scholarly journals 88. Review of nursing home antibiotic stewardship citation deficiencies to identify opportunities to improve antibiotic stewardship implementation, 2018-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
Katryna A Gouin ◽  
Andrea J Cool ◽  
Nimalie D Stone ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
Kara M Jacobs Slifka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Qualitative Review ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Barriers To Implementation ◽  
Facility Level ◽  
Level Training

Abstract Background Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) set standards for nursing homes (NH) and conduct inspections to assess adherence to regulatory requirements, including antibiotic stewardship implementation. NHs not meeting requirements are issued a citation. We reviewed text summaries for citations related to antibiotic stewardship to assess implementation in NHs. Methods We obtained publicly available antibiotic stewardship deficiency citations issued to NHs from 9/2018—7/2019 and NH characteristics data from CMS Nursing Home Compare. We used the χ2 test to compare characteristics of NHs with and without citations. We did a qualitative review of a randomly selected subset (318/635) of antibiotic stewardship citations and classified citations into one or more of four categories based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship: 1) Leadership & Accountability, 2) Action, 3) Tracking & Reporting, 4) Education (Fig 1). We developed subcategories based on our iterative review process to further describe the citations. Each citation was reviewed by two reviewers and yielded 95% agreement in categorization. Discordant citations were reviewed by a third reviewer, and core element categories with agreement by ≥2/3 reviewers were assigned, resulting in 99% agreement. Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiency Category Common Themes and Examples from Citation Text from Qualitative Review of Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiencies. Results There were 635 NH stewardship citation deficiencies across 44 states from 9/2018—7/2019. NHs with a citation were more likely to have < 100 beds (60% vs. 50%) and for-profit ownership (75% vs. 70%) (Table 1). Of the 318 reviewed citations, Action was cited in 67% of NHs; 115/213 had missing or incomplete criteria documented for antibiotic initiation. Tracking & Reporting was cited in 40% of NHs; 117/126 had missing or incomplete antibiotic or infection tracking logs. Leadership & Accountability was cited in 23% of NHs; 41/72 NHs had no stewardship policy available. Education was cited in 13% of NHs (Fig 2). Table 1. Characteristics of US Nursing Homes With and Without an Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiency from 9/2018-7/2019. Figure 2. Types of Antibiotic Stewardship Citation Deficiencies in US Nursing Homes, 2018-2019, N=318. Conclusion The most common opportunities for improvement fell under appropriate assessment and documentation of criteria for antibiotic initiation at the resident and facility-level. Training NH staff to use available resources for antibiotic stewardship activities may improve implementation. Further evaluation to identify barriers to implementation is needed. Disclosures David Gifford, MD, MPH, American Healthcare Association (Employee)

Implementation of core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes—National Healthcare Safety Network, 2016–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Katryna A. Gouin ◽  
Sarah Kabbani ◽  
Angela Anttila ◽  
Josephine Mak ◽  
Elisabeth Mungai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
The Core ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Core Elements

Abstract Objective: To assess the national uptake of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes from 2016 to 2018 and the effect of infection prevention and control (IPC) hours on the implementation of the core elements. Design: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. Setting: US nursing homes. Methods: We used the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Long-Term Care Facility Component annual surveys from 2016 to 2018 to assess nursing home characteristics and percent implementation of the core elements. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all 7 core elements while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. Results: We included 7,506 surveys from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported implementation of all 7 core elements, a 28% increase from 2016. The greatest increases in implementation from 2016 to 2018 were in education (19%), reporting (18%), and drug expertise (15%). In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. Nursing homes that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% (95% confidence interval, 7%–20%) more likely to implement all 7 core elements when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation. Conclusions: Nursing homes reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016 to 2018. Improvements in access to drug expertise, education, and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and resource use among nursing home providers under new regulatory requirements. Nursing home stewardship programs may benefit from increased IPC staff hours.

“There is no one to pick up the pieces”: Sustainability of antibiotic stewardship programs in nursing homes

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sandhya Seshadri ◽  
Christina B. Felsen ◽  
Craig R. Sellers ◽  
Ghinwa K. Dumyati
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Disciplinary Boundaries ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Critical Areas ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Leadership Support ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Staff Experiences

