scholarly journals FACILITY AND RESIDENT LEVEL DIFFERENCES: ANTIBIOTIC USE IN NURSING HOMES FOR RESIDENTS WITH ADVANCE DEMENTIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S883-S883
Author(s):  
Meghan Hendricksen ◽  
Daniel Habtemariam ◽  
Susan Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Advanced Dementia

Abstract Previous studies have shown that there is a high frequency of antibiotic use in NH for advance dementia patients. However, research has shown limited clinical benefit from antimicrobial use for this population, and antimicrobial exposure increases colonization with drug-resistant bacteria in nursing homes. The aim of this study was to identify NH and resident level characteristics associated with antibiotic use for patients with advance dementia. Using data from an ongoing cluster RCT in 28 Boston NHs; Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial use in Nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease and other Dementias (TRAIN-AD), testing a program intervention to improve management of infections in advanced dementia. These data are taken from baseline measurements 2 months prior to intervention, and individual nursing home residents with advance dementia are units of analysis (n = 425). We ran multivariable logistic regression model with antibiotic use as the outcome, adjusting for clustering at NH level, with NH (#beds, profit status, staffing, #cognitively impaired, etc.) and individual patient characteristics (age, gender, race, etc.) as independent variables. Analyses found residents were more likely to receive antibiotics if they resided in nursing homes that employed less intense infectious disease practices prior to baseline (AOR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.08, 5.05), and full-time nurse practitioners or physician assistants (AOR= 3.68; 95%CI 1.49, 9.04). Female patients also had higher odds of receiving antibiotics (AOR=2.16; 95%CI1.10, 4.67). These findings provide potential insight into the importance of education regarding stringent infectious disease practices for practitioners, particularly for patients with advanced dementia.

scholarly journals Complementary therapy for advanced dementia palliation in nursing homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-432
Author(s):  
Bryan Mitchell ◽  
Graham A. Jackson ◽  
Barbara Sharp ◽  
Debbie Tolson
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Complementary Therapy ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Care Home Staff

PurposeThis paper reports on an action research study that aimed to collaboratively develop a complementary therapy care intervention to augment palliative care choices available to nursing home residents with advanced dementia.Design/methodology/approachAn action research design was adopted that consisted of a series of action cycles involving collaborative exploration, problem-solving planning, development and evidence gathering. A combination of mixed methods was used when gaining data at the different stages, including face to face delivered questionnaires, observational notes, focus groups, and the objective measure of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory adapted for Nursing Homes (NPI-NH).FindingsCare home staff and relatives considered the use of Complementary Therapy to be a helpful intervention promoting that it can reduce a sense of loneliness and provide companionship for residents experiencing distress. Analysis of NPI-NH scores showed a reduction in presenting neuropsychiatric behaviours associated with stress and distress.Research limitations/implicationsDiffering levels of participant group engagement may affect this study’s findings as it was noted that care home staff provided a fuller contribution to the project in comparison to relatives.Practical implicationsImplementation guidance is needed when implementing complementary therapy within the nursing home practice to promote consistency and successful integration of an intervention that is not provided as routine care.Originality/valueThe findings of this study are encouraging and demonstrate the acceptability of complementary therapies to residents with advanced dementia, where positive impacts on otherwise difficult to address dementia symptoms related to stress and distress are highlighted.

