814. Successful Treatment of Cutibacterium acnes (CA) Prosthetic Device Infection (PDI) with Oral Linezolid and Rifampin (LR)

Abstract Background CA PDI is increasingly recognized. CA is felt to create a slime layer that makes infection more likely and treatment more difficult in this setting. Traditional management has included prosthetic device explantation (PDE), prolonged antibiotic treatment, and delayed reimplantation. Recent interest in the use of oral treatment regimens and single stage procedures with long duration antibiotic therapy led us to treat a series of patients with oral treatment and retained prosthesis after debridement. We report those results. Methods Sequential patients with CA PDI treated with oral therapy were identified. All patients underwent debridement of the tissue, exchange of components and/or reimplantation of the prosthetic device. Only patients with exchanges were included. PDE was excluded. MIC testing for CA isolates was obtained when possible. Initial treatment was recorded at time of surgery. LR was the treatment of choice unless toxicity developed. A minimum of a 3-month follow-up post treatment was required to be included. 6 and 12 month follow up were obtained for all patients but 1 at this time. Results 10 patients were treated (Table 1). Shoulder joint infections were most common. All patients were treated with LR. All completed a minimum of 42 days of treatment (Table 2). The medication was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nausea. 9/10 patients with 12 month follow up had no evidence of relapse. 1/10 had no relapse at 3 months. Typical for CA infection laboratory markers for infection were not markedly elevated. Notably thrombocytopenia did not occur (Table 3). Table 1. Distribution of Prosthetic Device Infections Table 2. Duration of Treatment Table 3. Selected Laboratory Results Conclusion We demonstrated the ability to successfully treat 10/10 patients with CA PDI without explantation using prolonged oral treatment with LR after debridement. This combination should be considered a treatment option and explored further as a low cost, well tolerated, high value treatment approach to this difficult infection. Disclosures Ronald G. Nahass, MD, Abbvie (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Alkermes (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Kathleen H. Seneca, MSN, Abbvie (Research Grant or Support)Alkermes (Research Grant or Support)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joints Infections: Safety and Outcome in a Cohort of 10 Patients

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofx163.079 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S98-S99

Author(s):

Tristan Ferry ◽

Cecile Pouderoux ◽

Sylvain Goutelle ◽

Sébastien Lustig ◽

Claire Triffault-Fillit ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Therapy ◽

Oral Treatment ◽

Clinical Signs ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Treatment Modalities ◽

Induction Phase ◽

Prosthesis Loosening ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy

Abstract Background Optimal surgical therapy could be sometimes non-feasible, especially in the elderly population. Therefore, a medical therapy with oral prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy (PSAT) seems to be an option to prevent recurrence and prosthesis loosening. Subcutaneous (SC) administration of injectable intravenous antibiotics as PSAT could be a convenient way when oral treatment is not available to facilitate ambulatory care, even if this practice is considered as an “off-label” practice. Methods All patients receiving SC PSAT since 2010 were prospectively enrolled in a cohort study evaluating treatment modalities, efficacy, and safety. Success was defined by the absence of clinical signs of infection at the time of last follow-up. Results We included 10 patients (median age of 79 years): seven had PJI and three chronic osteomyelitis. Six had plurimicrobial infections and four had infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Suboptimal surgery was performed in seven patients, and three received only antibiotics. All patients received an induction-phase therapy with conventional antibiotic treatment before SC PSAT. For nine patients, SC injections were delivered by a 50 mlml 30 minute gravity infusion of the antibiotic, using butterfly disposable needle. One patient received direct flash SC administration. The most frequent drug used was ertapenem (n = 7; 1–2 g/day), followed by ceftriaxone (n = 2; 1 g/day), and ceftazidime (n = 1; 2 g/day). The dose was adjusted depending on the results of trough residual blood concentration. Median duration of treatment was 6 months (from 1 to 58 months), corresponding to a total of about 5,000 SC injections. SC PSAT had to be discontinued for side effects in only two patients, including skin necrosis in the patient receiving direct SC infusion (lost to follow-up after treatment discontinuation) and epilepsy under ertapenem therapy (with relapse of the BJI after the treatment discontinuation). One other patient experienced a relapse despite the SC PSAT. Finally, SC PSAT was still ongoing in seven patients with a favorable outcome at the last follow-up. Conclusion SC PSAT appears to be a safe and effective alternative therapy when optimal surgical strategy is not feasible and when oral treatment is not available. Disclosures T. Ferry, HERAEUS: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. S. Lustig, Heraeus: Consultant, Consulting fee

