scholarly journals CTNI-68. EFFICACY OF TTFIELDS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM) – SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS OF THE EF-14 TRIAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii58-ii58
Author(s):  
Zvi Ram ◽  
Chae-Yong Kim ◽  
Jay-Jiguang Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Alternating Electric Fields

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an anti-mitotic, regional treatment that utilizes low intensity alternating electric fields delivered non-invasively to the tumor using a portable medical device. In the EF-14 phase 3 study leading to FDA approval, TTFields significantly extended survival in newly diagnosed GBM when added to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). Elderly GBM patients usually have worse prognosis and often receive only partial treatment for the disease. This sub-group analysis examined the effects of TTFields in the elderly population (≥65 years of age) enrolled in the EF-14 study. METHODS All 134 elderly patients (≥65 years of age) from the EF-14’s intent-to-treat population were included in the analysis, Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as adverse event frequency and severity were compared between the TMZ/TTFields arm and the TMZ alone arm. RESULTS The median age was 69 (range: 65–83), median KPS was 90%, and 69% were male. Median PFS from randomization was 6.5 months versus 3.9 months in the TMZ/TTFields versus TMZ alone arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95%CI 0.30, 0.74] P< 0.0236). Median OS was 17.4 months versus 13.7 months in the TMZ/TTFields versus TMZ alone arm, respectively (HR 0.51 [CI 0.33, 0.77] P< 0.020). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 39% of patients treated with TMZ/TTFields and in 33% of patients treated with TMZ alone. None of the SAEs were considered related to TTFields but attributed to TMZ or to the underlying disease. Grades 1–2 skin AEs related to TTFields were observed in 51% of patients. CONCLUSION Consistent with the overall outcome of the EF-14 study, elderly patients treated with TMZ/TTFields showed significantly better OS compared to patients on TMZ alone, and without increase in grade III or IV toxicity.

Efficacy of tumor treating fields (TTFields) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM): Sub-group analysis of the phase III EF-14 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24019-e24019
Author(s):  
Zvi Ram ◽  
Chae-Yong Kim ◽  
Jay-Jiguang Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields

e24019 Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an anti-mitotic, regional treatment modality, utilizing low intensity alternating electric fields delivered non-invasively to the tumor using a portable medical device. TTFields are FDA-approved for glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. In the EF-14 [NCT00916409] phase 3 GBM study, TTFields significantly extended survival in newly diagnosed GBM when added to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). Elderly GBM patients usually have worse prognosis and often receive only partial treatment for the disease. The aim of the following post-hoc analysis was to examine the effects of TTFields in the elderly population (≥65 years of age) enrolled in the EF-14 study. Methods: All 134 elderly patients (≥65 years of age) from the EF-14’s intent-to-treat population were included in the analysis, Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as adverse events were compared between the TMZ + TTFields arm and the TMZ alone arm. Results: The median age was 69 (range: 65-83), 69% were male. Median PFS from randomization was 6.5 months versus 3.9 months in the TTFields + TMZ versus TMZ alone arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95%CI 0.30, 0.74] P < 0.0236). Median OS was 17.4 months versus 13.7 months in the TTFields + TMZ versus TMZ alone arm, respectively (HR 0.51 [CI 0.33, 0.77] P < 0.020). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 39% of patients treated with TTFields + TMZ and in 33% of patients treated with TMZ alone. None of the SAEs were considered related to TTFields. SAEs were considered related to TMZ or to the underlying disease. Grades 1-2 skin AEs were observed in 51% of patients. Conclusions: Consistent with the overall outcome of the EF-14 study, elderly patients treated with TMZ + TTFields showed significantly better OS compared to patients on TMZ alone, and without increase in grade 3-4 toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT00916409 .

scholarly journals P14.71 Tumor Treating Fields combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final safety and efficacy results from a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii84-iii84
Author(s):  
R Grossman ◽  
F Bokstein ◽  
D Blumenthal ◽  
C Ben Harush ◽  
D Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Sensitizing Effect

