scholarly journals 1.F. Workshop: The barriers to effective hypertension care: a focus on the patient's journey

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Lived Experiences ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health System Change ◽  
Disadvantaged Populations ◽  
Technical Innovations

Abstract Millions of people across the world depend on health systems that simply do not work. They struggle to find someone who can help and, when they do, can face catastrophic bills for often substandard care. But we fail to listen to those whose needs, desires, and expectations are most unmet. We assume their understanding of health and illness is the same as ours and we ignore the coping strategies developed over years that they use to overcome the barriers that those who design health systems place in their way. They live their lives unseen and unheard by those who make the decisions that will determine whether they live or die. This workshop explores issues that arise when researchers actively engage with disadvantaged populations. It reports our experiences from the RESPOND project (Responsive and Equitable Health Systems - Partnership for Non-Communicable Diseases), working with disadvantaged communities in Malaysia and the Philippines to view the health system from the perspective of people whose health depends on a long-term relationship with it. We use a mixed methods approach, involving household surveys, in-depth interviews and digital diaries, where participants use mobile phones to record their experiences of living with chronic conditions and seeking care for it. The aim of this workshop is to demonstrate why it is important to listen to those in disadvantaged populations, in order to understand the barriers they face and the ways that they seek to overcome them as they seek care for a chronic disorder. We will illustrate this by achieving five objectives: To show why we need to look beyond the biomedical approach to illness;To recognise the many different journeys that patients follow;To understand the economic consequences of the choices that they make;To describe the theoretical and technical innovations developed as part of the RESPOND project to do this; andTo illustrate how bringing such insights together can be used to implement equitable health system change. The workshop will be chaired and moderated by Dina Balabanova and Martin McKee, two globally recognised leaders researching chronic conditions and health system reforms in low- and middle-income countries. The first three presentations will introduce people living with chronic conditions from the study communities, and will examine the challenges they face, their options and the choices they make to treat it. All five presentations, but particularly the remaining two, will describe the theoretical and technical innovations developed as part of the RESPOND project used to capture the voices and lived experiences of disadvantaged populations so that they may be better represented in the planning of health systems and services. The remaining 30 minutes will be devoted to guided interactive discussion with the audience on how we are using this people-centred evidence to implement change in each country, and how these approaches may be applied in other settings. Key messages Designing effective and responsive health systems that leave no one behind must account for the lived experiences of all beneficiaries, including those groups whose voices often go unheard. We present evidence from Malaysia and the Philippines from studies that used innovative methods to capture the lived experiences of disadvantaged populations seeking care for chronic conditions.

scholarly journals The impact of economic sanctions on health and health systems in low- and middle-income countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Suhrcke ◽  
M Pinna Pintor ◽  
C Hamelmann
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Economic Sanctions ◽  
Political Crisis ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Adverse Health ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Economic sanctions, understood as measures taken by one state or a group of states to coerce another into a desired conduct (eg by restricting trade and financial flows) do not primarily seek to adversely affect the health or health system of the target country's population. Yet, there may be indirect or unintended health and health system consequences that ought to be borne in mind when assessing the full set of effects of sanctions. We take stock of the evidence to date in terms of whether - and if so, how - economic sanctions impact health and health systems in LMICs. Methods We undertook a structured literature review (using MEDLINE and Google Scholar), covering the peer-reviewed and grey literature published from 1970-2019, with a specific focus on quantitative assessments. Results Most studies (23/27) that met our inclusion criteria focus on the relationship between sanctions and health outcomes, ranging from infant or child mortality as the most frequent case over viral hepatitis to diabetes and HIV, among others. Fewer studies (9/27) examined health system related indicators, either as a sole focus or jointly with health outcomes. A minority of studies explicitly addressed some of the methodological challenges, incl. control for relevant confounders and the endogeneity of sanctions. Taking the results at face value, the evidence is almost unanimous in highlighting the adverse health and health system effects of economic sanctions. Conclusions Quantitatively assessing the impact of economic sanctions on health or health systems is a challenging task, not least as it is persistently difficult to disentangle the effect of sanctions from many other, potentially major factors at work that matter for health (as, for instance, war). In addition, in times of severe economic and political crisis (which often coincide with sanctions), the collection of accurate and comprehensive data that could allow appropriate measurement is typically not a priority. Key messages The existing evidence is almost unanimous in highlighting the adverse health and health system effects of economic sanctions. There is preciously little good quality evidence on the health (system) impact of economic sanctions.

