scholarly journals NCOG-19. BEVACIZUMAB IN REAL LIFE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: BENEFIT OR FUTILITY?

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii133-ii133
Author(s):  
Cristina Smolenschi ◽  
Emeline Colomba ◽  
Elie Rassy ◽  
Naima Lezghed ◽  
Mohamed Kettab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Arterial Bleeding ◽  
Substantial Clinical Benefit ◽  
Radiological Response

Abstract Angiogenesis represents a hallmark of glioblastoma but most trials disappointed and failed to change the poor outcome of this disease. However, Bevacizumab (Bev) is widely used in clinical practice by expert oncologists due to experience or efficacy in real life.We retrospectively reviewed the use of Bev and its benefit in terms of Time to treatment failure (TTF), Overall Survival(OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and clinical benefit. METHODS: We analyzed two hundred and two patients treated at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus with Bev until definitive failure for recurrent glioblastoma between 2006 and 2016. Patients were treated with Bev alone or in association with radiotherapy, temozolomide, lomustine or irinotecan. RESULTS: The median duration of Bev treatment until definitive failure was 6 months. The median TTF was 7.27 months(95%CI 6.30-8.24) and the median OS from diagnosis was 22.43 months(95%CI 19.68-25.18). Two patients were still alive without active treatment at the end of study. A hundred and fourteen (56%) patients experienced symptom amelioration and seventy-five (37%) improved their Performance Status. Fifty percent of patients exhibited Partial and Complete Response on MRI, as best radiological response, within 1.6 months. No patient had anaphylactic reaction. Grade 1-2 hypertension(HT)(17%) and grade 1(10%) proteinuria were most common. Six patients presented lethal toxicity: 4 with GI perforation, 1 p with cerebral hemorrhage and 1 p with arterial bleeding. HT was correlated with treatment response in 67% of patients. A neutrophil count superior to 6000/mm³ was associated with longer TTF(mTTF 8.23m(95%CI 6.64-9.82). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study reports a substantial clinical benefit of Bev in patients with recurrent glioblastoma with an acceptable toxicity profile. As the panel of therapeutic option is still very limited in these tumors, this work supports the maintained use of Bev as a therapeutic option.

A phase II trial of first-line FOLFIRINOX for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 89-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haeseong Park ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Rama Suresh ◽  
Caron E. Rigden ◽  
Manik A. Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

89 Background: Standard first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas have an approximate 40% objective response rate (ORR). FOLFIRINOX has been used in first line therapy in other GI cancers (i.e pancreatic and CRC) with impressive efficacy signals. Methods: This is a phase II study of first line combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (NCT01928290). Starting doses were 5-FU 400mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours with leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. Trastuzumab was administered as 6 mg/kg loading dose then 4 mg/kg every 14 days if patients had HER2+ cancer. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and duration of response. Enrollment of 41 patients with HER2- disease was planned to reach one-sided = 0.10 and power 0.90 with goal of detecting true ORR60%. No enrollment goal was planned for HER2+. Results: From Nov 2013 to July 2017, 58 patients were enrolled, 25 out of 58 (43%) had HER2+ disease. Forty-nine patients were evaluable for response as they completed at least one restaging scan. ORR was 78% (38/49) in all patients, 67% (18/27) in HER2-, 91% (20/22) in HER2+. One patient (2%) had complete response, 37 (76%) had partial response, 7 (14%) had stable disease > 6 months; therefore, CBR was 92%. Median PFS is 11.9 months, median OS is 17.4 months and median follow up time 16.1 months. 41 (83.7%) had dose modification or delay during treatment. There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX with or without trastuzumab showed remarkable ORR and PFS in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in the first-line setting. This regimen may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with preserved performance status. Further investigation in larger population is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01928290.