Download Full-text

1085. Enterococcal Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: Clinical Features and Outcomes

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofy210.920 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S325-S325

Author(s):

Timothy S Oh ◽

James E Peacock ◽

Katherine Le ◽

M Rizwan Sohail ◽

Larry M Baddour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Boston Scientific ◽

Device Removal ◽

Research Support ◽

Jude Medical ◽

Duke Criteria ◽

Device Infection ◽

Enterococcal Species ◽

Pocket Infection ◽

Overall Mortality ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Unlike enterococcal native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (IE), enterococcal CIED infections are not well described. Methods Data from the Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Collaboration (MEDIC), a prospective, observational, multinational cohort study of CIED infections, were used to provide a descriptive analysis of adult patients with CIED infections due to enterococcal species. Results Of 433 patients, 21 (4.8%) were diagnosed with enterococcal CIED infection. Specific data on enterococcal species and antimicrobial susceptibilities were not recorded. The mean age was 70.8 years. No patient had previous CIED infection. Twelve patients (57%) had permanent pacemakers, 5 (24%) had implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and 4 (19%) had biventricular devices. Among the 21 infections, 3 (14%) were categorized as CIED-related bloodstream infections and 18 (86%) as IE; no patient had isolated pocket infection. Of the IE cases, four were valvular IE, eight were lead IE, and six were both. Fourteen cases of IE (78%) were definite by the modified Duke criteria. Median time from last device procedure to infection was 510 days (range 37–2,952 days). The most common presenting symptom was fever (48%); five patients (24%) exhibited local signs of pocket infection. All 21 patients underwent TEE with vegetations demonstrated in 17 (81%). Blood cultures grew enterococci from all patients. The most common antimicrobial regimen was a penicillin plus aminoglycoside (38%); two patients (9.5%) received ampicillin + ceftriaxone. Antibiotics were given for a median of 43 days. Only 14 patients (67%) had complete device removal; the seven patients retaining their device were judged to be at high risk for extraction. There was one death during the index hospital stay with four additional patients dying over the 6 months after therapy (overall mortality 24%); two of the seven patients retaining their CIED died. Conclusion Enterococci caused 4.8% of all CIED infections in our cohort. Most infections appeared to be hematogenous in origin with late onset. IE was the most common infectious syndrome. A penicillin plus aminoglycoside, given for 6 weeks, was the most frequent therapy. Only 67% of patients underwent device removal. At 6 months follow-up, no relapses had occurred but overall mortality was 24%. Disclosures J. E. Peacock Jr., Pfizer, Inc.: Shareholder, Owns common stock in Pfizer which was inherited and held in a trust. M. R. Sohail, TyRx Inc.: Investigator, Research support. Medtronic Inc.: Investigator, Research support. Medtronic Inc.: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Spectranetics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Boston Scientific Corp: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. L. M. Baddour, UpToDate: Collaborator, Royalty payment. J. M. Miro, Abbvie: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Genentech: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Medtronic: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Novartis: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Gilead Sciences: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. Pfizer: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting honoraria and Research grant. A. J. Greenspon, Medtronic: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Boston Scientific: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. St. Jude: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. R. G. Carrillo, St. Jude Medical Group: Speaker’s Bureau, Research support. Spectranetics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Sorin Group: Speaker’s Bureau, None. Boston Scientific Corp: Speaker’s Bureau, None. D. Z. Uslan, Medtronic: Investigator, Research support. Boston Scientific: Consultant, Speaker honorarium.

