Hand—arm vibration syndrome. A double-blind case—control study with a new esthesiometer

1994 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
D. S. Chatterjee
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1014
Author(s):  
Rakshith Reddy H. V. ◽  
Aswathy Rajan ◽  
Amitha Rao Aroor

Background: Venipuncture is one of the most common cause of iatrogenic pain in neonates which is equally stressful to the parents as well as to the personnel performing the procedure. Despite an abundance of data that demonstrate the efficacy of local anesthetics for reducing venipuncture pain in neonates their use in day to day practice is not used widely used. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of EMLA cream and 5% Lignocaine cream versus placebo for pain relief in newborns undergoing venipuncture.Methods: Present study was a hospital based, double blind randomised, case control study. A 240 eligible new-borns were randomised into EMLA, 5%lignocaine and placebo groups after randomization. The respective creams were applied 1 hour before the procedure and pain scores were assessed using NIPS scoring during venepunture. Data was analysed using SPSS ver. 20.0 statistical package. Student’s unpaired t-test and paired t tests was used to compare continuous data, and to compare pain scores one-way ANOVA was used to compare categorical data. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Paired t-tests revealed significant lower NIPS scores in EMLA and 5% lignocaine group than the placebo group (p value=0.001).Conclusions: From present study it can be concluded that both EMLA and 5% lignocaine are equally efficacious and cost effective in reducing the pain of venepuncture in neonates.


2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. WATTS ◽  
P. GASTON ◽  
G. HOOPER

We performed a randomized double-blind case–control study in 64 consecutive patients undergoing open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthetic to assess the pain experienced on injection of plain lidocaine (pH 6.4) compared with lidocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate (pH 7.4). The results showed no statistical difference in the pain scores reported by patients. The mean pain scores for all patients were low, and most patients reported that they were “not at all anxious” about receiving a similar injection in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Song ◽  
Jingyi Li ◽  
Lishun Liu ◽  
Richard Xu ◽  
Ziyi Zhou ◽  
...  

Background: The association between plasma vitamin E levels and first stroke risk in men and women remains unclear.Objective: We aimed to examine the prospective association between plasma vitamin E and first stroke, and evaluate the effect modifiers for the association, among hypertensive patients.Design: The study sample was drawn from the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT), which randomized a total of 20,702 hypertensive patients to a double-blind, daily treatment with either 10 mg enalapril and 0.8 mg folic acid or 10 mg enalapril alone. This nested case-control study, including 618 first stroke cases and 618 controls matched for age, sex, treatment group, and study site, was conducted after the completion of the CSPPT.Results: The median follow-up duration was 4.5 years. Among men, a significantly higher risk of first stroke (adjusted OR, 1.67; 95%CI: 1.01, 2.77) was found for those with plasma vitamin E ≥7.1 μg/mL (≥quartile 1) compared with those with plasma vitamin E &lt; 7.1 μg/mL. Subgroup analyses further showed that the association between vitamin E (≥7.1 vs. &lt;7.1 μg/mL) and first stroke in men was significantly stronger in non-drinkers (adjusted OR, 2.64; 95%CI: 1.41, 4.96), compared to current drinkers (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.66, P-interaction = 0.008). However, there was no significant association between plasma vitamin E and first stroke in women (P-interaction between sex and plasma vitamin E = 0.048).Conclusions: Among Chinese hypertensive patients, there was a statistically significant positive association between baseline plasma vitamin E and the risk of first stroke in men, but not in women.Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00794885, Identifier: NCT00794885.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document