Cost burden and cost-effective analysis of the nationwide implementation of the Quality in Acute Stroke Care protocol in Australia

Abstract Background The Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) protocol is a multidisciplinary approach to implement evidence-based treatment after acute stroke that reduces death and disability. Aim This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the QASC protocol across Australia, from a healthcare and a societal perspective. Methods A decision-analytic model was constructed to reflect one-year outcomes post-stroke, aligned with the stroke severity categories of the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Decision analysis compared outcomes following implementation of the QASC protocol versus no implementation. Population data were extracted from Australian databases and data inputs regarding stroke incidence, costs, and utilities were drawn from published sources. The analysis assumed a progressive uptake and efficacy of the QASC protocol over five years. Health benefits and costs were discounted by 5% annually. The cost of each year lived by an Australian, from a societal perspective, was based on the Australian Government's “value of statistical life year” (AUD 213,000). Results Over five years, the model predicted 263,722 strokes among the Australian population. The implementation of the QASC protocol was predicted to prevent 1,154 deaths and yield a gain of 876 years of life (0.003 per stroke), and 3,180 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.012 per stroke). There was an estimated net saving of AUD 65.2 million in healthcare costs (AUD 247 per stroke) and AUD 251.7 million in societal costs (AUD 955 per stroke). Conclusions Implementation of the QASC protocol in Australia represents both a dominant (cost-saving) strategy, from a healthcare and a societal perspective. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Decision tree PSA

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Abstract P849: Effects of Standardized Stroke Protocols on Nursing Confidence and Knowledge in Low Volume Telestroke Emergency Departments

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p849 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Michelle Provencher ◽

Stephen A Figueroa ◽

Robin Novakovic ◽

Linda Hynan ◽

Daiwai M Olson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nursing Education ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Emergency Departments ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Workflow Model ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Care Protocol

Introduction: Nurses and staff in Emergency Departments (ED) with low monthly case volumes have few opportunities to build confidence and solidify skills in acute stroke management. The Nursing-driven Acute Stroke Care (NAS-Care) study tested a workflow model with empowerment of ED bedside nurses, clear role assignments for team members, and standardized protocols including a predefined run sheet. Methods: Seven Texas hospitals participated in this prospective, multisite, baseline-controlled study as part of the Lone Star Stroke Research Consortium. After three months of blinded baseline data collection, the following interventions were implemented: NIHSS certification, nursing education including mock stroke codes, and a standardized flowsheet for code organization and documentation (run sheet). Participating nurses were surveyed before and after implementation of this process. Results: The study was completed at 6 hospitals, with 180 patients in the pre-intervention group and 267 in the post-intervention group. The study intervention was found to improve Door-to-ED provider and Door-to-CT metrics but not physician-dependent metrics, Door-to-Needle or Door-to-Provider times (Provencher et al, ISC 2020). Completed surveys were returned by 97 nurses (pre-intervention) and 57 nurses (post-intervention). There were significant increases in the following questions (10 point scale, p<.001): “I understand goals and processes of stroke code activation”, “stroke codes at my institution are completed efficiently”, and “stroke codes are nursing-driven.” In the post-intervention surveys, nurses reported that the NAS-Care protocol improved understanding (mean score 8.0 +/- 2.4 SD/10) and efficiency (8.2 +/- 2.4/10), and reported that they would recommend NAS-Care to be adopted at other institutions (8.8 +/- 2.1/10). Conclusion: Standardized nurse-driven stroke protocols improved self-assessed knowledge and confidence for nurses in EDs utilizing telestroke, in addition to gains in staff-dependent stroke metrics.

Download Full-text

Abstract P855: Importance of Compliance in Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p855 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Patty Noah ◽

Melanie Henderson ◽

Rebekah Heintz ◽

Russell Cerejo ◽

Christopher T Hackett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Aspiration Pneumonia ◽

Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Oral Intake ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Chi Square ◽

Stroke Center

Introduction: Dysphagia occurs in up to two thirds of stroke patients and can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, which is also linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines recommend a bedside dysphagia assessment before oral intake in stroke patients regardless of initial stroke severity. Several studies have described registered nurses’ competency in terms of knowledge and skills regarding dysphagia screening. We aimed to examine the rate of aspiration pneumonia compared to the rate of dysphagia screening. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single tertiary stroke center was carried out between January 2017 and June 2020. Data comparison was completed utilizing ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify aspiration pneumonia in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. The data was reviewed to compare the compliance of a completed dysphagia screen prior to any oral intake to rate of aspiration pneumonia. Chi square tests were used to assess proportion differences in completed dysphagia screen and proportion of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis in the ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. Results: We identified 3320 patient that met inclusion criteria. 67% were ischemic strokes, 22% were intracerebral hemorrhages and 11% were subarachnoid hemorrhages. Compliance with dysphagia screening decreased from 94.2% (n=1555/1650) in 2017-2018 to 74.0% (n=1236/1670) in 2019-2020, OR=0.17 (95%CI 0.14 - 0.22), p < 0.0001. Aspiration pneumonias increased from 58 (3.5%) in 2017-2018 to 77 (4.6%) in 2019-2020, but this difference was not statistically significant, OR=0.75 (95%CI 0.53 - 1.07), p = 0.11. Conclusion: We noted that the decrease in compliance with completing a dysphagia screen in patients with acute stroke prior to any oral intake was associated with a higher trend of aspiration pneumonia.

