scholarly journals 1121. Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Oral Tebipenem-Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Healthy Subjects

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S652-S652
Author(s):  
Vipul K Gupta ◽  
Gina Patel ◽  
Leanne Gasink ◽  
Floni Bajraktari ◽  
Yang Lei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tebipenem-pivoxil-hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is a novel oral carbapenem being developed to treat serious bacterial infections including complicated urinary tract infection. The objectives of this study were to assess the bioequivalence (BE) of two tablet formulations of TBP-PI-HBr in healthy adult subjects under fasted conditions and to evaluate the food-drug interactions of the registration drug product. Methods This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, semi-replicate, 3-sequence, 4-period crossover, BE, and food effect study. Subjects were randomized to one of three sequences where they received a single 600 mg oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr, as either the reference clinical study drug product (Treatment A) or the registration drug product (Treatment B) under fasted conditions. Subsequently, all subjects received a single 600 mg oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr as the registration drug product under fed conditions. There was by a 7-day washout between each period. Whole blood sampling to determine TBP pharmacokinetics (PK) was conducted predose and up to 24 hours post dose in each period. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Results Thirty-six healthy, adult male and female subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The TBP-PI-HBr registration product was bioequivalent to the clinical study product (Figure 1). For TBP, 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% BE limits when administered under fasted conditions. A standard high-fat/high-calorie meal had no meaningful effect on the total plasma exposure of TBP after administration of the registration product, thus, overall exposure based on AUC0-t and AUC0-inf was comparable under fed and fasted conditions (Figure 2). Five (14%) subjects reported adverse events of mild severity. No deaths, serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs were reported, and no clinically relevant ECGs, vital signs or safety laboratory findings were observed. Figure 1. Arithmetic mean plasma TBP concentrations following a 600 mg dose of clinical study drug product (A1 and A2) and registrational drug product (B) – PK population. Figure 2. Arithmetic mean plasma TBP concentrations following a 600 mg dose of registrational drug product (B) under fasted and fed conditions – PK population. Conclusion The TBP-PI-HBr registration product was bioequivalent to the clinical study product under fasted conditions, and no meaningful effect of a high fat meal on TBP PK was observed. Disclosures Vipul K. Gupta, Ph.D., Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Gina Patel, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Leanne Gasink, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Floni Bajraktari, MSc, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Yang Lei, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Akash Jain, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Praveen Srivastava, MS, BS, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Angela Talley, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S652-S653
Author(s):  
Vipul K Gupta ◽  
Gina Patel ◽  
Leanne Gasink ◽  
Floni Bajraktari ◽  
Yang Lei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) is an oral prodrug that is converted to tebipenem (TBP), the active moiety being developed for treating complication urinary tract infections. Antacids and proton pump inhibitors are known to change gastric pH after administration, which could affect the absorption of oral medications. This study evaluated the effect of a single dose of aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone and the effect of multiple doses of omeprazole on the PK of TBP, following a single dose of TBP-PI-HBr. Methods This was an open-label, 3-period, fixed sequence drug-drug interaction study. On Day 1, Period 1, subjects received a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg (2 x 300 mg tablets) at Hour 0. On Day 1, Period 2, subjects received a single oral 20 mL dose of aluminum hydroxide 800 mg/magnesium hydroxide 800 mg/simethicone 80 mg suspension per 10 mL (Maalox® Advanced Maximum Strength oral suspension) with a single oral dose of TBP-PI-HBr 600 mg at Hour 0. In Period 3, on Days 1 through 5, subjects received a single oral dose of omeprazole 40 mg (Prilosec®) once daily (QD), at Hour -2. On Day 5, a single oral dose of 600 mg TBP-PI-HBr was administered at Hour 0. Whole blood sampling for TBP PK occurred pre-dose and up to 24 hours post dose. Whole blood samples were assayed for TBP by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results Twenty subject were enrolled and completed the study. Geometric mean ratios for AUC indicated mean TBP exposure (AUC) was approximately 11% lower and mean Cmax was 22% lower for TBP-PI-HBr combined with aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone vs. TBP-PI-HBr alone (Figure). Similarly, geometric mean ratios for AUC indicated mean TBP exposure (AUC) was approximately 11% lower and mean Cmax was 43% lower for TBP-PI-HBr in combination with omeprazole vs. TBP-PI-HBr alone. Because the PK/PD driver for TBP efficacy is AUC dependent, concomitant administration is not expected to impact the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr. Figure 1. Arithmetic mean plasma TBP concentrations following a 600 mg dose of clinical study drug product (A1 and A2) and registrational drug product (B) – PK population. Conclusion Administration of TBP-PI-HBr combined with aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone or omeprazole QD had no meaningful effect on plasma TBP exposure; Cmax decreased with both agents. Co-administration was generally safe and well tolerated. Disclosures Vipul K. Gupta, Ph.D., Spero Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Gina Patel, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Leanne Gasink, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Floni Bajraktari, MSc, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Yang Lei, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Akash Jain, PhD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Praveen Srivastava, MS, BS, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Angela Talley, MD, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee)


