scholarly journals Prior myocardial infarction in the young: predisposes to a high relative risk but low absolute risk of a sudden cardiac death

EP Europace ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarke Risgaard ◽  
Jonas Bille Nielsen ◽  
Reza Jabbari ◽  
Stig Haunsø ◽  
Anders Gaarsdal Holst ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
pp. 74-83
Author(s):  
Anh Tien Hoang ◽  
Nhat Quang Nguyen

Background: Decades of research now link TWA with inducible and spontaneous clinical ventricular arrhythmias. This bench-to-bedside foundation makes TWA, NT-ProBNP a very plausible index of susceptibility to ventricular arrythmia, and motivates the need to define optimal combination of TWA and NT-ProBNP in predicting ventricular arrythmia in myocardial infarction patients. We research this study with 2 targets: 1. To evaluate the role of TWA in predicting sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction patients. 2. To evaluate the role of NT-ProBNP in predicting sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction patients 3. Evaluate the role of the combined NT-ProBNP and TWA in predicting sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction patients. Methods: Prospective study with follow up the mortality in 2 years: 71 chronic myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospital from 5/2009 to 5/20011 and 50 healthy person was done treadmill test to caculate TWA; ECG, echocardiography, NT-ProBNP. Results: Cut-off point of NT-ProBNP in predicting sudden cardiac death is 3168 pg/ml; AUC = 0,86 (95% CI: 0,72 - 0,91); Cut-off point of TWA in predicting sudden cardiac death is 107 µV; AUC = 0,81 (95% CI: 0,69 - 0,87); NT-ProBNP can predict sudden cardiac death with OR= 7,26 (p<0,01); TWA can predict sudden cardiac death with OR= 8,45 (p<0,01). The combined NT-ProBNP and TWA in predicting ventricular arrythmia in heart failure patients: OR= 17,91 (p<0,001). Conclusions: The combined NT-ProBNP and TWA have the best predict value of sudden cardiac death in myocardial infarction patients, compare to NT-ProBNP or TWA alone


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 614
Author(s):  
Diana Hernández-Romero ◽  
María del Rocío Valverde-Vázquez ◽  
Juan Pedro Hernández del Rincón ◽  
José A. Noguera-Velasco ◽  
María D. Pérez-Cárceles ◽  
...  

In approximately 5% of unexpected deaths, establishing a conclusive diagnosis exclusively on the basis of anatomo-pathological findings in a classic autopsy is difficult. Postmortem biomarkers have been actively investigated as complementary indicators to help to reach valid conclusions about the circumstances of death. Several studies propose either the pericardial fluid or peripheral veins as a location for troponin determination, but the optimum sampling site is still a matter of debate. Our objective was to evaluate the association between the ratio of troponin values in the pericardial fluid and serum (determined postmortem) and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the context of sudden cardiac death. We included 175 forensic cases. Two groups were established: AMI deaths (48; 27.4%) and the control group (127; 72.6%). The cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) values in the pericardial fluid and the troponin ratio were found to be associated with the cause of death. Univariate regression analyses showed that both age and the cTnI ratio were significantly associated with the diagnosis of AMI death. In a multivariate analysis, adjusting for confounding factors, the age and cTnI ratio were independent predictors of death from myocardial infarction. We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the cTnI ratio for AMI death and selected a cut-off point. Our biomarker was found to be a valuable and highly effective tool for use in the forensic field as a complementary method to facilitate diagnosis in nonconclusive autopsies.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Roberts ◽  
John P. Middleton

Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of death and disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Registry data show that 41% of deaths in ESRD patients are due to a variety of cardiovascular causes, such as acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death, and stroke. In the general population, each of these disease entities in isolation can be effectively managed according to evidence from large clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines. However, many of these trials did not include patients with ESRD, limiting the transferability of this evidence to the care of patients on dialysis. To complicate matters, cardiovascular events in ESRD patients are likely augmented from a unique interplay of cardiac risk due to both reduced kidney function and the necessity for artificial renal replacement therapies. In this light, the patient on dialysis is subjected to a series of unique factors: the continued presence of the metabolic perturbations of uremia and the peculiar environment of the dialysis treatment itself. Since the ESRD heart is under a considerable amount of strain due to chronic volume overload, rapid electrolyte and fluid shifts, and accelerated vascular calcification, management can be complex and outcomes multifactorial. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding management of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and atrial fibrillation. We also address modifiable risk factors related to the dialysis procedure itself and highlight recent randomized controlled trials that included dialysis patients and measured important cardiovascular outcomes. 


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Roberts ◽  
John P. Middleton

Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of death and disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Registry data show that 41% of deaths in ESRD patients are due to a variety of cardiovascular causes, such as acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death, and stroke. In the general population, each of these disease entities in isolation can be effectively managed according to evidence from large clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines. However, many of these trials did not include patients with ESRD, limiting the transferability of this evidence to the care of patients on dialysis. To complicate matters, cardiovascular events in ESRD patients are likely augmented from a unique interplay of cardiac risk due to both reduced kidney function and the necessity for artificial renal replacement therapies. In this light, the patient on dialysis is subjected to a series of unique factors: the continued presence of the metabolic perturbations of uremia and the peculiar environment of the dialysis treatment itself. Since the ESRD heart is under a considerable amount of strain due to chronic volume overload, rapid electrolyte and fluid shifts, and accelerated vascular calcification, management can be complex and outcomes multifactorial. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding management of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and atrial fibrillation. We also address modifiable risk factors related to the dialysis procedure itself and highlight recent randomized controlled trials that included dialysis patients and measured important cardiovascular outcomes. 


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuomas Kenttä ◽  
Bruce D Nearing ◽  
Kimmo Porthan ◽  
Jani T Tikkanen ◽  
Matti Viitasalo ◽  
...  

Introduction: Noninvasive identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major clinical challenge. Abnormal ventricular repolarization is associated with increased risk of lethal ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. Hypothesis: We investigated the hypothesis that spatial repolarization heterogeneity can identify patients at risk for SCD in general population. Methods: Spatial R-, J- and T-wave heterogeneities (RWH, JWH and TWH, respectively) were automatically analyzed with second central moment technique from standard digital 12-lead ECGs in 5618 adults (46% men; age 50.9±12.5 yrs.) who took part in Health 2000 Study, an epidemiological survey representative of the entire Finnish adult population. During average follow-up of 7.7±1.4 years, a total of 72 SCDs occurred. Thresholds of RWH, JWH and TWH were based on optimal cutoff points from ROC curves. Results: Increased RWH, JWH and TWH (Fig.1) in left precordial leads (V4-V6) were univariately associated with SCD (P<0.001, each). When adjusted with clinical risk markers (age, gender, BMI, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, heart rate, left ventricular hypertrophy, QRS duration, arterial hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease and previous myocardial infarction) JWH and TWH remained as independent predictors of SCD. Increased TWH (≥102μV) was associated with a 1.9-fold adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2 - 3.1; P=0.011) and increased JWH (≥123μV) with a 2.0-fold adjusted relative risk for SCD (95% CI: 1.2 - 3.3; P=0.004). When both TWH and JWH were above threshold, the adjusted relative risk for SCD was 3.2-fold (95% CI: 1.7 - 6.2; P<0.001). When all heterogeneity measures (RWH, JWH and TWH) were above threshold, the risk for SCD was 3.7-fold (95% CI: 1.6 - 8.6; P=0.003). Conclusions: Automated measurement of spatial J- and T-wave heterogeneity enables analysis of high patient volumes and is able to stratify SCD risk in general population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document