Septal vs apical defibrillator electrode placement a systematic review

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Santos ◽  
I Almeida ◽  
M Santos ◽  
S Paula ◽  
H Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Pacing Threshold ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Lead Placement ◽  
Defibrillator Lead

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The optimal right ventricular defibrillator lead placement is still a debatable matter. We attempt to performed a systemic review to evaluate whether septal and apical placement had significant differences in the follow-up with an indication for implantation of these devices. Objective Review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of right ventricular apical and septal defibrillator lead placement. Methods A systemic research on MEDLINE and PUBMED with the term "septal pacing", "apical pacing" "septal defibrillation" or "apical defibrillation". 309 results were identified, however, after a serious analysis, several articles were excluded. Comparisons between apical and septal placement were performed regarding R wave amplitude, pacing threshold at 0.5 ms, lead impedance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and lead complication that produced lead re-placement. Mean differences (MD) and confidence interval (CI) was used as a measurement of treatment. Results Six studies were selected, including a total of 2180 patients. The studies were performed with different techniques, analyses and goals. The studies presented heterogeneous and diverse results, with a varied follow-up period, that resulted in the exclusion of one of the studies. Mean age 64.51 years old, 76.86% male, a median ejection fraction of 27.84%, NYHA class of 2.65, ischemic etiologic in 51.10% and a follow-up period of 26.49 months. Septal defibrillator lead placement was established in 772 patients, while the apical defibrillator lead placement was performed in 1399 patients. No differences regarding the lead performance on apical and septal placement were detected regarding the R-wave (MD -0.36, CI -0.75 - +0.03, p = 0.68, I2 = 0%) (reported in 3 studies) and lead impedance (MD -23.83, CI -51.36 - +3.69, p = 0.003, I2 = 82%) (reported in 3 studies). Pacing threshold seems to be favor a septal defibrillator lead implantation (MD -0.05, CI -0.09 - -0.02, p = 0.12, I2 = 53%) (reported in 3 studies). Concerning echocardiography parameters during the follow up period, LVEF (MD -0.83, CI -3.05 - +1.38, p = 0.10, I2 = 57%) (reported in 3 studies) and LVEDD (MD -0.51, CI -2.13 - +1.10, p = 0.20, I2 = 38%) (reported in 3 studies) were not significant influenced for the defibrillator lead placement. Lead complications that provoke a lead replacement was not significant between the lead placement (MD 1.25, CI 0.53 – 2.94, p = 0.71, I2 = 0%) (reported in 3 studies). Conclusions Just pacing threshold proved to improve the septal defibrillator lead placement. Neither the other lead parameters or the echocardiography results during the follow-up were influenced by the lead placement. For a definitive conclusion is important to further investigation.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Outcomes of Upgrading to Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Infranodal Atrioventricular Block

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Ye ◽  
Shengjie Wu ◽  
Lan Su ◽  
Xia Sheng ◽  
Jiefang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Atrioventricular Block ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Pacing Threshold ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Systolic Volume

His bundle pacing (HBP) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardimyopathy (PICM) but may be unable to correct infranodal atrioventricular block (AVB). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) results in rapid LV activation and may be able to reliably pace beyond the site of AVB. Our study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of permanent LBBP in infranodal AVB and PICM patients. Patients with infranodal AVB and PICM who underwent LBBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were included. Clinical evaluation and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Permanent LBBP upgrade was successful in 19 of 20 patients with a median follow-up duration of 12 months. QRS duration (QRSd) increased from 139.3 ± 28.0 ms at baseline to 176.2 ± 21.4 ms (P < 0.001) with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and was shortened to 120.9 ± 15.2 ms after LBBP (P < 0.001). The mean LBBP threshold was 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 36.3% ± 6.5% to 51.9% ± 13.0% (P < 0.001) with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduced from 180.1 ± 43.5 to 136.8 ± 36.7 ml (P < 0.001) during last follow-up. LBBP paced beyond the site of block, which results in a low pacing threshold with a high success rate in infranodal AVB patients. LBBP improved LV function with stable parameters over the 12 months, making it a reasonable alternative to cardiac resynchronization pacing via a coronary sinus lead in infranodal AVB and PICM patients.

