Final comments: perverse effects, advice, and arguments

Author(s):  
Pierre Salmon

This concluding chapter considers three related matters: perverse effects, advice, and arguments. Perverse effects of yardstick competition are a serious possibility. They may take different forms, but in all cases, they justify some reluctance to derive and formulate recommendations. But, abstaining from giving any advice does not imply policy irrelevance. The uncovering of yardstick competition as a possibly important mechanism should play a role mainly as an argument in political economy debates. This suggestion is in agreement with a methodological position relating three concepts undervalued for a long time in the philosophy of science: models, as imaginary non-linguistic entities; mechanisms, as ingredients both of models and of reality; and arguments, in particular when critical of established views.

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (03) ◽  
pp. 477-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Jérôme

In the past 40 years an extensive literature has grown up around aggregate political economy models of elections, but few articles have focused on the German case. Initially, Kirchgässner (1977; 1991), developed vote-popularity (VP) functions, with the unemployment rate as the dominant economic variable predicting the German ruling parties' performance. Thereafter, using vote functions (VF) from 1961 to 1994, Jérôme, Jérôme-Speziari, and Lewis-Beck (2001) tested the “yardstick” competition existing between French and German economic votes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sudhakar Venukapalli

Historically, the problem of discovery or the problem of the genesis of scientific ideas has been taken seriously by the historians, psychologists, sociologists and philosophers who analyzed the creative thinking and formation of ideas and attempted to provide a meaningful account of them. In fact, the philosophical concern with scientific discovery is as old as science and philosophy of science themselves. However, almost throughout the first half of 20th century, philosophical reflection on the phenomenon of scientific discovery remained in a state of suspended animation. This is because the dominant trend in philosophy of science in this period outlawed it. The dominant view in philosophy of science maintained that the phenomenon of scientific discovery is philosophically irrelevant, and an adequate philosophical understanding of science should confine itself to the way in which scientific theories are justified; it was assumed that the process of justification is a neat, spick-and-span phenomenon eminently suited to be described in terms which are, logically speaking, cut and dry. The process of justification or evaluation according to this orthodox view constitutes the essence of science. Obviously, justification was demarcated from discovery. Justification, because of its supposed epistemic transparency, became the exclusive focus of philosophical attention to the detriment of discovery. The invidious distinction between discovery of scientific ideas and justification of finished ideas of science remained the catchword for a long time. This paper is an attempt to critically examine the nihilistic attitude of the dominant philosophies of science and to arrive at a philosophical theory of scientific discovery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Martin Van Bruinessen

In our coverage of Kurdish history and society, it has been our journal’s intention to pay adequate attention to the gender dimension (besides those of class, ethnicity, language, religion and political economy). We are therefore pleased to present this special issue titled Theorising women and war in Kurdistan: A feminist and critical perspective with a focus on the role of women as actors as well as victims in war and conflict. The guest editors, Nazand Begikhani, Wendelmoet Hamelink and Nerina Weiss, are long-time members of the Kurdish Studies Network (KSN) and have each previously published relevant and memorable work themselves, and for this issue they have brought together a set of remarkable papers, each of which offers a new and unusual perspective on cases of gendered violence. 


Literator ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-59
Author(s):  
M. E. Botha

Although there are important areas of overlap, the problem of realism differs in the contexts of philosophy, science and literature. What is common to all three realms is the fact that the empiricist notion of objectivity is not tenable any more. The recognition of the theory ladenness of scientific observation and the commentary ladenness of interpretation in literature is in fundamental contrast with the older views of objectivity which have dominated the scene for such a long time. The notion of realism inherent in this older view of objectivity in which science, philosophy or literature somehow “mirrors” the world, has fundamentally been affected by the overthrow of the objectivist tradition through developments in philosophy of science and developments in metaphor theory in which the emphasis on “literal” descriptions of reality have made way for the recognition of the relative distinction between the literal and the metaphorical. Both science and literature have acknowledged the possibility of a potential plurality of possible interpretations of “reality”. This means that as many “realities” exist as interpretations of reality and of texts are possible. This has confronted both science and literature with the need for a fundamentally revised notion of “realism” and of truth and has posed the very real problem of the (im-)possibility of convergence toward truth, reality or the one and only “correct” interpretation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
S. O. Biliaieva