Download Full-text

127. Development of a Kinetic ELISA (kELISA) and Reactive B-cell Frequency (RBF) Assay to Detect Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Pre-Fusion F Protein-Specific Immune Responses in Infants

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.127 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S77-S78

Author(s):

Stephanie L Rolsma ◽

Sandy M Yoder ◽

Rachel S Nargi ◽

Eric Brady ◽

Natalia Jimenez-Truque ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Panel Member ◽

Multiple Time ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Cell Frequency ◽

Material Support ◽

F Protein ◽

Multiple Time Points ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background RSV is a major cause of pediatric respiratory disease. Antibodies to the prefusion conformation of the RSV fusion (pre-F) protein are needed for virus neutralization. Methods We measured RSV-specific responses in two groups of children < 3 years of age; subjects with laboratory-confirmed RSV (RSV-infected) or infants born in the period May to September and enrolled prior to their first RSV season (RSV-uninfected). RSV-infected infants had blood samples obtained at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months after infection. RSV-uninfected infants had blood samples obtained at enrollment, at the end of their first RSV season, and 6 months later. A kELISA to measure RSV pre-F-specific antibodies and an RBF assay to identify RSV F-specific B cells were developed. Results 102 subjects were enrolled; 11 were excluded due to missed visits or withdrawal. Of the 65 subjects in the RSV-uninfected group, all were kELISA positive at enrollment, consistent with maternal antibody transfer. 53 subjects had sufficient samples for analysis at multiple time points; 29 became seronegative and 24 remained seropositive. In the seronegative group, the kELISA value decreased rapidly to < 0.25 by 6 months after the RSV season in 27/29 (93%), (Figure 1a). In the persistently seropositive group, all 24 subjects maintained a positive kELISA value, with some developing higher values over time, consistent with asymptomatic infection (Figure 1b). An RBF assay was used to determine whether antibodies were due to persistent maternal antibodies or endogenous production (Figure 2). In the seronegative group, 24/29 (80%) had a negative RBF; in the seropositive group, 23/24 (96%) had a positive RBF during follow-up. There were 26 subjects in the RSV-infected group; 22 had sufficient samples for analysis at multiple time points. All were seropositive by kELISA at one month post-infection with variable kELISA values during follow-up (Figure 3). 17/22 (77%) had a positive RBF, although 4 of the subjects without a positive RBF had indeterminate results at ≥ 1 visit. Figure 1. kELISA values of baseline RSV-negative subjects, by subject age at time of sample. Panel A: Subjects classified as seronegative (n=29). Panel B: Subjects without known RSV classified as persistently seropositive (n=24). Figure 2. Reactive B-cell frequency assay. The first step in the RBF assay is growth of Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines (LCLs), as shown over days 1-3 (Left-Day 1, Middle-Day 2, Right-Day 3, magnification 200X). The cells circled in the figure indicate a single LCL’s growth over time. LCL supernatant is used to detect RSV F-protein specific antibodies using traditional ELISA, resulting in a positive, indeterminate, or negative result. Indeterminate results occur due to a lack of cell viability and/or failure to form LCLs, resulting in failure to exceed an optical density of 5x background. Figure 3. kELISA values of RSV-infected subjects, by subject age at time of sample. First sample was obtained at approximately one month after laboratory-confirmed RSV. Conclusion Assays measuring F-specific immune responses in infants will be critical for RSV vaccine development. A kELISA targeting RSV pre-F epitopes, with an RBF assay targeting RSV F-specific B cells, may allow discrimination for maternal and infant-derived antibodies. Disclosures Isaac Thomsen, MD, MSCI, Horizon Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant James E. Crowe, Jr., MD, Astra Zeneca (Grant/Research Support)IDBiologics (Board Member, Grant/Research Support, Shareholder)Luna Biologics (Consultant)Meissa Vaccines (Advisor or Review Panel member)Takeda Vaccines (Grant/Research Support) Kathryn M. Edwards, MD, Bionet (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; CDC (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; IBM (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; Moderna (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; NIH (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; Roche (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member of DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; Sanofi Pasteur (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; Sequiras (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Member DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; X4 Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Buddy Creech, MD, MPH, Altimmune (Consultant)Astellas (Other Financial or Material Support, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee)Diotheris (Consultant)GSK (Consultant)Horizon (Consultant)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Premier Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member)Vir (Consultant)

Download Full-text

67. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Preliminary Findings from a Household-based Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.377 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S165-S165

Author(s):

