CTIM-03. AUTOLOGOUS ADOPTIVE IMMUNE-CELL THERAPY ELICITED A DURABLE RESPONSE WITH ENHANCED IMMUNE REACTION SIGNATURES IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: AN OPEN LABEL, PHASE I/IIA TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi49-vi49
Author(s):  
Jaejoon Lim ◽  
Young Joon Park ◽  
Ju Won Ahn ◽  
Jeong Min Sim ◽  
Suwan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Immune Reaction ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
World Health ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy classified by the World Health Organization as a grade IV glioma. Despite the availability of aggressive standard therapies, most patients experience recurrence, for which there are currently no effective treatments. We aimed to conduct a phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of adoptive, ex-vivo-expanded, and activated natural killer cells and T lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with recurrent GBM. This study was a single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated trial on 14 patients recruited between 2013 and 2017. The immune cells were administered via intravenous injection 24 times at 2-week intervals after surgical resection or biopsy. The safety and clinical efficacy of this therapy was examined by assessing adverse events and comparing 2-year overall survival (OS). Transcriptomic analysis of tumor tissues was performed using NanoString to identify the mechanism of therapeutic efficacy. No grade 4 or 5 severe adverse events were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The most severe adverse event was grade 3 fever. Median OS was 22.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 10 months. Five patients were alive for over 2 years and showed durable response with enhanced immune reaction transcriptomic signatures without clinical decline until the last follow-up after completion of the therapy. In conclusion, autologous adoptive immune-cell therapy was safe and showed durable response in patients with enhanced immune reaction signatures. This therapy may be effective for recurrent GBM patients with high immune response in their tumor microenvironments. Trial registration: The Korea Clinical Research Information Service database: KCT0003815, Registered 18 April 2019, retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Autologous adoptive immune-cell therapy elicited a durable response with enhanced immune reaction signatures in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: An open label, phase I/IIa trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0247293
Author(s):  
Jaejoon Lim ◽  
YoungJoon Park ◽  
Ju Won Ahn ◽  
JeongMin Sim ◽  
Su Jung Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Immune Reaction ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
World Health ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy classified by the World Health Organization as a grade IV glioma. Despite the availability of aggressive standard therapies, most patients experience recurrence, for which there are currently no effective treatments. We aimed to conduct a phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of adoptive, ex-vivo-expanded, and activated natural killer cells and T lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with recurrent GBM. This study was a single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated trial on 14 patients recruited between 2013 and 2017. The immune cells were administered via intravenous injection 24 times at 2-week intervals after surgical resection or biopsy. The safety and clinical efficacy of this therapy was examined by assessing adverse events and comparing 2-year overall survival (OS). Transcriptomic analysis of tumor tissues was performed using NanoString to identify the mechanism of therapeutic efficacy. No grade 4 or 5 severe adverse events were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The most severe adverse event was grade 3 fever. Median OS was 22.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 10 months. Five patients were alive for over 2 years and showed durable response with enhanced immune reaction transcriptomic signatures without clinical decline until the last follow-up after completion of the therapy. In conclusion, autologous adoptive immune-cell therapy was safe and showed durable response in patients with enhanced immune reaction signatures. This therapy may be effective for recurrent GBM patients with high immune response in their tumor microenvironments. Trial registration: The Korea Clinical Research Information Service database: KCT0003815, Registered 18 April 2019, retrospectively registered.

CF102 for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14731-e14731
Author(s):  
Salomon M. Stemmer ◽  
Ofer Benjaminov ◽  
Gal Medalia ◽  
Noa Ciuraru ◽  
Michael H. Silverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Wnt Signaling Pathway ◽  
Drug Candidate ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hcc Cells

