scholarly journals Patients with symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation show quantitative signs of pain sensitisation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jackson ◽  
O Frobert ◽  
D Boye Larsen ◽  
L Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
A Bjorkenheim
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Asymptomatic Group ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pain Area ◽  
Pain Sensitisation

Abstract Background/Introduction Most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) report symptoms, while around one-third are asymptomatic. We hypothesized that sensory processing, in particular pain, differs in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AF. Purpose To assess differences in pain sensitisation in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AF. Methods Thirty individuals with permanent AF (15 symptomatic, 15 asymptomatic) completed the AF6 and SF-36 questionnaires and underwent quantitative pain sensitisation testing using pressure algometry at the sternum (referred pain area) and the tibialis anterior muscle (generalized pain area). The primary objective was to assess differences in pressure pain thresholds (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the two groups. The secondary objective was to determine association of demographic and clinical parameters to quantitative measures of pain sensitisation. Results The symptomatic group had lower PPTs at both tibialis (p=0.004) and sternum (p=0.01), as well as impaired CPM (p=0.025) and facilitated TSP (p=0.008) at the tibialis but not sternum, compared to the asymptomatic group. The AF6 sum score was negatively correlated to PPT on both tibialis (r=−0.50, p=0.005) and sternum (r=−0.42, p=0.02) and positively correlated to TSP of both tibialis (r=0.57, p=0.001) and sternum (r=0.45, p=0.01), but not to CPM. The physical component summary score was positively correlated to the PPT on both tibialis (r=0.52, p=0.003) and sternum (r=0.40, p=0.03) and negatively to TSP on the tibialis (r=−0.53, p=0.003) but not sternum. Conclusions Patients with symptomatic AF exhibit lower pain tolerance than patients with asymptomatic AF, as well as impaired pain inhibitory control and facilitated summation of pain, indicating that pain sensitisation may be of importance in symptomatic AF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiology, Örebro University, Sweden PPTs tibialis anterior muscle PPTs sternum

scholarly journals Patients with symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation show quantitative signs of pain sensitisation

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001699
Author(s):  
Adam Jackson ◽  
Ole Frobert ◽  
Dennis Boye Larsen ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Anna Björkenheim
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Asymptomatic Group ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pain Area ◽  
Pain Sensitisation

ObjectiveMost patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) report symptoms, while one-third are asymptomatic. We hypothesised that sensory processing, in particular pain, differs in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AF.MethodsThirty individuals with permanent AF (15 symptomatic and 15 asymptomatic) completed the Atrial Fibrillation 6 (AF6) and short form 36 Health Survey questionnaires and underwent quantitative pain sensitisation testing using pressure algometry at the sternum (referred pain area) and the tibialis anterior muscle (generalised pain area). The primary objective was to assess differences in pressure pain thresholds (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the two groups. The secondary objective was to determine association of demographic and clinical parameters to measures of pain sensitisation.ResultsThe symptomatic group had lower PPTs at both tibialis (p=0.004) and sternum (p=0.01), and impaired CPM (p=0.025) and facilitated TSP (p=0.008) at the tibialis but not sternum, compared with the asymptomatic group. The AF6 sum score was negatively correlated to PPT on both tibialis (r=−0.50, p=0.005) and sternum (r=−0.42, p=0.02) and positively correlated to TSP on both tibialis (r=0.57, p=0.001) and sternum (r=0.45, p=0.01), but not to CPM. The physical component summary score was positively correlated to the PPT on both tibialis (r=0.52, p=0.003) and sternum (r=0.40, p=0.03) and negatively to TSP on the tibialis (r=−0.53, p=0.003) but not sternum.ConclusionsPatients with symptomatic AF exhibit lower pain tolerance than patients with asymptomatic AF, as well as impaired pain inhibitory control and facilitated summation of pain, indicating that pain sensitisation may be of importance in symptomatic AF.Trial registration numberNCT04649437.

scholarly journals Increased deep pain sensitivity in persistent musculoskeletal pain but not in other musculoskeletal pain states

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Eva Margareta Gunnarsson ◽  
Birgitta Grahn ◽  
Jens Agerström
Keyword(s):  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
Persistent Pain ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Recurrent Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pain Duration

AbstractBackgroundPressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in a non-painful body area are known to be affected in some chronic pain states. The aim of this study is to investigate PPTs in a pain-free body part in relation to pain persistence and intensity in patients with musculoskeletal pain.MethodsPatients with musculoskeletal pain were divided into three different pain groups: acute pain (pain duration < 3 months, n = 38), regularly recurrent pain (regularly recurrent pain duration > 3 months, n = 56), persistent pain (persistent pain duration >3 months, n = 52) and a healthy control group (n = 51). PPT measures were conducted over the tibialis anterior muscle on the right leg in all groups.ResultsThe persistent pain group showed significantly lower PPTs over the tibialis anterior muscle compared to controls. No significant differences were found between the acute and regularly recurrent pain groups compared to healthy controls. Significant correlations, albeit small, were found between pain intensity and PPTs.ConclusionsIncreased deep pain sensitivity was found in patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain, but not in regularly recurrent pain or in acute pain. Yet, a limitation of the study is that it did not have sufficient power to detect small levels of increased deep pain sensitivity among the latter groups when compared to healthy controls.ImplicationsKnowledge about increased general hypersensitivity in persistent musculoskeletal pain could be important in clinical treatment.

scholarly journals Central inhibition of pain is augmented in women with self-injurious behavior

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Lalouni ◽  
Jens Fust ◽  
Johan Bjureberg ◽  
Granit Kastrati ◽  
Robin Fondberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds

Individuals who engage in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) have demonstrated higher pain thresholds and tolerance compared with individuals without NSSI. The objective of the study was to assess which aspects of the pain regulatory system that account for this augmented pain perception. In a cross-sectional design, 81 women, aged 18-35 (mean [SD] age, 23.4 [3.9]), were included (41 with NSSI and 40 healthy controls). A quantitative sensory testing protocol, including heat pain thresholds, heat pain tolerance, pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation (assessing central down-regulation of pain), and temporal summation (assessing facilitation of pain signals) was used. Thermal pain stimuli were assessed during fMRI scanning and NSSI behaviors and clinical symptoms were self-assessed. NSSI participants demonstrated higher pain thresholds during heat and pressure pain compared to controls. During conditioned pain modulation, NSSI participants showed a more effective central down-regulation of pain for NSSI participants. Temporal summation did not differ between the groups. There were no correlations between pain outcomes and NSSI behaviors or clinical characteristics. The fMRI analyses revealed increased activity in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in NSSI participants, compared to healthy controls, which are brain regions implicated in sensory aspects of pain processing. The findings suggest segregated inhibitory mechanisms for pain and emotion in NSSI, as pain insensitivity was linked to enhanced inhibitory control of pain in spite of significant impairments in emotion regulation. This may represent an endophenotype associated with a greater risk for developing self-injurious behavior.

scholarly journals Associations of pain sensitisation with tender and painful joint counts in people with hand osteoarthritis: results from the Nor-Hand study

RMD Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001774
Author(s):  
Marthe Gløersen ◽  
Pernille Steen Pettersen ◽  
Tuhina Neogi ◽  
Barbara Slatkowsky-Christensen ◽  
Tore K Kvien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Finger Joint ◽  
Hand Osteoarthritis ◽  
Widespread Pain ◽  
Central Sensitisation ◽  
Painful Joint ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Body Joint ◽  
Pain Sensitisation

ObjectiveTo examine associations of pain sensitisation with tender and painful joint counts and presence of widespread pain in people with hand osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsPressure pain thresholds (PPT) at a painful finger joint and the tibialis anterior muscle, and temporal summation (TS) were measured in 291 persons with hand OA. We examined whether sex-standardised PPT and TS values were associated with assessor-reported tender hand joint count, self-reported painful hand and total body joint counts and presence of widespread pain using linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, education and OA severity.ResultsPeople with lower PPTs at the painful finger joint (measure of peripheral and/or central sensitisation) had more tender and painful hand joints than people with higher PPTs. PPT at tibialis anterior (measure of central sensitisation) was associated with painful total body joint count (beta=−0.82, 95% CI −1.28 to –0.35) and presence of widespread pain (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77). The associations between TS (measure of central sensitisation) and joint counts in the hands and the total body were statistically non-significant.ConclusionThis cross-sectional study suggested that pain sensitisation (ie, lower PPTs) was associated with joint counts and widespread pain in hand OA. This knowledge may be used for improved pain phenotyping of people with hand OA, which may contribute to better pain management through more personalised medicine. Further studies are needed to assess whether a reduction of pain sensitisation leads to a decrease in tender and painful joint counts.