Carlos G Grijalva ◽

Yuwei Zhu ◽

Natasha B Halasa ◽

Ahra Kim ◽

Melissa A Rolfes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Onset ◽

Median Number ◽

Household Member ◽

Research Support ◽

Nasal Swabs ◽

Household Members ◽

Index Cases ◽

Support Research ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Social distancing measures, such as shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders, are recommended for control of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Few studies, however, have characterized the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infections in households. Methods We conducted a case-ascertained study of household transmission in Nashville, TN starting in April 2020, after recommendations to stay at home were enacted. Index cases were ambulatory patients identified through clinical RT-PCR testing at Vanderbilt walk-in-clinics dispersed across the Nashville metropolitan area. For this study, the index case was the first person presenting with respiratory or compatible symptoms in a household and who lived with at least one other household member. After informed consent was obtained, household members were remotely trained in the self-collection of nasal swabs and use of REDCap electronic questionnaires. Household members completed daily symptom diaries and collected daily nasal swabs for 14 days. Contact patterns within households before and after disease onset were ascertained. Nasal swab samples were tested using RT-PCR at an academic research laboratory. Results At the time of writing, 18 families were enrolled (including 18 index cases and 34 household members) with at least 1 follow-up nasal swab tested. The median age of index cases and household members was 37 years (IQR: 26–46) and 27 years (15–39), respectively. The median number of days from index patient onset of symptoms to first sample collected in the household was 4 (2–5). Before onset of symptoms, 83% of index cases spent >4 hours in the same room with at least one other household member, whereas after disease onset and diagnosis, 44% did. Among 34 non-index household members, 18 (53%) had a positive test during follow-up; the median number of days from index case’s symptoms onset to first positive detection in a household member was 4.5 (3–5) days. Interestingly, 13 (72%) of 18 secondary infections were detected within the first 3 days of follow-up, whereas 5 (28%) were detected during subsequent days. Conclusion These observations suggest that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within households is high, with many infections detected during the initial days of study follow-up. Disclosures Carlos G. Grijalva, MD, MPH, AHRQ (Grant/Research Support)Campbell Alliance (Grant/Research Support)CDC (Grant/Research Support)FDA (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)NIH (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant)Sanofi (Consultant)Sanofi (Grant/Research Support) Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH, Genentech (Other Financial or Material Support, I receive an honorarium for lectures - it’s a education grant, supported by genetech)Karius (Consultant)Moderna (Consultant)Quidel (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)Sanofi (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)

Download Full-text

358. Sociodemographic and clinical features of children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Nashville, Tennessee

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.553 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S248-S249

Author(s):

Leigh Howard ◽

Kathryn Garguilo ◽

Jessica Gillon ◽

Steven Webber ◽

Natasha B Halasa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Children And Adolescents ◽

Research Support ◽

Full Spectrum ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

Healthcare Settings ◽

Asymptomatic Children ◽

Asymptomatic Patients ◽

Support Research ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Little is known regarding the full spectrum of illness among children with SARS-CoV-2 infection across integrated healthcare settings, as many published pediatric cohorts focus on hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods Active surveillance was performed for SARS-CoV-2 detections among symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adolescents ≤18 years of age in a quaternary care academic hospital laboratory in the Southeastern U.S. For symptomatic patients with a positive respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and for neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers, we performed phone follow-up and medical record review at days 2, 7, and 30 after diagnosis. Testing was initiated 3/12/20 for symptomatic patients and 5/4/20 for screening asymptomatic patients. Results By 6/14/20, SARS-CoV-2 tests were positive in 193/5306 (3.6%) specimens from unique patients ≤18 (Table 1), compared to 2653/36503 (7.2%) specimens in patients >18 years. Specimens from 181/2638 (6.8%) symptomatic and 12/2768 (0.4%) asymptomatic children were positive. Nine infants born to SARS-CoV-2 infected mothers had negative PCR tests at birth; 1 infant subsequently acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection at 5 weeks of age. Sociodemographic and clinical data for 181 SARS-CoV-2-positive symptomatic children are displayed in Table 2 and Figure 1. The most common symptoms were cough (59%), fever (50%), and rhinorrhea (39%). Nine/181 symptomatic patients (5%) were hospitalized, primarily for respiratory symptoms. Symptom resolution occurred by follow-up day 2 in 82/178 (46%) and day 7 in 128/164 (78%) patients with complete assessments to date. 131/181 (72%) of children had known SARS-CoV-2 positive contacts. We observed no cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Conclusion In our community, pediatric SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was low, but was much higher among symptomatic than asymptomatic children. Symptoms were mild, and the duration of symptoms brief, in the majority of these patients captured within an integrated ambulatory and hospital-based healthcare system, capturing the full spectrum of the disease profile in this age group. Disclosures Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH, Genentech (Other Financial or Material Support, I receive an honorarium for lectures - it’s a education grant, supported by genetech)Karius (Consultant)Moderna (Consultant)Quidel (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)Sanofi (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)