e14731 Background: The A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) is over-expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells as well as in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with HCC. The orally active drug candidate CF102, an A3AR agonist, induces in vivo apoptosis of HCC cells via de-regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. In this open label phase I/II trial, the safety and clinical effects of CF102 were assessed in patients with advanced unresectable HCC. Methods: The primary objectives of this trial were to examine the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of CF102 given orally twice daily in continuous cycles of 28 days each. Evaluation of anti-tumor effects and the utilization of A3AR as a biological predictive marker of response to CF102 were the secondary objectives. Results: 18 patients received CF102, six at each dose level (1 mg, 5 mg and 25 mg BID). No serious drug-related adverse events or dose-limiting toxicity were observed. Most adverse events were of grade 1-2 severity. CF102 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and linear PK behavior. Median overall survival in the study population, 67% of whom were sorafenib failures, was 7.8 months (range, 3·5-27·3 months) and for Child-Pugh B patients (28%) was 8.1 months. Stable disease (SD) by RECIST was observed in four patients for at least 4 months. CF102 had no adverse effect on routine measures of liver function over a 6 months period in 12 patients. A direct correlation between A3AR expression levels at baseline and patients’ response to CF102 was found. Conclusions: CF102 is safe and well-tolerated and shows favorable PK characteristics and hepatoprotective effects in patients with HCC. CF102 has shown preliminary evidence of clinical activity in Child-Pugh A and B HCC patients, justifying further clinical development.

scholarly journals A phase I study of a dual PI3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Lang ◽  
Lydia Wunderle ◽  
Susanne Badura ◽  
Eberhard Schleyer ◽  
Monika Brüggemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background Combined inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes may be an efficient treatment for acute leukemia. The primary objective of this phase I single center open label study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the dual pan-class I PI3K and mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced leukemia. Methods Herein patients > 18 years of age who had relapsed or showed refractory leukemia were treated with BEZ235 (orally at 300–400 mg BID (cohort − 1/1)) to assess safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK). Adverse events data and serious adverse events were analyzed and haematological and clinical biochemistry toxicities were assessed from laboratory test parameters. Response was assessed for the first time at the end of cycle 1 (day 29) and after every subsequent cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of BEZ235 were also included (BEZ235 plasma levels, phosphorylation of AKT, S6 and 4EBP1). On statistics this trial is a multiple ascending dose study in which a following variant of the 3 + 3 rule (“Rolling Six”), a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12 patients was recruited for the dose escalation and another 5 were planned for the expansion phase. Results Twenty-four patients with ALL (n = 11) or AML (n = 12) or CML-BP (n = 1) were enrolled. All patients had failed one (n = 5) or more lines of therapy (n = 5) and 14 patients were in refractory / refractory relapse. No formal MTD was defined, stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity at 400 mg BID dose was considered incompatible with prolonged treatment. The RP2D of BEZ235 was defined as 300 mg BID. Four of 24 patients showed clinical benefit. Twenty-two of 24 patients discontinued because of progression, (median time to progression 27 days (4d-112d). There was no association between PK parameters and efficacy or tolerability. Conclusions Combined inhibition of PI3K and mTOR inhibits a clinically meaningful driver pathway in a small subset of patients with ALL, with no benefit in patients with AML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01756118. retrospectively registered 19th December 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01756118.

scholarly journals ACTR-68. FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE EMULATE THERAPEUTICS™ VOYAGER SYSTEM IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi29-vi29
Author(s):  
Garni Barkhoudarian ◽  
Michael Badruddoja ◽  
Nicholas Blondin ◽  
Ricky Chen ◽  
Sajeel Chowdhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Radio Frequency Energy ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND The EMulate Therapeutics Voyager system is an investigational non-sterile, non-invasive, non-thermal, non-ionizing, portable, home-use medical device that uses a specific, localized ultra-low radio frequency energy (ulRFE®) cognate for the treatment of brain cancer. METHODS This ongoing, open-label, multi-center study (NAT-101) is being conducted in the US and Australia in patients with recurrent GBM. There are 3 treatment groups: 32 patients treated with Voyager alone, 43 patients treated with Voyager + Investigator’s choice of anti-cancer therapy, and 21 patients treated with Voyager+lomustine+/-bevacizumab. The objective of the study is to assess if the Voyager is a safe and feasible treatment for recurrent GBM. The primary outcome measure is safety, assessed by the incidence and evaluation of adverse events (AEs) associated with the Voyager. The secondary outcome measures are progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Enrollment is closed, and long-term treatment and follow-up is ongoing. 96 patients were enrolled and treated. 82 patients reported at least one AE, and 18 AEs were assessed as device-related (mild-moderate; 12 headache, 2 vomiting, 1 nausea, 1 confusion, 1 insomnia, and 1 skin irritation). 31 patients reported at least one serious AE, and none were assessed as device-related. 33% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 36% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy were progression-free after 6 months. 58% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 60% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy remained alive after 6 months; median overall survival is 7 months (95% CI=4.4±14.3) in patients treated with Voyager alone and 10 months (95% CI=6.7±11.5) in patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The Voyager system appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of recurrent GBM. Given that therapy is delivered non-invasively and no device-related serious adverse events were reported, further prospective study of the investigational device is planned.

