scholarly journals 1589. Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Activity Against Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Bloodstream Infections in US Hospitals

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S580-S580
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
S J Ryan Arends ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Jennifer M Streit ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
First Line ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections

Abstract Background Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) resistant to first-line agents are difficult to treat and require using more toxic antimicrobials, such as amikacin (AMK) and colistin (COL). Kadri et al. recently described the category of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) as intermediate or resistant to all tested first-line agents (fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and extended-spectrum cephalosporins). Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C-T) is an antibacterial combination of an antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T has been approved in >60 countries to treat complicated urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The filing is in progress for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors gram-negative (GN) isolates resistant to C-T worldwide. In this study, the activity of C-T and comparators against PSA bloodstream isolates that are DTR, multidrug-resistant (MDR), or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) were analyzed. Methods A total of 922 PSA isolates from BSI were collected between 2011 and 2018 from 35 PACTS hospitals in the United States. Isolates were tested for C-T susceptibility (S) by the CLSI broth microdilution method. Other antibiotics tested included cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin (LEV), doripenem, imipenem, meropenem (MEM), piperacillin–tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), AMK and COL. Antibiotic-resistant phenotypes analyzed using CLSI (2019) breakpoints included MDR (nonsusceptible to ≥ 1 agent in ≥ 3 drug classes), XDR (susceptible to ≤ 1 agent in ≤ 2 drug classes), or DTR. Results The percent of DTR isolates was 4.8% when compared with 15.2% MDR and 9.3% XDR. The %S for C-T and other first- and second-line agents are shown in the table for each phenotype. Conclusion C-T demonstrated 97.1%S overall for BSI isolates, similar to AMK (97.8%) and COL (99.5%). C-T had better coverage than first-line drugs against MDR (81.4%) and XDR (72.1%), and 50% for the DTR isolates, which represented only 4.8% of isolates. Only AMK and COL had > 75%S for DTR isolates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 1047. Global Surveillance: Susceptibility of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Collected From Bloodstream Infections in the United States From 2015 to 2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S313-S313
Author(s):  
S J Ryan Arends ◽  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Jennifer M Streit ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
The Us ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C-T) is an antibacterial combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014 and by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to treat complicated urinary tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors Gram-negative (GN) isolates resistant to C-T worldwide. In the current study, isolates were collected from patients hospitalized with bloodstream infections (BSIs) from 2015 to 2017 within the United States. Methods A total of 3,377 prevalence-based BSI GN isolates, including Escherichia coli (EC; 1,422), Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN, 630), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA; 344), were collected during 2015 to 2017 from 32 PACTS hospitals in the United States. Isolates were tested for C-T susceptibility by CLSI broth microdilution method in a central monitoring laboratory (JMI Laboratories). Other antibiotics tested were amikacin (AMK), cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP). Antibiotic-resistant phenotypes analyzed (CLSI, 2018) for EC and KPN included carbapenem-R (CR) and non-CR extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL); as well as CAZ-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS), MEM-NS, and COL-NS PSA. Results Of the 3,377 BSI GN isolates, 3,219 (95.3%) had a C-T MIC ≤ 4 mg/L. The three most prevalent GN species isolated from BSIs were EC (42.1%), KPN (18.7%), and PSA (10.2%). The %S of C-T and comparators for the top three pathogens are shown in the table. C-T showed activity against these isolates with %S of ≥96.0% against all three species. Of the comparators tested, AMK and COL also had high %S against these isolates. Conclusion C-T demonstrated activity against the most prevalent contemporary GN isolates from BSIs in the US. C-T was the only beta-lactam that had ≥96%S against all three species: EC, KPN, and PSA. For PSA, C-T maintained activity (>90%S) against isolates resistant to CAZ, TZP, and MEM. These data suggest that C-T may be a useful treatment for GN BSI. Disclosures S. J. R. Arends, Merck: Research Contractor, Research support. D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research support. M. Castanheira, Merck: Research Contractor, Research support. J. M. Streit, Merck: Research Contractor, Research support. R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research support.