Download Full-text

LB13. The Efficacy and Impact in Heathy Infants of Nirsevimab on Medically Attended RSV Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1649 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S811-S812

Author(s):

Laura Hammitt ◽

Ron Dagan ◽

Yuan Yuan ◽

Manuel Baca Cots ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Term Infants ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Support Research ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. Nirsevimab is a single-dose monoclonal antibody with extended half-life that was shown to protect preterm infants 29 to < 35 weeks gestation against RSV LRTI. However, most medically attended (MA) cases occur in otherwise healthy, term infants for whom there is currently no effective RSV prevention strategy. We report the primary analysis of efficacy and safety, along with the impact of nirsevimab in late preterm and term infants (≥ 35 weeks gestation) in the phase 3 MELODY study (NCT03979313). Methods Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive one intramuscular injection of nirsevimab (50 mg if < 5 kg; 100 mg if ≥ 5 kg at dosing) or placebo entering their first RSV season. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MA RSV LRTI over 150 days postdose. Cases met predefined clinical criteria of disease severity and were confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR. Safety was evaluated through 360 days postdose. Enrollment started on 23 July 2019 and was suspended following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020. Results Overall, 1490 infants were randomized and included in the intent-to-treat population; 1465 (98%) completed the 150-day efficacy follow-up, and 1367 (92%) completed the 360-day safety follow-up. The incidence of MA RSV LRTI was 1.2% (n=12/994) in the nirsevimab group and 5.0% (n=25/496) in the placebo group, giving nirsevimab an efficacy of 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.6, 87.1; p< 0.0001). Nirsevimab averted 93.6 (95% CI 63.0, 124.0) MA LRTIs per 1000 infants dosed. Nirsevimab was well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events (87.4% nirsevimab; 86.8% placebo) and serious adverse events (6.8% nirsevimab; 7.3% placebo) between groups. Conclusion In this phase 3 study, a single dose of nirsevimab protected late preterm and term infants against MA RSV LRTI over an RSV season with a favorable safety profile. Approximately 11 infants need to be immunized to prevent 1 case of LRTI; nirsevimab has the potential to be an important intervention to reduce the burden of RSV LRTI in healthy infants. Disclosures Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution Ron Dagan, MD, Medimmune/AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Yuan Yuan, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Shabhir A. Mahdi, PhD, BMGF (Research Grant or Support)EDCTP (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melody (Research Grant or Support)Minervax (Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Research Grant or Support)SAMRC (Research Grant or Support) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Astellas (Scientific Research Study Investigator)AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Genentech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Karius (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Melinta (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Nabriva (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Seqirus (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Tetraphase (Scientific Research Study Investigator) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; AstraZeneca (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; BD (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Eli Lilly (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Karius, Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Melinta (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Moderna (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Nabriva (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Seqirus (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Tetraphase (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Heather J. Zar, PhD, AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Dennis Brooks, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Amy Grenham, MSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Ulrika Wählby Hamrén, PhD, AstraZeneca R&D (Employee, Shareholder) Vaishali S. Mankad, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Therese Takas, BSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Own stock in AstraZeneca) Jon Heinrichs, PhD, AstraZeneca (Shareholder)Bristol Myers Squibb (Shareholder)J&J (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Organon (Shareholder)Procter & Gamble (Shareholder)Sanofi (Shareholder)Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Amanda Leach, MRCPCH, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) M. Pamela Griffin, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Tonya L. Villafana, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee)