scholarly journals The Urine-culturing Cascade: Variation in Nursing Home Urine Culturing and Association With Antibiotic Use and Clostridiodes difficile Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1620-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Antoine Brown ◽  
Nick Daneman ◽  
Kevin L Schwartz ◽  
Bradley Langford ◽  
Allison McGeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Adjusted Risk Ratio ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background Rates of antibiotic use vary widely across nursing homes and cannot be explained by resident characteristics. Antibiotic prescribing for a presumed urinary tract infection is often preceded by inappropriate urine culturing. We examined nursing home urine-culturing practices and their association with antibiotic use. Methods We conducted a longitudinal, multilevel, retrospective cohort study based on quarterly nursing home assessments between April 2014 and January 2017 in 591 nursing homes and covering >90% of nursing home residents in Ontario, Canada. Nursing home urine culturing was measured as the proportion of residents with a urine culture in the prior 14 days. Outcomes included receipt of any systemic antibiotic and any urinary antibiotic (eg, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfonamides, ciprofloxacin) in the 30 days after the assessment and Clostridiodes difficile infection in the 90 days after the assessment. Adjusted Poisson regression models accounted for 14 resident covariates. Results A total of 131 218 residents in 591 nursing homes were included; 7.9% of resident assessments had a urine culture in the prior 14 days; this proportion was highly variable across the 591 nursing homes (10th percentile = 3.4%, 90th percentile = 14.3%). Before and after adjusting for 14 resident characteristics, nursing home urine culturing predicted total antibiotic use (adjusted risk ratio [RR] per doubling of urine culturing, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.23), urinary antibiotic use (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28–1.38), and C. difficile infection (incidence rate ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.31). Conclusions Nursing homes have highly divergent urine culturing rates; this variability is associated with higher antibiotic use and rates of C. difficile infection.

scholarly journals The trial to reduce antimicrobial use in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea J. Loizeau ◽  
Erika M. C. D’Agata ◽  
Michele L. Shaffer ◽  
Laura C. Hanson ◽  
Ruth A. Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Real World ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Cluster Rct ◽  
Infection Management ◽  
Multicomponent Intervention ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Seriously Ill

Abstract Background Infections are common in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced dementia but are often managed inappropriately. Antimicrobials are extensively prescribed, but frequently with insufficient evidence to support a bacterial infection, promoting the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms. Moreover, the benefits of antimicrobials remain unclear in these seriously ill residents for whom comfort is often the goal of care. Prior NH infection management interventions evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) did not consider patient preferences and lack evidence to support their effectiveness in ‘real-world’ practice. Methods This report presents the rationale and methodology of TRAIN-AD (Trial to reduce antimicrobial use in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias), a parallel group, cluster RCT evaluating a multicomponent intervention to improve infection management for suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) and lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs) among NH residents with advanced dementia. TRAIN-AD is being conducted in 28 facilities in the Boston, USA, area randomized in waves using minimization to achieve a balance on key characteristics (N = 14 facilities/arm). The involvement of the facilities includes a 3-month start-up period and a 24-month implementation/data collection phase. Residents are enrolled during the first 12 months of the 24-month implementation period and followed for up to 12 months. Individual consent is waived, thus almost all eligible residents are enrolled (target sample size, N = 410). The intervention integrates infectious disease and palliative care principles and includes provider training delivered through multiple modalities (in-person seminar, online course, management algorithms, and prescribing feedback) and an information booklet for families. Control facilities employ usual care. The primary outcome, abstracted from the residents’ charts, is the number of antimicrobial courses prescribed for UTIs and LRIs per person-year alive. Discussion TRAIN-AD is the first cluster RCT testing a multicomponent intervention to improve infection management in NH residents with advanced dementia. Its findings will provide an evidence base to support the benefit of a program addressing the critical clinical and public health problem of antimicrobial misuse in these seriously ill residents. Moreover, its hybrid efficacy-effectiveness design will inform the future conduct of cluster RCTs evaluating nonpharmacological interventions in the complex NH setting in a way that is both internally valid and adaptable to the ‘real-world’. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03244917. Registered on 10 August 2017.

scholarly journals Experiences with the Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient in nursing home residents: a mixed-method study to assess physicians’ and nurse practitioners’ perceptions

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maartje S. Klapwijk ◽  
Natashe Lemos Dekker ◽  
Monique A. A. Caljouw ◽  
Wilco P. Achterberg ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Dying Patient