Abstract Objective: To describe nursing home staff experiences and perceptions of the factors that impact the sustainability of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, semistructured interviews with staff at 9 not-for-profit nursing homes with an established ASP were conducted and audio recorded. De-identified transcriptions of the interviews were coded using a sustainability framework and were analyzed to identify themes. Results: Interviews were conducted with 48 clinical and administrative staff to elicit their perceptions of the ASPs, and 7 themes were identified. ASPs were perceived to be resource intensive and “data driven,” requiring access to and interpretation of data that are not readily available at many nursing homes. Though motivated and committed, ASP champions felt that they could not single-handedly sustain the program. Attending to daily clinical needs (ie, “fires”) made it hard to progress beyond implementation and to reach step 2 of sustainability. Longstanding treatment habits by external prescribers and regulations were believed to impede ASP efforts. Partnerships with an external consultant with antibiotic stewardship expertise were considered important, as was the need for internal leadership support and collaboration across disciplinary boundaries. Participants felt that consistent and ongoing education on antibiotic stewardship at all staff levels was important. Conclusions: Although many interconnected factors impact the sustainability of an ASP, nursing homes may be able to sustain an ASP by focusing on 3 critical areas: (1) explicit support by nursing home leadership, (2) external partnerships with professionals with antibiotic stewardship expertise and internal interprofessional collaborations, and (3) consistent education and training for all staff.

scholarly journals 178. Implementation of the Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship in Nursing Homes – National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 2016–2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S96-S96
Author(s):  
Katryna A Gouin ◽  
Sarah Kabbani; Angela Anttila ◽  
Josephine Mak ◽  
Elisabeth Mungai ◽  
Ti Tanissha McCray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Long Term Care Facility ◽  
The Core ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Core Elements

Abstract Background Since 2016, nursing homes (NHs) enrolled in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s NHSN Long-term Care Facility (LTCF) Component have reported on their implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship. In 2016, 42% of NHs reported implementing all seven core elements. Recent regulations require antibiotic stewardship programs in NHs. The objectives of this analysis were to track national progress in implementation of the core elements and evaluate how time dedicated to infection prevention and control (IPC) is associated with the implementation of the core elements. Methods We used the NHSN LTCF 2016–2018 Annual Surveys to assess NH characteristics and implementation of the core elements, defined as self-reported implementation of at least one corresponding stewardship activity. We reported absolute differences in percent implementation. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all seven core elements, while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. Results We included 7,506 surveys from 2016–2018. In 2018, 71% of NHs reported implementation of all seven core elements, a 28% increase from 2016 (Fig. 1). The greatest increases in implementation from 2016–2018 were in Education (+19%), Reporting (+18%) and Drug Expertise (+15%) (Fig. 2). Ninety-eight percent of NHs had an individual responsible for antibiotic stewardship activities (Accountability), with 30% indicating that the role was fulfilled by an infection preventionist. Furthermore, 71% of NHs reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. NHs that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% more likely to implement all seven core elements, when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation, 95% CI: (1.07, 1.20). Conclusion NHs reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016–2018. Improvements in accessing drug expertise, providing education and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and use of resources among NH providers under new regulatory requirements. NHs with at least 20 hours dedicated to IPC per week may have greater capacity to implement all core elements. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Malpractice Environment vs Direct Litigation: What Drives Nursing Home Exit?

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 004695801878799
Author(s):  
R. Tamara Konetzka ◽  
Hari Sharma ◽  
Jeongyoung Park
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Consumer Welfare ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
For Profit ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

An ongoing concern about medical malpractice litigation is that it may induce provider exit, potentially affecting consumer welfare. The nursing home sector is subject to substantial litigation activity but remains generally understudied in terms of the effects of litigation, due perhaps to a paucity of readily available data. In this article, we estimate the association between litigation and nursing home exit (closure or change in ownership), separating the impact of malpractice environment from direct litigation. We use 2 main data sources for this study: Westlaw’s Adverse Filings database (1997-2005) and Online Survey, Certification and Reporting data sets (1997-2005). We use probit models with state and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between litigation and the probability of nursing home closure or change in ownership with and without adjustment for malpractice environment. We examine the relationship on average and also stratify by profit status, chain membership, and market competition. We find that direct litigation against a nursing home has a nonsignificant effect on the probability of closure or change in ownership within the subsequent 2 years. In contrast, the broader malpractice environment has a significant effect on change in ownership, even for nursing homes that have not been sued, but not on closure. Effects are stronger among for-profit and chain facilities and those in more competitive markets. A high-risk malpractice environment is associated with change of ownership of nursing homes regardless of whether they have been directly sued, indicating that it is too blunt an instrument for weeding out low-quality nursing homes.

scholarly journals Understanding implementation fidelity in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in the nursing home setting:a mixed-methods examination

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Palmer ◽  
Victoria A. Parker ◽  
Lacey R. Barre ◽  
Vincent Mor ◽  
Angelo E. Volandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Status Report ◽  
Program Participant ◽  
Participant Responsiveness ◽  
Core Elements