Download Full-text

854. Long-term Outcomes of Participants on F/TAF for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Results for 144 Weeks of Follow-Up in the DISCOVER Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1049 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S517-S518

Author(s):

Moti Ramgopal ◽

Peter Ruane ◽

Yongwu Shao ◽

Ramin Ebrahimi ◽

Alex Kintu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background In DISCOVER, a multinational randomized controlled trial, F/TAF demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared to F/TDF for HIV prevention with improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at the primary endpoint (when all participants had reached 48 weeks and 50% had reached 96 weeks) and at week (W) 96, the end of the blinded phase. We now report W144 outcomes for participants who were randomized to F/TAF and continued F/TAF in the open-label extension (OLE) phase. Methods All participants who completed the randomized blinded phase could opt to receive F/TAF for at least 48 weeks in the OLE phase. We evaluated HIV incidence in participants on F/TAF through W144 and assessed changes in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) and in glomerular function (eGFR) from baseline to W144. Results 2,080 of the 2,694 participants initially randomized to F/TAF opted into the OLE phase, and 1,933 were still on study drug through W144, thereby leading to a total of 7,885 person-years (PY) of follow-up on F/TAF. Eight participants taking F/TAF acquired HIV in the blinded phase and 3 in the OLE phase. Dried blood spot analyses on the 3 OL infections found tenofovir diphosphate levels consistent with low adherence. Genotypic resistance testing showed no relevant resistance mutations for the 3 new infections. Among participants taking F/TAF, HIV incidence was 0.16/100 PY (95% CI 0.06-0.33) at the primary endpoint, 0.16/100 PY (95% CI 0.07-0.31) through 96 weeks and 0.14/100 PY (95% CI 0.07-0.25) through 144 weeks. Participants taking F/TAF had increases in hip BMD (mean percentage change +0.54%) and in spine BMD (mean percentage change +1.02%) from baseline to W144 (Figure 1). Median eGFR increased over 144 weeks, with a median increase of 2.6 mL/min from baseline to week 144. Participants in the F/TAF arm gained a median 2.3 kg (IQR -0.9-5.8) over 3 years of follow up. Figure 1. Changes in hip and spine bone mineral density and in eGFR through Week 144 Conclusion The OLE of DISCOVER allowed for a long-term assessment (144 wks.) of F/TAF for PrEP. HIV incidence remained low with BMD and renal function parameters remaining stable through 144 weeks of follow-up. These findings demonstrate that F/TAF is a safe and effective option for long-term use in people who would benefit from PrEP. Disclosures Moti Ramgopal, MD FACP FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau) Peter Ruane, MD, AbbVie (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Shareholder, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Yongwu Shao, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ramin Ebrahimi, MSc, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Alex Kintu, MD, ScD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Christoph C. Carter, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Moupali Das, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jared Baeten, MD, PHD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Cynthia Brinson, MD, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator)BI (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau, Personal fees)GSK (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Novo Nordisk (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Peter Shalit, MD, PhD, Abbvie (Grant/Research Support)Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Glaxo Smithkline (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Thera (Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Speaker’s Bureau) Karam Mounzer, MD, Epividian (Advisor or Review Panel member)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)

Download Full-text

489. SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Antibody Response Among Pregnant People in Seattle, WA

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.688 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S345-S345

Author(s):

Sylvia LaCourse ◽

Alisa Kachikis ◽

Kelsey L Kinderknecht ◽

Romeo R Galang ◽

Lauren B Zapata ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Longitudinal Study ◽

Antibody Response ◽

Antenatal Care ◽

Medical Records ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Research Support ◽

