scholarly journals Eosinopenia and Binary Toxin Increase Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Clostridioides difficile Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis J Carlson ◽  
Bradley T Endres ◽  
Julie Le Pham ◽  
Anne J Gonzales-Luna ◽  
Faris S Alnezary ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) with either eosinopenia or infected with a binary toxin strain have increased likelihood of mortality. However, the relationship between binary toxin and eosinopenia to synergistically increase mortality has not been studied in humans. We hypothesized that patients with CDI due to binary toxin strains and concomitant peripheral eosinopenia would have a higher likelihood of inpatient mortality. Methods This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included adult patients with CDI of known ribotypes stratified by eosinopenia, defined as an absence of eosinophils in the peripheral blood (Houston cohort). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Results were supported by a separate national cohort of veterans with CDI (Veterans’ cohort). Results In the Houston cohort, a total of 688 patients from 13 institutions in 6 cities were included. Of these, 132 (19%) had an eosinophil count of 0.0 cells/µL (0.0 cells*109/L) and 109 (16%) were infected with a binary toxin strain. After adjusting for covariates, the combination of eosinopenia and infection with a binary toxin strain was an independent predictor of inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR], 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–33.2; P = .005). In the separate Veterans’ cohort (n = 790), this combination was also a significant predictor of inpatient mortality (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.5–23.9; P = .009). Conclusions In conclusion, the combination of eosinopenia and CDI due to a binary toxin strain was correlated with increased mortality in hospitalized patients from 2 independent cohorts. Prospective studies should further study this important subset of patients at the time of CDI diagnosis.

Author(s):  
Eric Wombwell ◽  
Mark E Patterson ◽  
Bridget Bransteitter ◽  
Lisa R Gillen

Abstract Background Hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) is a costly problem leading to readmissions, morbidity, and mortality. We evaluated the effect of a single probiotic strain, Saccharomyces boulardii, at a standardized dose on the risk of HO-CDI within hospitalized patients administered antibiotics frequently associated with HO-CDI. Methods This retrospective cohort study merged hospital prescribing data with HO-CDI case data. The study assessed patients hospitalized from January 2016 through March 2017 who were administered at least 1 dose of an antibiotic frequently associated with HO-CDI during hospitalization. Associations between S. boulardii administration, including timing, and HO-CDI incidence were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression. Results The study included 8763 patients. HO-CDI incidence was 0.66% in the overall cohort. HO-CDI incidence was 0.56% and 0.82% among patients coadministered S. boulardii with antibiotics and not coadministered S. boulardii, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients coadministered S. boulardii had a reduced risk of HO-CDI (odds ratio [OR], 0.57 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .33–.96]; P = .04) compared to patients not coadministered S. boulardii. Patients coadministered S. boulardii within 24 hours of antibiotic start demonstrated a reduced risk of HO-CDI (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, .23–.97]; P = .04) compared to those coadministered S. boulardii after 24 hours of antibiotic start. Conclusions Saccharomyces boulardii administered to hospitalized patients prescribed antibiotics frequently linked with HO-CDI was associated with a reduced risk of HO-CDI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A Petty ◽  
Valerie M Vaughn ◽  
Scott A Flanders ◽  
Twisha Patel ◽  
Anurag N Malani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Reducing antibiotic use in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) has been inpatient focused. However, testing and treatment is often started in the emergency department (ED). Thus, for hospitalized patients with ASB, we sought to identify patterns of testing and treatment initiated by emergency medicine (EM) clinicians and the association of treatment with outcomes. Methods We conducted a 43-hospital, cohort study of adults admitted through the ED with ASB (February 2018–February 2020). Using generalized estimating equation models, we assessed for (1) factors associated with antibiotic treatment by EM clinicians and, after inverse probability of treatment weighting, (2) the effect of treatment on outcomes. Results Of 2461 patients with ASB, 74.4% (N = 1830) received antibiotics. The EM clinicians ordered urine cultures in 80.0% (N = 1970) of patients and initiated treatment in 68.5% (1253 of 1830). Predictors of EM clinician treatment of ASB versus no treatment included dementia, spinal cord injury, incontinence, urinary catheter, altered mental status, leukocytosis, and abnormal urinalysis. Once initiated by EM clinicians, 79% (993 of 1253) of patients remained on antibiotics for at least 3 days. Antibiotic treatment was associated with a longer length of hospitalization (mean 5.1 vs 4.2 days; relative risk = 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.23) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) (0.9% [N = 11] vs 0% [N = 0]; P = .02). Conclusions Among hospitalized patients ultimately diagnosed with ASB, EM clinicians commonly initiated testing and treatment; most antibiotics were continued by inpatient clinicians. Antibiotic treatment was not associated with improved outcomes, whereas it was associated with prolonged hospitalization and CDI. For best impact, stewardship interventions must expand to the ED.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 662-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Chan ◽  
Noreen H. Chan-Tompkins ◽  
James Como ◽  
Anthony J. Guarascio

Background: Nafcillin or cefazolin are drugs of choice for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. Prior studies indicate a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) with nafcillin, although AKI classification and time to occurrence is not well described. Objective: To characterize the incidence and time to adverse drug events for nafcillin versus cefazolin in the inpatient setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated hospitalized, adult patients receiving intravenous nafcillin or cefazolin for treatment of MSSA infection. Incidence and time to AKI based on RIFLE criteria were measured. Secondary end points included antibiotic discontinuation and incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminases, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results: Of 324 patients who received nafcillin (n = 119) or cefazolin (n = 205), higher rates of AKI were found for nafcillin versus cefazolin (19% vs 2%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Median time to AKI with nafcillin was 6.5 days (range, 3-14 days). The majority of patients were classified as RIFLE “Risk” stratum. Nafcillin treatment discontinuations were more frequent than for cefazolin (17.6% vs 0.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Nafcillin was an independent predictor of AKI (odds ratio = 12.4; 95% CI = 4.14-47.60, P < 0.0001). No differences in neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminases, or CDI were observed. Conclusion and Relevance: Nafcillin displayed higher rates of AKI at a median of 1 week of therapy, which provides a framework for clinician monitoring and consideration of antibiotic modification. Most patients developed “Risk” class AKI (RIFLE classification), which may be reversible with prompt intervention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 115283
Author(s):  
Ellen Axenfeld ◽  
William G. Greendyke ◽  
Jianhua Li ◽  
Daniel A. Green ◽  
Susan Whittier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Blevins ◽  
Jennifer N. Lashinsky ◽  
Craig McCammon ◽  
Marin Kollef ◽  
Scott Micek ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Critically ill patients are frequently treated with empirical antibiotic therapy, including vancomycin and β-lactams. Recent evidence suggests an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who received a combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) compared with patients who received vancomycin alone or vancomycin in combination with cefepime (VC) or meropenem (VM), but most studies were conducted predominately in the non-critically ill population. A retrospective cohort study that included 2,492 patients was conducted in the intensive care units of a large university hospital with the primary outcome being the development of any AKI. The rates of any AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, were 39.3% for VPT patients, 24.2% for VC patients, and 23.5% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Similarly, the incidences of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI were also significantly higher for VPT patients than for the patients in the other groups. The rates of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI, respectively, were 15% and 6.6% for VPT patients, 5.8% and 1.8% for VC patients, and 6.6% and 1.3% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In multivariate analysis, the use of vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam was found to be an independent predictor of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 2.161; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.620 to 2.883). In conclusion, critically ill patients receiving the combination of VPT had the highest incidence of AKI compared to critically ill patients receiving either VC or VM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document