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the participation of Turk’s factor in the civilization process on the territory of Ukraine from the middle of the first — in the second millennium AD. The study of the relations between Turks and Slavs for the long time was under press of negative views on the role of nomads, especially events of Mongol and Tatar’s invasion on the Old Russ in the middle of the XIII cent. The records were limited by written sources, and first archaeological materials come under observation only from the second part of XIX century. The results of mass archaeological excavation become the base of the investigation till the end of XX — at the beginning of the XXI century. It was the time of transformation of methodological position also. Due to achievements in the study of Turks monuments in Ukraine, the new aspects of the problem can be investigated. First of all, it is needed to stress the specific of natural environment of the Ukrainian lands, which provided the possibility of the development of the settled and nomadic mode of life. For the second one, the position on the crossroads of Asian and European worlds was one of the main reasons of the coming of Turk’s tribes into Ukraine, which became of the place of the obliged contacts and interrelations of Slav’s and Turk’s societies. The great attention was done to the problem of social organization of different Turk’s societies on the way to civilization, its contacts with Slavs on the different stages of the historical development, ethno and cultural integration. In the results of the archaeological and anthropological investigations the assimilation of the great part of Turks population on the territory of the Ukrainian lands was established. Besides of it, genetic features of Turks not only registries, but increased in the population of the Middle Dnieper area of Late Medieval and Modern periods. But in spite of that, in the formation of the Ukrainian nation the Slav’s component dominated. The movement of population, especially Cossacks to the direction of the Azov and Black sea was fixed, as of the natural and historical frontiers of Ukrainian lands.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-101
Author(s):  
Sonia Lucarelli ◽  
Francesco N. Moro ◽  
Daniela Sicurelli ◽  
Carla Monteleone ◽  
Eugenia Baroncelli

The discipline of International Relations (IR) for a long time of its history has developed in the form of Great Debates that involved competing paradigms and schools. More recently, it has been described as a cacophony of voices unable to communicate among themselves, but also incapable to provide keys to understand an ever more complex reality. This collection aims at evaluating the heuristic value of a selection of traditional paradigms (realism and liberalism), schools (constructivism), and subdisciplines (security studies and international political economy) so as to assess the challenges before IR theory today and the ability of the discipline to provide tools to make the changed world still intelligible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff ◽  
Øjvind Larsen

Piketty’s book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014) has become a bestseller in the world. Two month after its publication, it had sold more than 200.000 copies, and this success will surely continue for a long time. Piketty has established a new platform to discuss political economy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niv Horesh

Prognoses of China's currency—Renminbi or RMB in short—going global have become a hotly debated topic in the economic and popular literature of late. While some analysts are tipping a gradual transformation of the RMB into the world's next principal reserve currency in lieu of the US$, others contend that the deficiencies of China's financial market will continue to preclude any such transformation for a long time to come. The aim of this paper is to survey the arguments put forward by either camp and to weigh into this debate not only through the prism of applied economic theory or political economy but also through the prism of economic history.


Author(s):  
P. LEMESHHENKO

It is wellknown that A. Montchretien initiated the beginning of the science of political economy. In the past, 2015, therefore, mankind celebrated the 400th anniversary of the release of his "Treatise on political economy". Accounting the historical and practical significance expressed at that difficult time, ideas, Deputy editor of the recently converted and in a paper version for a long time published in the electronic version of journal "Questions of political economy", Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, head of chair of political economy of the National metallurgical Academy (Dnepropetrovsk), V. N. Tarasevich asked a few questions in accordance event, the graduate of the Department of political economy, Belarusian State University, now Professor, head of the Department of theoretical and institutional Economics P. S. Lemeshenko. The replies to a fundamentally new events and changes are given both in reality and in theoretical economic doctrines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document