scholarly journals Re-imagining Research: A Bold Call, but Bold Enough? Comment on "Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada: A Call to ‘Re-Imagine’ Research"

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bev J. Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Evidence Use ◽  
Health System Change ◽  
Health Leadership ◽  
System Leaders ◽  
Change Projects ◽  
High Level ◽  
Partnership Models

Many articles over the last two decades have enumerated barriers to and facilitators for evidence use in health systems. Bowen et al’s article "Response to Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers: A Call to ‘Re-imagine Research’" furthers the debate by focusing on an under-explored research area (health system design and health service organization) with an under-studied stakeholder group (health system leaders), by undertaking a broad program of research on partnerships, and, based on participant responses, by calling for re-imagining of research itself. In response to the claim that the research community is not providing expertise to this pressing issue in the health system, I provide four high level reasons: partnerships mean different things to different people, our language does not reflect the reality we want, our health systems have yet to fully embrace evidence use, and complexity is easier to talk about than act within. Bowen et al’s study, and their broader program of research, is well-placed to explore these issues further, helping identify appropriate researcher-health system leader partnership models for various health system change projects. Given the positive shifts identified in this study, and the knowledge that participants demonstrate about what needs to change, the time is right for bold action, re-imagining not only research, but healthcare, such that the production and use of evidence for better health is embraced and supported.

scholarly journals Measuring the efficiency of health systems in Asia: a data envelopment analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e022155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayem Ahmed ◽  
Md Zahid Hasan ◽  
Mary MacLennan ◽  
Farzana Dorin ◽  
Mohammad Wahid Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Health System ◽  
Technical Efficiency ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Income Group ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
System Efficiency ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health System Efficiency

ObjectiveThis study aims to estimate the technical efficiency of health systems in Asia.SettingsThe study was conducted in Asian countries.MethodsWe applied an output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to estimate the technical efficiency of the health systems in Asian countries. The DEA model used per-capita health expenditure (all healthcare resources as a proxy) as input variable and cross-country comparable health outcome indicators (eg, healthy life expectancy at birth and infant mortality per 1000 live births) as output variables. Censored Tobit regression and smoothed bootstrap models were used to observe the associated factors with the efficiency scores. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the consistency of these efficiency scores.ResultsThe main findings of this paper demonstrate that about 91.3% (42 of 46 countries) of the studied Asian countries were inefficient with respect to using healthcare system resources. Most of the efficient countries belonged to the high-income group (Cyprus, Japan, and Singapore) and only one country belonged to the lower middle-income group (Bangladesh). Through improving health system efficiency, the studied high-income, upper middle-income, low-income and lower middle-income countries can improve health system outcomes by 6.6%, 8.6% and 8.7%, respectively, using the existing level of resources. Population density, bed density, and primary education completion rate significantly influenced the efficiency score.ConclusionThe results of this analysis showed inefficiency of the health systems in most of the Asian countries and imply that many countries may improve their health system efficiency using the current level of resources. The identified inefficient countries could pay attention to benchmarking their health systems within their income group or other within similar types of health systems.

scholarly journals Mental health system governance in Nigeria: challenges, opportunities and strategies for improvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Abdulmalik ◽  
L. Kola ◽  
O. Gureje
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Mental Health System ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Health System Governance ◽  
Low And Middle Income

