Effect of the Pairing Gene Ph1 on Centromere Misdivision in Common Wheat

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 1285-1294
Author(s):  
Juan M Vega ◽  
Moshe Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Hexaploid Wheat ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Meiotic Behavior ◽  
Interphase Chromosome ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Arrangement ◽  
Homoeologous Gene ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Homoeologous Chromosomes

Abstract The cytologically diploid-like meiotic behavior of hexaploid wheat (i.e., exclusive bivalent pairing of homologues) is largely controlled by the pairing homoeologous gene Ph1. This gene suppresses pairing between homoeologous (partially homologous) chromosomes of the three closely related genomes that compose the hexaploid wheat complement. It has been previously proposed that Ph1 regulates meiotic pairing by determining the pattern of premeiotic arrangement of homologous and homoeologous chromosomes. We therefore assume that Ph1 action may be targeted at the interaction of centromeres with spindle microtubules—an interaction that is critical for movement of chromosomes to their specific interphase positions. Using monosomic lines of common wheat, we studied the effect of this gene on types and rates of centromere division of univalents at meiosis. In the presence of the normal two doses of Ph1, the frequency of transverse breakage (misdivision) of the centromere of univalent chromosomes was high in both first and second meiotic divisions; whereas with zero dose of the gene, this frequency was drastically reduced. The results suggest that Ph1 is a trans-acting gene affecting centromere-microtubules interaction. The findings are discussed in the context of the effect of Ph1 on interphase chromosome arrangement.

Effect of the Pairing Gene Ph1 and Premeiotic Colchicine Treatment on Intra- and Interchromosome Pairing of Isochromosomes in Common Wheat

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M Vega ◽  
Moshe Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Colchicine Treatment ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Polyploid Wheat ◽  
Main Gene ◽  
Ph1 Gene

Abstract The analysis of the pattern of isochromosome pairing allows one to distinguish factors affecting presynaptic alignment of homologous chromosomes from those affecting synapsis and crossing-over. Because the two homologous arms in an isochromosome are invariably associated by a common centromere, the suppression of pairing between these arms (intrachromosome pairing) would indicate that synaptic or postsynaptic events were impaired. In contrast, the suppression of pairing between an isochromosome and its homologous chromosome (interchromosome pairing), without affecting intrachromosome pairing, would suggest that homologous presynaptic alignment was impaired. We used such an isochromosome system to determine which of the processes associated with chromosome pairing was affected by the Ph1 gene of common wheat—the main gene that restricts pairing to homologues. Ph1 reduced the frequency of interchromosome pairing without affecting intrachromosome pairing. In contrast, intrachromosome pairing was strongly reduced in the absence of the synaptic gene Syn-B1. Premeiotic colchicine treatment, which drastically decreased pairing of conventional chromosomes, reduced interchromosome but not intrachromosome pairing. The results support the hypothesis that premeiotic alignment is a necessary stage for the regularity of meiotic pairing and that Ph1 relaxes this alignment. We suggest that Ph1 acts on premeiotic alignment of homologues and homeologues as a means of ensuring diploid-like meiotic behavior in polyploid wheat.

scholarly journals Spatial constraints on chromosomes are instrumental to meiotic pairing

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (22) ◽  
pp. jcs253724
Author(s):  
Miao Tian ◽  
Christiane Agreiter ◽  
Josef Loidl
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Tetrahymena Thermophila ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Homologous Pairing ◽  
Spatial Constraints ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Arrangement ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Prophase Nucleus