An Open-Label Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of [14c] Bendamustine in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Malignancy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2476-2476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman ◽  
Hilde Rosing ◽  
Mona Darwish ◽  
Denise D'Andrea ◽  
Mary Bond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Refractory Malignancy

Abstract Abstract 2476 Background: Bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent which combines a nitrogen mustard moiety of mechlorethamine with a benzimidazole. This study was conducted to characterize the distribution, metabolism, and elimination of [14C] bendamustine and its metabolites (M3, M4, and dihydroxy bendamustine [HP2]) and to assess the roles of renal and hepatic pathways in the drug's metabolism and excretion. A secondary objective was to further characterize the safety profile of single-agent bendamustine. Methods: This open-label, phase I study enrolled 6 patients, age ≥18 years, with confirmed relapsed or refractory malignancy. The study was divided into 2 assessment periods: period A, during which the mass balance and pharmacokinetics of [14C] bendamustine were investigated, and period B, an extended-use period of up to 6 cycles with non-labeled bendamustine, during which safety continued to be assessed. Patients received intravenous (IV) bendamustine (120 mg/m2), containing 80–95 μCi of [14C] bendamustine, on day 1 of cycle 1 and non-labeled IV bendamustine (120 mg/m2) on day 2 of cycle 1 (period A). Pharmacokinetic parameters of bendamustine and metabolites M3, M4, and HP2 were calculated through plasma and urine concentrations, which were determined through 24 hours following administration of bendamustine on day 1. Total radioactivity (TRA) levels were measured in plasma, urine, and feces collected prior to drug administration and at time points through 168 hours after patients received [14C] bendamustine. Collection of excreta could continue (after the 7-day period) on an outpatient basis: if radiolabeled bendamustine ≥1% of dose was measurable in the 144- to 168-hour urine or feces collection, collection continued until the recovery in each 24-hour urine or feces collection was <1% of dose. Results: Six patients (3 males; 3 females) with a median age of 66 (48–75) years were enrolled and completed the pharmacokinetic portion of the study. For bendamustine, the decline from peak plasma concentration was characterized by an initial rapid distribution phase, followed by a somewhat slower intermediate phase. The pharmacologically relevant half-life (t½) was approximately 40 minutes. The plasma concentrations of M3, M4, and HP2 were very low relative to the bendamustine concentrations. Of the TRA dose administered, approximately half of the dose was recovered in the urine and approximately a quarter of the dose was recovered in the feces. Less than 5% of TRA dose was recovered in the urine as unchanged bendamustine. Mean recovery of TRA in excreta was approximately 76% of the radiochemical dose. Total recovery was incomplete due to continued slow excretion of TRA at the end of the collection period. The sustained levels of radioactivity in the plasma as compared with plasma concentrations of bendamustine suggest that, despite the rapid clearance of bendamustine, 1 or more longer-lived [14C] bendamustine-derived materials remain in the plasma. These longer-lived materials likely include by-products of alkylation. As previously noted, bendamustine volume of distribution was small (Vss∼20 L). The steady-state volume of distribution for TRA was ∼50 L. These results confirm previous data and provide evidence that neither bendamustine nor TRA are extensively distributed into the tissues. All 6 patients withdrew prior to completion of period B due to disease progression (n = 4), an adverse event (n = 1), or refusal to continue treatment (n=1). Bendamustine was well tolerated when administered at a dosage of 120 mg/m2 for 2 to 3 cycles. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (50%) and vomiting (50%). A grade 3/4 absolute lymphocyte count decrease occurred in all patients at some point during the study. There were no other grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events. Conclusions: Bendamustine was extensively metabolized via multiple metabolic pathways, with subsequent excretion in both urine and feces. Bendamustine accumulation is not anticipated in cancer patients with renal or hepatic impairment due to the dose administration schedule and short intermediate half-life. Adverse events and hematologic changes were consistent with the known safety profile of bendamustine. This research was sponsored by and conducted by Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA. Disclosures: Darwish: Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. D'Andrea:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Bond:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment. Hellriegel:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment.

