scholarly journals Seafloor sediment thickness beneath the VoiLA broad-band ocean-bottom seismometer deployment in the Lesser Antilles from P-to-S delay times

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (3) ◽  
pp. 1758-1768
Author(s):  
Ben Chichester ◽  
Catherine Rychert ◽  
Nicholas Harmon ◽  
Robert Allen ◽  
Jenny Collier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Confidence Region ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Lesser Antilles ◽  
Earth Model ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Sediment Thickness ◽  
Delay Times ◽  
Crystalline Crust

SUMMARY Broad-band ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) deployments present an opportunity to investigate the seafloor sediment thickness, which is important for constraining sediment deposition, and is also useful for subsequent seismological analyses. The Volatile Recycling in the Lesser Antilles (VoiLA) project deployed 34 OBSs over the island arc, fore- and backarc of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone for 15 months from 2016 to 2017. Using the amplitudes and delay times of P-to-S (Ps) scattered waves from the conversion of teleseismic earthquake Pwaves at the crust–sediment boundary and pre-existing relationships developed for Cascadia, we estimate sediment thickness beneath each OBS. The delay times of the Ps phases vary from 0.20 ± 0.06 to 3.55 ± 0.70 s, generally increasing from north to south. Using a single-sediment and single-crystalline crust earth model in each case, we satisfactorily model the observations of eight OBSs. At these stations we find sediment thicknesses range from 0.43 ± 0.45 to 5.49 ± 3.23 km. To match the observations of nine other OBSs, layered sediment and variable thickness crust is required in the earth model to account for wave interference effects on the observed arrivals. We perform an inversion with a two-layer sediment and a single-layer crystalline crust in these locations finding overall sediment thicknesses of 1.75 km (confidence region: 1.45–2.02 km) to 7.93 km (confidence region: 6.32–11.05 km), generally thinner than the initial estimates based on the pre-existing relationships. We find agreement between our modelled velocity structure and the velocity structure determined from the VoiLA active-source seismic refraction experiment at the three common locations. Using the Ps values and estimates from the VoiLA refraction experiment, we provide an adjusted relationship between delay time and sediment equations for the Lesser Antilles. Our new relationship is ${{H}} = {{1.42}}{{\rm d}}{{{t}}^{ {1.44}}}$ , where H is sediment thickness in kilometres and dt is mean observed Ps delay time in seconds, which may be of use in other subduction zone settings with thick seafloor sediments.

In-Situ Calibration of Differential Pressure Gauges on OBSIP Ocean Bottom Seismometers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabi Laske ◽  
Adrian Doran
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Sensor ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Pressure Gauge ◽  
Differential Pressure ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Earth Tides ◽  
Release Mechanism ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer

<p>A standard ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) package of the U.S. OBS Instrument Pool (OBSIP) carries a seismometer and a pressure sensor. For broadband applications, the seismometer typically is a wide-band or broad-band three-components seismometer, and the pressure sensor is a differential pressure gauge (DPG). The purpose of the pressure sensor is manifold and includes the capture of pressure signals not picked up by a ground motion sensor (e.g. the passage of tsunami), but also for purposes of correcting the seismograms for unwanted signals generated in the water column (e.g. p-wave reverberations).<br>Unfortunately, the instrument response of the widely used Cox-Webb DPG remains somewhat poorly known, and can vary by individual sensor, and even by deployment of the same sensor.</p><p>Efforts have been under way to construct and test DPG responses in the laboratory. But the sensitivity and long‐period response are difficult to calibrate as they  vary with temperature and pressure, and perhaps by hardware of the same mechanical specifications.  Here, we present a way to test the response for each individual sensor and deployment in situ in the ocean. This test requires a relatively minimal and inexpensive modification to the OBS instrument frame and a release mechanism that allows a drop of the DPG by 3 inches after the OBS package settled and the DPG equilibrated on the seafloor. The seismic signal generated by this drop is then analyzed in the laboratory upon retrieval of the data. </p><p>The results compare favorably with calibrations estimated independently through post‐deployment data analyses of other signals such as Earth tides and the signals from large teleseismic earthquakes. Our study demonstrates that observed response functions can deviate from the nominal response by a factor of two or greater with regards to both the sensitivity and the time constant. Given the fact that sensor calibrations of DPGs in the lab require very specific and stable environments and are time consuming, the use of in-situ DPG calibration frames pose a reliable and inexpensive alternative. </p>