ABSTRACTIn most eukaryotes, the meiotic chromosomal bouquet (comprising clustered chromosome ends) provides an ordered chromosome arrangement that facilitates pairing and recombination between homologous chromosomes. In the protist Tetrahymena thermophila, the meiotic prophase nucleus stretches enormously, and chromosomes assume a bouquet-like arrangement in which telomeres and centromeres are attached to opposite poles of the nucleus. We have identified and characterized three meiosis-specific genes [meiotic nuclear elongation 1-3 (MELG1-3)] that control nuclear elongation, and centromere and telomere clustering. The Melg proteins interact with cytoskeletal and telomere-associated proteins, and probably repurpose them for reorganizing the meiotic prophase nucleus. A lack of sequence similarity between the Tetrahymena proteins responsible for telomere clustering and bouquet proteins of other organisms suggests that the Tetrahymena bouquet is analogous, rather than homologous, to the conserved eukaryotic bouquet. We also report that centromere clustering is more important than telomere clustering for homologous pairing. Therefore, we speculate that centromere clustering may have been the primordial mechanism for chromosome pairing in early eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Paired arrangement of kinetochores together with microtubule pivoting and dynamics drive kinetochore capture in meiosis I

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gheorghe Cojoc ◽  
Ana-Maria Florescu ◽  
Alexander Krull ◽  
Anna H. Klemm ◽  
Nenad Pavin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
General Feature ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Single Object ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Angular Movement ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract Kinetochores are protein complexes on the chromosomes, whose function as linkers between spindle microtubules and chromosomes is crucial for proper cell division. The mechanisms that facilitate kinetochore capture by microtubules are still unclear. In the present study, we combine experiments and theory to explore the mechanisms of kinetochore capture at the onset of meiosis I in fission yeast. We show that kinetochores on homologous chromosomes move together, microtubules are dynamic and pivot around the spindle pole, and the average capture time is 3–4 minutes. Our theory describes paired kinetochores on homologous chromosomes as a single object, as well as angular movement of microtubules and their dynamics. For the experimentally measured parameters, the model reproduces the measured capture kinetics and shows that the paired configuration of kinetochores accelerates capture, whereas microtubule pivoting and dynamics have a smaller contribution. Kinetochore pairing may be a general feature that increases capture efficiency in meiotic cells.

scholarly journals Genetically Divergent Types of the Wheat Leaf Fungus Puccinia triticina in Ethiopia, a Center of Tetraploid Wheat Diversity

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kolmer ◽  
M. A. Acevedo
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Rust ◽  
Common Wheat ◽  
Hexaploid Wheat ◽  
Rust Fungus ◽  
Tetraploid Wheat ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Puccinia Triticina ◽  
Leaf Rust Resistance ◽  
Virulence Phenotype ◽  
Wheat Leaf

Collections of Puccinia triticina, the wheat leaf rust fungus, were obtained from tetraploid and hexaploid wheat in the central highlands of Ethiopia, and a smaller number from Kenya, from 2011 to 2013, in order to determine the genetic diversity of this wheat pathogen in a center of host diversity. Single-uredinial isolates were derived and tested for virulence phenotype to 20 lines of Thatcher wheat that differ for single leaf rust resistance genes and for molecular genotypes with 10 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Nine virulence phenotypes were described among the 193 isolates tested for virulence. Phenotype BBBQJ, found only in Ethiopia, was predominantly collected from tetraploid wheat. Phenotype EEEEE, also found only in Ethiopia, was exclusively collected from tetraploid wheat and was avirulent to the susceptible hexaploid wheat ‘Thatcher’. Phenotypes MBDSS and MCDSS, found in both Ethiopia and Kenya, were predominantly collected from common wheat. Phenotypes CCMSS, CCPSS, and CBMSS were found in Ethiopia from common wheat at low frequency. Phenotypes TCBSS and TCBSQ were found on durum wheat and common wheat in Kenya. Four groups of distinct SSR genotypes were described among the 48 isolates genotyped. Isolates with phenotypes BBBQJ and EEEEE were in two distinct SSR groups, and isolates with phenotypes MBDSS and MCDSS were in a third group. Isolates with CCMSS, CCPSS, CBMSS, TCBSS, and TCBSQ phenotypes were in a fourth SSR genotype group. The diverse host environment of Ethiopia has selected and maintained a genetically divergent population of P. triticina.