Phase I study of AZD1775 with radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) and evaluation of intratumoral drug distribution (IDD) in patients with recurrent GBM.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2005-2005
Author(s):  
Brian Michael Alexander ◽  
Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia ◽  
Arati Suvas Desai ◽  
Jorg Dietrich ◽  
Thomas Joseph Kaley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

2005 Background: The standard of care treatment for newly diagnosed GBM is maximal safe surgical resection followed by two DNA damaging agents, RT and TMZ. Cellular response to DNA damage involves checkpoints that halt the cell cycle to allow DNA repair. AZD1775 is an oral small molecular inhibitor of a nuclear tyrosine kinase Wee1, a key regulator of the G2/M checkpoint. Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint prevents repair and pushes cells into mitosis with unrepaired DNA damage. AZD1775 was shown to enhance TMZ and RT effects in preclinical models. Methods: The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium 1202 trial (NCT01849146) is a phase I, open label, multicenter dose-finding study of AZD1775 in combination with standard RT and TMZ followed by an IDD study for patients undergoing surgery for recurrent GBM. The dose finding portion is comprised of two arms, one with AZD1775 given Monday through Friday during concurrent RT/TMZ and a second arm given with adjuvant TMZ qd x 5d/28d cycle. Each arm had standard 3+3 design. A combination cohort with both concurrent and adjuvant AZD1775 at MTD and analysis of PK/PD and IDD at MTD in patients undergoing surgery for recurrent GBM followed. Results: 51 patients enrolled in the dose finding arms. For the concurrent arm, the MTD was 200 mg. At 275 mg one patient had grade 3 fatigue and another had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Two of 6 total patients enrolled at 200 mg experienced DLTs (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 ALT elevation). The MTD for the adjuvant arm was 425 mg as 1 of 6 patients had DLT (grade 4 decrease in ANC). At 500 mg, 2 of 3 patients experienced intolerable diarrhea despite prophylaxis. Enrollment in the combination cohort is completed and evaluation of safety is underway. The drug concentration in contrast enhancing and non-enhancing brain tumor was 4-8 x and 0.5-2.6 x greater than plasma, respectively for patients on IDD portion. Conclusions: The MTD for AZD1775 in combination with RT/TMZ is 200 mg qd M-F with concurrent RT/TMZ and 425 mg qd x 5d/28d cycle in combination with adjuvant TMZ. IDD and PK/PD analysis is ongoing to inform the decision to proceed to phase II testing. Clinical trial information: NCT01849146.