Abstract Background The Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) is one of the first large pragmatic randomized clinical trials (pRCTs) to be conducted in U.S. nursing homes (N = 119 intervention and N = 241 control across two health-care systems). The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a suite of videos to improve advance care planning (ACP) for nursing home patients. This report uses mixed methods to explore the optimal and suboptimal conditions necessary for implementation fidelity within pRCTs in nursing homes. Methods PROVEN’s protocol required designated facility champions to offer an ACP video to long-stay patients every 6 months during the 18-month implementation period. Champions completed a video status report, stored within electronic medical records, each time a video was offered. Data from the report were used to derive each facility’s adherence rate (i.e., cumulative video offer). Qualitative interviews held after 15 months with champions were purposively sampled from facilities within the highest and lowest adherence rates (i.e., those in the top and bottom quintiles). Two researchers analyzed interview data thematically using a deductive approach based upon six domains of the revised Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF). Matrices were developed to compare coded narratives by domain across facility adherence status. Results In total, 28 interviews involving 33 champions were analyzed. Different patterns were observed across high- versus low-adherence facilities for five CFIF domains. In low-adherence nursing homes, (1) there were limited implementation resources (Context), (2) there was often a perceived negative patient or family responsiveness to the program (Participant Responsiveness), and (3) champions were reticent in offering the videos (Recruitment). In high-adherence nursing homes, (1) there was more perceived patient and family willingness to engage in the program (Participant Responsiveness), (2) champions supplemented the video with ACP conversations (Quality of Delivery), (3) there were strategic approaches to recruitment (Recruitment), and (4) champions appreciated external facilitation (Strategies to Facilitate Implementation). Conclusions Critical lessons for implementing pRCTs in nursing homes emerged from this report: (1) flexible fidelity is important (i.e., delivering core elements of an intervention while permitting the adaptation of non-core elements), (2) reciprocal facilitation is vital (i.e., early and ongoing stakeholder engagement in research design and, reciprocally, researchers’ and organizational leaders’ ongoing support of the implementation), and (3) organizational and champion readiness should be formally assessed early and throughout implementation to facilitate remediation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02612688. Registered on 19 November 2015.

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of Antibiotic Stewardship Implementation at Arizona Skilled Nursing Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s101-s101
Author(s):  
Theresa LeGros ◽  
Connor Kelley ◽  
James Romine ◽  
Katherine Ellingson
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Care Transition ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Elements

Background: The CDC Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship (AS) include 7 evidence-based best practices adapted for a variety of healthcare settings, including nursing homes. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators related to AS implementation in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) within 18 months of the CMS mandate for AS implementation in SNFs, and to examine their relevance to the CDC’s Core Elements for Nursing Homes. Methods: We conducted 56 semistructured interviews with administrators, clinicians, and nonclinical staff at 10 SNFs in urban, suburban, rural, and border regions of Arizona. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and imported into NVivo v12.0 software for constant comparative analysis by 3 researchers using a priori and emergent codes. After iterative coding, we confirmed high interrater reliability (κ = 0.8), finalized the code book, and used matrix coding queries to examine relationships and generate themes. Results: We identified 7 themes as “influencers” that were less (barrier) or more (facilitator) supportive of AS in SNFs. Intra- and interfacility communication were the most frequently described: respondents described stronger communication within the SNF and between the SNF and hospitals, labs, and pharmacies as critical to robust AS implementation. Other influencers included AS education, antibiotic tracking systems, SNF prescribing norms, human resources, and diagnostic resources. The Core Elements were reflected in all influencer themes except interfacility communication between SNFs and hospitals. Additionally, themes pertaining to systems emerged as critical to successful AS implementation, including the need to address: the interactions of multiple roles across the traditional SNF hierarchy, stewardship barriers from the lens of patient-level concerns (as opposed to population-level concerns), the distinction between antibiotic prescribing gatekeepers and stewardship gatekeepers, and care transition policies and practices. The Core Elements target many aspects of these systems themes—for example, they recognize the importance of creating a culture of stewardship. However, they do not address care transition policies or procedures beyond recommending that transfer-initiated antibiotics be tracked and verified. Conclusions: Because the interactions of various agents within and beyond the SNF can facilitate or inhibit stewardship in complex ways, our findings suggest the use of a systems approach to AS implementation that prioritizes communication within the SNF hierarchy, and between SNFs and hospitals, diagnostic facilities, and pharmacies. When followed, the CDC’s Core Elements can provide crucial guidance. However, SNFs need support to overcome the challenges of incorporating these elements into policy and practice. Additionally, more work is needed to understand and enhance stewardship-related care transition, which remains under-addressed by the CDC.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

Illusions of Affection: Bureaucratic Ritualization's Relation to Emotional Abuse and Neglect in Nursing Homes

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason S. Ulsperger ◽  
J. David Knottnerus
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Emotional Abuse ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
For Profit ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Structural Ritualization Theory ◽  
Abuse And Neglect ◽  
Poor Treatment ◽  
Everyday Interaction

