DDRE-01. CDK PATHWAY INHIBITION WITH ABEMACICLIB IMPROVES INTRACRANIAL AND EXTRACRANIAL RESPONSE TO CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE IN PRE-CLINICAL MODELS OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi74-vi74
Author(s):  
Naema Nayyar ◽  
Mohini Singh ◽  
Magali de Sauvage ◽  
Ashish Dahal ◽  
Michael Brehm ◽  
...  

Abstract While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized treatment of metastatic melanoma, few of the 75% of patients who develop brain metastases benefit from immunotherapy. Inhibition of CDK4/6 pathway – altered in ~90% of melanoma patients – can reportedly increase tumor inflammation and sensitize extracranial tumors to ICI. To determine whether intracranial melanoma can be similarly sensitized, we studied efficacy of combination CDK4/6 inhibitor Abemaciclib and ICI in immunocompetent mouse models of melanoma brain metastases bearing concurrent intracranial and extracranial tumors. 8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice received subcutaneous injections of 2x105 YUMM1.7 or B16-F10 melanoma cells 3 days prior to intracranial injections of 5x104 YUMM1.7 cells or 5x103 B16-F10 cells respectively. Mice were randomized into 6 treatment groups (n=5-7/group): Abemaciclib alone, anti-PD-1 monotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 combined (combination ICI), Abemaciclib and anti-PD-1, Abemaciclib combined with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 (triple therapy), and treatment with vehicle and isotype-matched antibodies as control. In mice bearing YUMM1.7 tumors, subcutaneous tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to control in mice treated with Abemaciclib alone (p< 0.05), combination ICI (p< 0.05) and triple therapy (p< 0.05). However, improvement in survival was only observed with triple therapy (p=0.039) compared to control group. In mice bearing B16-F10 tumors, we observed striking reduction in subcutaneous tumor growth in mice treated with Abemaciclib and anti-PD-1 compared to control-treated mice (p=0.0016) or to mice receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy (p=0.000056). This further corresponded to a significant increase in survival of Abemaciclib and anti-PD-1 treated mice compared to control (p=0.02). Additionally, we observed improved survival in mice treated with combination ICI (p=0.006) or triple therapy (p=0.01). These results indicate CDK4/6 inhibition with Abemaciclib can improve both extracranial and intracranial responses to ICI and sensitize melanoma brain metastases to immunotherapy. Our pre-clinical findings warrant further investigation to determine whether this combination approach can improve patient outcomes.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1489
Author(s):  
John M. Rieth ◽  
Umang Swami ◽  
Sarah L. Mott ◽  
Mario Zanaty ◽  
Michael D. Henry ◽  
...  

