scholarly journals 1511. Influenza antiviral use in patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza in the United States, FluSurv-NET, 2015 – 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S759-S759
Author(s):  
Mark W Tenforde ◽  
Charisse N Cummings ◽  
Melissa Sutton ◽  
Sue Kim ◽  
Amber Maslar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Antiviral therapy is recommended for all patients hospitalized with influenza to reduce morbidity and mortality. We used data from the population-based Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) to evaluate trends in influenza antiviral use in patients hospitalized with influenza over 4 seasons in the United States. Methods We included cases residing within the FluSurv-NET catchment area and hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza from October 1 – April 30 during 2015-16 through 2018-19 seasons. For 2015-16 and 2016-17, chart abstraction of demographic and clinical characteristics and antiviral use was performed on all cases; for 2017-18 and 2018-19, all patients < 50-years and an age-stratified random sample of older adults were sampled. Data were weighted to reflect the probability of selection. We assessed the frequency of treatment, by season and age group, and evaluated trends by season using the Cochran-Armitage test. Among those receiving antivirals, we used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between the days from symptom onset to admission and receipt of early (0-2 days from symptom onset) versus late (> 2 days) treatment, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and underlying medical conditions. Results Over 4 seasons, we sampled 62,182 patients; 54% female and 63% non-Hispanic white. Overall, 92% of patients received antivirals, increasing from 86% in 2015-16 to 94% in 2018-19; use increased by season in all age strata (p < 0.001) [Figure]. Most received oseltamivir (99%); in 2018-19, 2% received baloxavir. Of those who received antivirals, 38% received early treatment. The median days from symptom onset to admission was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3) for those who received early treatment and 4 days (IQR 3-6) for those who received late treatment. Ninety-three percent who received antivirals started within 1 day of admission. For each additional day from symptom onset to admission, the adjusted odds of late treatment was 8.56 (95% confidence interval: 7.83-9.35). Figure. Weighted percentage of hospitalized patients receiving influenza antivirals by influenza season and age strata, FluSurv-NET, 2015-16 through 2018-19. Conclusion In patients hospitalized with influenza, most received antiviral treatment within 1 day of admission. However, a majority had delays from symptoms onset to initiation, due to late presentation of illness. Disclosures Melissa Sutton, MD, MPH, CDC funding (Emerging Infections Program) (Grant/Research Support) Sue Kim, MPH, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) (Grant/Research Support) Nisha B. Alden, MPH, CDC (Grant/Research Support)

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2623-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL D. FRENZEN ◽  
ALISON DRAKE ◽  
FREDERICK J. ANGULO ◽  

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O157 (O157 STEC) infections cause 73,000 illnesses annually in the United States, resulting in more than 2,000 hospitalizations and 60 deaths. In this study, the economic cost of illness due to O157 STEC infections transmitted by food or other means was estimated based on the CDC estimate of annual cases and newly available data from the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) of the CDC Emerging Infections Program. The annual cost of illness due to O157 STEC was $405 million (in 2003 dollars), including $370 million for premature deaths, $30 million for medical care, and $5 million in lost productivity. The average cost per case varied greatly by severity of illness, ranging from $26 for an individual who did not obtain medical care to $6.2 million for a patient who died from hemolytic uremic syndrome. The high cost of illness due to O157 STEC infections suggests that additional efforts to control this pathogen might be warranted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID J. WALLACE ◽  
THOMAS VAN GILDER ◽  
SUE SHALLOW ◽  
TERRY FIORENTINO ◽  
SUZANNE D. SEGLER ◽  
...  