IntroductionA health systems approach to understanding efforts for improving health care services is gaining traction globally. A component of this approach focuses on health system governance (HSG), which can make or mar the successful implementation of health care interventions. Very few studies have explored HSG in low- and middle-income countries, including Nigeria. Studies focusing on mental health system governance, are even more of a rarity. This study evaluates the mental HSG of Nigeria with a view to understanding the challenges, opportunities and strategies for strengthening it.MethodologyThis study was conducted as part of the project, Emerging Mental Health Systems in Low and Middle Income Countries (Emerald). A multi-method study design was utilized to evaluate the mental HSG status of Nigeria. A situational analysis of the health policy and legal environment in the country was performed. Subsequently, 30 key informant interviews were conducted at national, state and district levels to explore the country's mental HSG.ResultsThe existing policy, legislative and institutional framework for HSG in Nigeria reveals a complete exclusion of mental health in key health sector documents. The revised mental health policy is however promising. Using the Siddiqi framework categories, we identified pragmatic strategies for mental health system strengthening that include a consideration of existing challenges and opportunities within the system.ConclusionThe identified strategies provide a template for the subsequent activities of the Emerald Programme (and other interventions), towards strengthening the mental health system of Nigeria.

scholarly journals Mapping the health systems response to violence against women: key learnings from five LMIC settings (2015–2020)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shegufta Shefa Sikder ◽  
Rakhi Ghoshal ◽  
Padma Bhate-Deosthali ◽  
Chandni Jaishwal ◽  
Nobhojit Roy
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
System Response ◽  
Provider Attitudes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Violence against women (VAW) is a global challenge, and the health sector is a key entry point for survivors to receive care. The World Health Organization adopted an earlier framework for health systems response to survivors. However, documentation on the programmatic rollout of health system response to violence against women is lacking in low and middle-income countries. This paper studies the programmatic roll out of the health systems response across select five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and identifies key learnings. Methods We selected five LMIC settings with recent or active programming on national-level health system response to VAW from 2015 to 2020. We synthesized publicly available data and program reports according to the components of the WHO Health Systems Framework. The countries selected are Bangladesh, Brazil, Nepal, Rwanda, and Sri Lanka. Results One-stop centers were found to be the dominant model of care located in hospitals in four countries. Each setting has implemented in-service training as key to addressing provider knowledge, attitudes and practice; however, significant gaps remain in addressing frequent staff turnover, provision of training at scale, and documentation of the impact of training. The health system protocols for VAW address sexual violence but do not uniformly include clinical and health policy responses for emotional or economic violence. Providing privacy to survivors within health facilities was a universal challenge. Conclusion Significant efforts have been made to address provider attitudes towards provision of care and to protocolize delivery of care to survivors, primarily through one-stop centers. Further improvements can be made in data collection on training impact on provider attitudes and practices, in provider identification of VAW survivors, and in prioritization of VAW within health system budgeting, staffing, and political priorities. Primary health facilities need to provide first-line support for survivors to avoid delays in response to all forms of VAW as well as for secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations from the Emerald programme

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Semrau ◽  
Atalay Alem ◽  
Jose L. Ayuso-Mateos ◽  
Dan Chisholm ◽  
Oye Gureje ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Human Resource Development ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

BackgroundThere is a large treatment gap for mental, neurological or substance use (MNS) disorders. The ‘Emerging mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)’ (Emerald) research programme attempted to identify strategies to work towards reducing this gap through the strengthening of mental health systems.AimsTo provide a set of proposed recommendations for mental health system strengthening in LMICs.MethodThe Emerald programme was implemented in six LMICs in Africa and Asia (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda) over a 5-year period (2012–2017), and aimed to improve mental health outcomes in the six countries by building capacity and generating evidence to enhance health system strengthening.ResultsThe proposed recommendations align closely with the World Health Organization's key health system strengthening ‘building blocks’ of governance, financing, human resource development, service provision and information systems; knowledge transfer is included as an additional cross-cutting component. Specific recommendations are made in the paper for each of these building blocks based on the body of data that were collected and analysed during Emerald.ConclusionsThese recommendations are relevant not only to the six countries in which their evidential basis was generated, but to other LMICs as well; they may also be generalisable to other non-communicable diseases beyond MNS disorders.Declaration of interestNone.