Inferences from genetical evidence on the course of meiotic chromosome pairing in plants

1977 ◽  
Vol 277 (955) ◽  
pp. 313-326 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
Gene Control ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Or Gene

Meiotic chromosome pairing is a process that is amenable to genetic and experimental analysis. The combined use of these two approaches allows for the process to be dissected into several finite periods of time in which the developmental stages of pairing can be precisely located. Evidence is now available, in particular in plants, that shows that the pairing of homologous chromosomes, as observed at metaphase I, is affected by events occurring as early as the last premeiotic mitosis; and that the maintenance of this early determined state is subsequently maintained by constituents (presumably proteins) that are sensitive to either colchicine, temperature or gene control. A critical assessment of this evidence in wheat and a comparison of the process of pairing in wheat with the course of meiotic pairing in other plants and animals is presented.

Meiosis in Coprinus Lagopus: A Comparative Study with Light and Electron Microscopy

1967 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-536
Author(s):  
B. C. LU
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fusion ◽  
Light And Electron Microscopy ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Fruiting Bodies ◽  
Homologous Pairing ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Characteristic Structure ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Central Spindle ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Meiosis within fruiting bodies of Coprinus lagopus Fr. is closely synchronized. This conveniently facilitates joint light- and electron-microscope observations. Before nuclear fusion the chromatin appears diffuse in the light microscope; after nuclear fusion individual chromosomes can be recognized. In the electron micrographs the chromatin of pre-fusion and early fusion nuclei cannot be recognized as defined structures with the fixation and staining procedures employed. At the time of synapsis the lateral components of the synaptinemal complexes can be seen in the micrographs. The pairing process of the two chromosomes of the homologous pairs is believed to involve two steps: (1) two homologous chromosomes become aligned in parallel, and (2) pairing occurs by formation of the synaptinemal complex including the central synaptic component. The term synaptic centre is coined for the central component, which is believed to be the zone where crossing-over occurs. The formation of this structure in relation to homologous pairing, and the structural organization of the synaptinemal complexes are discussed. At meiotic metaphase, the chromosomes congregate around the central spindle microtubules. They are contracted and contain densely packed chromatin fibrils. Two types of spindle microtubules are demonstrated: (1) the chromosomal microtubules directly connecting the chromosomes to the centrosomes, and (2) the central spindle microtubules connecting the two centrosomes. The centrosomes are round, fibril-containing bodies approximately 0.3 µ in diameter. They have been observed outside the nuclear envelope at pachytene, but do not show the characteristic structure normally found in animal cells.

scholarly journals On emerging nuclear order

2011 ◽  
Vol 192 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indika Rajapakse ◽  
Mark Groudine
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Organization ◽  
Chromatin State ◽  
Interphase Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Arrangement ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Nuclear Processes ◽  
Genomic Function

Although the nonrandom nature of interphase chromosome arrangement is widely accepted, how nuclear organization relates to genomic function remains unclear. Nuclear subcompartments may play a role by offering rich microenvironments that regulate chromatin state and ensure optimal transcriptional efficiency. Technological advances now provide genome-wide and four-dimensional analyses, permitting global characterizations of nuclear order. These approaches will help uncover how seemingly separate nuclear processes may be coupled and aid in the effort to understand the role of nuclear organization in development and disease.

THE MEIOTIC BEHAVIOR OF ANEUPOLYHAPLOIDS OF THE CULTIVATED OAT AVENA SATIVA (2n = 6x = 42)

1977 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Leggett
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Control ◽  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Avena Sativa ◽  
Meiotic Behavior ◽  
Homoeologous Chromosomes

Chromosome pairing and the frequency of secondary associations in two aneupolyhaploid plants of A. sativa are described. There was little evidence of pairing between homoeologous chromosomes in either plant. The results are discussed in relation to the genetic control of bivalent pairing in A. sativa and the possible divergence between the constituent genomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document