scholarly journals Patterns of E.coli leucine tRNA isoacceptors following bacteriophage MS2 infection.

1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Di Natale ◽  
D. Eilat
Author(s):  
P.E. Matthew Smith ◽  
Sean Stuntz ◽  
Yun Xing ◽  
Matthew Magnuson ◽  
Rebecca Phillips ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah N. Redmond ◽  
Basya S. Pearlmutter ◽  
Yilen K. Ng-Wong ◽  
Heba Alhmidi ◽  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To investigate the timing and routes of contamination of the rooms of patients newly admitted to the hospital. Design: Observational cohort study and simulations of pathogen transfer. Setting: A Veterans’ Affairs hospital. Participants: Patients newly admitted to the hospital with no known carriage of healthcare-associated pathogens. Methods: Interactions between the participants and personnel or portable equipment were observed, and cultures of high-touch surfaces, floors, bedding, and patients’ socks and skin were collected for up to 4 days. Cultures were processed for Clostridioides difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Simulations were conducted with bacteriophage MS2 to assess plausibility of transfer from contaminated floors to high-touch surfaces and to assess the effectiveness of wearing slippers in reducing transfer. Results: Environmental cultures became positive for at least 1 pathogen in 10 (59%) of the 17 rooms, with cultures positive for MRSA, C. difficile, and VRE in the rooms of 10 (59%), 2 (12%), and 2 (12%) participants, respectively. For all 14 instances of pathogen detection, the initial site of recovery was the floor followed in a subset of patients by detection on sock bottoms, bedding, and high-touch surfaces. In simulations, wearing slippers over hospital socks dramatically reduced transfer of bacteriophage MS2 from the floor to hands and to high-touch surfaces. Conclusions: Floors may be an underappreciated source of pathogen dissemination in healthcare facilities. Simple interventions such as having patients wear slippers could potentially reduce the risk for transfer of pathogens from floors to hands and high-touch surfaces.


Langmuir ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1035-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Mylon ◽  
Claudia I. Rinciog ◽  
Nathan Schmidt ◽  
Leonardo Gutierrez ◽  
Gerard C. L. Wong ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Donofrio ◽  
Sal Aridi ◽  
Ratul Saha ◽  
Robin Bechanko ◽  
Kevin Schaefer ◽  
...  

Obtaining an accurate assessment of a treatment system's antimicrobial efficacy in recreational water is difficult given the large scale and high flow rates of the water systems. A laboratory test system was designed to mimic the water conditions and potential microbial contaminants found in swimming pools. This system was utilized to evaluate the performance of an in situ ozone disinfection device against four microorganisms: Cryptosporidium parvum, bacteriophage MS2, Enterococcus faecium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The sampling regimen evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness in a single pass fashion, with samples being evaluated initially after exposure to the ozone unit, as well as at points downstream from the device. Based on the flow dynamics and log reductions, cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated. The observed organism log reductions were as follows: >6.7 log for E. faecium and P. aeruginosa; >5.9 log for bacteriophage MS2; and between 2.7 and 4.1 log for C. parvum. The efficacy results indicate that the test system effectively functions as a secondary disinfection system as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Model Aquatic Health Code.


1992 ◽  
Vol 227 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Brunel ◽  
J. Caillet ◽  
P. Lesage ◽  
M. Graffe ◽  
J. Dondon ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1650-1658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi Jain ◽  
Andrea L. Knorr ◽  
Joseph Bernacki ◽  
Ranjan Srivastava

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Lazarova ◽  
M. L. Janex ◽  
L. Fiksdal ◽  
C. Oberg ◽  
I. Barcina ◽  
...  

Advanced disinfection processes (peracetic acid, UV irradiation and ozonation) have been tested and evaluated through bench and pilot scale studies. 3 log removals of total coliforms, faecal coliforms and faecal streptococci were achieved by 10mg/L peracetic acid at a 10min contact time, by UV radiation at 35mW.s/cm2 and by ozone at 5mg/L for 10min contact time. Higher doses are required for virus removal by UV and PAA and especially for highly resistant viruses such as F-specific bacteriophage MS2. Ozonation has the advantage of having a strong effect on all types of bacteriophages and protozoa cysts even when low treatment doses and short contact times are applied. The results of this study demonstrated that evaluation of disinfection efficiency of ozone, UV and PAA depends on the criteria and methods employed. Standard method (plate count) results showed an important disinfection effect on culturability, while results from non-standard methods (respiratory activity and β-galactosidase activity assay) indicated less reduction of viable cells. Moreover, the results confirm that disinfectants act on bacteria in different ways. It has been clearly demonstrated that b-galactosidase activity is affected by PAA while UV treatment has no or very limited effect on the enzyme activity. Even without sunlight reactivation, bacterial regrowth in seawater was observed after disinfection of sewage effluents. This study also shows that the biodegradability of sewage effluent for an E coli strain was affected differently by the oxidative disinfectants ozone and PAA. Biodegradability should therefore be considered when evaluating the total disinfection efficiency.


FEBS Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (7) ◽  
pp. 1198-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Pan ◽  
Yuan Zhang ◽  
Tingting Jia ◽  
Kuo Zhang ◽  
Jinming Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document