Abstract Background The Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient (LCP) is a multidisciplinary tool developed for the dying phase for use in palliative care settings. The literature reports divergent experiences with its application in a nursing home setting related to its implementation and staff competencies. The aim of this study is to understand how the LCP is being used in the context of the nursing home, including for residents with dementia, and experienced from the perspectives of those responsible for medical treatment in nursing homes. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of a survey followed by interviews. A link to a 9-item online survey with closed and open-ended questions was emailed to all physicians and nurse practitioners of 33 care organisations with nursing homes in three regions of the Netherlands (North, West and South). In addition, 10 respondents with particularly positive or negative experiences were selected for semi-structured interviews. Results The survey was completed by 159 physicians and nurse practitioners. The respondents were very positive on the content and less positive on the use of the LCP, although they reported difficulties identifying the right time to start the LCP, especially in case of dementia. Also using the LCP was more complicated after the implementation of the electronic health record. The LCP was judged to be a marker of quality for the assessment of symptoms in the dying phase and communication with relatives. Conclusion An instrument that prompts regular assessment of a dying person was perceived by those responsible for (medical) care to contribute to good care. As such, the LCP was valued, but there was a clear need to start it earlier than in the last days or hours of life, a need for a shorter version, and for integration of the LCP in the electronic health record. Regular assessments with an instrument that focusses on quality of care and good symptom control can improve palliative care for nursing home residents with and without dementia.

scholarly journals Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection Among Nursing Home Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s127-s128
Author(s):  
Taniece R. Eure ◽  
Nicola D. Thompson ◽  
Austin Penna ◽  
Wendy M. Bamberg ◽  
Grant Barney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Uncomplicated Cystitis

Background: Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in nursing homes; urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a frequent indication. Although there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of UTIs, various criteria have been developed to inform and standardize nursing home prescribing decisions, with the goal of reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Using different published criteria designed to guide decisions on initiating treatment of UTIs (ie, symptomatic, catheter-associated, and uncomplicated cystitis), our objective was to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among NH residents. Methods: In 2017, the CDC Emerging Infections Program (EIP) performed a prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in 161 nursing homes from 10 states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee. EIP staff reviewed resident medical records to collect demographic and clinical information, infection signs, symptoms, and diagnostic testing documented on the day an antibiotic was initiated and 6 days prior. We applied 4 criteria to determine whether initiation of treatment for UTI was supported: (1) the Loeb minimum clinical criteria (Loeb); (2) the Suspected UTI Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation tool (UTI SBAR tool); (3) adaptation of Infectious Diseases Society of America UTI treatment guidelines for nursing home residents (Crnich & Drinka); and (4) diagnostic criteria for uncomplicated cystitis (cystitis consensus) (Fig. 1). We calculated the percentage of residents for whom initiating UTI treatment was appropriate by these criteria. Results: Of 248 residents for whom UTI treatment was initiated in the nursing home, the median age was 79 years [IQR, 19], 63% were female, and 35% were admitted for postacute care. There was substantial variability in the percentage of residents with antibiotic initiation classified as appropriate by each of the criteria, ranging from 8% for the cystitis consensus, to 27% for Loeb, to 33% for the UTI SBAR tool, to 51% for Crnich and Drinka (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Appropriate initiation of UTI treatment among nursing home residents remained low regardless of criteria used. At best only half of antibiotic treatment met published prescribing criteria. Although insufficient documentation of infection signs, symptoms and testing may have contributed to the low percentages observed, adequate documentation in the medical record to support prescribing should be standard practice, as outlined in the CDC Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for nursing homes. Standardized UTI prescribing criteria should be incorporated into nursing home stewardship activities to improve the assessment and documentation of symptomatic UTI and to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Rectal Colonization by Drug Resistant Bacteria in Nursing Home Residents in Crete, Greece

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Moschou ◽  
Petros Ioannou ◽  
Eleni Moraitaki ◽  
Dimitra Stafylaki ◽  
Sofia Maraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Drug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Rectal Colonization