P5694Outcomes of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy after ventricular tachycardia ablation without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a multicenter international study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Gandjbakhch ◽  
M Laredo ◽  
A Berruezo ◽  
J B Gourraud ◽  
R Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background In arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) after an episode of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) are currently recommended in most situations. However, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RCA) is effective in reducing recurrent VT and whether MVT is a surrogate of sudden cardiac death is debated when other risk factors are lacking. Purpose To report the outcomes of patients with ARVC/D who underwent RCA of well-tolerated MVT without a back-up ICD. Methods Patients with a definite ARVC/D diagnosis according to the 2010 Task Force revised criteria who underwent RCA of well-tolerated MVT at 9 tertiary centers across 5 countries, without an ICD prior to RCA and in the 3 following months were retrospectively included. Patients presenting with syncope or electrical storm, and patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Similar patients implanted with an ICD prior or without RCA in the same period served as controls. Results Sixty-five patients [median age 46.1 years, range (19.5–73.8), 75% males] underwent RCA of MVT between 2003 and 2016. Familial history of ARVC/D was found in 11% of patients. Epsilon-waves were present in 19% and T-waves inversion beyond V2 in 43%. A right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction ≤40% or fractional area change ≤33% was found in 14 (25%) patients. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 61% (50–70). Clinical presentation was palpitations in 81% of patients and near-syncope in 14%. Prior to RCA, patients were on beta-blockers alone in 18%, class I drugs in 37% and amiodarone in 9%, while 15% of patients were free any antiarrhythmic medication. Only 1 patient (2%) had >1 clinical VT morphology. Median VT rate was 180 (110–270). An epicardial approach was used in 31% patients. The clinical VT was inducible in 84% of patients. The median number of targeted RV site was 1 (1–3) (RV outflow tract in 72%). Full acute success defined inability to induce any VT was achieved in 72% of patients. During a median follow-up time of 49 month (1.4–162), there was no death or aborted cardiac arrest. Survival without VT recurrence was estimated at 82%, 71% and 60%, 12-, 36- and 60-months after RCA. No VT recurrence was observed among patient who had undergone an epicardial ablation. Among patients with VT recurrence, 6 (35%) did not receive an ICD, and 14 (70%) underwent redo RCA. An ICD was implanted in 10 patients, including 5 for VT recurrence. Fifty-eight patients constituted the control group, and 64% had appropriate ICD interventions during follow-up. Conclusions Despite a significant rate of VT recurrence, selected patients with ARVC/D who underwent RCA for stable MVT without an ICD did not experience any arrhythmic death. Further prospective studies are mandatory to precise the respective places of ICD and RCA in the management of ARVC/D patients with well-tolerated MVT. Acknowledgement/Funding None

ACCESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION USING TAPSE

2011 ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Lien Nhut Nguyen ◽  
Anh Vu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: The prognostic importance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has been suggested in patients with systolic heart failure (due to primary or secondary dilated cardiomyopathy - DCM). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is a simple, feasible, reality, non-invasive measurement by transthoracic echocardiography for evaluating RV systolic function. Objectives: To evaluate TAPSE in patients with primary or secondary DCM who have left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% and to find the relation between TAPSE and LVEF, LVDd, RVDd, RVDd/LVDd, RA size, severity of TR and PAPs. Materials and Methods: 61 patients (36 males, 59%) mean age 58.6 ± 14.4 years old with clinical signs and symtomps of chronic heart failure which caused by primary or secondary DCM and LVEF ≤ 40% and 30 healthy subject (15 males, 50%) mean age 57.1 ± 16.8 were included in this study. All patients and controls were underwent echocardiographic examination by M-mode, two dimentional, convensional Dopler and TAPSE. Results: TAPSE is significant low in patients compare with the controls (13.93±2.78 mm vs 23.57± 1.60mm, p<0.001). TAPSE is linearly positive correlate with echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (r= 0,43; p<0,001) and linearly negative correlate with RVDd (r= -0.39; p<0.01), RVDd/LVDd (r=-0.33; p<0.01), RA size (r=-0.35; p<0.01), TR (r=-0.26; p<0.05); however, no correlation was found with LVDd and PAPs. Conclusions: 1. Decreased RV systolic function as estimated by TAPSE in patients with systolic heart failure primary and secondary DCM) compare with controls. 2. TAPSE is linearly positive correlate with LVEF (r= 0.43; p<0.001) and linearly negative correlate with RVDd (r= -0.39; p<0.01), RVDd/LVDd (r=-0.33; p<0.01), RA size (r=-0.35; p<0.01), TR (r=-0.26; p<0.05); however, no correlation is found with LVDd and PAPs. 3. TAPSE should be used routinely as a simple, feasible, reality method of estimating RV function in the patients systolic heart failure DCM (primary and secondary).

Peak Oxygen Consumption and Resting Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Changes After Cardiomyoplasty at 6-Month Follow-up

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edimar Alcides Bocchi ◽  
Guilherme Veiga Guimarães ◽  
Luiz Felipe P. Moreira ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Alvaro Vilela de Moraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Peak Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Left and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury

Infection ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Bieber ◽  
Angelina Kraechan ◽  
Johannes C. Hellmuth ◽  
Maximilian Muenchhoff ◽  
Clemens Scherer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Right Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Strain Echocardiography