The influence of isometric exercise on endogenous pain modulation: comparing exercise-induced hypoalgesia and offset analgesia in young, active adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Harris ◽  
Michele Sterling ◽  
Scott F. Farrell ◽  
Ashley Pedler ◽  
Ashley D. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Isometric Exercise ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pain Ratings ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Active Adults ◽  
Endogenous Analgesia

Abstract Background and aims Impairment of endogenous analgesia has been associated with the development, maintenance and persistence of pain. Endogenous analgesia can be evaluated using exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and offset analgesia (OffA) paradigms, which measure temporal filtering of sensory information. It is not clear if these paradigms are underpinned by common mechanisms, as EIH and OffA have not previously been directly compared. A further understanding of the processes responsible for these clinically relevant phenomena may have future diagnostic and therapeutic utility in management of individuals with persistent pain conditions. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if there is a correlation between the magnitudes of EIH and OffA. The secondary aim of the study was to examine whether exercise influences OffA. Methods Thirty-six healthy, pain-free participants were recruited. EIH was evaluated using pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and pain ratings to suprathreshold pressure stimuli over tibialis anterior and the cervical spine. OffA evaluation utilised a three-step protocol, whereby individualised heat pain thermal stimuli [Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)=50/100] were applied (T1), before increasing 1 °C (T2), followed by 1 °C reduction (T3). The magnitude of OffA was calculated as the percentage reduction in the NRS from T2 to T3. PPT/suprathreshold pain ratings and OffA measures were recorded, before and after 5 min of isometric quadriceps exercise performed at 20–25% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC); and following a 15 min rest period. Data were analysed using repeated measures (RM) ANCOVA and correlational analyses. Results There was no correlation between EIH measures (PPTs or pain ratings to suprathreshold pressure stimuli over tibialis anterior or the cervical spine) and OffA (p>0.11 for all). OffA was induced and not modulated by exercise (p=0.28). Conclusions Five minutes of 20–25% MVC lower limb isometric exercise provided non-pharmacological pain modulation in young, active adults. Magnitude of EIH was not correlated with that of OffA, and exercise did not influence magnitude of OffA. Implications These results suggest that in young, pain-free individuals, separate testing of these two paradigms is required to comprehensively evaluate efficacy of endogenous analgesia. If these results are replicated in patient populations, alternative or complementary methods to exercise interventions may be required to modulate impaired OffA.

scholarly journals High concurrent validity between digital and analogue algometers to measure pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and people with migraine: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
René F. Castien ◽  
Michel W. Coppieters ◽  
Tom S. C. Durge ◽  
Gwendolyne G. M. Scholten-Peeters
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Cephalic Region ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Temporal Muscle ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Healthy Participants

Abstract Background Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) are commonly assessed to quantify mechanical sensitivity in various conditions, including migraine. Digital and analogue algometers are used, but the concurrent validity between these algometers is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the concurrent validity between a digital and analogue algometer to determine PPTs in healthy participants and people with migraine. Methods Twenty-six healthy participants and twenty-nine people with migraine participated in the study. PPTs were measured interictally and bilaterally at the cephalic region (temporal muscle, C1 paraspinal muscles, and trapezius muscle) and extra-cephalic region (extensor carpi radialis muscle and tibialis anterior muscle). PPTs were first determined with a digital algometer, followed by an analogue algometer. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3.1) and limits of agreement were calculated to quantify concurrent validity. Results The concurrent validity between algometers in both groups was moderate to excellent (ICC3.1 ranged from 0.82 to 0.99, with 95%CI: 0.65 to 0.99). Although PPTs measured with the analogue algometer were higher at most locations in both groups (p < 0.05), the mean differences between both devices were less than 18.3 kPa. The variation in methods, such as a hand-held switch (digital algometer) versus verbal commands (analogue algometer) to indicate when the threshold was reached, may explain these differences in scores. The limits of agreement varied per location and between healthy participants and people with migraine. Conclusion The concurrent validity between the digital and analogue algometer is excellent in healthy participants and moderate in people with migraine. Both types of algometer are well-suited for research and clinical practice but are not exchangeable within a study or patient follow-up.