Evolution of Caribbean subduction from P-wave tomography and plate reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Allen ◽  
Benedikt Braszus ◽  
Saskia Goes ◽  
Andreas Rietbrock ◽  
Jenny Collier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zones ◽  
Plate Boundary ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Lesser Antilles ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Equatorial Atlantic ◽  
The North ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Plate Reconstruction

<p>The Caribbean plate has a complex tectonic history, which makes it  particularly challenging to establish the evolution of the subduction zones at its margins. Here we present a new teleseismic P-wave tomographic model under the Antillean arc that benefits from ocean-bottom seismometer data collected in our recent VoiLA (Volatile Recycling in the Lesser Antilles) project. We combine this imagery with a new plate reconstruction that we use to predict possible slab positions in the mantle today. We find that upper mantle anomalies below the eastern Caribbean correspond to a stack of material that was subducted at different trenches at different times, but ended up in a similar part of the mantle due to the large northwestward motion of the Americas. This stack comprises: in the mantle transition zone, slab fragments that were subducted between 70 and 55 Ma below the Cuban and Aves segments of the Greater Arc of the Caribbean; at 450-250 km depth, material subducted between 55 and 35 Ma below the older Lesser Antilles (including the Limestone Caribees and Virgin Islands);  and above 250 km, slab from subduction between 30 and 0 Ma below the present Lesser Antilles to Hispaniola Arc. Subdued high velocity anomalies in the slab above 200 km depth coincide with where the boundary between the equatorial Atlantic and proto-Caribbean subducted, rather than as previously proposed, with the North-South American plate boundary. The different phases of subduction can be linked to changes in the age, and hence buoyancy structure, of the subducting plate.</p>

scholarly journals Seismic Velocity Structure of Kita-Yamato Trough, Japan Sea Revealed by Ocean Bottom Seismometer and Airgun Survey

2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi SATO ◽  
Masanao SHINOHARA ◽  
Kiyoshi SUYEHIRO ◽  
Nobuhiro ISEZAKI ◽  
Boris Y. KARP ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Japan Sea ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Seismic Velocity Structure

scholarly journals Crust and upper mantle structure of the Ligurian Sea revealed by ambient noise tomography using ocean bottom seismometer data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Noah Wolf ◽  
Dietrich Lange ◽  
Heidrun Kopp ◽  
Anke Dannowski ◽  
Ingo Grevemeyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Ambient Noise ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Ligurian Sea ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle

<p>The Liguro-Provencal-basin was formed as a back-arc basin of the retreating Calabrian-Apennines subduction zone during the Oligocene and Miocene. The resulting rotation of the Corsica-Sardinia block at roughly 32–24 Ma is associated with rifting, shaping the Ligurian Sea. It is highly debated though, whether oceanic or atypical oceanic crust was formed or if the crust is continental and experienced extreme thinning during the opening of the basin.</p><p>To investigate the velocity structure of the Ligurian Sea a network (LOBSTER) of 29 broadband Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) was installed jointly by GEOMAR (Germany) and ISTerre (France). The LOBSTER array measured continuously for eight months between June 2017 and February 2018 and is part of the AlpArray seismic network. AlpArray is a European initiative to further reveal the geophysical and geological properties of the greater Alpine area.</p><p>We contribute to the debate by surveying the type of crust and lithosphere flooring the Ligurian Sea.<br>Because of additional noise sources in the ocean, causing instrument tilt or seafloor compliance, OBS data are rarely used for ambient noise studies. However, we extensively pre-process the data to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Then, we calculate daily cross-correlation functions for the LOBSTER array and surrounding land stations. Additionally, we correlate short time windows that include strong events. The cross-correlations of these are dominated by earthquake signals and allow us to derive surface wave group velocities for longer periods than using ambient noise only. Finally, phase velocity maps are obtained by inverting Green’s functions derived from cross-correlation of ambient noise and teleseismic events, respectively. The phase velocity maps show strong heterogeneities for short periods (5-15 s, corresponding to shallow depths). Causes for these include varying sediment thickness, fault zones and magmatism. For longer periods (20-80 s) the velocity structure smoothens and reveals mantle velocities north-northwest of the basin centre. This might hint on an asymmetric opening of the basin. We do not see strong indications for an oceanic spreading centre in the Ligurian basin.</p>

scholarly journals Along‐Arc Heterogeneity in Local Seismicity across the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone from a Dense Ocean‐Bottom Seismometer Network

