scholarly journals SPREAD AND SUSTAINMENT OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS IN VA RURAL PRIMARY CARE CLINICS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S756-S756
Author(s):  
Josea Kramer ◽  
Claire O’Hanlon ◽  
Joe Douglas ◽  
Michael N Mitchell ◽  
Michael McClean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Quality Improvements ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Primary Care Workforce

Abstract The VA has invested in developing the skills of its primary care workforce through the longitudinal Geriatric Scholars Program. Now in its 11th year, the program has increased career satisfaction and job retention, standardized provider behaviors, improved clinical decision-making and reduced dispensing of potentially inappropriate medications. The program consists of: intensive coursework in geriatrics; workshop in quality improvement (QI); and initiation of a micro QI projects in the Scholar’s clinic. Electives enable learners to tailor the program to self-identified gaps in knowledge, skills and competencies. This presentation focuses on the sustainment and spread of these QI projects based on a recent survey of Scholars. Differences between rural and urban QI projects are compared. Commonality among rural QI projects is explored based on topic, team composition, and the types of efficiencies gained in clinical and/or organizational processes to improve care for older Veterans living in rural areas.

scholarly journals OVERVIEW: THE VA GERIATRIC SCHOLARS PROGRAM FOR PRIMARY CARE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S765-S766
Author(s):  
Josea Kramer ◽  
Joe Douglas ◽  
Shawn Clarke ◽  
Luis Melendez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Workforce Development ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Intensive Course ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Abstract The VA has invested in developing the skills of its primary care workforce through the longitudinal Geriatric Scholars Program. The program consists of core components --- intensive course in geriatrics, intensive workshop in quality improvement (QI) and initiation of a micro QI projects in the Scholar’s clinic; electives allow learners to tailor the program to self-identified gaps in knowledge, skills and competencies. The program has demonstrated direct impacts of continuing education through a workforce development process that enhances skills and competencies at a pace and selection that meets clinicians’ self-identified gaps in training. Now in its 11th year, the program has been shown to increase career satisfaction and job retention, standardize provider behaviors, improve clinical decision-making and reduce dispensing of potentially inappropriate medications. This symposium further explores the impact of the program on individual clinicians and on clinical teams.

Nurse Practitioner Autonomy and Complexity of Care in Rural Primary Care

2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872094591
Author(s):  
Hannah T. Neprash ◽  
Laura Barrie Smith ◽  
Bethany Sheridan ◽  
Ira Moscovice ◽  
Shailendra Prasad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Clinical Autonomy ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

The growing ranks of nurse practitioners (NPs) in rural areas of the United States have the potential to help alleviate existing primary care shortages. This study uses a nationwide source of claims- and EHR-data from 2017 to construct measures of NP clinical autonomy and complexity of care. Comparisons between rural and urban primary care practices reveal greater clinical autonomy for rural NPs, who were more likely to have an independent patient panel, to practice with less physician supervision, and to prescribe Schedule II controlled substances. In contrast, rural and urban NPs provided care of similar complexity. These findings provide the first claims- and EHR-based evidence for the commonly held perception that NPs practice more autonomously in rural areas than in urban areas.

scholarly journals The primary care workforce in Europe: a cross-sectional international comparison of rural and urban areas and changes between 1993 and 2011

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv12-iv17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter P Groenewegen ◽  
Mark W G Bosmans ◽  
Wienke G W Boerma ◽  
Peter Spreeuwenberg
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Medical Procedures ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Rural And Urban Areas ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Practice Population ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Rural areas have problems in attracting and retaining primary care workforce. This might have consequences for the existing workforce. We studied whether general practitioners (GPs) in rural practices differ by age, sex, practice population and workload from those in less rural locations and whether their practices differ in resources and service profiles. We used data from 2 studies: QUALICOPC study collected data from 34 countries, including 7183 GPs in 2011, and Profiles of General Practice in Europe study collected data from 32 countries among 7895 GPs in 1993. Data were analyzed using multilevel analysis. Results show that the share of female GPs has increased in rural areas but is still lower than in urban areas. In rural areas, GPs work more hours and provide more medical procedures to their patients. Apart from these differences between locations, overall ageing of the GP population is evident. Higher workload in rural areas may be related to increased demand for care. Rural practices seem to cope by offering a broad range of services, such as medical procedures. Dedicated human resource policies for rural areas are required with a view to an ageing GP population, to the individual preferences and needs of the GPs, and to decreasing attractiveness of rural areas.

scholarly journals Elderly Patients in Primary Care are Still at Risks of Receiving Potentially Inappropriate Medications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110350
Author(s):  
Pasitpon Vatcharavongvan ◽  
Viwat Puttawanchai
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Background Most older adults with comorbidities in primary care clinics use multiple medications and are at risk of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescription. Objective This study examined the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs using Thai criteria for PIMs. Methods This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected from electronic medical records in a primary care clinic in 2018. Samples were patients aged ≥65 years old with at least 1 prescription. Variables included age, gender, comorbidities, and medications. The list of risk drugs for Thai elderly version 2 was the criteria for PIMs. The prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine associations between variables and PIMs. Results Of 2806 patients, 27.5% and 43.7% used ≥5 medications and PIMs, respectively. Of 10 290 prescriptions, 47% had at least 1 PIM. The top 3 PIMs were anticholinergics, proton-pump inhibitors, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Polypharmacy and dyspepsia were associated with PIM prescriptions (adjusted odds ratio 2.48 [95% confident interval or 95% CI 2.07-2.96] and 3.88 [95% CI 2.65-5.68], respectively). Conclusion Prescriptions with PIMs were high in the primary care clinic. Describing unnecessary medications is crucial to prevent negative health outcomes from PIMs. Computer-based clinical decision support, pharmacy-led interventions, and patient-specific drug recommendations are promising interventions to reduce PIMs in a primary care setting.