Initial Testing ◽

Igg Index ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Antenatal care is a unique opportunity to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody response in pregnant people, including those with previously unknown infection. Methods Pregnant people were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG during antenatal care or delivery in Seattle, Washington with Abbott Architect chemiluminescent immunoassay which provides quantitative index (positive ≥1.4). Participants with IgG+ results or identified with RT-PCR+ results via medical records were invited to enroll in a longitudinal evaluation of antibody responses. We report preliminary results of an ongoing seroprevalence and longitudinal study with planned 18-month follow-up. Results Between September 9, 2020–May 7, 2021, we screened 1304 pregnant people; 62 (4.8%) tested SARS-CoV-2 IgG+, including 28 (45%) with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among participants testing IgG+, median age was 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] 26–35) and median gestational age was 21 weeks (IQR 12–38) at screening; median IgG index was 3.2 (IQR 2.1–4.9, range 1.4–9.9), including 3.9 (IQR 2.3–5.8) among those with vs. 2.7 (IQR 1.9–4.2) among those without prior RT-PCR+ results (p=0.05 by Wilcoxon rank-sum). Of 30 longitudinal study participants enrolled, 24 tested IgG+ at baseline (75% with prior RT-PCR+ result) and 6 tested IgG- on enrollment but were identified as previously RT-PCR+ via medical records; 24/30 (80%) reported previous symptoms. Of 24 participants testing IgG+ at baseline, 14 (58%) had first follow-up IgG results at median of 66 days (IQR 42–104) since initial testing, with median IgG index of 2.0 (IQR 1.0–3.8). 9/14 (64%) participants with repeat IgG testing remained IgG+ at first follow-up (≤280 days after first RT-PCR+ result for those with and ≥104 days after first IgG detection for those without prior RT-PCR+ results), while 5/14 (26%) had a negative Abbott IgG test at a median of 81 days (IQR 75–112) since initial testing. Conclusion Nearly half of pregnant people testing SARS-CoV-2 IgG+ reported no known prior SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis or symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response and durability in pregnancy has implications for maternal and neonatal protection and susceptibility and highlights potential benefits of vaccination in this population. Disclosures Sylvia LaCourse, MD, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Alisa Kachikis, MD, MS, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant) Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support) Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Meissa Vaccines (Consultant)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant)Teva Pharmaceuticals (Consultant) Alison Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck (Grant/Research Support)

Download Full-text

595. Letermovir (LTV) for Secondary Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prevention in High Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) Recipients: Interim Results of a Single Center, Open Label Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.793 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S401-S401

Author(s):

Gyuri Han ◽

Anat Stern ◽

Yiqi Su ◽

Boglarka Gyurkocza ◽

Craig Sauter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Material Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Letermovir (LTV) is effective for prevention (ppx) of primary clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in the first 100 days after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Data on LTV for secondary ppx is limited. We report on the efficacy and safety of LTV administered for 14 weeks as secondary CMV ppx. Methods Patients (pts) enrolled in an open label study of LTV (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04017962) from August 2019 through February 2021 were analyzed. Key eligibility criteria were: CMV high risk (receipt of mismatched and/or T-cell depleted HCT and/or graft versus host disease (GVHD) requiring systemic immunosuppressants) AND prior csCMVi with either undetectable CMV (≤ 136 IU/mL) or ≥ 2 consecutive values < 300 IU/mL at enrollment. Pts with breakthrough csCMVi on LTV or history of LTV resistance were excluded. LTV was administered for 14 weeks or csCMVi whichever occurred first. The study duration was 24 weeks. CMV was monitored per standards of care. The primary endpoint was csCMVi by week 14. Secondary endpoints were csCMVi by week 24, LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD) and adverse events (AE) at least possibly related to LTV. Results Of 20 pts analyzed, the median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-63); 17 (85%) pts were CMV seropositive, 7 (35%) received mismatched HCT (haploidentical 3, cord blood 3; mismatched unrelated 1), 9 (45%) received CD34 selected allograft and 9 (45%) had GVHD at enrollment. Fourteen (70%) pts had received prior LTV. The median time from HCT to enrollment was 156 (IQR 37-244) and 55 (IQR 40-69) days for pts with and without prior LTV, respectively (P=0.16). CMV at enrollment was < 136IU/mL for 8 (40%) pts. By week 14, 4 (20%) pts developed csCMVi at median 48 days (range 40-66). Resistance testing performed in 3 of the 4 pts, identified LTV resistance mutations in 2 pts. There were no AEs related to LTV, and none developed EOD. Two pts developed csCMVi in the follow up phase. Three pts died during follow up (due to relapse, treatment related toxicity and GVHD), and four pts are in follow up. Conclusion LTV secondary prophylaxis was safe and prevented recurrent csCMVi in 80% of high risk patients, including patients with prior LTV exposure. Our data supports the utility of LTV for secondary CMV prevention following HCT. Disclosures Boglarka Gyurkocza, MD, Actinium Pharma, Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, ADMA biologics and Siemens Healthineers (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)AlloVir (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)Amplyx (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Other Financial or Material Support)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Behring (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)Chimerix (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Cidara (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)Merck & Co (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Partners Therapeutics (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)Shionogi (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support)Shire/Takeda (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support) Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, allovir (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; amplyx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; behring (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Merck&Co (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Investigator and received funding and consulting fees from Merck, Chimerix, Shire and Astellas, Research Grant or Support; octapharma (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Partners Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; takeda (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator

Download Full-text

Detecting Infections Rapidly and Easily for Candidemia Trial (DIRECT1): A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the T2Candida Panel

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofx162.122 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S52-S52

Author(s):

Cornelius J Clancy ◽

Peter Pappas ◽

Jose Vazquez ◽

Marc A Judson ◽

Ellis Tobin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Cultures ◽

Important Advance ◽

Research Support ◽

Prospective Multicenter Study ◽

Indwelling Catheters ◽

Blood Samples ◽

Grant Recipient ◽

Mean Time ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Blood cultures (BC) are the diagnostic gold standard for candidemia, but sensitivity is <50%. T2 Candida (T2) is a novel, FDA-approved nanodiagnostic panel, which utilizes T2 magnetic resonance and a dedicated instrument to detect Candida within whole blood samples. Methods Candidemic adults were identified at 14 centers by diagnostic BC (dBC). Follow-up blood samples were collected from all patients (pts) for testing by T2 and companion BC (cBC). T2 was run-in batch at a central lab; results are reported qualitatively for three groups of spp. (Candida albicans/C. tropicalis (CA/CT), C. glabrata/C. krusei (CG/CK), or C. parapsilosis (CP)). T2 and cBC were defined as positive (+) if they detected a sp. identified in dBC. Results 152 patients were enrolled (median age: 54 yrs (18–93); 54% (82) men). Candidemia risk factors included indwelling catheters (82%, 125), abdominal surgery (24%, 36), transplant (22%, 33), cancer (22%, 33), hemodialysis (17%, 26), neutropenia (10%, 15). Mean times to Candida detection/spp. identification by dBC were 47/133 hours (2/5.5 d). dBC revealed CA (30%, 46), CG (29%, 45), CP (28%, 43), CT (11%, 17) and CK (3%, 4). Mean time to collection of T2/cBC was 62 hours (2.6 d). 74% (112) of patients received antifungal (AF) therapy prior to T2/cBC (mean: 55 hours (2.3 d)). Overall, T2 results were more likely than cBC to be + (P < 0.0001; Table), a result driven by performance in AF-treated patients (P < 0.0001). T2 was more likely to be + among patients originally infected with CA (61% (28) vs. 20% (9); P = 0.001); there were trends toward higher positivity in patients infected with CT (59% (17) vs. 23% (4; P = 0.08) and CP (42% (18) vs. 28% (12); P = 0.26). T2 was + in 89% (32/36) of patients with + cBC. Conclusion T2 was sensitive for diagnosing candidemia at the time of + cBC, and it was significantly more like to be + than cBC among AF-treated patients. T2 is an important advance in the diagnosis of candidemia, which is likely to be particularly useful in patients receiving prophylactic, pre-emptive or empiric AF therapy. Disclosure D. P. Kontoyiannis, Pfizer: Research Contractor, Research support and Speaker honorarium; Astellas: Research Contractor, Research support and Speaker honorarium; Merck: Honorarium, Speaker honorarium; Cidara: Honorarium, Speaker honorarium; Amplyx: Honorarium, Speaker honorarium; F2G: Honorarium, Speaker honorarium; L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, Astellas: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Merck: Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; Pfizer: Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Grant recipient and Speaker honorarium; Scynexis: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; Cidara: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant; S. Apewokin, T2 biosystems: Investigator, Research support; Astellas: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee

Download Full-text