(1) Background: In an area with a high prevalence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), we investigated the colonization of nursing home residents by such organisms. (2) Methods: A point prevalence study was performed in six nursing homes of the Heraklion area on the island of Crete. A rectal swab was taken and cultured from each participant, while additional risk factors such as recent hospitalization or antimicrobial usage were recorded and evaluated. (3) Results: A total of 137 nursing home residents were included in the study. Their mean age was 82.1 years and 19.7% were males. In total, cultures yielded 255 GNB; E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa were the most common. Among the microorganisms cultured, 17.6% had the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase phenotype, while 18% were MDR. A statistically significant association was found between recent antimicrobial use and colonization by MDR-GNB; (4) Conclusions: Colonization by MDR-GNB was found to be highly prevalent in nursing home residents. Recent antimicrobial use was associated with MDR-GNB carriage.

scholarly journals Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Inter- and Intradissemination Among Nursing Homes of Residents With Advanced Dementia

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 930-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika M. C. D’Agata ◽  
Daniel Habtemariam ◽  
Susan Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Gram Negative

OBJECTIVETo quantify the extent of inter– and intra–nursing home transmission of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN) among residents with advanced dementia and characterize MDRGN colonization among these residents.DESIGNProspective cohort study.SETTINGTwenty-two nursing homes in the greater Boston, Massachusetts, area.PATIENTSResidents with advanced dementia.METHODSSerial rectal surveillance cultures for MDRGN and resident characteristics were obtained every 3 months for 12 months or until death. Molecular typing of MDRGN isolates was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.RESULTSA total of 190 MDRGN isolates from 152 residents with advanced dementia were included in the analyses. Both intra– and inter–nursing home transmission were identified. Genetically related MDRGN strains, recovered from different residents, were detected in 18 (82%) of the 22 nursing homes. The percent of clonally related strains in these nursing homes ranged from 0% to 86% (average, 35%). More than 50% of strains were clonally related in 3 nursing homes. Co-colonization with more than 1 different MDRGN species occurred among 28 residents (18.4%). A total of 168 (88.4%), 20 (10.5%), and 2 (1.0%) of MDRGN isolates were resistant to 3, 4, and 5 different antimicrobials or antimicrobial classes, respectively.CONCLUSIONSMDRGN are spread both within and between nursing homes among residents with advanced dementia. Infection control interventions should begin to target this high-risk group of nursing home residents.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2015;36(8):930–935

scholarly journals Trends in antibiotics use among long-term US nursing-home residents

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Catherine C. Cohen ◽  
Andrew W. Dick ◽  
Mansi Agarwal ◽  
Tadeja Gracner ◽  
Susan Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Data Set

Abstract Objectives: Antibiotics are overly prescribed in nursing homes. Recent antibiotic stewardship efforts attempt to reduce inappropriate use. Our objective was to describe antibiotic use from 2012 to 2016 among nursing-home residents with various health conditions. Design: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. Setting and participants: All long-term residents in a random 10% sample of national nursing homes: 2,092,809 assessments from 319,615 nursing-home residents in 1,562 nursing homes. Measurements: We calculated a 1-day antibiotic prevalence using all annual and quarterly clinical assessments in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) from April 2012 through December 2016. We calculated prevalence of antibiotic use overall and within conditions of interest: Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD), advanced cognitive impairment (ACI), and infections likely to be treated with antibiotics. We applied logistic regressions with nursing-home cluster, robust standard errors to assess changes in conditions and antibiotic use 2012–2016. Results: Overall, antibiotic use did not change (2012 vs 2016, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.03). Antibiotic use was higher in 2016 versus 2012 among assessments with any infection (AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.16), urinary tract infection (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12–1.25), and no infection (AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09–1.17). Results were similar by cognitive status. Conclusions: The increased proportion of assessments recording antibiotics but no infection may not be clinically appropriate. Higher antibiotic use among infected residents with advanced cognitive impairment is also concerning. Further efforts to understand mechanisms driving these trends and to promote antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document