Brain metastases commonly develop in melanoma and are associated with poor overall survival of about five to nine months. Fortunately, new therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, have been developed. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma were identified at a single institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify baseline and treatment factors, which correlated with progression-free and overall survival. A total of 209 patients with melanoma brain metastases were identified. The median overall survival of the cohort was 5.3 months. On multivariable analysis, the presence of non-cranial metastatic disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2–4), whole-brain radiation therapy, and older age at diagnosis of brain metastasis were associated with poorer overall survival. Craniotomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.97) and treatment with a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.94) were the only interventions associated with improved overall survival. Further studies with novel agents are needed to extend lifespan in patients with brain metastases in melanoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler P. Robin ◽  
Robert E. Breeze ◽  
Derek E. Smith ◽  
Chad G. Rusthoven ◽  
Karl D. Lewis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21523-e21523
Author(s):  
Charlotte Fenioux ◽  
Idriss Troussier ◽  
Jean-Jacques Mazeron ◽  
Charles Henry Canova ◽  
Philippe Saiag ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii2
Author(s):  
Ramin Morshed ◽  
Jason Chung ◽  
Vivek Sudhakar ◽  
Daniel Cummins ◽  
Jacob Young ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Metastasis of melanoma to the brain is associated with poor outcomes. Recent trials demonstrate improved survival after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact that checkpoint inhibitor treatment has on overall survival (OS) and central nervous system (CNS) progression in a cohort of patients undergoing surgical resection of melanoma brain metastases. METHODS This retrospective, single-center study included patients undergoing first-time surgical resection of melanoma brain metastases. A multivariate Cox proportional model was used to estimate the association of patient and treatment factors with OS and CNS progression. RESULTS 85 patients underwent first-time resection of 97 melanoma brain metastases with a median follow-up of 9.5 months. Checkpoint inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, and/or Nivolumab) were used in 55.1% of cases (19 pre-op; 47 post-op; median 9 cycles). Patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors had similar peri-op systemic disease status and KPS but had been treated with more systemic agents and had more instances of CNS progression prior to surgery. Median OS and time to CNS progression for the cohort were 1 year and 237 days, respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression model, age (HR 1.03 by decade; p=0.02), treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.27; p<0.0001), prior radiotherapy (HR 2.44; p=0.007), and number of brain metastases at the time of surgery (HR 1.05 per metastasis; p=0.04) were significant predictors of OS. Checkpoint inhibitor treatment was associated with longer OS from surgery (median 3 vs 0.5 yrs, log-rank p=0.004). However, patients who underwent craniotomy after prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment had poor OS (median 0.56 yrs). Prior radiotherapy was also associated with poor OS (median 0.53 yrs). CONCLUSIONS While checkpoint inhibitor treatment was associated with improved survival in this surgical cohort of melanoma brain metastases, patients who require surgical resection after checkpoint inhibitor treatment or radiotherapy are poor surgical candidates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii43-ii43
Author(s):  
S H A E Derks ◽  
J L M Jongen ◽  
C Slagter ◽  
A Joosse ◽  
J W Schouten ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Until recently, patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) had limited therapeutic options. With the arrival of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapy (TT) and advances in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), treatment has improved. We evaluated treatments and patient outcome before and after the introduction of these novel therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective, single-center study, patients presenting with MBMs at the Erasmus MC between November 2005 and January 2021 with sufficient follow-up were included. Overall survival (OS), measured from date of MBM diagnosis, was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients were stratified according to MBM diagnosis before and after January 1, 2016, since novel therapies were mostly prescribed in our clinic after this date. Results were significant (p<0.05), unless otherwise stated. RESULTS Overall, 413 patients were included. Median [IQR] age was 56.6 years [52–71] with a 60% male predominance. A BRAF mutation was present in 46.7% of patients. A single MBM was found in 29.3% and ≥4 MBMs were found in 49.0% of patients. Before January 1, 2016, 191 patients were treated, and 222 patients after that date. Chemotherapy was more frequently used before 2016, both prior to (3.9% pre-2016 vs. 0.9% post-2016) and after (7.0% vs. 0.0%) the diagnosis of MBMs. In contrast, treatment with TT was more frequent after 2016, both prior to (3.7% vs. 16.2%) and after (7.9% vs. 41.4%) the diagnosis of MBMs. Comparable changes were observed for treatment with ICIs (prior to MBM diagnosis: 0.5% vs. 25.2%; after MBM diagnosis: 18.3% vs 39.2%). The application of SRT did not differ significantly before and after 2016 (12.0% vs. 19.4%, p=0.89), while the application of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) decreased (52.4% vs. 13.5%). Surgical resection was not significantly different between those periods (15.7% vs. 16.7%, p=0.90). Before 2016, median OS [IQR] was shorter than after 2016 (4.6 [1.9–10.9] vs. 6.6 [1.8–24.5] months). The effect of novel therapies on OS was further analysed in patients diagnosed after 2016; treatment vs. no treatment was compared. ICI treatment prior to MBM diagnosis was associated with worse OS (median OS 4.0 vs. 7.5 months). ICI treatment after MBM diagnosis was associated with better OS (median OS 24.5 vs. 3.0 months). In patients with a BRAF mutation, TT before MBM diagnosis was associated with worse OS (median OS 1.8 vs. 9.4 months). TT after MBM diagnosis in those patients was not significantly associated with improved OS (median OS 7.6 vs. 5.2 months, p=0.96). CONCLUSION Recent therapeutic advances for MBM replaced WBRT and chemotherapy with SRT, TT and ICIs. In that period, prognosis of MBM patients increased significantly. OS in patients treated with ICIs or TT prior to MBM diagnosis is still poor, but OS is improved in patients treated with ICIs after the diagnosis of MBM.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13586-e13586
Author(s):  
William J Phillips ◽  
Bryan Lo ◽  
Michael Ong ◽  
Tyler Smith ◽  
Xinni Song

e13586 Background: Brain metastases are observed in more than 40% of all patients with stage IV melanoma. In recent years, more extensive use of stereotactic radiation (STRT) and the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF targeted therapies have positively impacted outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma (MBM) In this study, we examined real-world clinical outcomes of patients presented with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Methods: This retrospective review evaluated MBM patients treated at the Ottawa Hospital. Clinical, radiologic, and pathologic variables were collected from the electronic medical records from January 2000 to June 2018. Results: A total of 277 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median overall survival was 4 months. LDH was the only significant prognostic factor in this study. Over 65% of brain metastases were detected due to the presence of neurological symptoms, while surveillance and restaging identified asymptomatic brain metastases in the remaining patients. Detection by neurological symptoms was related to larger (p < 0.001) and haemorrhagic (p = 0.032) intra-cranial lesions as well as decreased overall survival (HR = 1.2, p = 0.018). With regards to locoregional treatment STRT radiation outperformed WBRT alone in patients with single and oligo (2-6 lesions) brain lesions (HR = 0.149, p = 0.001 for oligo; HR = 0.149, p = 0.003 for single) and was associated with approximately a 3-fold increase in median survival. STRT was used 2-fold less frequently in patients with more than one lesion (54.8% in single; 31.7% in oligo). In patients receiving systemic therapy, immunotherapy is the only modality demonstrated overall survival benefit compared to no systemic treatment (HR = 0.511, p = 0.014). Furthermore, patients receiving STRT in combination with immunotherapy outperformed patients receiving STRT with WBRT (HR = 0.389, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Results from this study support the consideration of routine screening of high-risk asymptomatic patients, the increased use of STRT in patients with multiple intra-cranial lesions. The efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with MBM is consistent with current clinical trial data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document