scholarly journals Comparison of the In Vitro Susceptibility of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam With the Cumulative Susceptibility Rates of Standard Antibiotic Combinations When Tested Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa From ICU Patients With Bloodstream Infections or Pneumonia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
S J Ryan Arends ◽  
Janet Raddatz ◽  
Daryl D DePestel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Seriously Ill Patients ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains an important cause of hospital-acquired infections in the United States and is frequently multidrug-resistant (MDR). The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend empiric combination therapy that includes an antipseudomonal β-lactam with an aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone likely to cover ≥95% of P. aeruginosa infections in seriously ill patients at risk of having an MDR pathogen. Ceftolozane is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin, combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. A phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumoniae was recently completed. We compared the in vitro susceptibility rate of ceftolozane-tazobactam with the cumulative susceptibility rates of antibiotic combinations commonly used against P. aeruginosa. Methods Isolates were collected from intensive care unit patients hospitalized in 32 US hospitals from 2011 to 2017. The susceptibilities of 1543 P. aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections (198 isolates, 12.8%) or pneumonia (1345 isolates, 87.2%) were determined for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators. Results The most active antimicrobials were colistin (99.4% susceptible), amikacin (98.1% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (96.5% susceptible). The susceptibilities to other antipseudomonal β-lactams and fluoroquinolones were <84%. A cumulative susceptibility of ≥95% was reached for cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam only in combination with amikacin due to the lower susceptibilities of gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. Monotherapies that exceeded 95% were ceftolozane-tazobactam, amikacin, and colistin. Conclusions Ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy is likely to be active against more isolates than a combination of another β-lactam and a fluoroquinolone or gentamicin for serious P. aeruginosa infections.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Various Resistance Patterns Isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012)

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 6305-6310 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Good Activity ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

ABSTRACTCeftolozane/tazobactam, a novel antimicrobial agent with activity againstPseudomonas aeruginosa(including drug-resistant strains) and other common Gram-negative pathogens (including most extended-spectrum-β-lactamase [ESBL]-producingEnterobacteriaceaestrains), and comparator agents were susceptibility tested by a reference broth microdilution method against 7,071Enterobacteriaceaeand 1,971P. aeruginosaisolates. Isolates were collected consecutively from patients in 32 medical centers across the United States during 2011 to 2012. Overall, 15.7% and 8.9% ofP. aeruginosaisolates were classified as multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR), and 8.4% and 1.2% ofEnterobacteriaceaewere classified as MDR and XDR. No pandrug-resistant (PDR)Enterobacteriaceaeisolates and only one PDRP. aeruginosaisolate were detected. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 μg/ml) agent tested againstP. aeruginosaand demonstrated good activity against 310 MDR strains (MIC50/90, 2/8 μg/ml) and 175 XDR strains (MIC50/90, 4/16 μg/ml). Ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited high overall activity (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 μg/ml) againstEnterobacteriaceaeand retained activity (MIC50/90, 4/>32 μg/ml) against many 601 MDR strains but not against the 86 XDR strains (MIC50, >32 μg/ml). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was highly potent (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml) against 2,691Escherichia coliisolates and retained good activity against most ESBL-phenotypeE. coliisolates (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 μg/ml), but activity was low against ESBL-phenotypeKlebsiella pneumoniaeisolates (MIC50/90, 32/>32 μg/ml), explained by the high rate (39.8%) of meropenem coresistance observed in this species phenotype. In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated high potency and broad-spectrum activity against many contemporaryEnterobacteriaceaeandP. aeruginosaisolates collected in U.S. medical centers. Importantly, ceftolozane/tazobactam retained potency against many MDR and XDR strains.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by US Census Division

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S371-S372
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Us Census ◽  
Phenotype Screen ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. In this study, the activities of C-T and comparators vs. GN isolates from each of the 9 US Census divisions were compared. Methods A total of 18,856 Enterobacteriaceae (ENT) and 4,735 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) isolates were collected from 32 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). The following resistant phenotypes were analyzed for ENT: carbapenem resistant (CRE); extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype screen-positive (ESBL); and ESBL, nonCRE. or PSA, MER-nonsusceptible (NS), TZP-NS, and CAZ-NS isolates were analyzed. CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used. Results For all ENT, 94.2% were S to C-T, 91.5% were S to TZP, 98.0% were S to MER, and 98.8% were S to AMK; 1,697 (9.0%) were ESBL, nonCRE and 356 (1.9%) were CRE. For all PSA isolates, 97.4% were S to C-T, 99.3% were S to COL, 96.9% were S to AMK, and 81.2% were S to MER. The % C-T S for each division (DIV) are shown in the table. The % C-T S for ENT ranged from 98.1% (DIV 4) to 87.4% (DIV 2) and % C-T S for ESBL, nonCRE ranged from 93.8% in DIV 4 to 79.8% in DIV 7. For PSA, the % C-T S ranged from 99.6% in DIV 4 to 94.9% in DIV 9. Activity of C-T against PSA NS to MER, CAZ or TZP varied by division and was >80% for all except DIV 9. Conclusion Against PSA, only COL was more active than C-T. C-T demonstrated potent activity against PSA NS to other β-lactams. For ENT, overall activity was good. For both PSA and ENT, C-T varied by DIV. Disclosures D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant

scholarly journals Arbekacin Activity against Contemporary Clinical Bacteria Isolated from Patients Hospitalized with Pneumonia