Download Full-text

Abstract 352: Early Data From an Implementation Science Study Suggests the Need for Identification and Adoption of Best Practices to Improve the Timeliness of Stroke Treatment

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.352 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Lisa M Monk

Keyword(s):

Best Practices ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Early Data ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Ct Scanner ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Treatment

There is a disconnect from discovery of best treatment options and application into clinical practice in a timely manner. The I M plementation of best Pr actices f O r acute stroke care-de v eloping and optimizing regional systems of Stroke Care (IMPROVE Stroke Care) goal is to develop a regional integrated stroke system that identifies, classifies, and treats patients with acute ischemic stroke more rapidly and effectively with reperfusion therapy. These improvements in acute stroke care delivery are expected to result in lower mortality, fewer recurrent strokes, and improved long term functional outcomes. Recent discoveries in stroke care and advancement in technology extends the window for both TPA administration and mechanical thombectomy. The challenge of implementing these latest advances are difficult considering the ability of hospitals to implement the original American Heart Association (AHA) Systems of Stroke Care recommendations. Early data from this project shows that the challenges continue to exist in recommendations that have been in place as early as 2005. EMS is not utilizing pre-hospital stroke screening tools, only 5% of the time, stroke severity tools, only 7% of the time, lytic checklists, 0% of the time, destination decision changed due to severity score, 0% of the time, and pre-notifying emergency rooms, only 63% of the time. Emergency departments door to CT <45 minutes, only 55% of the time, Lytic given in CT scanner, only 35% of the time, Door to lytic therapy< 45 minutes, 77% of the time, Door to Groin puncture, 81% of the time, and Door to TICI Flow 2c/3 flow <90 minutes, 39% of the time. The Systems of Stroke Care have recommendations that will improve time to treatment and outcomes for patients. This project is working to provide tools, guidance, data, and feedback to improve application of these recommendations and identify best practices and solutions to barriers.

Download Full-text

The Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Stroke Centers for Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.111.648238 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (6) ◽

pp. 1617-1623 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Gregory F. Guzauskas ◽

Denise M. Boudreau ◽

Kathleen F. Villa ◽

Steven R. Levine ◽

David L. Veenstra

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

The Cost

Download Full-text

Critical factors determining access to acute stroke care

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.51.2.427 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 51 (2) ◽

pp. 427-432 ◽

Cited By ~ 116

Author(s):

Sindhu C. Menon ◽

Dilip K. Pandey ◽

Lewis B. Morgenstern

Keyword(s):

Access To Care ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

Multivariate Regression ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Physician ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Hospital Arrival ◽

Ambulance Transport

Objective: Our objective was to assess gender, ethnic, and access-to-care factors critical in delay time (DT) for presentation to the hospital for acute stroke.Background: Little information is available on the effect of gender, ethnicity, and access issues on DT.Design: Demographic, access-to-care, and DT information was obtained from emergency department (ED) documentation of stroke patients admitted from July 1995 through June 1997 at Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.Results: Of the 241 eligible patients, 126 were African American (AA), 82 were non-Hispanic white (NHW), and 33 were Hispanic American (HA). Median DT from symptom onset to presentation to the ED was 222 minutes for AAs, 280 minutes for HAs, and 230 minutes for NHWs. A multivariate regression model estimated DT to ED arrival decreased with ambulance transport (p= 0.003) and increased in patients with a primary care physician(p = 0.145) and in women (p = 0.052). DT to see an ED physician after hospital arrival decreased with ambulance transport (p < 0.001), hemorrhage patients (p = 0.006), and worse stroke severity (p = 0.038), and increased in women (p = 0.041). DT to see a neurologist decreased with hemorrhage (p = 0.002) and ambulance arrival (p = 0.010). Neurologists saw patients within 3 hours of symptom onset in 34% of NHWs, 28% of AAs, and 18% of HAs.Conclusion: Gender and access-to-care issues may be important determinants of delay in acute stroke care. Less than 20% of HAs presented to the ED within 3 hours of symptom onset.

Download Full-text

Abstract MP22: Sex Differences in the Delivery of Acute Telestroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.mp22 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Johanna L Morton ◽

Suraj Didwania ◽

Eric Anderson ◽

Jason Hallock

Keyword(s):

Sex Differences ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Patient Population ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Presenting Symptoms ◽

Suspected Stroke

Background: Sex differences are encountered in many aspects of ischemic stroke, including risk factors, presenting symptoms, stroke mechanism, acute interventions and functional outcomes. As telestroke services continue to expand, many patients utilize telestroke for the evaluation and treatment of suspected stroke symptoms. To date, the existence of such differences between sexes has not been identified in the patient population having utilized telestroke for acute stroke care. Methods: A retrospective observational study of the experience of a single teleneurology practice serving 340 hospitals from April 2018 to June 2020 was performed. Patients seen in the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of suspected stroke were included. Data from the acute stroke encounter was reported through the current medical record platform. Results: Within the queried period, there were 11,454 male and 11,794 female patients identified as having received ED telestroke evaluation for suspected acute stroke. Males were younger than females (67 vs 70, P <0.01). Males had higher rates of prior stroke, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coronary disease than females ( P <0.01), while females had higher rates of atrial fibrillation ( P =0.03) and TIA ( P <0.01). Rates of antiplatelet and anticoagulants were higher in males ( P <0.01) than females. There were no differences in time to ED presentation, time to request consult or make a thrombolysis decision, or length of consult. Females had higher stroke severity ( P <0.01) and door-to-needle times ( P <0.01), but lower alteplase rates ( P =0.02) compared to males. Conclusion: This review of a national heterogeneous telestroke patient population is indicative of sex differences in multiple aspects of acute ischemic stroke, most notably in thrombolysis delivered via telestroke. Further investigation into the etiology of such differences is warranted, as well as a survey of functional outcomes. As telemedicine continues to expand in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that the reasons behind this disparity are investigated.

Download Full-text