scholarly journals IMT-05 PHASE III RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF AFTV FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii17-ii18
Author(s):  
Masayuki Nitta ◽  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Eiichi Ishikawa ◽  
Takashi Maruyama ◽  
Soko Ikuta ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The highly fatal glioblastoma has an extremely poor prognosis and development of a new treatment is desired. Local treatment is limited due to its high invasiveness, and immunotherapy utilizing self-immune mechanism is theoretically expected. An autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) is a vaccine that is prepared using formalin-fixed tumor tissue and recognizes tumor antigen peptides to induce cytotoxic T cells. We have previously conducted three clinical trials using AFTV for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma since 2004. The third trial was a double-blind multicenter phase IIb/III trial with 63 case registries, which did not make a significant difference in OS (study group 25 months, placebo group 31 months), the total removal group showed excellent clinical results (3-year survival rate; 65%, median survival; not reached). Since the study was designed to go to Phase III if the test group was not inferior to the placebo group, so it went on to go to Phase III. METHODS Target patients will be 80 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing pathologic diagnosis, who have undergone total removal of contrast-enhanced lesions and receive standard chemoradiation therapy. STUDY DESIGN Double-blind, 3-year enrollment period, 18-month observation period. Stratification factor: Photodynamic therapy (PDT), facility, age, KPS. Administration method: After standard chemoradiotherapy, in parallel with maintenance chemotherapy, a total of 9 times intradermal administration of vaccine. Primary endpoint: PFS of FAS patients, Secondary endpoints: 18 months PFS of the FAS patient, OS, PFS of the ITT analysis target case. Based on the results of the IIb trial, we limited the registered patients with total tumor removal, and in view of the fact that the prognosis of patients with combined PDT and AFTV were excellent, PDT was added to the stratification factor. We outline our efforts and problems aimed at clinical approval of AFTV for glioblastoma.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2069-2069
Author(s):  
Y. Muragaki ◽  
T. Maruyama ◽  
H. Iseki ◽  
K. Tsuboi ◽  
A. Matsumura ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii20-iii20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Muragaki ◽  
T. Maruyama ◽  
E. Ishikawa ◽  
M. Nitta ◽  
S. Ikuta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 890-891
Author(s):  
N. Lomakin ◽  
B. Bakirov ◽  
G. Musaev ◽  
D. Protsenko ◽  
O. Moiseeva ◽  
...  

Background:Levilimab (LVL) is a novel anti-IL6Rmonoclonal antibody against IL6Rα. Cytokine release syndrome plays the key role in the pathogenesis of a range of life-threatening conditions including the acute respiratory distress syndrome in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Thus, the use of LVL could be considered as anti-cytokine therapy with a potency to prevent the complications and progression of respiratory failure in COVID-19.Objectives:We analyzed the changes in the serum concentrations of inflammatory markers (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and IL-6) in patients treated with LVL or placebo as part of a phase III multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled adaptive-design CORONA clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LVL in subjects with severe COVID-19 (NCT04397562).Methods:A total of 217 patients were enrolled in the study, 206 patients were randomized, and 204 patients received the investigational product (IP, LVL or placebo).Study included men and non-pregnant women aged ≥18 years, hospitalized for severe COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving standard therapy according to the national guidelines. Patients with acute respiratory failure with the need in invasive respiratory support, septic shock, multiple organ failure or life expectancy less than 24 hours could not participate in the study. The use of other monoclonal antibodies and glucocorticoids for the treatment of COVID-19 were not allowed.Subjects were stratified according to the CRP level (CRP ≤ 7 mg/L; CRP > 7 mg/L) and then randomized (1:1) into 2 groups to receive LVL 324 mg or placebo. LVL/placebo were administered as a single subcutaneous injection, investigator and patients were unaware of the received therapy.Among secondary endpoints of the study changes from baseline in ESR, CRP and IL-6 concentrations were assessed. CRP level and ESR were measured before the IP administration and on Days 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 29 and 30. Blood samples for the measurement of IL-6 concentration were obtained before the IP administration and then every day for 2 weeks after administration.Results:We observed the pronounced decrease of ESR in LVL group compared to Placebo group. The difference was statistically significant on Days 3 and 7: the median ESR change from baseline was -3 mm/h and +3 mm/h on Day 3, -11 mm/h and -3.1 mm/h on Day 7, in LVL and Placebo groups, respectively (p=0.0319 and p=0.0110, Days 3 and 7). The statistically significant difference in the change of CRP level was detected between the groups on Day 3: -26.6±41.9 mg/L and -19.2±58.2 mg/L in LVL and Placebo groups, respectively (p=0.0241). Numerically the same dynamics of ESR and CRP was observed over entire study period.The dynamics of IL-6 serum concentrations in LVL and Placebo groups was strikingly different. After LVL administration we detected the rapid significant increase in IL-6 concentration due to IL-6 receptors inhibition. Maximum change from baseline was observed on Day 3 (+91.9±117.7 pg/mL), on Day 14 the value was +31.9±62.7 pg/mL.In the Placebo group, the IL-6 concentration increased slightly until Day 4 (+5,1±76,5 pg/mL), and then decreased significantly (-39.2±55.1 pg/mL on Day 14) due to clinical improvement in this group.Conclusion:The significant differences in the dynamics of ESR, CRP and IL-6 after LVL administration compared to placebo confirmed the pharmacodynamic effect and its potency to prevent the excessive release of inflammatory substances in severely ill COVID-19 patients.References:[1]Xu X, Han M, Li T, Sun W, Wang D, Fu B, Zhou Y, Zheng X, Yang Y, Li X, Zhang X, Pan A, Wei H. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10970-10975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005615117. Epub 2020 Apr 29. PMID: 32350134; PMCID: PMC7245089.Acknowledgements:We thank all contributors to the CORONA study.Disclosure of Interests:Nikita Lomakin: None declared, Bulat Bakirov: None declared, Gaziiavdibir Musaev: None declared, Denis Protsenko: None declared, Olga Moiseeva: None declared, Elena Pasechnik: None declared, Vladimir Popov: None declared, Elena Smolyarchuk: None declared, Ivan Gordeev: None declared, Michail Gilyarov: None declared, Daria Fomina: None declared, V Mazurov: None declared, Maria Morozova Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Ekaterina Dokukina Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Dmitrii Bogdan Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Anton Lutskii Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Arina Zinkina-Orihan Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Iulia Linkova Employee of: JSC BIOCAD, Anton Seleznev Employee of: JSC BIOCAD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Gilbert ◽  
James Dignam ◽  
Minhee Won ◽  
Deborah T. Blumenthal ◽  
Michael A. Vogelbaum ◽  
...  