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment consisting of low intensity alternating electric fields. The combination of TTFields with maintenance temozolomide significantly improved survival versus temozolomide alone in the phase 3 EF-14 study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). In preclinical studies, TTFields increased the number of glioma cells undergoing cellular death following radiotherapy (RT) by inhibiting DNA damage repair, suggesting a radio-sensitizing effect of TTFields. This pilot study is the first to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering TTFields concomitant to RT and TMZ in ndGBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by maintenance TMZ and TTFields for up to 24 months. TTFields (200kHz) were delivered for >18 hours/day while the transducer arrays were removed during delivery of RT. TMZ was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2/daily for 6 weeks and RT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was safety of the combined TTFields/RT/TMZ; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS 10 ndGBM patients that recovered from maximal debulking surgery or biopsy were enrolled at a single center in Israel between April and December 2017. Five patients (50%) had undergone gross total resection while the rest had biopsy only. Eight of the patients were male, median age was 59, median KPS was 80 and median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Six patients (60%) reported at least one AE. The most common AE was TTFields-related skin toxicity, reported in four patients (40%), all of which were grade 1–2 in severity. Two patients reported serious AEs (seizures and general deterioration) that were considered unrelated to TTFields. Median PFS with RT/TMZ/TTFields was 10.5 months. Median OS has not yet been reached. CONCLUSION The proportion of patients with TTFields-related skin toxicity was similar to that reported in ndGBM patients in the randomized Phase III study (52%), where patients started TTFields at least 4 weeks after RT. No other TTFields-related toxicities were reported and there were no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities as a result of combining TTFields with RT in addition to TMZ. Based on the safety and preliminary efficacy results of this pilot study, a phase II randomized study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in 60 ndGBM patients.

scholarly journals CTNI-38. PriCoTTF TRIAL: A PHASE I/II TRIAL OF TTFIELDS PRIOR AND CONCOMITANT TO RADIOTHERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi68-vi68
Author(s):  
Sied Kebir ◽  
Daniela Pierscianek ◽  
Martin Proescholdt ◽  
Peter Hau ◽  
Anca-Ligia Grosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract TTFields therapy is applied at 200 kHz by arrays that are placed at the patients’ scalp. In the phase 3 EF-14 trial, survival rates were significantly improved when adding tumor-treating fields (TTFields) to adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). Preclinical studies showed that combination of TTFields and radiotherapy synergistically impaired glioblastoma cell growth. Here, we present the PriCoTTF trial, which is enrolling nGBM patients and will assess the safety and efficacy of TTFields initiated prior and concomitant to radiochemotherapy. Following surgery and wound-healing, TTFields therapy is initiated in adult nGBM patients. TTFields therapy continues throughout radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for a total of approximately 9 months. During radiotherapy, the arrays - through which TTFields is delivered - remain on the patients’ scalp. Totally, thirty-three patients are planned to be enrolled in two treatment arms. In arm A, 20 patients receive normo-fractionated radiotherapy, whereas in the elderly arm, arm B, 13 patients receive hypo-fractionated radiotherapy. The primary endpoint of this trial is safety and tolerance that will be gauged by a set of pre-specified treatment-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints include the frequency of adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The trial is currently enrolling patients at four sites in Germany. At the time of abstract submission, 9 patients enrolled in Arm B. Patient recruitment for arm A has been completed with. We will present initial practical experiences as well as preliminary safety and tolerance data. There is a biological rationale for combining TTFields and radiotherapy to further improve survival of GBM patients. In the presented phase I/II trial, the safety and efficacy of TTFields initiated prior and concomitant to RT in nGBM will be assessed. In addition, initial efficacy data (phase II) may serve as a rationale for a putative randomized phase III trial.

scholarly journals CTNI-73. OVERALL SURVIVAL OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS TREATED BY STANDARD THERAPY IN COMPARISON TO STANDARD THERAPY PLUS TUMOR TREATING FIELDS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii59-ii59
Author(s):  
Aaron Rulseh ◽  
Adam Derner ◽  
Jan Sroubek ◽  
Jan Klener ◽  
Josef Vymazal
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Intermediate Frequency ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Alternating Electric Fields ◽  
Overall Survival Benefit

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor treating fields (TTFields; 200 kHz) have shown significant prolonged survival in newly diagnosed (ndGBM). TTFields are anti-mitotic, low intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields. The applied fields disrupt the mitotic spindle, microtubule assembly and the segregation of intracellular organelles during cell division, leading to apoptosis or mitotic arrest. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients recently treated with standard therapy and standard therapy plus TTFields at our institution. METHODS Subjects (N=25) with ndGBM treated with standard therapy plus TTFields (STDTh-TTF) at our institution were included. Standard therapy (STDTh) consisted of surgical resection, followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Temozolomide). In 3 cases, biopsies were performed instead of resection. The date of resection or biopsy was considered the entry date and was used in calculating survival. The study took place from July 2015 to April 2019. A matching control group of 25 subjects with ndGBM were treated with STDTh alone at our institution and were assembled from our database based primarily on date of resection or biopsy, and secondarily by age (2 subjects underwent biopsy in place of resection). When assembling the control group, the investigators were blinded to survival outcome. RESULTS Significantly greater overall survival was observed for the group treated by TTFields in addition to standard therapy (p &lt; 0.001; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–0.45; median survival time STDTh-TTF 31.7 months, STDTh 7.1 months). The groups were balanced with respect to sex, and no differences with respect to age (p = 0.13; STDTh-TTF mean 51.58 years, SD 8.8; STDTh mean 52.42 years, SD 8.7) or inclusion date (p = 0.22) by paired t-test were detected. CONCLUSIONS Our initial results appear promising with respect to overall survival benefit in patients undergoing TTFields treatment in addition to standard therapy.