A novel clinical applicable bed-side tool for assessing conditioning pain modulation: proof-of-concept

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-807
Author(s):  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Jesper Bie Larsen ◽  
Stine Rasmussen ◽  
Malene Krogh ◽  
Laura Borg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Finger Nail ◽  
Tonic Stimulus ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Descending Pain Modulation ◽  
Finger Pressure

AbstractBackground and aimsIn recent years, focus on assessing descending pain modulation or conditioning pain modulation (CPM) has emerged in patients with chronic pain. This requires reliable and simple to use bed-side tools to be applied in the clinic. The aim of the present pilot study was to develop and provide proof-of-concept of a simple clinically applicable bed-side tool for assessing CPM.MethodsA group of 26 healthy volunteers participated in the experiment. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were assessed as test stimuli from the lower leg before, during and 5 min after delivering the conditioning tonic painful pressure stimulation. The tonic stimulus was delivered for 2 min by a custom-made spring-loaded finger pressure device applying a fixed pressure (2.2 kg) to the index finger nail. The pain intensity provoked by the tonic stimulus was continuously recorded on a 0–10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).ResultsThe median tonic pain stimulus intensity was 6.7 cm (interquartile range: 4.6–8.4 cm) on the 10 cm VAS. The mean PPT increased significantly (P = 0.034) by 55 ± 126 kPa from 518 ± 173 kPa before to 573 ± 228 kPa during conditioning stimulation. When analyzing the individual CPM responses (increases in PPT), a distribution of positive and negative CPM responders was observed with 69% of the individuals classified as positive CPM responders (increased PPTs = anti-nociceptive) and the rest as negative CPM responders (no or decreased PPTs = Pro-nociceptive). This particular responder distribution explains the large variation in the averaged CPM responses observed in many CPM studies. The strongest positive CPM response was an increase of 418 kPa and the strongest negative CPM response was a decrease of 140 kPa.ConclusionsThe present newly developed conditioning pain stimulator provides a simple, applicable tool for routine CPM assessment in clinical practice. Further, reporting averaged CPM effects should be replaced by categorizing volunteers/patients into anti-nociceptive and pro-nociceptive CPM groups.ImplicationsThe finger pressure device provided moderate-to-high pain intensities and was useful for inducing conditioning stimuli. Therefore, the finger pressure device could be a useful bed-side method for measuring CPM in clinical settings with limited time available. Future bed-side studies involving patient populations are warranted to determine the usefulness of the method.

scholarly journals A High Protein Diet Does Not Improve Protein Synthesis in the Nonweight-Bearing Rat Tibialis Anterior Muscle

1996 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 266-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Taillandier ◽  
Charles-Yannick Guezennec ◽  
Philippe Patureau-Mirand ◽  
Xavier Bigard ◽  
Maurice Arnal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
High Protein Diet ◽  
High Protein ◽  
Protein Diet

Structure of the cortical cytoskeleton in fibers of postural muscles and cardiomyocytes of mice after 30-day 2-g centrifugation

2015 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina V. Ogneva ◽  
V. Gnyubkin ◽  
N. Laroche ◽  
M. V. Maximova ◽  
I. M. Larina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Tibialis Anterior ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Tibialis Anterior Muscle ◽  
Muscle Fibers ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Transverse Stiffness ◽  
G 12 ◽  
Cortical Cytoskeleton

Altered external mechanical loading during spaceflights causes negative effects on muscular and cardiovascular systems. The aim of the study was estimation of the cortical cytoskeleton statement of the skeletal muscle cells and cardiomyocytes. The state of the cortical cytoskeleton in C57BL6J mice soleus, tibialis anterior muscle fibers, and left ventricle cardiomyocytes was investigated after 30-day 2- g centrifugation (“2- g” group) and within 12 h after its completion (“2- g + 12-h” group). We used atomic force microscopy for estimating cell's transverse stiffness, Western blotting for measuring protein content, and RT-PCR for estimating their expression level. The transverse stiffness significantly decreased in cardiomyocytes (by 16%) and increased in skeletal muscles fibers (by 35% for soleus and by 29% for tibialis anterior muscle fibers) in animals of the 2-g group (compared with the control group). For cardiomyocytes, we found that, in the 2- g + 12-h group, α-actinin-1 content decreased in the membranous fraction (by 27%) and increased in cytoplasmic fraction (by 28%) of proteins (compared with the levels in the 2- g group). But for skeletal muscle fibers, similar changes were noted for α-actinin-4, but not for α-actinin-1. In conclusion, we showed that the different isoforms of α-actinins dissociate from cortical cytoskeleton under increased/decreased of mechanical load.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document