1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 2196-2200 ◽  
Author(s):  
L J Lee ◽  
B Hafkin ◽  
I D Lee ◽  
J Hoh ◽  
R Dix

The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S324-S324
Author(s):  
Keith S Kaye ◽  
Anita F Das ◽  
Paul B Eckburg ◽  
Steven P Gelone ◽  
Jennifer Schranz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background FOS is being pursued for US registration in cUTI/AP. Safety and efficacy of FOS vs. PIP-TAZ were demonstrated in the noninferiority ZEUS trial in hospitalized patients with cUTI/AP. Although FOS resistance has been observed in several in vitro studies, resistance rates in clinical settings have remained relatively stable despite >40 years of clinical use of FOS outside of the United States. Here we report outcomes in patients who developed reduced susceptibility to study drug (FOS or PIP-TAZ) after enrollment in ZEUS. Methods Patients received IV FOS 6g q8h or PIP-TAZ 4.5g q8h for 7 days (no oral switch allowed). The primary endpoint was overall success (clinical cure + microbiologic eradication) in microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population at test-of-cure (TOC; Day 19–21). Reduced susceptibility to FOS or PIP-TAZ was defined as a ≥4-fold increase from baseline in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at Day 5, end of treatment (EOT; Day 7–8), TOC, or late follow-up (LFU; Day 26 ± 2). Microbiologic eradication/persistence of baseline and postbaseline pathogens was confirmed post hoc by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Results In all m-MITT patients, overall success/clinical cure/microbiologic eradication rates (with PFGE) at TOC were 69.0/90.8/70.7% (FOS) and 57.3/91.6/60.1% (PIP-TAZ). Reduced study drug susceptibility was identified in 7/184 (3.8%) FOS and 8/178 (4.5%) PIP-TAZ patients; all had monomicrobial infections (Table 1). Of these patients, almost all were aged ≥50 years (93%), male (73%), white (100%), and had a screening diagnosis of cUTI (93%). At TOC, 7/7 FOS patients and 7/8 PIP-TAZ patients had microbiologic persistence but all patients were clinical cures; these responses were all sustained through LFU (Table 1). Conclusion In the ZEUS study, few patients had urine isolates with reduced postbaseline susceptibility to either FOS or PIP-TAZ. No trend was observed in isolate species associated with decreased susceptibility to FOS or PIP-TAZ, including various Enterobacteriaceae species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Despite microbiologic persistence at TOC in a small number of patients, all of these patients were clinical cures at TOC and sustained cures at LFU. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoshu Dai ◽  
Michael D Karol ◽  
Matthew Hitron ◽  
Marjie Hard ◽  
J Evan Blanchard ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Hansson ◽  
Thomas Rasmussen ◽  
Roland Perfekt ◽  
Elin Hall ◽  
Holger Kraiczi

Abstract Background Ability to manage urges to smoke is fundamental to maximizing the chances of success in smoking cessation. Previous studies have linked a higher dose of nicotine in nicotine replacement therapy to a higher success rate for smoking cessation. Thus, this study was performed to compare relief of urges to smoke, up until 5 h following treatment with a new 6 mg nicotine gum versus currently marketed 4 mg nicotine gum. Methods This was a randomized crossover clinical study. Following 12 h of abstinence from smoking, either one 6 mg or one 4 mg nicotine gum was given to 240 healthy adult smokers. Thereafter, urges to smoke were scored on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale repeatedly over 5 h. Results The reductions in urges to smoke over the first 1 and 3 h after administration were statistically significantly greater with 6 mg than 4 mg gum, (p < 0.005). A 50% reduction in perceived urges to smoke was reached in 9.4 min with 6 mg gum compared to 16.2 min with 4 mg gum (median values). The median duration of a 50% or more reduction in VAS urges to smoke score was 111 min with the 6 mg gum, versus 74 min for the 4 mg gum. Conclusion This study provides evidence that the 6 mg nicotine gum provided a greater reduction, faster and longer relief of urges to smoke than the 4 mg nicotine gum. Trial registration EudraCT Number: 2010–023268-42. Study was first entered in EudraCT 2011-02-23.


1997 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-604
Author(s):  
Masato Sano ◽  
Satoshi Takahashi ◽  
Masahiro Nishimura ◽  
Takaoki Hirose ◽  
Yoshiaki Kumamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document