scholarly journals 770. Multimodal Sepsis Performance Improvement Initiative Improves Early and Appropriate Treatment, Reduces Sepsis-related Readmissions, and Reduces Overall Mortality

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S343-S343
Author(s):  
Seife Yohannes
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Post Intervention Period ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Abstract Background CMS has implemented the SEP-1 Core Measure, which mandates that hospitals implement sepsis quality improvement initiatives. At our hospital, a 900-bed tertiary hospital, a sepsis performance improvement initiative was implemented in April 2016. In this study, we analyzed patient outcomes before and after these interventions. Methods We studied coding data in patients with a diagnosis of Sepsis reported to CMS using a third-party performance improvement database between October, 2015 and July, 2017. The interventions included a hospital-wide education campaign about sepsis; a 24–7 electronic warning system (EWS) using SIRS criteria; a rapid response nursing team that monitors the EWS; a 24–7 mid-level provider team; a database to monitor compliance and timely treatment; and education in sepsis documentation and coding. We performed a before and after analysis of patient outcomes. Results A total of 4,102 patients were diagnosed with sepsis during the study period. 861 (21%) were diagnosed during the pre-intervention period and 3,241 (80%) were diagnosed in the post-intervention period. The overall incidence of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were 59%, 13%, and 28% consecutively. Regression analysis showed age, admission through the ED, and severity of illness as independent risk factors for increased mortality. Adjusted for these risk factors, the incidence of severe sepsis and septic was reduced by 5.3% and 6.9% in the post-intervention period, while the incidence of simple sepsis increased by 12%. In the post-intervention period, compliance with all 6 CMS mandated sepsis bundle interventions improved from 11% to 37% (P = 0.01); hospital length of stay was reduced by 1.8 days (P = 0.05); length of stay above predicted was less by 1.5 days (P = 0.05); re-admission rate was reduced by 1.6% (P = 0.05); and death from any sepsis diagnosis was reduced 4.5% (P = 0.01). Based on an average of 2000 sepsis cases at our hospital, this amounted to 90 lives saved per year. Death from severe sepsis and septic shock both were also reduced by 5% (P = 0.01) and 6.5% (P = 0.01). Conclusion A multi-modal sepsis performance improvement initiative reduced the incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock, reduced hospital length of stay, reduced readmission rates, and reduced all-cause mortality. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Time to First Antimicrobial Administration After Onset of Sepsis in Critically Ill Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Fusco ◽  
Kristine A. Parbuoni ◽  
Jill A. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
Antimicrobial Administration

OBJECTIVES: Delay of antimicrobial administration in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock has been associated with a decrease in survival to hospital discharge. The primary objective of this investigation was to determine the time to first antimicrobial administration after the onset of sepsis in critically ill children. Secondary objectives included appropriateness of empiric antimicrobials and microbiological testing, fluid resuscitation during the first 24 hours after onset of sepsis, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. METHODS: Retrospective, chart review of all subjects less than or equal to 18 years of age admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a diagnosis of sepsis between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012. RESULTS: A total of 72 subjects met the inclusion criteria during the study period. Median time to first antimicrobial administration by a nurse after the onset of sepsis was 2.7 (0.5–5.1) hours. Cultures were drawn prior to administration of antimicrobials in 91.7% of subjects and were repeated within 48 hours in 72.2% of subjects. Empiric antimicrobial regimens were appropriate in 91.7% of cases. The most common empiric antimicrobial regimens included piperacillin/tazobactam plus vancomycin in 19 subjects (26.4%) and ceftriaxone plus vancomycin in 15 subjects (20.8%). Median PICU length of stay was 129 (64.6–370.9) hours, approximately 5 days, and median hospital length of stay was 289 (162.5–597.1) hours, approximately 12 days. There were 4 deaths during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Time to first antimicrobial administration after onset of sepsis was not optimal and exceeded the recommendations set forth in international guidelines. At our institution, the process for treating pediatric patients with severe sepsis and septic shock should be modified to increase compliance with national guidelines.