1 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June, 2, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Sunday edition of ASCO Daily News.


2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Takashi Maruyama ◽  
Hiroshi Iseki ◽  
Masahiko Tanaka ◽  
Chie Shinohara ◽  
...  

Object The objective of the present study was analysis of results of the prospective clinical trial directed toward the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of the administration of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) concomitant with fractionated radiotherapy in cases of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Methods Twenty-four patients were enrolled into the clinical trial, while 2 cases were excluded from the final analysis of results. The treatment protocol included aggressive tumor resection, fractionated radiotherapy up to a total dose of 60 Gy, and 3 concomitant courses of AFTV administered with an interval of one week at the late stage of irradiation. Two delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) tests were done—one 48 hours before the initial course of vaccination (DTH-1) and one 2 weeks after the third (DTH-2). All but one of the patients received salvage therapy at the time of tumor progression. The defined primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety of concomitant treatment. Results The median duration of overall survival was 19.8 months (95% CI 13.8–31.3 months). The actuarial 2-year survival rate was 40%. The median duration of progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI 4.3–13.6 months). Overall survival showed a statistically significant association with recursive partitioning analysis class (p < 0.05); progression-free survival showed a statistically significant association with p53 staining index (p < 0.05) and size of DTH-2 response (p < 0.001). AFTV injection concomitant with fractionated radiotherapy was well tolerated by all patients and in no case did treatment-related adverse effects exceed Grade 1 toxicity; adverse effects were limited to local erythema, induration, and swelling at the site of injection. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that AFTV treatment concomitant with fractionated radiotherapy may be effective in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Further clinical testing is warranted.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v118.2-v118
Author(s):  
Takashi Maruyama ◽  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Masayuki Nitta ◽  
Hiroshi Iseki ◽  
Tadao Ohno ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2023-2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Nishikawa ◽  
Frank Saran ◽  
Warren Mason ◽  
Wolfgang Wick ◽  
Timothy Francis Cloughesy ◽  
...  

2023^ Background: Bv plus 1st-line standard of care (SoC; T+RT) achieved a PFS benefit in the AVAglio phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo [P]-controlled trial in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed GBM. AVAglio includes BM evaluation to identify pts benefiting most from Bv. Analysis of plasma VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 was prioritized based on encouraging findings in Bv trials in several tumor types. Methods: AVAglio includes an optional, exploratory correlative BM analysis; participating pts provided informed consent for BMs. Baseline (BL) plasma samples were analyzed using the Roche IMPACT platform, based on multiplex ELISA technology. Pts were dichotomized according to BM levels using either Q1, median or Q3 cut-offs. Potential interactions between BL BM levels and PFS were tested using Cox regression analyses. Results: Of 921 patients enrolled, 571 (62%) were evaluable in the BM study. Baseline characteristics and PFS outcome were comparable in the ITT and BM-evaluable populations. Median BL VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 levels were 77.0 pg/mL and 12.6 ng/mL, respectively. No significant interaction for PFS was seen at α=0.025. Conclusions: The potential predictive (VEGF-A, VEGFR-2) and prognostic (VEGF-A) value seen in breast, pancreatic and gastric cancers was not apparent in BL BM samples from AVAglio using a median, Q1 or Q3 cut-off. Additional plasma and tumor BM analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00943826. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (32) ◽  
pp. 4085-4091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Gilbert ◽  
Meihua Wang ◽  
Kenneth D. Aldape ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Monika E. Hegi ◽  
...  

Purpose Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients and Methods This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. Results A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document