in wing deformities and weakening colonies. DWV can be found in honey bees, bumble bees, and other wild bees as three major genotypes named DWV-A, -B (also named Varroa destructor virus 1), and -C. Various recombinants of DWV-A and -B have been previously found in honey bees, some of which have been suggested to have higher virulence over non-recombinant, parental virus. In most of these cases, recombinants were only shown as consensus sequences from previous assemblies and alignments and may not reflect the biological reality of all variants present within a host bee. It is therefore important to build a method of recombinant detection and quantification within mixed infections in single-host individuals, including both parental and various recombinant genomes, so as to evaluate the relevance of recombinants for viral genome evolution and the impact on hosts. Here, we propose to visualize and quantify these recombinants using next-generation sequencing data to better understand how these genomes evolve within bees. Our method will be performed directly from raw sequence reads from various datasets (including field and lab experiments as well as screening of public databases) in order to obtain an overview of DWV recombination in various in vivo and in vitro conditions. Recombination of viral genomes is a key point for virus evolution. The detection and quantification of recombination will facilitate analysis of the determinants of recombination and help in understanding the routes by which new viral variants emerge. The emergence of new (more virulent) recombinant viruses can result from acquisition of new capabilities, such as escape from host immunity or increased transmission rates. Recombination can also lead to adaptation to new environments and new hosts by a change in cell tropism, allowing cross-species transmission, which may be particularly relevant for bumble bees and wild bees infected by honey bee-derived DWV.

Download Full-text

Reduced nest development of reared Bombus terrestris within apiary dense human-modified landscapes

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-82540-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ivan Meeus ◽

Laurian Parmentier ◽

Matti Pisman ◽

Dirk C. de Graaf ◽

Guy Smagghe

Keyword(s):

Honey Bee ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Bombus Terrestris ◽

Global Scale ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Wild Bee ◽

Important Trait ◽

Competition For Resources ◽

Biomass Increase

AbstractWild bees are in decline on a local to global scale. The presence of managed honey bees can lead to competition for resources with wild bee species, which has not been investigated so far for human-modified landscapes. In this study we assess if managed honey bee hive density influence nest development (biomass) of bumble bees, an important trait affecting fitness. We hypothesize that domesticated honey bees can negatively affect Bombus terrestris nest development in human-modified landscapes. In Flanders, Belgium, where such landscapes are dominantly present, we selected 11 locations with landscape metrics ranging from urban to agricultural. The bee hive locations were mapped and each location contained one apiary dense (AD) and one apiary sparse (AS) study site (mean density of 7.6 ± 5.7 managed honey bee hives per km2 in AD sites). We assessed the effect of apiary density on the reproduction of reared B. terrestris nests. Reared B. terrestris nests had more biomass increase over 8 weeks in apiary sparse (AS) sites compared to nests located in apiary dense (AD) sites. This effect was mainly visible in urban locations, where nest in AS sites have 99.25 ± 60.99 g more biomass increase compared to nest in urban AD sites. Additionally, we found that managed bumble bee nests had higher biomass increase in urban locations. We conclude that the density of bee hives is a factor to consider in regard to interspecific competition between domesticated honey bees and bumble bees.

Download Full-text

Genomic changes underlying host specialization in the bee gut symbiont Lactobacillus Firm5

10.1101/483685 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

KM Ellegaard ◽

S Brochet ◽

G Bonilla-Rosso ◽

O Emery ◽

N Glover ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Honey Bee ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Host Specialization ◽