scholarly journals Tricuspid Annular Plane of Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) for the Evaluation of Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 348-352
Author(s):  
Shadi Lahham ◽  
Clifton Lee ◽  
Qumber Ali ◽  
John Moeller ◽  
Chanel Fischetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Septic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Introduction: Sepsis is a systemic infection that can rapidly progress into multi organ failure and shock if left untreated. Previous studies have demonstrated the utility of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of patients with sepsis. However, limited data exists on the evaluation of the tricuspid annular plane of systolic excursion (TAPSE) in patients with sepsis. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with concern for severe sepsis or septic shock in a pilot study. In patients that screened positive, the treating physician then performed POCUS to measure the TAPSE value. We compared the intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, hospital length of stay, and morbidity with their respective TAPSE values. Results: We enrolled 24 patients in the study. Eight patients had TAPSE values less than 16 millimeters (mm), two patients had TAPSE values between 16mm-20mm, and fourteen patients had TAPSE values greater than 20mm. There was no statistically significant association between TAPSE levels and ICU admission (p=0.16), or death (p=0.14). The difference of length of stay (LOS) was not statistically significant in case of hospital LOS (p= 0.72) or ICU LOS. Conclusion: Our pilot data did not demonstrate a correlation between severe sepsis or septic shock and TAPSE values. This may be due to several factors including patient comorbidities, strict definitions of sepsis and septic shock, as well as the absence of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Future large-scale studies are needed to determine if TAPSE can be beneficial in the ED evaluation of patients with concern for SCM.

Epidemiology, recognition and documentation of sepsis in the pre-hospital setting and associated clinical outcomes: a prospective multicenter study

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 168-175
Author(s):  
Nadia Alam ◽  
◽  
Kirtiedevi BNS Doerga ◽  
Tahira Hussain ◽  
Sadia Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Care Chain ◽  
Discharge Letter ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

Introduction: General practitioners (GPs) and the emergency medical services (EMS) personnel have a pivotal role as points of entry into the acute care chain. This study was conducted to investigate the recognition of sepsis by GPs and EMS personnel and to evaluate the associations between recognition of sepsis in the pre-hospital setting and patient outcomes. Methods Design: prospective, observational study during a 12 week period in the emergency department (ED) of two academic hospitals. Study population: Patients >18 years presenting with sepsis at the ED. The information available in the ED discharge letter and the ED charts was used to make a definite diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock Outcome measures: primary: recognition/documentation of sepsis. Secondary: ED arrival time to antibiotic administration, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results: A total of 301 patients were included in the study. GPs and EMS personnel correctly identified and documented 31.6% (n=114) and 41.4% of all sepsis patients (n=140) respectively. Recognition and documentation of sepsis improved with increasing severity. The mean time to administration of antibiotics (TTA) was nearly halved for the group of patients where sepsis was documented (GP: 66,4 minutes, EMS: 65,6 minutes) compared to the group in which sepsis was not documented (GP: 123,9 minutes, EMS: 101,5 minutes; p= 0.365 and p= 0.024 respectively). Conclusions: There is room for improvement in the recognition of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock by practitioners working in the pre-hospital setting. Documentation of sepsis prior to arrival in hospital led to a reduced time delay in administration of antibiotics.

Abstract WP155: Increased Physician and Physical Therapist Communication is Associated With Earlier Mobility and Decreased Length of Stay in the Cerebrovascular and Trauma Neuroscience Population