IMPACT: Immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancers and CDK12 mutations.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5091-TPS5091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Andrea Reimers ◽  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Jonathan Chou ◽  
Daniel J. George ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Diversity Assessment ◽  
Potential Biomarker

TPS5091 Background: Tumors with biallelic CDK12 loss have been identified as a distinct subtype in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and other cancer types. The CDK12 biallelic loss mCRPC genomic signature, distinct from homologous recombination deficient (HRD) and ETS fusion signatures, is characterized by excessive tandem duplications, genomic instability, gene fusion-caused putative neoantigens, and increased tumor T cell infiltration. Early clinical experience with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in CDK12 loss mCRPC patients (pts) is notable for deep and sustained PSA as well as radiographic responses. We hypothesize that CDK12 biallelic loss is a potential biomarker of immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI) efficacy in mCRPC and other cancers. Methods: IMPACT (NCT03570619) is a multi-center, open label, phase 2 study of pts with metastatic cancers that harbor CDK12 biallelic loss. mCRPC pts will be enrolled in cohort A (n = 25) in a Mini-Max Simon Two-Stage design, and all other pts in single-stage cohort B (n = 15). All pts will receive induction therapy with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV q3 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by maintenance nivolumab at 480 mg IV q4 weeks (up to 52 weeks in total). Eligible pts must have identified biallelic CDK12 loss on any CLIA/CAP approved next generation sequencing assay and a histologic diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma or other metastatic carcinoma. No prior ICI is allowed. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A per PCWG3 criteria. An ORR of 30% is targeted in cohort A. Secondary endpoints include safety, secondary efficacy measures, quality of life, and survival measures. Exploratory objectives include tumor whole exome analysis and changes in immune profiles with therapy. Comprehensive and serial monitoring of peripheral blood immune cell populations will be performed via T cell clonal diversity assessment and multi-parametric flow cytometry. Changes in myeloid and lymphoid populations will be assessed from whole blood. Polarization and effector function of T cells and activation of antigen presenting cells will be further characterized from isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Study accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03570619.

Initial safety run-in findings with bavituximab plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16537-e16537
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Haeseong Park ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Jessicca Martin Rege ◽  
Kerry Culm-Merdek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chylous Ascites ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Post Hoc

e16537 Background: Bavituximab, an investigational, chimeric monoclonal antibody designed to inhibit the immunosuppressive effects of phosphatidylserine (PS), is being evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Bavituximab binds in a high-affinity complex with β2-glycoprotein and PS to reverse immunological non-responsiveness and activate multiple immune cell receptors. Post-hoc data from the Phase III Sunrise second-line lung cancer study indicated that patients who progressed on study treatment with bavituximab plus docetaxel and continued with a checkpoint inhibitor showed significantly improved overall survival. Cumulative data suggest that bavituximab may potentiate pembrolizumab-mediated checkpoint inhibition, potentially increasing overall clinical benefit. ONCG100 is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm global study designed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of bavituximab and pembrolizumab when administered in combination to advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma patients, regardless of PD-L1 status, who have progressed on or after at least one prior standard therapy (NCT04099641). Methods: The safety run-in phase of the trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of de-escalating doses of bavituximab when administered in combination with the approved dose and schedule of pembrolizumab (200mg, Q3W). Adverse events were evaluated by CTCAE v5.0. Results: Three patients enrolled and completed the safety-run in phase of the study where bavituximab was administered at the starting dose of 3 mg/kg QW in combination with pembrolizumab. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed during the 21-day monitoring period. A total of 4 treatment emergent adverse events were observed; 2 of which were reported as related to treatment with bavituximab (arthralgia and fatigue, both grade 1). There was one treatment-unrelated SAE reported (chylous ascites, grade 2), which resolved allowing the patient to continue treatment. Conclusions: The 3 mg/kg dose of bavituximab was readily combined during the safety run-in phase of the study with the approved dose of pembrolizumab. The AE profiles for this combination were manageable and expected given the known profiles of each agent. Based upon these findings, the recommended dose for expansion for the combination was declared and the expansion phase of the study opened. Updated safety data from the study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04099641 .

