scholarly journals Hierarchical Effects of Tamarix aphylla Afforestation in a Sand Dune Environment on Vegetation Structure and Plant Diversity

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 568-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofir Katz ◽  
Ilan Stavi
Keyword(s):  
Plant Diversity ◽  
Vegetation Structure ◽  
Sand Dune ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Biodiversity Loss ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Litter Production ◽  
Salt Accumulation ◽  
Percent Decrease

Abstract One method of controlling dune encroachment is afforestation, which may result in biodiversity loss because of habitat change and adverse effects of trees on ecosystem functioning. We carried out a study on the effects of planting discrete areas with Tamarix aphylla (L.) Karsten trees, over 50 years ago, in a semiarid dunefield in the northern Negev, Israel. We surveyed the vegetation and sampled litter and soil in five microhabitats formed by this afforestation scheme. Afforestation had spatially and functionally hierarchical effects on vegetation and plant diversity. The strongest effect was associated with land-use change, showing reduced species richness (by 30–50 percent) and litter production following afforestation. The second strongest effect was associated with salt accumulation in T. aphylla leaves and litter, which increases soil salinity under T. aphylla canopies by 4–5, forming “salinity islands,” and leading to over 30 percent decrease in plant cover and aboveground biomass. The assumed effect of trees in blocking solar irradiance and wind was observed only outside canopies and had a weak impact on plant cover. Therefore, afforestation can increase plant diversity at the regional scale, but at the local (microhabitat) scale it has an overall adverse effect on measured ecosystem functions.

scholarly journals Vegetation structure determines the spatial variability of soil biodiversity across biomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Durán ◽  
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variability ◽  
Vegetation Structure ◽  
Field Survey ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Soil Organisms ◽  
Soil Biodiversity ◽  
Soil Age ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Composition Changes

AbstractThe factors controlling the spatial variability of soil biodiversity remain largely undetermined. We conducted a global field survey to evaluate how and why the within-site spatial variability of soil biodiversity (i.e. richness and community composition) changes across global biomes with contrasting soil ages, climates and vegetation types. We found that the spatial variability of bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates is positively correlated across ecosystems. We also show that the spatial variability of soil biodiversity is mainly controlled by changes in vegetation structure driven by soil age and aridity. Areas with high plant cover, but low spatial heterogeneity, were associated with low levels of spatial variability in soil biodiversity. Further, our work advances the existence of significant, undescribed links between the spatial variability of soil biodiversity and key ecosystem functions. Taken together, our findings indicate that reductions in plant cover (e.g., via desertification, increases in aridity, or deforestation), are likely to increase the spatial variability of multiple soil organisms and that such changes are likely to negatively impact ecosystem functioning across global biomes.

scholarly journals Biodiversity as a multidimensional construct: a review, framework and case study of herbivory's impact on plant biodiversity

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1844) ◽  
pp. 20153005 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Naeem ◽  
Case Prager ◽  
Brian Weeks ◽  
Alex Varga ◽  
Dan F. B. Flynn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Plant Cover ◽  
Biodiversity Loss ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Environmental Consequences ◽  
Genetic Landscape ◽  
Understory Plant ◽  
Functional And Phylogenetic Diversity

Biodiversity is inherently multidimensional, encompassing taxonomic, functional, phylogenetic, genetic, landscape and many other elements of variability of life on the Earth. However, this fundamental principle of multidimensionality is rarely applied in research aimed at understanding biodiversity's value to ecosystem functions and the services they provide. This oversight means that our current understanding of the ecological and environmental consequences of biodiversity loss is limited primarily to what unidimensional studies have revealed. To address this issue, we review the literature, develop a conceptual framework for multidimensional biodiversity research based on this review and provide a case study to explore the framework. Our case study specifically examines how herbivory by whitetail deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) alters the multidimensional influence of biodiversity on understory plant cover at Black Rock Forest, New York. Using three biodiversity dimensions (taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity) to explore our framework, we found that herbivory alters biodiversity's multidimensional influence on plant cover; an effect not observable through a unidimensional approach. Although our review, framework and case study illustrate the advantages of multidimensional over unidimensional approaches, they also illustrate the statistical and empirical challenges such work entails. Meeting these challenges, however, where data and resources permit, will be important if we are to better understand and manage the consequences we face as biodiversity continues to decline in the foreseeable future.

Are local losses of biodiversity causing degraded ecosystem function?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Vellend
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Function ◽  
Species Interactions ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Biodiversity Loss ◽  
Large Degree ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Degraded Ecosystem ◽  
Biodiversity Change ◽  
Local Extirpation

This chapter highlights the scale dependence of biodiversity change over time and its consequences for arguments about the instrumental value of biodiversity. While biodiversity is in decline on a global scale, the temporal trends on regional and local scales include cases of biodiversity increase, no change, and decline. Environmental change, anthropogenic or otherwise, causes both local extirpation and colonization of species, and thus turnover in species composition, but not necessarily declines in biodiversity. In some situations, such as plants at the regional scale, human-mediated colonizations have greatly outnumbered extinctions, thus causing a marked increase in species richness. Since the potential influence of biodiversity on ecosystem function and services is mediated to a large degree by local or neighborhood species interactions, these results challenge the generality of the argument that biodiversity loss is putting at risk the ecosystem service benefits people receive from nature.

scholarly journals A review of regulation ecosystem services and disservices from faunal populations and potential impacts of agriculturalisation on their provision, globally

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 1-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Gutierrez-Arellano ◽  
Mark Mulligan
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Biodiversity Loss ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Natural Ecosystem ◽  
Structure Degradation ◽  
Animal Populations

Land use and cover change (LUCC) is the main cause of natural ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss and can cause a decrease in ecosystem service provision. Animal populations are providers of some key regulation services: pollination, pest and disease control and seed dispersal, the so-called faunal ecosystem services (FES). Here we aim to give an overview on the current and future status of regulation FES in response to change from original habitat to agricultural land globally. FES are much more tightly linked to wildlife populations and biodiversity than are most ecosystem services, whose determinants are largely climatic and related to vegetation structure. Degradation of ecosystems by land use change thus has much more potential to affect FES. In this scoping review, we summarise the main findings showing the importance of animal populations as FES providers and as a source of ecosystem disservices; underlying causes of agriculturalisation impacts on FES and the potential condition of FES under future LUCC in relation to the expected demand for FES globally. Overall, studies support a positive relationship between FES provision and animal species richness and abundance. Agriculturalisation has negative effects on FES providers due to landscape homogenisation, habitat fragmentation and loss, microclimatic changes and development of population imbalance, causing species and population losses of key fauna, reducing services whilst enhancing disservices. Since evidence suggests an increase in FES demand worldwide is required to support increased farming, it is imperative to improve the understanding of agriculturalisation on FES supply and distribution. Spatial conservation prioritisation must factor in faunal ecosystem functions as the most biodiversity-relevant of all ecosystem services and that which most closely links sites of service provision of conservation value with nearby sites of service use to provide ecosystem services of agricultural and economic value.

scholarly journals The influence of soil on vegetation structure and plant diversity in different tropical savannic and forest habitats

2016 ◽  
pp. rtw135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscyla Maria Silva Rodrigues ◽  
Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaud Schaefer ◽  
Jhonathan de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Walnir Gomes Ferreira Júnior ◽  
Rubens Manoel dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Diversity ◽  
Vegetation Structure ◽  
Forest Habitats
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document