In 1997, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Program (FoodNet) conducted active surveillance for culture-confirmed cases of Campylobacter, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Cyclospora, and Cryptosporidium in five Emerging Infections Program sites. FoodNet is a collaborative effort of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Infectious Diseases, the United States Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service, the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, and state health departments in California, Connecticut, Georgia, Minnesota, and Oregon. The population under active surveillance for food-borne infections was approximately 16.1 million persons or roughly 6% of the United States Population. Through weekly or monthly contact with all clinical laboratories in these sites, 8,576 total isolations were recorded: 2,205 cases of salmonellosis, 1,273 cases of shigellosis, 468 cases of cryptosporidiosis, 340 of E. coli O157:H7 infections, 139 of yersiniosis, 77 of listeriosis, 51 of Vibrio infections, and 49 of cyclosporiasis. Results from 1997 demonstrate that while there are regional and seasonal differences in reported incidence rates of certain bacterial and parasitic diseases, and that some pathogens showed a change in incidence from 1996, the overall incidence of illness caused by pathogens under surveillance was stable. More data over more years are needed to assess if observed variations in incidence reflect yearly fluctuations or true changes in the burden of foodborne illness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S193-S194
Author(s):  
Rachel Holstein ◽  
Fatima S Dawood ◽  
Pam Daily Kirley ◽  
Rachel Herlihy ◽  
Kim Yousey-Hindes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pregnant women are at high-risk for influenza-associated hospitalization. We used data from the U.S. Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) to characterize pregnant women hospitalized with influenza. Methods We included pregnant women (15–44 years) residing within a FluSurv-NET catchment area and hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza between October 1 and April 30, during the 2010–19 influenza seasons. Clinical data were obtained on cases through medical chart abstraction. We examined trends in vaccination coverage and antiviral treatment using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend and characterized maternal interventions and maternal and fetal outcomes during hospitalization. Results Of 9,652 women aged 15–44 years hospitalized with influenza, 2,697 (28%) were pregnant. Median maternal age was 28 years and median gestational age was 32 weeks; 36% were non-Hispanic white, 29% non-Hispanic black, and 20% Hispanic. Underlying conditions were present in 35% (n=931), with asthma (n=613; 22.7%) and chronic metabolic disease (n=204; 7.6%) as the most common; 12% (n=299) were current smokers. Vaccination coverage and antiviral receipt varied by season and age [Figures 1 and 2]. Overall, 31% (n=846) were vaccinated and 89% (n=2,408) received antivirals. Five percent (n=132) had intensive care unit admission, 2% (n=52) required mechanical ventilation, 6% (n=165) developed pneumonia and 0.3% (n=9) died; median length of hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 1–3). The most common symptoms at admission included cough (68%) and fever (66%) [Figure 3]. At discharge, most women (70%; n=1865) were still pregnant while 28% (n=758) were no longer pregnant and 2% (n=44) had unknown pregnancy status. Among women who were no longer pregnant at discharge, 96% (n=726) had pregnancies resulting in live births, 3% (n=25) had pregnancies resulting in loss of the fetus or neonate, and 1.0% (n=7) had unknown birth outcome. Figure 1. Vaccination coverage among pregnant women hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza by season and by age group, FluSurv-NET 2010–2019 Figure 2. Antiviral treatment among pregnant women hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza by season and by age group, FluSurv-NET 2010–2019 Figure 3. Symptoms at admission among pregnant women hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza by age group, FluSurv-NET 2010–2019 Conclusion Over 9 influenza seasons, nearly one-third of women aged 15–44 years and hospitalized with influenza were pregnant. Severe maternal and fetal outcomes were rare. While most women received antivirals, fewer than one-third received current season influenza vaccine. Disclosures Sue Kim, MPH, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) (Grant/Research Support) Melissa Sutton, MD, MPH, CDC funding (Emerging Infections Program) (Grant/Research Support)


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S714-S715
Author(s):  
Jean-Etienne Poirrier ◽  
Theodore Caputi ◽  
John Ayers ◽  
Mark Dredze ◽  
Sara Poston ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A small number of powerful users (“influencers”) dominates conversations on social media platforms: less than 1% of Twitter accounts have at least 3,000 followers and even fewer have hundreds of thousands or millions of followers. Beyond simple metrics (number of tweets, retweets...) little is known about these “influencers”, particularly in relation to their role in shaping online narratives about vaccines. Our goal was to describe influential Twitter accounts that are driving conversations about vaccines and present new metrics of influence. Methods Using publicly-available data from Twitter, we selected posts from 1-Jan-2016 to 31-Dec-2018 and extracted the top 5% of accounts tweeting about vaccines with the most followers. Using automated classifiers, we determined the location of these accounts, and grouped them into those that primarily tweet pro- versus anti-vaccine content. We further characterized the demographics of these influencer accounts. Results From 25,381 vaccine-related tweets available in our sample representing 10,607 users, 530 accounts represented the top 5% by number of followers. These accounts had on average 1,608,637 followers (standard deviation=5,063,421) and 340,390 median followers. Among the accounts for which sentiment was successfully estimated by the classifier, 10.4% (n=55) posted anti-vaccine content and 33.6% (n=178) posted pro-vaccine content. Of the 55 anti-vaccine accounts, 50% (n=18) of the accounts for which location was successfully determined were from the United States. Of the 178 pro-vaccine accounts, 42.5% (n=54) were from the United States. Conclusion This study showed that only a small proportion of Twitter accounts (A) post about vaccines and (B) have a high follower count and post anti-vaccine content. Further analysis of these users may help researchers and policy makers better understand how to amplify the impact of pro-vaccine social media messages. Disclosures Jean-Etienne Poirrier, PhD, MBA, The GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Theodore Caputi, PhD, Good Analytics Inc. (Consultant) John Ayers, PhD, GSK (Grant/Research Support) Mark Dredze, PhD, Bloomberg LP (Consultant)Good Analytics (Consultant) Sara Poston, PharmD, The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Cosmina Hogea, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder)