scholarly journals ACTR-46. TUMOR TREATING FIELDS COMBINED WITH RADIOTHERAPY AND TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: FINAL RESULTS FROM A PILOT STUDY

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi23-vi24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Grossman ◽  
Dror Limon ◽  
Felix Bokstein ◽  
Deborah Blumenthal ◽  
Camit Ben Harush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Alternating Electric Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Sensitizing Effect

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment comprising low intensity alternating electric fields approved for GBM. Preclinical data show that TTFields have a radio-sensitizing effect. This pilot study evaluated the safety and feasibility of TTFields/RT/TMZ in ndGBM patients. METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed ndGBM were treated with TTFields/RT/TMZ followed by maintenance TTFields and TMZ for up to 24 months. TTFields (200kHz) were delivered for >18 hours/day with removal of the transducer arrays during RT delivery. TMZ was administered at 75 mg/m2/daily for 6 weeks and RT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was safety of the combined TTFields/RT/TMZ; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS Ten patients were enrolled at a single center in Israel between April and December 2017. All patients had recovered from maximal debulking surgery or biopsy. Five patients (50%) had undergone gross total resection; rest had biopsy only. Median age was 59 and median KPS was 80. Median dose of RT was 60 Gy. Six patients (60%) reported at least one AE. The most common AE was TTFields-related skin toxicity reported in 4 patients (40%), of Grade 1–2 in severity. Two patients reported serious AEs (seizures and general deterioration) considered unrelated to TTFields. Median PFS with RT/TMZ/TTFields was 10.5 months. Median OS has not been reached. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of patients with TTFields-related skin toxicity was similar to that reported in EF-14 phase 3 study (52%). No other TTFields-related toxicities were reported. There was no increase in RT- or TMZ-related toxicities with TTFields/RT/TMZ combination. A phase 2 randomized study has been initiated to investigate the efficacy of concomitant RT/TMZ/TTFields in 60 ndGBM patients.

scholarly journals Alternating electric tumor treating fields for treatment of glioblastoma: rationale, preclinical, and clinical studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 414-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Mittal ◽  
Neil V. Klinger ◽  
Sharon K. Michelhaugh ◽  
Geoffrey R. Barger ◽  
Susan C. Pannullo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Fields ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Alternating Electric Fields ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

OBJECTIVETreatment for glioblastoma (GBM) remains largely unsuccessful, even with aggressive combined treatment via surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Tumor treating fields (TTFs) are low-intensity, intermediate-frequency, alternating electric fields that have antiproliferative properties in vitro and in vivo. The authors provide an up-to-date review of the mechanism of action as well as preclinical and clinical data on TTFs.METHODSA systematic review of the literature was performed using the terms “tumor treating fields,” “alternating electric fields,” “glioblastoma,” “Optune,” “NovoTTF-100A,” and “Novocure.”RESULTSPreclinical and clinical data have demonstrated the potential efficacy of TTFs for treatment of GBM, leading to several pilot studies, clinical trials, and, in 2011, FDA approval for its use as salvage therapy for recurrent GBM and, in 2015, approval for newly diagnosed GBM.CONCLUSIONSCurrent evidence supports the use of TTFs as an efficacious, antimitotic treatment with minimal toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Additional studies are needed to further optimize patient selection, determine cost-effectiveness, and assess the full impact on quality of life.

scholarly journals A novel nutritional index “simplified CONUT” and the disease risk index independently stratify prognosis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Senjo ◽  
Masahiro Onozawa ◽  
Daisuke Hidaka ◽  
Shota Yokoyama ◽  
Satoshi Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Elderly patients aged 65 or older with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have poor prognosis. The risk stratification based on genetic alteration has been proposed in national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) guideline but its efficacy was not well verified especially in real world elderly patients. The nutritional status assessment using controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a prognostic biomarker in elderly patients with solid tumors but was not examined in elderly AML patients. We performed prospective analysis of genetic alterations of 174 patients aged 65 or older with newly diagnosed AML treated without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and developed simplified CONUT (sCONUT) score by eliminating total lymphocyte count from the items to adapt AML patients. In this cohort, both the NCCN 2017 risk group and sCONUT score successfully stratified the overall survival (OS) of the elderly patients. A multivariable analysis demonstrated that adverse group in NCCN 2017 and high sCONUT score were independently associated with poor 2-year OS. Both risk stratification based on NCCN 2017 and sCONUT score predict prognosis in the elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document