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidong Bie ◽  
Andreas Rietbrock ◽  
Stephen Hicks ◽  
Robert Allen ◽  
Jon Blundy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Subduction Zones ◽  
Lesser Antilles ◽  
Seismogenic Zone ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Plate Interface ◽  
Local Seismicity ◽  
Slow Spreading ◽  
Lesser Antilles Arc

Abstract The Lesser Antilles arc is only one of two subduction zones where slow‐spreading Atlantic lithosphere is consumed. Slow‐spreading may result in the Atlantic lithosphere being more pervasively and heterogeneously hydrated than fast‐spreading Pacific lithosphere, thus affecting the flux of fluids into the deep mantle. Understanding the distribution of seismicity can help unravel the effect of fluids on geodynamic and seismogenic processes. However, a detailed view of local seismicity across the whole Lesser Antilles subduction zone is lacking. Using a temporary ocean‐bottom seismic network we invert for hypocenters and 1D velocity model. A systematic search yields a 27 km thick crust, reflecting average arc and back‐arc structures. We find abundant intraslab seismicity beneath Martinique and Dominica, which may relate to the subducted Marathon and/or Mercurius Fracture Zones. Pervasive seismicity in the cold mantle wedge corner and thrust seismicity deep on the subducting plate interface suggest an unusually wide megathrust seismogenic zone reaching ∼65  km depth. Our results provide an excellent framework for future understanding of regional seismic hazard in eastern Caribbean and the volatile cycling beneath the Lesser Antilles arc.

Exploration in the Shetland‐Faeroe Basin using densely spaced arrays of ocean‐bottom seismometers

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 490-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Hughes ◽  
Penny J. Barton ◽  
David Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Physical Property ◽  
Seismic Exploration ◽  
Gravity Modeling ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Oil Reserves ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometers ◽  
Basaltic Layer

Recent exploration activity in the peripheral regions of the Shetland‐Faeroe Basin, offshore northwest Scotland, has led to the discovery of some of the largest oil reserves on the United Kingdom (UK) continental shelf. We present results from two ocean‐bottom seismometer profiles acquired by Mobil North Sea Ltd. across the center of the Shetland‐Faeroe Basin. These data provide a powerful tool for delineating long‐wavelength velocity variations and thus have potential for reducing the nonuniqueness associated with conventional seismic exploration methods. Analysis of the first‐arrival traveltime data using both forward and inverse ray‐based techniques produces a well constrained velocity‐depth model of the basin fill. We estimate that the uncertainty in the velocity structure is ±5% from a series of trial and error perturbations applied to the final models. The velocity structure of the Faeroe Basin has three principal layers: (1) a near‐surface layer with velocities in the range 1.6 to 2.2 km/s, (2) a 3.0–3.2 km/s layer which is characterized by a northwards structural pinch out in the center of the basin, and (3) a deeper laterally heterogeneous layer with velocities in the range 3.8 to 4.2 km/s. In the northwestern portion of the basin, a high velocity (5.0 km/s) basaltic layer is imaged dipping toward the southeast at a depth of 2–3 km. The basement is mapped at a depth of 7–9 km in the center of the basin. Gravity modeling provides independent corroboration of our models through the application of a velocity‐density relationship obtained from a synthesis of physical property measurements. Reflections from the Moho indicate a crustal thickness of 18 ± 3 km, suggesting that the basin is underlain by highly attenuated continental crust, but the velocities in the basement are closer to those of the Faeroe Islands basalts than the expected Lewisian gneiss, suggesting that it may be highly intruded.