This research uses 40 ethnographies, biographies, and autobiographies to explore various symbolic themes expressed through everyday interaction in nursing homes. The themes involve bureaucratic concepts such as staff separation, rules, documentation, and efficiency. They also involve ideas of emotional abuse and neglect, like objectification, compassion transgressions, and spiritual negligence. Relying on structural ritualization theory, we argue ritualized symbolic practices of bureaucracy unintentionally facilitate attitudes and acts of emotional neglect in both for-profit and nonprofit nursing homes. This assists in the development of rituals facilitating the poor treatment of residents. Overall, we propose that if society is going to have humane care for nursing home residents, it must first understand the ritual dynamics that lead to employees viewing and treating those they care for with a lack of dignity.

scholarly journals Secret Shopper Data on Private Prices in the Nursing Home Industry From 2008 to 2010

2019 ◽  
pp. 107755871987902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lacey Loomer ◽  
Ashvin Gandhi ◽  
Fangli Geng ◽  
David C. Grabowski
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Health Care Market ◽  
Special Care Unit ◽  
Urban Hospital ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Facility Level

Nationwide nursing home private-pay prices at the facility-level have not been available for researchers interested in studying this unique health care market. This study presents a new data source, Caregiverlist, for private-pay prices for private and semiprivate rooms for 12,000 nursing homes nationwide collected between 2008 and 2010. We link these data to publicly available national nursing home-level data sets to examine the relationship between price and nursing home characteristics. We also compare private-pay prices with average private-pay revenues per day for California nursing homes obtained from facilities’ financial filings. On average, private-pay prices were $224 per day for private rooms compared with $197 per day for semiprivate rooms. We find that nursing homes that are nonprofit, urban, hospital-based, have a special care unit, chain-owned, and have higher quality ratings have higher prices. We find average revenues per day in California to be moderately correlated with prices reported by Caregiverlist.

scholarly journals High-Minority Nursing Homes Disproportionately Affected by COVID-19 Deaths

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Weech-Maldonado ◽  
Justin Lord ◽  
Ganisher Davlyatov ◽  
Akbar Ghiasi ◽  
Gregory Orewa
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Ethnic Disparities ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Face ◽  
Facility Level ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare have been highlighted by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File, this study examined the relationship between nursing home racial/ethnic mix and COVID-19 resident mortality. As of October 25, 2020, high minority nursing homes reported 6.5 COVID-19 deaths as compared to 2.6 deaths for nursing homes that had no racial/ethnic minorities. After controlling for interstate differences, facility-level resident characteristics, resource availability, and organizational characteristics, high-minority nursing homes had 61% more COVID-19 deaths [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 1.61; p < 0.001] as compared to nursing facilities with no minorities. From a policy perspective, nursing homes, that serve primarily minority populations, may need additional resources, such as, funding for staffing and personal protective equipment in the face of the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has sharpened the focus on healthcare disparities and societal inequalities in the delivery of long-term care.

scholarly journals Description of antibiotic use variability among US nursing homes using electronic health record data

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Kabbani ◽  
Stanley W. Wang ◽  
Laura L. Ditz ◽  
Katryna A. Gouin ◽  
Danielle Palms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Short Stay ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Facility Level ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed in nursing homes; national data describing facility-level antibiotic use are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to describe variability in antibiotic use in nursing homes across the United States using electronic health record orders. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of antibiotic orders for 309,884 residents in 1,664 US nursing homes in 2016 were included in the analysis. Antibiotic use rates were calculated as antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 resident days and were compared by type of stay (short stay ≤100 days vs long stay >100 days). Prescribing indications and the duration of nursing home-initiated antibiotic orders were described. Facility-level correlations of antibiotic use, adjusting for resident health and facility characteristics, were assessed using multivariate linear regression models. Results: In 2016, 54% of residents received at least 1 systemic antibiotic. The overall rate of antibiotic use was 88 DOT per 1,000 resident days. The 3 most common antibiotic classes prescribed were fluoroquinolones (18%), cephalosporins (18%), and urinary anti-infectives (9%). Antibiotics were most frequently prescribed for urinary tract infections, and the median duration of an antibiotic course was 7 days (interquartile range, 5–10). Higher facility antibiotic use rates correlated positively with higher proportions of short-stay residents, for-profit ownership, residents with low cognitive performance, and having at least 1 resident on a ventilator. Available facility-level characteristics only predicted a small proportion of variability observed (Model R2 version 0.24 software). Conclusions: Using electronic health record orders, variability was found among US nursing-home antibiotic prescribing practices, highlighting potential opportunities for targeted improvement of prescribing practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document