Divergent Evolution ◽

Bumble Bee ◽

Genomic Changes ◽

Social Bees ◽

Gut Symbionts ◽

Phylogenetic Lineages

AbstractBacteria that engage in longstanding associations with particular hosts are expected to evolve host-specific adaptations that limit their capacity to thrive in other environments. Consistent with this, many gut symbionts seem to have a limited host range, based on community profiling and phylogenomics. However, few studies have experimentally investigated host specialization of gut symbionts and underlying mechanisms have largely remained elusive. Here, we studied host specialization of a dominant gut symbiont of social bees, Lactobacillus Firm5. We show that Firm5 strains isolated from honey bees and bumble bees separate into deep-branching host-specific phylogenetic lineages. Despite their divergent evolution, colonization experiments show that bumble bee strains are capable of colonizing the honey bee gut. However, they were less successful than honey bee strains, and competition with honey bee strains completely abolished their colonization. In contrast honey bee strains of divergent phylogenetic lineages were able to coexist within individual bees. This suggests that both host selection and interbacterial competition play important roles for host specialization. Using comparative genomics of 27 Firm5 isolates, we found that the genomes of honey bee strains harbor more carbohydrate-related functions than bumble bee strains, possibly providing a competitive advantage in the honey bee gut. Remarkably, most of the genes encoding carbohydrate-related functions were not conserved among the honey bee strains, which suggests that honey bees can support a metabolically more diverse community of Firm5 strains than bumble bees. These findings advance our understanding of genomic changes underlying host specialization.

Download Full-text

The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees

10.7287/peerj.preprints.309v2 ◽

2014 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Peter Graystock ◽

Dave Goulson ◽

William O Hughes

Keyword(s):

Honey Bee ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Parasite Prevalence ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Deformed Wing Virus ◽

Nosema Bombi ◽

Crithidia Bombi ◽

Parasite Spillover ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

Honey bees and, more recently, bumblebees have been domesticated and are now managed commercially primarily for crop pollination, mixing with wild pollinators during foraging on shared flower resources. There is mounting evidence that managed honey bees or commercially produced bumblebees may affect the health of wild pollinators such as bumblebees by increasing competition for resources and the prevalence of parasites in wild bees. Here we screened 764 bumblebees from around five greenhouses that either used commercially produced bumblebees or did not, as well as bumblebees from 10 colonies placed at two sites either close to or far from a honey bee apiary, for the parasites Apicystis bombi, Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, N. apis and deformed wing virus. We found that A. bombi and C. bombi were more prevalent around greenhouses using commercially produced bumblebees, while C. bombi was 18% more prevalent in bumblebees at the site near to the honey bee apiary than those at the site far from the apiary. Whilst these results are from only a limited number of sites, they support previous reports of parasite spillover from commercially produced bumblebees to wild bumblebees, and suggest that the impact of stress from competing with managed bees or the vectoring of parasites by them on parasite prevalence in wild bees needs further investigation. It appears increasingly likely that the use of managed bees comes at a cost of increased parasites in wild bumblebees, which is not only a concern for bumblebee conservation, but which may impact other pollinators as well.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Pollination Services Provided by Wild and Managed Bees (Apoidea) in Wild Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) Production in Maine, USA, with a Literature Review

Agronomy ◽

10.3390/agronomy10091413 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (9) ◽

pp. 1413

Author(s):

Sara L. Bushmann ◽

Francis A. Drummond

Keyword(s):

Honey Bee ◽

Crop Yield ◽

Honey Bees ◽

Fruit Set ◽

Bumble Bees ◽

Wild Bees ◽

Vaccinium Angustifolium ◽

Wild Bee ◽

Bee Communities ◽

Wild Blueberry

Maine is the largest producer of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) in the United States. Pollination comes from combinations of honey bees (Apis mellifera (L.)), commercial bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson), and wild bees. This study addresses (1) previous research addressing wild-blueberry pollination, (2) effects of wild-bee and honey-bee activity densities on fruit set, yield, and crop value, (3) the economic value of wild-bee communities, and (4) economic consequences of pollinator loss. Bee communities were sampled in 40 fields over three years (2010–2012) and bee activity densities were estimated for bumble bees, honey bees, and other wild bees. These data were applied to an economic model to estimate the value of bee taxa. Bumble bees and honey bees predicted fruit set and reduced its spatial heterogeneity. Other wild bees were not significant predictors of fruit set. Yield was predicted by fruit set and field size, but not pest management tactics. Our analysis showed that disruption in supply of honey bees would result in nearly a 30% decrease in crop yield, buffered in part by wild bees that provide “background” levels of pollination. Honey-bee stocking density and, thus, the activity density of honey bees was greater in larger fields, but not for wild bees. Therefore, a decrease in crop yield would be greater than 30% for large fields due to the proportionally greater investment in honey bees in large fields and a relatively lower contribution by wild bees.

Download Full-text