scholarly journals RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 4481-4481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi M Cammack ◽  
Kathleen J Austin ◽  
William R Lamberson ◽  
Gavin C Conant ◽  
Hannah C Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Livestock Production ◽  
Ruminant Nutrition ◽  
Rumen Microbes

The role of biotechnology in enhancing the digestion of forage cell walls by ruminants (jerry hughes scholarship)

1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
E. R. Deaville
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Engineering ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Livestock Production ◽  
Service Industries ◽  
Animal Nutrition ◽  
Rumen Microbes

The term biotechnology has been defined as the application of biological organisms, systems or processes to manufacture and service industries (Anon, 1980) and is, therefore, more than the application of ‘genetic engineering’ techniques alone. The potential application of biotechnology to the agricultural livestock industry includes many wide ranging areas: animal health; breeding; livestock production; livestock nutrition and the nutritive value of feeds. The role of biotechnology in animal nutrition and feeding is of particular importance since feed costs account for a significant proportion of the total variable costs in any livestock production system (e.g. milk, meat). The potential implications of biotechnology in animal nutrition has been reviewed by Armstrong (1986) and includes references to the improvement of the nutritive value of feeds through, for example, genetic manipulation of feed sources (cereals), appropriate supplementation and the use of biological inoculants with or without enzymes as silage additives and to improvements in the ability of the animal to obtain nutrients from feeds through the addition of enzymes to feeds and modification of rumen microbes through genetic engineering.

scholarly journals Tiny but mighty: The role of the rumen microbes in livestock production

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
K M Cammack ◽  
K J Austin ◽  
W R Lamberson ◽  
G C Conant ◽  
H C Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Livestock Production ◽  
Rumen Microbes

The role of biotechnology in enhancing the digestion of forage cell walls by ruminants (jerry hughes scholarship)

1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
E. R. Deaville
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Engineering ◽  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Livestock Production ◽  
Service Industries ◽  
Animal Nutrition ◽  
Rumen Microbes

The term biotechnology has been defined as the application of biological organisms, systems or processes to manufacture and service industries (Anon, 1980) and is, therefore, more than the application of ‘genetic engineering’ techniques alone. The potential application of biotechnology to the agricultural livestock industry includes many wide ranging areas: animal health; breeding; livestock production; livestock nutrition and the nutritive value of feeds. The role of biotechnology in animal nutrition and feeding is of particular importance since feed costs account for a significant proportion of the total variable costs in any livestock production system (e.g. milk, meat). The potential implications of biotechnology in animal nutrition has been reviewed by Armstrong (1986) and includes references to the improvement of the nutritive value of feeds through, for example, genetic manipulation of feed sources (cereals), appropriate supplementation and the use of biological inoculants with or without enzymes as silage additives and to improvements in the ability of the animal to obtain nutrients from feeds through the addition of enzymes to feeds and modification of rumen microbes through genetic engineering.

scholarly journals The role of organic sulphur in the copper-molybdenum-S interrelationship in ruminant nutrition

1975 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. F. Suttle
Keyword(s):  
Factorial Design ◽  
Basal Diet ◽  
Sodium Sulphate ◽  
Ruminant Nutrition ◽  
Normal Range ◽  
Organic S ◽  
Treatment Variation ◽  
Inorganic Sulphur ◽  
Design Experiments

1. The ability of organic and inorganic sulphur to influence the copper and molybdenum metabolism of sheep was compared in a series of three 2 × 2 factorial design experiments. In each experiment, four groups of five to seven hypocupraemic ewes were repleted with a basal diet supplemented with 6 mg Cu/kg and containing S and Mo at one of two concentrations, 1 or 4 g S and 0.5 or 4.5 mg Mo/kg respectively. Sodium sulphate (Expt 1), methionine (Expt 2) or cysteine (Expt 3) were used as the S sources. Cu and Mo concentrations in plasma were estimated in each experiment and in Expt 3 the concentrations of Cu in liver and Mo in urine were also estimated.2. The effects of the three S sources on Cu and Mo metabolism were similar. Repletion of the plasma Cu pool was unaffected by Mo alone, reduced by S alone and totally inhibited by Mo + S. Plasma Mo was greatly increased by Mo supplements, slightly decreased by S supplements and unaffected by Mo and S supplements given together.3. In Expt 3 the treatments were found to affect urinary Mo and plasma Mo in a similar manner; S prevented dietary Mo from increasing Mo excretion. The only group to show a significant repletion of the liver Cu pool was that given Mo alone.4. Supplementation of the diet with organic S significantly reduced the within-treatment variation in plasma Cu and Mo, liver Cu and urinary Mo.5. It is suggested that variations in dietary S and Mo within the normal range for herbage affect the Cu and Mo metabolism of the grazing animal, and that total S rather than inorganic S is the more useful measurement in the context of the Cu–Mo–S interrelationship.

Integrated freshwater aquaculture, crop and livestock production in the Mekong delta, Vietnam: Determinants and the role of the pond

2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dang K. Nhan ◽  
Le T. Phong ◽  
Marc J.C. Verdegem ◽  
Le T. Duong ◽  
Roel H. Bosma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mekong Delta ◽  
Livestock Production ◽  
Freshwater Aquaculture ◽  
Crop And Livestock Production

scholarly journals Meat as a matter of fact(s): the role of science in everyday representations of livestock production on social media

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. A01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Olausson
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Representation Theory ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Environmental Issues ◽  
Livestock Production ◽  
Social Representation ◽  
Online Discussions ◽  
Social Representation Theory ◽  
Strong Position

In recent times we have allegedly witnessed a “post-truth” turn in society. Nonetheless, surveys show that science holds a relatively strong position among lay publics, and case studies suggest that science is part of their online discussions about environmental issues on social media — an important, yet strikingly under-researched, debate forum. Guided by social representation theory, this study aims to contribute knowledge about the role of science in everyday representations of livestock production on social media. The analysis identifies two central themata, namely lay publics' contestations of (1) facts and non-facts, and (2) factual and non-factual sources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document