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 3263-3270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Paul R. Rhomberg ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Infection Types

ABSTRACTArbekacin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside licensed for systemic use in Japan and under clinical development as an inhalation solution in the United States. We evaluated the occurrence of organisms isolated from pneumonias in U.S. hospitalized patients (PHP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and thein vitroactivity of arbekacin. Organism frequency was evaluated from a collection of 2,203 bacterial isolates (339 from VAP) consecutively collected from 25 medical centers in 2012 through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Arbekacin activity was tested against 904 isolates from PHP collected in 2012 from 62 U.S. medical centers and 303 multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms collected worldwide in 2009 and 2010 from various infection types. Susceptibility to arbekacin and comparator agents was evaluated by the reference broth microdilution method. The four most common organisms from PHP wereStaphylococcus aureus,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Klebsiellaspp., andEnterobacterspp. The highest arbekacin MIC amongS. aureusisolates from PHP (43% methicillin-resistantS. aureus[MRSA]) was 4 μg/ml. AmongP. aeruginosaisolates from PHP, only one had an arbekacin MIC of >16 μg/ml (MIC50and MIC90, 1 and 4 μg/ml), and susceptibility rates for gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin were 88.0, 90.0, and 98.0%, respectively. Arbekacin (MIC50, 2 μg/ml) and tobramycin (MIC50, 4 μg/ml) were the most potent aminoglycosides tested againstAcinetobacter baumannii. AgainstEnterobacteriaceaefrom PHP, arbekacin and gentamicin (MIC50and MIC90, 0.25 to 1 and 1 to 8 μg/ml for both compounds) were generally more potent than tobramycin (MIC50and MIC90, 0.25 to 2 and 1 to 32 μg/ml) and amikacin (MIC50and MIC90, 1 to 2 and 2 to 32 μg/ml). Arbekacin also demonstrated potentin vitroactivity against a worldwide collection of well-characterized MDR Gram-negative and MRSA strains.

scholarly journals Ceftazidime/Avibactam: Who Says You Can’t Teach an Old Drug New Tricks?

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie E. Barber ◽  
Jessica K. Ortwine ◽  
Ronda L Akins
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections

Purpose: Gram-negative resistance continues to rise with treatment options becoming more limited. Ceftazidime/avibactam was recently approved in the United States and Europe, which combines an established third-generation cephalosporin with a new, unique, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review conducts a thorough examination of structure, pharmacology, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, in vitro and clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability of ceftazidime/avibactam, as well as detailed future directions for the agent. Methods: Pubmed and clinicaltrials.gov searches, as well as abstracts from the 2015 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/International Society of Chemotherapy (ICAAC/ICC) and ID Week meetings and the 2016 American Society of Microbiology Microbe meeting, were conducted from January 2004 – September 2016. Relevant search terms included ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, avibactam, NXL104 and AVE1330A. The US package insert for ceftazidime/avibactam (02/2015) and European public assessment report (06/2016) were also reviewed. Results: In vitro susceptibility for ceftazidime/avibactam displayed potent activity against many Enterobacteriaceae including extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase-producing strains, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Phase II clinical trials utilized for approval demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to imipenem/cilistatin for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (70.4% vs. 71.4%) and combined with metronidazole compared to meropenem in complicated intra-abdominal infections (91.2% vs 93.4%). Phase III data displayed non-inferior efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam compared to doripenem for complicated urinary tract infections (70.2% vs 66.2%) and combined with metronidazole compared to meropenem in complicated intra-abdominal infections (82.5% vs 84.9%), as well as comparable safety. Ceftazidime/avibactam was well-tolerated but does require renal adjustments. Additionally, 3 case series and a single case report have demonstrated the potential for ceftazidime/avibactam against multidrug resistant organisms for compassionate use or failure after previous therapy. Conclusion: By adding avibactam to ceftazidime, clinicians’ antimicrobial armamentarium is expanded, potentially increasing the ability to combat multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens, particularly ESBL and carbapenemase-producing organisms, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.

scholarly journals Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1126
Author(s):  
George L. Daikos ◽  
Clóvis Arns da da Cunha ◽  
Gian Maria Rossolini ◽  
Gregory G. Stone ◽  
Nathalie Baillon-Plot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

scholarly journals Ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam susceptibility of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Hungary