Local Seismicity indicates basin inversion in the Ligurian Sea 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Thorwart ◽  
Anke Dannowski ◽  
Ingo Grevemeyer ◽  
Dietrich Lange ◽  
Heidrun Kopp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Tectonic Setting ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Tyrrhenian Sea ◽  
Uppermost Mantle ◽  
Fault Plane Solutions ◽  
Ligurian Sea ◽  
Basin Inversion ◽  
Ligurian Basin

<p>The Alpine orogen and the Apennine system are part of the complex tectonic setting in the Mediterranean Sea caused by the convergence between Africa and Eurasia. Between 30 Ma and 15 Ma the Calabrian subduction retreated in a southeast direction pulling Corsica and Sardinia away from the Eurasian landmass. In this extensional setting, the Ligurian Sea was formed as a back-arc basin. The rifting jumped 15 Ma ago in the Tyrrhenian Sea leaving Corsica and Sardinia in a stable position relative to Eurasia.</p><p>Within the framework of the AlpArray research initiative a long-term seismological experiment was conducted in the Ligurian Sea to investigate the lithospheric structure and the seismicity in the Ligurian basin. The passive seismic network consisted of 29 broad-band ocean bottom stations from Germany and France. It was in operation between June 2017 and February 2018.</p><p>Two seismicity clusters occurred in the centre of the Ligurian Basin. The 18 earthquakes are located in the lower crust and in the upper-most mantle at depths between 10 km and 16 km. Re-location was performed only using picks from the OBS in the centre of the Ligurian Sea to avoid artifacts from the complex 3D velocity structure of the basin. Mantle refractions Pn and Sn have apparent velocities of 8.2 km/s and 4.7 km/s. The low Vp-Vs-ratio of 1.72 indicates a more brittle behaviour of the mantle material.</p><p>Fault plane solutions were determined for four events using also the data of land stations in southern France, Corsica, Sardinia and northern Italy. The focal mechanisms are thrust faulting. Fault planes strike in a NE-SW direction, coinciding with the alignment of the events and the direction of the basin axis.</p><p>We interprete the two earthquake clusters related to the inversion of the Ligurian Basin where the basin’s centre is under compression and stresses are taken up by reactivated faults in the crust and uppermost mantle. The compressional forces could be caused by the convergence of Africa and Europe. In general, observations of earthquakes in continental mantle lithosphere are rare and they reveal on the one hand a strengthening of the crust and uppermost mantle during rifting and on the other hand they support the interpretation that rifting failed in the northern Ligurian Basin.</p><p> </p>

The 2018 Mw 6.8 Zakynthos, Greece, earthquake – strike-slip and thrust faulting in shallow subduction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efthimios Sokos ◽  
František Gallovič ◽  
Christos P. Evangelidis ◽  
Anna Serpetsidaki ◽  
Vladimír Plicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Models ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Aftershock Sequence ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Plate Motion ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Ocean Bottom Seismometer ◽  
Fault Interaction

<p>On October 25, 2018, at 22:54 UTC, an Mw 6.8 earthquake occurred southwest of Zakynthos island in the Ionian Sea. This is an area with different styles of faulting and the locus of strong events thus ideal for fault interaction studies. The 2018 Zakynthos earthquake was recorded by broad-band and strong-motion networks and provides an opportunity to resolve such faulting complexity. We used waveform inversion and backprojection of strong motion data, partly verified by co-seismic GNSS data, too. The aftershock sequence was relocated, and the moment tensors of the strongest events were evaluated. Stress inversion shows that the region is under sub-horizontal southwest-northeast compression, enabling mixed thrust- and strike-slip faulting. Based on detailed waveform inversion studies, we conclude that the 2018 mainshock consisted of two fault segments: a low-dip thrust, and a dominant, moderate-dip, right-lateral strike slip, both in the crust. This model explains the observed large negative CLVD component of the mainshock. Slip vectors of both ruptured segments, oriented to SW, are consistent with plate motion in the area. The sequence can be explained in terms of trench-orthogonal fractures in the subducting plate and reactivated faults in the upper plate. The 2018 event, and an Mw 6.6 event of 1997, occurred near three localized swarms of 2016 and 2017. Future numerical models of the slab deformation and ocean-bottom seismometer observations may illuminate possible relations between earthquakes, swarms and fluid paths in the region.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document