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Burch ◽  
Silke Bernert ◽  
Justin F Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Multidisciplinary Rounds ◽  
Level I ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Background and Purpose: There is growing interest in methods for early rehabilitation in patients with acute neurologic conditions. The purpose of this study was to identify whether increased coordination between the physical therapist and an attending cerebrovascular neurosurgeon through daily multidisciplinary rounds would correlate with positive changes in overall care. Hypothesis: We evaluated the hypothesis that a physical therapist participating in cerebrovascular neuroscience rounds would decrease the time to initial physical therapy (PT) consult, decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), decrease Intensive Care Unit (ICU) LOS, and decrease ventilator days. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 235 patients who were admitted to the neuroscience service under a single cerebrovascular neurosurgeon over a 16-month period (April 2014 through July 2015) in a level-I trauma hospital. The study consisted of an eight-month pre-intervention period (n=117) where the physical therapist did not attend physician rounds and an eight-month post-intervention period (n=118). Results: In the post-intervention group the PT assessment occurred on average 1.57 days sooner than before the physical therapist participated in neuroscience physician rounds (p<0.001). Hospital LOS decreased by an average of 3.46 days (p=0.04) and ICU LOS decreased on average by 1.83 days (p=0.05) in the post-intervention group. Ventilator days decreased on average by 0.55 days, which was not statistically significant (p=0.26). Conclusions: In conclusion, daily coordination with multidisciplinary rounds between the physician and the physical therapist was associated with decreased time to initial PT assessment, decreased hospital LOS, and decreased ICU LOS in the neuroscience population.

scholarly journals Additional Telemedicine Rounds as a Successful Performance-Improvement Strategy for Sepsis Management: Observational Multicenter Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Deisz ◽  
Susanne Rademacher ◽  
Katrin Gilger ◽  
Rudolf Jegen ◽  
Barbara Sauerzapfe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
Sepsis Bundles ◽  
Improvement Programs ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
Effective Component

BACKGROUND Sepsis is a major health care problem with high morbidity and mortality rates and affects millions of patients. Telemedicine, defined as the exchange of medical information via electronic communication, improves the outcome of patients with sepsis and decreases the mortality rate and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Additional telemedicine rounds could be an effective component of performance-improvement programs for sepsis, especially in underserved rural areas and hospitals without ready access to critical care physicians. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate the impact of additional daily telemedicine rounds on adherence to sepsis bundles. We hypothesized that additional telemedicine support may increase adherence to sepsis guidelines and improve the detection rates of sepsis and septic shock. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicenter study between January 2014 and July 2015 with one tele-ICU center and three ICUs in Germany. We implemented telemedicine as part of standard care and collected data continuously during the study. During the daily telemedicine rounds, routine screening for sepsis was conducted and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s 3-hour and 6-hour sepsis bundles were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 1168 patients were included in this study, of which 196 were positive for severe sepsis and septic shock. We found that additional telemedicine rounds improved adherence to the 3-hour (Quarter 1, 35% vs Quarter 6, 76.2%; P=.01) and 6-hour (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 6, 95.2%; P=.001) sepsis bundles. In addition, we noted an increase in adherence to the item “Administration of fluids when hypotension” (Quarter 1, 80% vs Quarter 6, 100%; P=.049) of the 3-hour bundle and the item “Remeasurement of lactate” (Quarter 1, 65% vs Quarter 6, 100%, P=.003) of the 6-hour bundle. The ICU length of stay after diagnosis of severe sepsis and septic shock remained unchanged over the observation period. Due to a higher number of patients with sepsis in Quarter 5 (N=60) than in other quarters, we observed stronger effects of the additional rounds on mortality in this quarter (Quarter 1, 50% vs Quarter 5, 23.33%, P=.046). CONCLUSIONS Additional telemedicine rounds are an effective component of and should be included in performance-improvement programs for sepsis management.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Physician Incentivized QI Strategy to Address Time to Parenteral Analgesia in Patients with Voe in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2989-2989
Author(s):  
Romy Shane ◽  
Sanjay J. Shah ◽  
Blake Bulloch ◽  
Anita Bharath
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Timely Administration ◽  
Order Set