scholarly journals CTIM-03. PHASE II STUDY OF REGORAFENIB IN BEVACIZUMAB REFRACTORY RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii33-ii33
Author(s):  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Cathy Schilero ◽  
David Peereboom ◽  
Manmeet Ahluwalia
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Molecule Inhibitor ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Abstract BACKGROUND Most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) receive bevacizumab as part of their treatment. There is no good therapeutic option after bevacizumab failure. Regorafenib has potent preclinical antitumor activity and long-lasting anti-angiogenic activity as measured by dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) – magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple membrane-bound and intracellular kinases involved in normal cellular functions and in pathologic processes such as oncogenesis, tumor angiogenesis, and maintenance of the tumor microenvironment. METHODS Patients with progression of GBM after treatment with Bevacizumab will be eligible for the study. Oral administration of Regorafenib at 160 mg once daily will be administered for 3 weeks on /1 week off. Weekly dose escalation of regorafenib from 80 mg to 160 mg/day will be employed as per the Redos strategy. Patients start the treatment 80 mg/day in week 1, with weekly dose escalation to 120 mg in week 2, then 160 mg week in 3 if no significant drug-related toxicities are observed. They will be continued on treatment with Regorafenib 160 md /day till tumor progression or toxicity. They will get MRI brain every 4 weeks during the study. RESULTS Primary endpoint is median Overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival at 6 months and the median time to progression and objective response rate using the modified RANO criteria. The overall safety and tolerability of regorafenib by CTCAE version 5.0. will also be reported. CONCLUSION This is an ongoing clinical trial.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Axitinib plus avelumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a stratified, open-label, single-center phase 2 clinical trial (GliAvAx)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001146
Author(s):  
Gil Awada ◽  
Laila Ben Salama ◽  
Jennifer De Cremer ◽  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
Lydia Fischbuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Corticosteroid Dose

BackgroundNo treatment demonstrated to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) in a randomized trial. Combining axitinib with the programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking monoclonal antibody avelumab may result in synergistic activity against rGB.MethodsAdult patients with rGB following prior surgery, radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were stratified according to their baseline use of corticosteroids. Patients with a daily dose of ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) initiated treatment with axitinib (5 mg oral two times per day) plus avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks) (Cohort-1). Patients with a higher baseline corticosteroid dose initiated axitinib monotherapy; avelumab was added after 6 weeks of therapy if the corticosteroid dose could be tapered to ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (Cohort-2). Progression-free survival at 6 months (6-m-PFS%), per immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria, served as the primary endpoint.ResultsBetween June 2017 and August 2018, 54 patients (27 per cohort) were enrolled and initiated study treatment (median age: 55 years; 63% male; 91% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–1). Seventeen (63%) patients treated in Cohort-2 received at least one dose of avelumab. The 6-m-PFS% was 22.2% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI 3.8% to 33.2%) in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively; median overall survival was 26.6 weeks (95% CI 20.8 to 32.4) in Cohort-1 and 18.0 weeks (95% CI 12.5 to 23.5) in Cohort-2. The best objective response rate was 33.3% and 22.2% in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively, with a median duration of response of 17.9 and 19.0 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were dysphonia (67%), lymphopenia (50%), arterial hypertension and diarrhea (both 48%). There were no grade 5 adverse events.ConclusionThe combination of avelumab plus axitinib has an acceptable toxicity profile but did not meet the prespecified threshold for activity justifying further investigation of this treatment in an unselected population of patients with rGB.

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a study by the Korean Cancer Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10735-10735 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bensalem ◽  
K. Bouzid
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