An exploratory study of metformin (Met) with or without rapamycin (Rapa) as maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy in patients (Pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 700-700
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Bever ◽  
Erkut Hasan Borazanci ◽  
Elizabeth Thompson ◽  
Annie Wu ◽  
Jennifer N. Durham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Oncogenic Pathways ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Ecog Ps

700 Background: Few studies have examined maintenance therapy in unselected pts with metastatic PDA (mPDA). mTOR signaling is central to several oncogenic pathways in PDA and also has a role in T cell differentiation and activation, and we hypothesized a role for mTOR inhibition (mTORi) in the maintenance setting. Methods: This was a randomized open-label study conducted at 2 sites. Eligible pts had mPDA with stable disease for ≥6 months on chemotherapy and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to Met 850mg BID alone (Arm A) or with Rapa 4mg daily (Arm B), stratified by prior FOLFIRINOX. Baseline and on-treatment PET scans and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained for exploratory analyses. Results: 23 pts were randomized. Median age was 64 (range 34-77) and 82% had ECOG PS 1. 12 of 23 received prior FOLFIRINOX; 8 received >1 prior line of therapy. 22 subjects (11 per arm) were treated per protocol. Treatment related adverse events of Grade ≥3 were seen in 0% vs 27% of pts in Arm A vs B and were all asymptomatic hematologic or electrolyte abnormalities that were not clinically significant. Median PFS/OS were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.9-9.2)/13.2 mos (95% CI: 7.8 to not reached) respectively, with 2 yr OS rate of 37% (95% CI: 21-66%); there were no differences between treatment arms. As expected in the maximally debulked setting, no responses were observed by RECIST; however, decreases in FDG avidity and/or CA199 were observed in several long-term survivors. Better survival was associated with low baseline neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, baseline lack of assessable disease by PET, and with expansion of dendritic cells following treatment. Compared to Met alone, Met + Rapa was associated with decreased mTOR activity on some immune cell subsets and decreased metabolic fitness, but this was not correlated with outcome. Conclusions: Met +/- rapa maintenance for mPDA was well-tolerated and several pts achieved stable disease associated with exceptionally long survival. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of mTORi in the maintenance setting and to enhance pt selection for such approaches. Clinical trial information: NCT02048384.

A phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of glumetinib (SCC244) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21702-e21702
Author(s):  
Hua-Jun Chen ◽  
Jin-Ji Yang ◽  
Xuening Yang ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Minghui Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Once Daily

e21702 Background: Aberrant activation of the MET pathway is associated poor prognosis and poor response to standard therapies in cancer patients. Glumetinib (SCC224) is an oral potent and highly selective MET inhibitor. This is an open label, dose-escalation, phase I clinical study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC regardless of MET status. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC failed standard treatments received glumetinib orally according to one of four dose escalation regimens on a 28-day cycle: 100 mg, 200 mg, 300mg and 400 mg once daily, in a Pharmacologically Guided Dose Escalation (PGDE) design (a variation of the standard 3+3 design). The primary endpoints are the incidence of dose limit toxicity (DLT), maximally tolerated dose (MTD), biologically effective dose (BED). The secondary endpoints are treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and its metabolites. Results: As of Feb 7, 2020, a total of eighteen eligible (18) patients were enrolled into this study: 3 at 100 mg, 3 at 200 mg, 6 at 300 mg and 6 at 400 mg. Only one patient among 6 evaluable patients at 400mg cohort reported one DLT of grade 3 vomiting. Treatment-related adverse events mostly were grade 1 or 2 nausea, vomiting, elevated alkaline phosphatase, elevated conjugated bilirubin, edema, headache, asthenia and decreased appetite. Non-DLT treatment related G3/4 adverse events were peripheral edema (n = 1, 5.5%), hypothyroidism (n = 1, 5.5%). Absorption was rapid after dosing and the median time to reach maximum plasma drug concentration ( Tmax) was 2.0‐6.0 hours. The mean value of half-life(t1/2) in each dose group ranged from 20.43h to 35.36 h. In response to glumetinib, one patient with MET overexpression at 200mg dose level had a best of response of partial response and completed 44 weeks glumetinib treatment, 4 patients (3 with MET amplification) had a best of response of stable disease. Conclusions: Glumetinib was well tolerated at doses up to 400 mg once daily and demonstrated clinical activity in advanced NSCLC with MET alterations. Glumetinib is used in ongoing clinical trials to further explore safety and efficacy in NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03466268.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document