scholarly journals The Differences in the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease, Its Risk Factors, and Achievement of Therapeutic Goals among Urban and Rural Primary Care Patients in Poland: Results from the LIPIDOGRAM 2015 Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 5656
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Studziński ◽  
Tomasz Tomasik ◽  
Adam Windak ◽  
Maciej Banach ◽  
Ewa Wójtowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Patient ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Therapeutic Goals ◽  
Rural Primary Care

A nationwide cross-sectional study, LIPIDOGRAM2015, was carried out in Poland in the years 2015 and 2016. A total of 438 primary care physicians enrolled 13,724 adult patients that sought medical care in primary health care practices. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and CVD were similar in urban and rural areas (49.5 vs. 49.4%; 13.7 vs. 13.1%; 84.2 vs. 85.2%; 14.4 vs. 14.2%, respectively). The prevalence of obesity (32.3 vs. 37.5%, p < 0.01) and excessive waist circumference (77.5 vs. 80.7%, p < 0.01), as well as abdominal obesity (p = 43.2 vs. 46.4%, p < 0.01), were higher in rural areas in both genders. Mean levels of LDL-C (128 vs. 130 mg/dL, p = 0.04) and non-HDL-C (147 vs. 148 mg/dL, p = 0.03) were slightly higher in rural populations. Altogether, 14.3% of patients with CVD from urban areas and 11.3% from rural areas reached LDL <70 mg/dL (p = 0.04). There were no important differences in the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and CVD, or in mean levels of blood pressure, cholesterol fractions, glucose, and HbA1c between Polish urban and rural primary care patient populations. A high proportion of patients in cities and an even-higher proportion in rural areas did not reach the recommended targets for blood pressure, LDL-C, and HbA1c, indicating the need for novel CVD-prevention programs.

scholarly journals Medical students' assessments of skill development in rural primary care clinics

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Hunsaker ◽  
Michael Glasser ◽  
Kim Nielsen ◽  
martin lipsky
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Rural Primary Care

The value of a consultant physiotherapist within a primary care musculoskeletal interface service: part of the spinal multidisciplinary team

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Michelle L Angus ◽  
Victoria Dickens ◽  
Naveed Yasin ◽  
James Greenwood ◽  
Irfan Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Pain Pathway ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Case Based

Background/aims The national low back pain pathway in the UK suggests practitioners managing patients with spinal pathology should be specifically trained to do so and have the ability to link with tertiary spinal services when required. The aim of this study was to ensure referrals through to a tertiary spinal surgical centre are appropriate and patients get the correct advice early in their management pathway. Methods A retrospective review of 700 cases were discussed at a spinal case-based discussion meeting in a primary care interface service, compared to services without this model. A convenience sample of cases were analysed with the consultant physiotherapist and those referred from other allied health professionals into the tertiary spinal surgical centre. Case-based team discussion took place before every referral into the tertiary spinal service, with spinal surgical discussion where required. Results Patients referred from other interface services were more likely to require further work-up such as investigations, or be discharged from clinic on their first attendance than those who had been through the case-based discussion. Conclusions A consultant physiotherapist working as part of the spinal team of a tertiary referral centre can help advanced practitioners with their clinical decision making to help prevent unnecessary referrals to spinal surgical services.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e039674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Verhoeven ◽  
Giannoula Tsakitzidis ◽  
Hilde Philips ◽  
Paul Van Royen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Profound Impact ◽  
The Core ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study

ObjectivesThe current COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the measures taken to control it, have a profound impact on healthcare. This study was set up to gain insights into the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak on the core competencies of general practice, as they are experienced by general practitioners (GPs) on the frontline.Design, setting, participantsWe performed a descriptive study using semistructured interviews with 132 GPs in Flanders, using a topic list based on the WONCA definition of core competencies in general practice. Data were analysed qualitatively using framework analysis.ResultsChanges in practice management and in consultation strategies were quickly adopted. There was a major switch towards telephone triage and consults, for covid-related as well as for non-covid related problems. Patient-centred care is still a major objective. Clinical decision-making is largely focused on respiratory assessment and triage, and GPs feel that acute care is compromised, both by their own changed focus and by the fact that patients consult less frequently for non-covid problems. Chronic care is mostly postponed, and this will have consequences that will extend and become visible after the corona crisis. Through the holistic eyes of primary care, the current outbreak—as well as the measures taken to control it—will have a profound impact on psychological and socioeconomic well-being. This impact is already visible in vulnerable people and will continue to become clear in the medium and long terms. GPs think that they are at high risk of getting infected. Dropping out and being unable to contribute their part or becoming virus transmitters are reported to be greater concerns than getting ill themselves.ConclusionsThe current times have a profound impact on the core competences of primary care. Although the vast increase in patients soliciting medical help and the necessary separate covid and non-covid flows have been dealt with, GPs are worried about the continuity of regular care and the consequences of the anticovid measures. These may become a threat for the general health of the population and for the provision of primary healthcare in the near and distant future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document