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xian ◽  
Haolin Xu ◽  
Eric E. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey L. Saver ◽  
Mathew J. Reeves ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: The benefits of tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent. However, delivery of thrombolytic therapy rapidly after hospital arrival was initially occurring infrequently in hospitals in the United States, discrepant with national guidelines. Methods: We evaluated door-to-needle (DTN) times and clinical outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving tPA before and after initiation of 2 successive nationwide quality improvement initiatives: Target: Stroke Phase I (2010–2013) and Target: Stroke Phase II (2014–2018) from 913 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals in the United States between April 2003 and September 2018. Results: Among 154 221 patients receiving tPA within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset (median age 72 years, 50.1% female), median DTN times decreased from 78 minutes (interquartile range, 60–98) preintervention, to 66 minutes (51–87) during Phase I, and 50 minutes (37–66) during Phase II ( P <0.001). Proportions of patients with DTN ≤60 minutes increased from 26.4% to 42.7% to 68.6% ( P <0.001). Proportions of patients with DTN ≤45 minutes increased from 10.1% to 17.7% to 41.4% ( P <0.001). By the end of the second intervention, 75.4% and 51.7% patients achieved 60-minute and 45-minute DTN goals. Compared with the preintervention period, hospitals during the second intervention period (2014–2018) achieved higher rates of tPA use (11.7% versus 5.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 2.31–2.56]), lower in-hospital mortality (6.0% versus 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.69 [0.64–0.73]), fewer bleeding complication (3.4% versus 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [0.62–0.74]), and higher rates of discharge to home (49.6% versus 35.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [1.38–1.50]). Similar findings were found in sensitivity analyses of 185 501 patients receiving tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Conclusions: A nationwide quality improvement program for acute ischemic stroke was associated with substantial improvement in the timeliness of thrombolytic therapy start, increased thrombolytic treatment, and improved clinical outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Russell L. Blaylock

The ongoing “pandemic” involving the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has several characteristics that make it unique in the history of pandemics. This entails not only the draconian measures that some countries and individual states within the United States and initiated and made policy, most of which are without precedent or scientific support, but also the completely unscientific way the infection has been handled. For the 1st time in medical history, major experts in virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and vaccinology have not only been ignored, but are also demonized, marginalized and in some instances, become the victim of legal measures that can only be characterized as totalitarian. Discussions involving various scientific opinions have been eliminated, top scientists have been frightened into silence by threats to their careers, physicians have lost their licenses, and the concept of early treatment has been virtually eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly as a result of, in my opinion and the opinion of others, poorly designed treatment protocols, mostly stemming from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been rigidly enforced among all hospitals. The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable. Whole generations of young people will suffer irreparable damage, both physical and psychological, possibly forever. The truth must be told.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Drisko Zago

This article surveys the Access to Justice movement in the United States and proposes including more types of professionals to develop longer term solutions that will alleviate barriers to the court system. This article discusses the need to expand the access to justice concept to reach beyond the courthouse to address civil legal issues before they blossom into litigation. Mobile outreach providing preventive lawyering and early treatment of societal problems can prevent delays and the bottleneck that many courts are seeing with the vast numbers of Self-Represented Litigants. A team of professionals including lawyers, social workers, nurses, counselors, translators and law librarians, working with a network of public librarians, can make a significant impact into the everyday lives of the working poor and folk of modest means in underserved areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document