10735 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) has shown efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted studies with GEM-based regimens to assess the efficacy and toxicity of GEM combined with other drugs in MBC. GEM was combined with docetaxel (DXL) in pre-treated MBC with an anthracycline-based regimen and GEM was combined with doxorubicin (DXR) in chemonaive patients (pts) with MBC. The studies’ objectives were to show clinically relevant hematologic toxicity and response rates among pts treated with GEM-DXL either in combination in pre-treated pts with anthracycline regimen or GEM-DXR in chemonaive pts with MBC to assess the efficacy of GEM in MBC either in neoadjuvant or first-line treatment. Methods: For GEM-DXL: 42 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D8, DXL: 75 mg /m2 D1, every 21 days with classical premedication for DXL. For GEM-DXR: 51 pts were enrolled; GEM: 1250 mg /m2 D1 & D 8, DXR: 25 mg/m2 D1 & D8, every 21 days. Results: See table below. In the GEM-DXR group, surgery was performed in 30 pts, and 13 (43.2%) had histologically complete response. The median TTP in this group was 13.3 months (range, 2–53). Conclusions: GEM in MBC is very efficient and produced an interesting objective response and clinical benefit. This activity is consistent in either chemonaive pts or in pts with relapsing breast cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Biweekly gemcitabine and capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14617-e14617
Author(s):  
Maria Del Pilar Solis Hernandez ◽  
Paula Jiménez ◽  
Laura Faez Garcia ◽  
Carlos Alvarez Fernandez ◽  
Quionia Pérez Arnillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
And Function

e14617 Background: Some patients with mCRC are still susceptible to continue with active therapy after progression to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan regimens due to their good performance status. Preclinical and clinical trials suggest that gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidines are synergic antimetabolites. Their major mechanism of action is to incorporate dFdCTP into DNA and to introduce FUTP into RNA, respectively, affecting their processing and function. This study aims to describe patients profile and response to gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap) in heavily pretreated mCRC, and so possible predictive factors for survival. Methods: Between June 2001 and July 2011, 119 evaluable patients pretreated with oxaliplatin and irinotecan regimens were enrolled: ECOG 0-1 97%, male 68%, median age 63yo, range: 36-79, rectum 57%, 3rd line: 61%. Patients received Gem 1000 mg/m2 d2 and Cap 1000 mg/m2BID x 7d q2w. Survival analysis was determined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. Results: ORR and clinical benefit were: 5% and 36%. Median PFS and OS were 2.83m (0.43-35) and 6.53m (0.47m-10yrs in patient with complete response). Most frequent toxicities were anemia (22%), thrombocytopenia (10%), hand-foot syndrome (9%) and grade ≥3 were diarrhea in 5%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Predictive factors for PFS and OS are shown in Table. Statistic significance was registered in favor of clinical benefit achieved and for those who had not previously received monoclonal Abs, for SLP and OS respectively. Moreover, patients under 65yo tend to have a better survival. Conclusions: These data suggest GemCap is a tolerable regimen that achieves maintained responses for non selected heavily preated mCRC patients, especially in those reaching radiological clinical benefit, without previous use of monoclonal Abs and younger patients. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Clinical update.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3521-3521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Grade 3

3521 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had any grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

Association of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with improved clinical outcome in sarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11510-11510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Rosenbaum ◽  
Kenneth Seier ◽  
Ciara Marie Kelly ◽  
Hannah Kiesler ◽  
Moriah Martindale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Category Comparison ◽  
Grade 3

11510 Background: IrAEs are associated with improved clinical outcomes after treatment with ICB in select epithelial malignancies. We hypothesized that sarcoma patients (pts) treated with ICB who developed an irAE would have improved outcomes compared to pts who had no irAE. Methods: Adverse events (AEs) from 3 sarcoma-specific ICB trials (nivolumab plus NKTR-214, pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, and pembrolizumab plus T-VEC) were reviewed. AEs probably or definitely related to ICB were classified as immune- or non-immune-related by the principal investigator. Endpoints of interest included best overall response (BOR) by RECIST 1.1 (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]), durable clinical benefit (DCB; CR/PR/stable disease [SD] ≥ 16 weeks), and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were stratified by the presence or absence of ≥ 1 irAE of any grade and by grade 1-2, grade 3-4, or no irAE (three-category comparison). Results: A total of 124 pts received ICB on these studies. Median pt age was 56 (range: 13-90); 53% were male; all but one pt had a performance status of ≤ 1. BOR was PR in 12 pts, SD in 41, and PD in 69. 2 pts were not evaluable. 40 pts (32%) had ≥ 1 irAE of any grade, 6 of whom had a grade 3-4 irAE. The most common irAEs (≥ 5% of pts) were rash (15%), arthralgia (11%), myalgia (9%), pruritis (8%), and hypothyroidism (6%). The proportion of pts with a CR/PR was higher in pts with than without an irAE (18% vs. 6%, respectively; P = 0.058). A significantly higher proportion of pts with an irAE had DCB compared to those without (53% and 29%, respectively; P = 0.017). The median PFS of pts with an irAE was 16.6 months compared to 10.6 in those without (P = 0.013). The proportion of pts with a grade 3-4 irAE and a CR/PR was highest (33%) compared to pts with grade 1-2 (15%) or no irAE (6%) (P = 0.048). More pts with grade 3-4 irAE achieved DCB (67%) than grade 1-2 (50%) or no irAE (29%) (P = 0.027). Median PFS was 22.6, 15, and 10.6 weeks in the grade 3-4, grade 1-2, and no irAE groups, respectively (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Approximately one-third of advanced sarcoma pts with ICB-based immunotherapy developed an irAE. As reported previously in select carcinomas, sarcoma pts with irAEs were more likely to have clinical benefit than those without irAEs. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind this association and to validate these findings prospectively.

Efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic cancers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18092-e18092
Author(s):  
Michelle Kuznicki ◽  
Amy Joehlin-Price ◽  
Peter Graham Rose ◽  
Haider Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line

e18092 Background: There is limited data on outcomes for gynecologic cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outside the scope of clinical trials. Here we present our Institutional experience with a cohort of endometrial (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) treated with ICI. Methods: 59 patients who received ICI were included (23 OC and 36 EC). Progression-free (PFS) and Overall survivals (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and log rank test. Comparison of duration of response (DOR) and stable disease (DOSD) was done with unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA. Rates of objective response (ORR) including partial response (PR) and complete response (CR), and stable disease (SD) were compared by Fischer’s exact test. Results: Median age was 66 years. 23 patients were microsatellite stable (MSS), 23 microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). Median number of prior lines was 2 (0-11). PFS and OS for EC and OC were overlapping; therefore outcomes for both were combined [(PFS 6.4m OC vs 7.3 m EC, p = 0.61), (OS 15.9 m OC vs 14.2 m EC, p = 0.78)]. Response rates consisted of 20.3% PR, 8.5% CR, 37.3% SD. Differences in responses were noted for clear cell carcinoma (CC) (33.3% PR, 11.1% CR, 33.3% SD) and MSI-H (36.4% PR, 18.2% CR, 22.7% SD) compared to MSS (11.8% PR, 0% CR, 47% SD). MSI-H had higher ORR vs. MSS (54.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.0078). CC trended toward improved ORR vs. MSS (44.4% vs 11.8%, p = 0.14). PFS was improved for MSI-H vs. MSS (10m v 5.0m, p = 0.03). OS for CC compared to any other histology was improved (NR vs 12.8m respectively, p = 0.009). 5 recurrent MSI-H EC patients received ICI as first line monotherapy. Responses included 4 PR and 1 SD (80% ORR, 100% clinical benefit). PFS was 9.2m (3.3-13.3). 80% remained progression-free at last follow up. Overall, 38.9% experienced toxicity: hypothyroidism (15%), dermatitis (5%), pneumonitis (10%), LFT elevation (2%), amylase/lipase elevation (3%), colitis or diarrhea (5%), uveitis (2%) or nephritis (5%). 10% of patients required discontinuation of ICI secondary to toxicity. Trends for PFS and OS favored improved outcomes in patients with toxicity vs. no toxicity [(PFS 12.9m vs 5.6m, p = 0.07), (OS 22.9m vs 13.1m, p = NS)] respectively. Conclusions: In this study, immunotherapy with ICI outcomes favor MSI-H and CC compared to MSS disease. CC had promising OS compared to other histology types. ICI showed promising efficacy in MSI-H EC with 100% clinical benefit rate in chemonaive patients. First line ICI should be investigated in these patients. Positive correlation between toxicity and outcome is noted and will be further investigated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document