scholarly journals Erratum to “Role of fruit juice in achieving the 5-a-day recommendation for fruit and vegetable intake” Nutrition Reviews 2019;77(11):829–843

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-260
2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 829-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Benton ◽  
Hayley A Young

Abstract Although there is strong evidence that consumption of fruit and vegetables is associated with a reduced rate of all-cause mortality, only a minority of the population consumes 5 servings a day, and campaigns to increase intake have had limited success. This review examines whether encouraging the consumption of fruit juice might offer a step toward the 5-a-day target. Reasons given for not consuming whole fruit involve practicalities, inconvenience, and the effort required. Psychologically, what is important is not only basic information about health, but how individuals interpret their ability to implement that information. It has been argued that fruit juice avoids the problems that commonly prevent fruit consumption and thus provides a practical means of increasing intake and benefitting health through an approach with which the population can readily engage. Those arguing against consuming fruit juice emphasize that it is a source of sugar lacking fiber, yet juice provides nutrients such as vitamin C, carotenoids, and polyphenols that offer health-related benefits. Actively encouraging the daily consumption of fruit juice in public health policy could help populations achieve the 5-a-day recommendation for fruit and vegetable intake.


Nutrition ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Guerra ◽  
Andrea Ticinesi ◽  
Franca Allegri ◽  
Antonio Nouvenne ◽  
Beatrice Prati ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea Suldrup Jørgensen ◽  
Mette Rasmussen ◽  
Anne Kristine Aarestrup ◽  
Annette Kjær Ersbøll ◽  
Sanne Ellegaard Jørgensen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
D. A Johnson ◽  
G. Divine ◽  
G. Alexander ◽  
S. Rolnick ◽  
J. Calvi ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. McSpadden ◽  
Heather Patrick ◽  
April Y. Oh ◽  
Amy L. Yaroch ◽  
Laura A. Dwyer ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 105283
Author(s):  
Daniela Craveiro ◽  
Sibila Marques ◽  
Iva Zvěřinová ◽  
Vojtěch Máca ◽  
Milan Ščasný ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana Miewald ◽  
David Holben ◽  
Peter Hall

Purpose: We examined whether participation in a food box program has a positive effect on fruit and vegetable consumption and food security. Methods: Participants and nonparticipants in a food box program were surveyed to determine differences between the two groups and change over time. Results: Fruit and vegetable intake declined in those who left the program after several months, and intake of fruit, carrots, and vegetables was lower among those who had left than among those who remained in the program. Food insecurity was associated with lower intakes of fruit and vegetables. Conclusions: Participation in a food box program can provide some benefit in terms of increased fruit and vegetable consumption for those who use the program regularly. Increasing the frequency of the box and encouraging continued use may improve these effects.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nour A. Elsahoryi ◽  
Charlotte E. Neville ◽  
Christopher C. Patterson ◽  
Gerry J. Linden ◽  
Marie Moitry ◽  
...  

Abstract Increased fruit and vegetable (FV) intake is associated with reduced blood pressure (BP). However, it is not clear whether the effect of FV on BP depends on the type of FV consumed. Furthermore, there is limited research regarding the comparative effect of juices or whole FV on BP. Baseline data from a prospective cohort study of 10 660 men aged 50–59 years examined not only the cross-sectional association between total FV intake but also specific types of FV and BP in France and Northern Ireland. BP was measured, and dietary intake assessed using FFQ. After adjusting for confounders, both systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly inversely associated with total fruit, vegetable and fruit juice intake; however, when examined according to fruit or vegetable sub-type (citrus fruit, other fruit, fruit juices, cooked vegetables and raw vegetables), only the other fruit and raw vegetable categories were consistently associated with reduced SBP and DBP. In relation to the risk of hypertension based on SBP >140 mmHg, the OR for total fruit, vegetable and fruit juice intake (per fourth) was 0·95 (95 % CI 0·91, 1·00), with the same estimates being 0·98 (95 % CI 0·94, 1·02) for citrus fruit (per fourth), 1·02 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·06) for fruit juice (per fourth), 0·93 (95 % CI 0·89, 0·98) for other fruit (per fourth), 1·05 (95 % CI 0·99, 1·10) for cooked vegetable (per fourth) and 0·86 (95 % CI 0·80, 0·91) for raw vegetable intakes (per fourth). Similar results were obtained for DBP. In conclusion, a high overall intake of fruit, vegetables and fruit juice was inversely associated with SBP, DBP and risk of hypertension, but this differed by FV sub-type, suggesting that the strength of the association between FV sub-types and BP might be related to the type consumed, or to processing or cooking-related factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document