The Internal Revenue Code and Religious Institutions

Author(s):  
Edward A. Zelinsky

This chapter examines the Internal Revenue Code’s treatment of religious entities. The federal tax statute embodies three diverse approaches to taxing and exempting sectarian organizations and activities. Some provisions of the Code—the charitable deduction, the general income tax exemption for eleemosynary institutions, the federal unemployment tax—exempt religious entities and other charitable, educational, and philanthropic institutions. Other provisions of the Code narrowly target churches for tax exemption. For example, the Code relieves churches of filing requirements with which nonchurch religious entities and other eleemosynary organizations must comply. Similarly, churches’ retirement plans receive lenient treatment under the Code. Churches receive procedural protections from IRS audits.Yet other provisions of the Code tax churches as for secular entities. Churches generally pay FICA taxes—Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes—on the compensation paid to nonclerical employees. These payroll taxes can be considerable. Churches also pay federal income taxes on their unrelated business incomes.

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela C. Smith ◽  
Donna J. Shaver

ABSTRACT: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has significantly revised Form 990, “Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax.” The informational return has not been substantively modified in 30 years. The IRS states the redesign of the return was based on three guiding principles: (1) enhancing transparency, (2) promoting tax compliance, and (3) minimizing the burden on the filing organization. This paper outlines the historical context of legislative changes concerning transparency and accountability within the tax exempt sector. It also outlines the major revisions to Form 990 and argues that they meet the underlying goals established by the IRS to enhance the overall accountability within the sector.


2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Dhaliwal ◽  
Merle M. Erickson ◽  
Shane Heitzman

This paper investigates the impact of the seller's tax liability on the price paid in hospital acquisitions. Lock-in theory predicts that for a given asset, asset holders with larger tax liabilities demand a higher price to compensate for income tax liabilities generated on the sale. We apply this theory to a sample of hospital acquisitions by for-profit firms where the primary difference among target hospitals is the seller's tax status—either taxable or tax-exempt. Consistent with the predicted lock-in effect, the evidence indicates that purchase prices are higher when the seller is taxable than when the seller is tax-exempt. Thus, our findings suggest that seller tax liabilities are positively related to purchase prices.


Author(s):  
Edward A. Zelinsky

This chapter revisits the tax status of parsonages and parsonage allowances. The tax treatment of these allowances is an important test case for many of the themes advanced in this book. Some states exempt clerical residences from taxation. Other states do not. The Internal Revenue Code excludes from ministers’ gross incomes both the imputed rental value of parsonages provided in-kind and cash parsonage allowances. These income tax exclusions are constitutionally permitted, though not constitutionally compelled, to reduce church-state enforcement entanglement. Such minimization of church-state entanglement is a legitimately nonsubsidizing, secular purpose. However, the Code’s exclusion of cash housing allowances from ministers’ incomes is not justified as a matter of tax policy. Such cash transactions are easily valued and give cash to the minister to pay income tax. Thus, taxing cash parsonage allowances would entail less enforcement entanglement than would the taxation of housing provided to clergy in kind.


2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Hofmann

Tax-exempt organizations are subject to the Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) on the profits of business activities unrelated to their exempt mission. This study extends recent research on the expense allocations of charitable nonprofit organizations by examining a group of noncharitable nonprofits—primarily trade, labor, and agricultural associations—that differ from charitable nonprofits on a number of dimensions. The paper tests for tax-motivated expense shifting by associations. Data is obtained from the IRS Statistics of Income Division, and is supplemented by data requested from associations. Reported unrelated business expenses are compared to those predicted by a regression model to estimate expense shifting. Associations are estimated to shift approximately 20–21 percent of the expenses reported on their UBIT returns. Further analysis calls into question the validity of the estimation model, and suggests that expense shifting may be understated in this and previous studies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Sansing

Profits a tax-exempt organization earns from business activities that are not related to the organization's exempt purpose are subject to the unrelated business income tax (UBIT). This paper shows that when the taxable and tax-exempt activities are substitutes, taxable income exceeds the incremental pretax financial return from the unrelated business activity because the exempt organization cannot deduct the opportunity cost of lost exempt function revenues when computing UBIT. As a result, the exempt organization may: (1) reduce or eliminate its unrelated business activity, or (2) change the way it uses its assets for unrelated business purposes by licensing the use of its assets to an unrelated taxable organization in exchange for nontaxable royalties. The model shows that although UBIT may distort the way in which an exempt organization uses its assets, this distortion can increase social welfare.


Author(s):  
Edward A. Zelinsky

This chapter examines the states’ statutory approaches to taxing and exempting churches. Here too an important theme is diversity. The various states and their taxes treat religious institutions diversely. Sometimes, churches and religious institutions are taxed like secular entities. In other contexts, sectarian entities and persons are tax-exempted along with secular eleemosynary institutions and actors. Yet other state tax provisions narrowly exempt religious organizations. Within the states’ broad statutory consensus exempting religious and other eleemosynary properties from taxation, there are notable differences. The states’ state sales tax statutes are highly diverse in their approaches to religious institutions. In contrast, the states’ income tax statutes all mirror the Internal Revenue Code’s income tax exemption of eleemosynary entities including religious entities. Real estate transfer taxes typically apply to sales and purchases by churches and other religious institutions. State unemployment taxes generally exempt churches while taxing nonchurch religious entities.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas K. Barney ◽  
Tonya K. Flesher

Farmers have benefited from unique tax treatment since the beginning of the income tax law. This paper explores agricultural influences on the passage of the income tax in 1913, using both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The results show that agricultural interests were influential in the development and passage of tax/tariff laws. The percentage of congressmen with agricultural ties explains the strong affection for agriculture. Discussion in congressional debates and in agricultural journals was passionate and patriotic in support of equity for farmers. The quantitative analysis reveals that the percentage farm population was a significant predictor of passage of the 16th Amendment by the states and of adoption of state income taxes in the 20th century.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document