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin O'Neall ◽  
Emese Juhász ◽  
Ákos Tóth ◽  
Edit Urbán ◽  
Judit Szabó ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Diffusion Test ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Gradient Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

Abstract Our objective was to compare the activity ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) and ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T) against multidrug (including carbapenem) resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates collected from six diagnostic centers in Hungary and to reveal the genetic background of their carbapenem resistance. Two hundred and fifty consecutive, non-duplicate, carbapenem-resistant multidrug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa isolates were collected in 2017. Minimal inhibitory concentration values of ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, C/A and C/T were determined by broth microdilution method and gradient diffusion test. Carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) test was performed on all isolates. Carbapenemase-encoding blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM genes were identified by multiplex PCR. Of the isolates tested, 33.6& and 32.4& showed resistance to C/A and C/T, respectively. According to the CIM test results, 26& of the isolates were classified as carbapenemase producers. The susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates to C/A and C/T without carbapenemase production was 89& and 91&, respectively. Of the CIM-positive isolates, 80& were positive for blaVIM and 11& for blaNDM. The prevalence of Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (VIM)-type carbapenemase was 20.8&. NDM was present in 2.8& of the isolates. Although the rate of carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa strains is high, a negative CIM result indicates that either C/A or C/T could be effective even if carbapenem resistance has been observed.

Evaluation of the in vitro interaction of fosfomycin and meropenem against metallo-β-lactamase–producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using Etest and time-kill assay

2020 ◽  
pp. jim-2020-001573
Author(s):  
Sanjida Jahan ◽  
Heather Davis ◽  
Deborah S Ashcraft ◽  
George A Pankey
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
In Vitro Interaction ◽  
Antimicrobial Combinations

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a nosocomial pathogen containing various resistance mechanisms. Among them, metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)–producing Pseudomonas are difficult to treat. Fosfomycin is an older antibiotic that has recently seen increased usage due to its activity against a broad spectrum of multidrug-resistant organisms. Our aim was to evaluate the combination of fosfomycin and meropenem against 20 MBL-producing P. aeruginosa (100% meropenem-resistant and 20% fosfomycin-resistant) using both an Etest minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC): MIC method and time-kill assay. MICs for fosfomycin and meropenem were determined by Etest and by broth microdilution method for the latter. The combination demonstrated synergy by Etest in 3/20 (15%) isolates and 5/20 (25%) isolates by time-kill assay. Results from the Etest method and time-kill assay were in agreement for 14/20 (70%) of isolates. No antagonism was found. Comparing both methods, Etest MIC: MIC method may be useful to rapidly evaluate other antimicrobial combinations.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane–Tazobactam Tested against Contemporary (2012–2016) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU vs. non-ICU Isolates Collected in US Medical Centers

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S366-S366
Author(s):  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Robert K Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) is a combination of a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a well-described β-lactamase inhibitor. C-T was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis and complicated intra-abdominal infections. C-T is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. The Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) monitors C-T resistance to gram-negative (GN) isolates worldwide. This study compares the activities of C-T and comparators against GN isolates from ICU patients and non-ICU patients. Methods A total of 3,100 GN ICU isolates and 3,271 isolates from non-ICU patients were collected from 30 US hospitals in 2012–2016. Isolates were tested for susceptibility (S) to C-T and comparators by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central monitoring laboratory. Other antibiotics tested included amikacin (AMK), cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), colistin (COL), meropenem (MER), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). CLSI (2017) interpretive criteria were used for all except COL with Enterobacteriaceae (ENT), for which EUCAST (2017) criteria were used. Results The most common ENT species from ICU and non-ICU patients were similar. The 3 most common ENT for ICU and non-ICU isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 24.1% and 25.8%; Escherichia coli, 19.4% and 18.2%; and Serratia marcescens, 14.7% and 14.3%, respectively. The most common non-enteric species was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) for ICU and non-ICU (72.7% and 78.2%). ICU ENT isolates generally had a lower %S than non-ICU (Table). ENT showed more variability than PSA for %S between ICU and non-ICU. Conclusion For ENT overall, MER and AMK were the most active, followed by C-T. Comparing ICU and non-ICU, MER and C-T were slightly more active vs. non-ICU ENT, while AMK %S was similar for both. For PSA, COL was the most active; C-T and AMK were similar. Activities between ICU and non-ICU isolates were similar for C-T and COL while AMK was more active vs. ICU isolates, and MER was more active vs. non-ICU. C-T showed potent activity against ICU and non-ICU isolates for ENT and PSA. Disclosures D. Shortridge, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; M. A. Pfaller, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Merck: Research Contractor, Research grant

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document