Abstract Introduction Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) are the most common cause of pediatric Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute published an Expert Panel Report regarding the management of SCD and VOE. Their consensus statement recommends initiating analgesic therapy within 30 minutes of triage or within 60 minutes of registration in the Emergency Department. Previous studies have demonstrated that earlier maximum opioid has been associated with shorter length of hospitalization and improved time to ED disposition decision. Despite the overwhelming evidence for timely administration of parenteral analgesic, significant delays still exist in delivery of pain medication in the pediatric SCD population. Barriers to timely administration include rapid triage of SCD patients, provider ordering of pain medication, and peripheral intravenous access. Therefore, a standardized approach to pain management may improve ED management of SCD crises. In order to address timely administration of opiates to SCD patients with VOE episodes in our pediatric ED a SCD pain order set was developed. This order set implemented the use of intranasal (IN) fentanyl as a first line analgesic for SCD patients who presents to the ED with VOE. The purpose of this study was addressing barriers to decrease time to parenteral opioid administration in the pediatric ED. Methods This Quality Improvement (QI) measure was performed at a free-standing, urban pediatric ED. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of SCD and presented with a pain score &gt;5 and without fever. A PDSA cycle was utilized for designing and evaluating the proposed changes. This cycle consisted of three intervention phases: (1) electronic medical record (EMR) order set development in October 2019, (2) provider incentive for order set use in January 2020, and (3) nursing/patient & family education in April 2020. Baseline data was collected pre-intervention from April-September 2019. The outcomes measures were mean time to 1 st analgesic, mean time from triage to disposition, Hospital Length of Stay, and overall admission rates. Our balancing measure included 48 hour ED re-visits after discharge. Results There were 67 ED visits from April-September 2019 (pre-intervention) and 104 ED visits in the post-intervention data from October-June 2020. There was no significant difference in age or initial pain score in the pre- and post- intervention groups. Improvements were seen in: mean time to first analgesic (58 to 26 minutes), time to disposition (271 to 213 minutes). Hospital length of stay was found to increase with the introduction of IN fentanyl: pre-intervention (120 hours), phase 1 (148 hours), phase 2 (152 hours), phase 3 (218 hours). However, the overall admission rate decreased (55% to 44%). The number of 48-hour ED re-visits remained stable. Conclusion By using QI methods to address key barriers in the pediatric ED, we demonstrated that timely administration of parenteral analgesic can be achieved for SCD patients with VOE. Utilizing the EMR order set allowed for more stream-lined care, both by physicians and nursing staff, resulting in more rapid ordering of medication therefore decreasing time to ED disposition. Additional interventions such as provider incentivization to meet the goal of parenteral opioids within 30 minutes of patient arrival led to further improvement. One of the greatest barriers to our QI intervention was hesitancy both by patients and their caregivers regarding the efficacy of IN fentanyl in decreasing pain compared to IV opioid. Further education was needed both for families and medical staff regarding the efficacy of IN fentanyl as a first line analgesic. It is unclear why overall hospital length of stay was not shown to be decreased with these interventions but this can be offset by an overall decrease in hospital admissions seen with our interventions. This data may be limited by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and how psychosocial stressors can impact patients with chronic medical conditions. Length of stay is also confounded by other factors during the hospitalization and acquisition of other diagnoses such as acute chest. Future research is needed to determine if the demonstrated trend of admission rates and hospital length of stay can be replicated in other pediatric EDs and whether earlier opioid administration affects the outcome of VOEs beyond the ED. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Impact of Vasopressor Initiation and Discontinuation Sequence on Mortality in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Cara McDaniel ◽  
Andrew Moyer ◽  
Cara McDaniel ◽  
Judah Brown ◽  
Michael Baram
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Vasoactive Agent ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection

Background: Little data exists guiding clinicians on how or when to initiate and discontinue the second vasoactive agent in the setting of septic shock refractory to norepinephrine monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with a primary diagnosis of septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit receiving norepinephrine in addition to concomitant vasopressors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all-cause in-hospital mortality when adding adjunctive vasopressors to norepinephrine either before the dose reached 2 mcg/kg/min (early adjunctive vasopressor) or after (late adjunctive vasopressor). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of clinically significant hypotension when discontinuing norepinephrine before or after vasopressin in the same population. Results: Forty-six patients were included (early adjunctive vasopressor [n=36]; late adjunctive vasopressor [n=10]), with a median age of 69 years and APACHE II score of 27. Fewer patients in the early adjunctive vasopressor cohort had malignancy prior to admission (16.7% vs. 60%, p=0.0117), however, more patients were managed in the surgical ICU (44.4% vs. 0%, p=0.0202) with intra-abdominal infection (33.3% vs. 0%, p=0.0439). The primary endpoint of all-cause in-hospital mortality was not statistically different between the early and late adjunctive vasopressor groups (75% vs. 90%, respectively, p=0.4203). Longer ICU and hospital length of stay in the early adjunctive vasopressor cohort was observed (9 days vs 3 days, p=0.0061; 11 days vs 3 days, p=0.0026, respectively). Twenty-two patients were included in analysis of vasopressor discontinuation sequence with no significant differences in mortality, incidence of hypotension, or ICU/hospital length of stay. Conclusion: Among patients with septic shock on multiple vasopressors, addition of adjunctive vasopressor before reaching a norepinephrine dose of 2 mcg/kg/min was associated with longer in-hospital and ICU survival but exhibited no difference in overall mortality. Discontinuation of vasopressin before norepinephrine led to longer total vasopressor duration without a difference in rates of hypotension. Future prospective studies are warranted.

scholarly journals Hospitals That Report Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance Have More Structured Sepsis Performance Improvement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ty B. Bolte ◽  
Morgan B. Swanson ◽  
Anna Kaldjian ◽  
Nicholas M. Mohr ◽  
Jennifer McDanel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Sepsis Mortality ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽  
Sepsis Care

Objective: Sepsis is a common cause of death in hospitalized patients. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Bundle (SEP-1) is an evidence-based early management bundle focused on improving sepsis outcomes. It is unknown which quality improvement (QI) practices are associated with SEP-1 compliance and if those practices reduce sepsis mortality. The objectives of this study were to compare sepsis QI practices in SEP-1 reporting and non-reporting hospitals and to measure the association between specific elements of sepsis QI processes and SEP-1 performance and hospital-specific risk-adjusted sepsis mortality. Design, Setting, and Patients: This mixed methods study linked telephone survey data on QI practices from Iowa hospitals to SEP-1 performance data and risk-adjusted mortality from statewide all-payer administrative claims database. The survey assessed sepsis QI practices in eight categories. Characteristics of hospitals and sepsis QI practices were compared by SEP-1 reporting status. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression estimated the association of QI practices with hospital SEP-1 performance and observed-to-expected sepsis mortality ratios. Interventions: None Measurements and Main Results: All 118 Iowa hospitals completed the survey (100% response rate). SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% vs. 38%, p = 0.026) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans (87% vs. 64%, p = 0.013). Sepsis QI practices were not associated with increased SEP-1 scores. Two were associated with reduced mortality: having a sepsis committee B= -0.11, p = 0.036) and using case review results for sepsis care plans (B= -0.10, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Hospitals reporting SEP-1 compliance to CMS conduct more sepsis QI practices. Most QI practices are not associated with increased SEP-1 performance or decreased sepsis mortality. Future work could explore how to implement these performance improvement practices in hospitals not reporting SEP-1 compliance.

scholarly journals Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Application

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Litwak ◽  
Nam Cho ◽  
H. Nguyen ◽  
Kayvan Moussavi ◽  
Thomas Bushell
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Sepsis And Septic Shock

A recent study suggested mortality benefits using vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine combination therapy (triple therapy) in addition to standard care in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. In order to further evaluate the effects of triple therapy in real-world clinical practice, we conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at an academic tertiary care hospital. A total of 94 patients (47 in triple therapy group and 47 in standard care group) were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics in both groups were well-matched. No significant difference in the primary outcome, hospital mortality, was seen between triple therapy and standard care groups (40.4% vs. 40.4%; p = 1.000). In addition, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, requirement for renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and time to vasopressor independence. When compared to standard care, triple therapy did not improve hospital or ICU mortality in patients with septic shock. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of triple therapy is necessary prior to implementing vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine combination therapy as a standard of care in patients with septic shock.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document