scholarly journals Enhancing the Understanding of Resilience in Health Systems of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Yongeun Grimm ◽  
Sandy Oliver ◽  
Sonja Merten ◽  
Wai Wai Han ◽  
Kaspar Wyss
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Dynamic Attributes ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: A country’s health system faces pressure when hit by an unexpected shock, such as what we observe in the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The concept of resilience is highly relevant in this context and is a prerequisite for a health system capable of withstanding future shocks. By exploring how the key dimensions of the resilient health system framework are applied, the present systematic review synthesizes the vital features of resilient health systems in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this review is to ascertain the relevance of health system resilience in the context of a major shock, through better understanding its dimensions, uses and implications. Methods: The review uses the best-fit framework synthesis approach. An a priori conceptual framework was selected and a coding framework created. A systematic search identified 4284 unique citations from electronic databases and reports by non-governmental organisations, 12 of which met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and coded against the pre-existing themes. Themes outside of the a priori framework were collated to form a refined list of themes. Then, all twelve studies were revisited using the new list of themes in the context of each study. Results: Ten themes were generated from the analysis. Five confirmed the a priori conceptual framework that capture the dynamic attributes of a resilient system. Five new themes were identified as foundational for achieving resilience: realigned relationships, foresight and motivation as drivers, and emergency preparedness and change management as organisational mechanisms. Conclusion: The refined conceptual model shows how the themes inter-connect. The foundations of resilience appear to be critical especially in resource-constrained settings to unlock the dynamic attributes of resilience. This review prompts countries to consider building the foundations of resilience described here as a priority to better prepare for future shocks.

scholarly journals The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 605-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seye Abimbola ◽  
Leonard Baatiema ◽  
Maryam Bigdeli
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Local Initiative ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
The Impact

Abstract One constant refrain in evaluations and reviews of decentralization is that the results are mixed. But given that decentralization is a complex intervention or phenomenon, what is more important is to generate evidence to inform implementation strategies. We therefore synthesized evidence from the literature to understand why, how and under what circumstances decentralization influences health system equity, efficiency and resilience. In doing this, we adopted the realist approach to evidence synthesis and included quantitative and qualitative studies in high-, low- and middle-income countries that assessed the the impact of decentralization on health systems. We searched the Medline and Embase databases via Ovid, and the Cochrane library of systematic reviews and included 51 studies with data from 25 countries. We identified three mechanisms through which decentralization impacts on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: ‘Voting with feet’ (reflecting how decentralization either exacerbates or assuages the existing patterns of inequities in the distribution of people, resources and outcomes in a jurisdiction); ‘Close to ground’ (reflecting how bringing governance closer to the people allows for use of local initiative, information, feedback, input and control); and ‘Watching the watchers’ (reflecting mutual accountability and support relations between multiple centres of governance which are multiplied by decentralization, involving governments at different levels and also community health committees and health boards). We also identified institutional, socio-economic and geographic contextual factors that influence each of these mechanisms. By moving beyond findings that the effects of decentralization on health systems and outcomes are mixed, this review presents mechanisms and contextual factors to which policymakers and implementers need to pay attention in their efforts to maximize the positive and minimize the negative impact of decentralized governance.

scholarly journals Challenges in Controlling SARS-CoV-2 in a Lower-middle Income Country and the Potential Unintended Effects due to Aggressive Restrictions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lincoln Lau ◽  
Peng Wu ◽  
Daryn Go ◽  
Warren Dodd ◽  
Charles Yu
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Middle Income Country ◽  
Unintended Effects ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Community Transmission ◽  
Official Data

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Philippines placed the majority of the country under enhanced community quarantine, restricting the movement of most of its 100 million plus population. These aggressive measures were initiated on March 15, 2020 and intensified on March 17. According to official data, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases has exponentially increased during this period, but it is important to note that the number of patients tested also substantially increased during the same period. It is not conclusive that widespread transmission of COVID-19 only started in March and our analysis suggests that community transmission was happening earlier. In discussing extended quarantine measures, it is important to properly understand the trends and recognize the limitations of the data. The unintended consequences on the population, especially in lower-middle income countries with fragile health systems like the Philippines, must be carefully considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document