Abstract Purpose SARS-COV-2 infection can develop into a multi-organ disease. Although pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury have been studied throughout the pandemic course in 2019, its morphological characterisation is still unclear. With this study, we aimed to characterise echocardiographic patterns of ventricular function in patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury. Methods We prospectively assessed 32 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and presence or absence of elevated high sensitive troponin T (hsTNT+ vs. hsTNT-) by comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) and strain echocardiography. Results A minority (34.3%) of patients had normal ventricular function, whereas 65.7% had left and/or right ventricular dysfunction defined by impaired left and/or right ventricular ejection fraction and strain measurements. Concomitant biventricular dysfunction was common in hsTNT+ patients. We observed impaired left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with myocardial injury (-13.9% vs. -17.7% for hsTNT+ vs. hsTNT-, p = 0.005) but preserved LV ejection fraction (52% vs. 59%, p = 0.074). Further, in these patients, right ventricular (RV) systolic function was impaired with lower RV ejection fraction (40% vs. 49%, p = 0.001) and reduced RV free wall strain (-18.5% vs. -28.3%, p = 0.003). Myocardial dysfunction partially recovered in hsTNT + patients after 52 days of follow-up. In particular, LV-GLS and RV-FWS significantly improved from baseline to follow-up (LV-GLS: -13.9% to -16.5%, p = 0.013; RV-FWS: -18.5% to -22.3%, p = 0.037). Conclusion In patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, comprehensive 3D and strain echocardiography revealed LV dysfunction by GLS and RV dysfunction, which partially resolved at 2-month follow-up. Trial registration COVID-19 Registry of the LMU University Hospital Munich (CORKUM), WHO trial ID DRKS00021225.

scholarly journals Natural Progression of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony Leslie Innasimuthu ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Jason Lazar ◽  
William E. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mild Stenosis ◽  
Natural Progression

Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371–1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (&gt;0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to &lt;1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (&lt;1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean &lt;40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics, one-year change in ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: a multicentre prospective observational study in Catalonia (Spain)

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Farré ◽  
Josep Lupon ◽  
Eulàlia Roig ◽  
Jose Gonzalez-Costello ◽  
Joan Vila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
End Point ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyse baseline characteristics and outcome of patients with heart failure and mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40%–49%) and the effect of 1-year change in LVEF in this group.SettingMulticentre prospective observational study of ambulatory patients with HF followed up at four university hospitals with dedicated HF units.ParticipantsFourteen per cent (n=504) of the 3580 patients included had HFmrEF.InterventionsBaseline characteristics, 1-year LVEF and outcomes were collected. All-cause death, HF hospitalisation and the composite end-point were the primary outcomes.ResultsMedian follow-up was 3.66 (1.69–6.04) years. All-cause death, HF hospitalisation and the composite end-point were 47%, 35% and 59%, respectively. Outcomes were worse in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (LVEF>50%), without differences between HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (LVEF<40%) and HFmrEF (all-cause mortality 52.6% vs 45.8% and 43.8%, respectively, P=0.001). After multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences in all-cause death and the composite end-point were seen between the three groups. HF hospitalisation and cardiovascular death were not statistically different between patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF. At 1-year follow-up, 62% of patients with HFmrEF had LVEF measured: 24% had LVEF<40%, 43% maintained LVEF 40%–49% and 33% had LVEF>50%. While change in LVEF as continuous variable was not associated with better outcomes, those patients who evolved from HFmrEF to HFpEF did have a better outcome. Those who remained in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups had higher all-cause mortality after adjustment for age, sex and baseline LVEF (HR 1.96 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.54, P=0.027) and HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.86, P=0.037), respectively).ConclusionsPatients with HFmrEF have a clinical profile in-between HFpEF and HFrEF, without differences in all-cause mortality and the composite end-point between the three groups. At 1 year, patients with HFmrEF exhibited the greatest variability in LVEF and this change was associated with survival.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic versus Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy after Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4989
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abumayyaleh ◽  
Christina Pilsinger ◽  
Ibrahim El-Battrawy ◽  
Marvin Kummer ◽  
Jürgen Kuschyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Background: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) decreases cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data regarding the impact of ARNI on the outcome in HFrEF patients according to heart failure etiology are limited. Methods and results: One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with HFrEF from the years 2016 to 2017 were included at the Medical Centre Mannheim Heidelberg University and treated with ARNI according to the current guidelines. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was numerically improved during the treatment with ARNI in both patient groups, that with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 61) (ICMP), and that with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 60) (NICMP); p = 0.25. Consistent with this data, the NT-proBNP decreased in both groups, more commonly in the NICMP patient group. In addition, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine changed before and after the treatment with ARNI in both groups. In a one-year follow-up, the rate of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) tended to be higher in the ICMP group compared with the NICMP group (ICMP 38.71% vs. NICMP 17.24%; p = 0.07). The rate of one-year all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (ICMP 6.5% vs. NICMP 6.6%; log-rank = 0.9947). Conclusions: This study shows that, although the treatment with ARNI improves the LVEF in ICMP and NICMP patients, the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains higher in ICMP patients in comparison with NICMP patients. Renal function is improved in the NICMP group after the treatment. Long-term mortality is similar over a one-year follow-up.

Abstract P232: Screening Past B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Values to Identify Candidates for Treatment of Systolic Dysfunction

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document