Sexual and Gender Minorities, Public Health, and Ethics

Author(s):  
Tonya Littlejohn ◽  
Tonia Poteat ◽  
Chris Beyrer

Sexual and gender minorities (LGBT persons) are more visible and mobilized than ever. In some countries, that visibility and activism have contributed to the advancement of sexual and gender rights. Nevertheless, and despite those gains, stigma, discrimination, and criminalization of these populations persist and have impeded efforts to address their public health needs. As a result, sexual and gender minorities continue to experience a range of health disparities, and overall face a disproportionately high burden of mental health issues, HIV/AIDS, and other illnesses. This chapter explores core ethical challenges and debates that impact health promotion and prevention efforts with sexual and gender minorities, with a focus on issues arising in public health surveillance and interventions, and on understanding the social and political context that impacts the lived reality of sexual and gender minorities.

Author(s):  
Ruth Gaare Bernheim ◽  
Elizabeth Fenton

Improving the health of populations is a fundamental goal of public health. An essential step to achieve this goal is addressing the varying health needs and stressors experienced by different populations and subgroups within a population, along with the significant ethical issues of health equity raised by disparities in health among these groups. This chapter provides an overview of the section of The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics dedicated to examining the public health needs and related ethical issues of a number of subpopulations that generally experience or are exposed to health stressors. Those stressors may include historic injustices, discrimination and stigmatization, and unique social or physical needs, limitations, or vulnerabilities. The chapters in this section consider aging populations, children and adolescents, persons with mental illness, persons with disabilities, sexual and gender minorities, and immigrants and refugees. Examining public health practices and strategies through the lens of each of these particular populations helps to illustrate the ethical challenges of improving population health equitably.


2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Randall L. Sell ◽  
Elise I. Krims

Public health surveillance can have profound impacts on the health of populations, with COVID-19 surveillance offering an illuminating example. Surveillance surrounding COVID-19 testing, confirmed cases, and deaths has provided essential information to public health professionals about how to minimize morbidity and mortality. In the United States, surveillance has also pointed out how populations, on the basis of geography, age, and race and ethnicity, are being impacted disproportionately, allowing targeted intervention and evaluation. However, COVID-19 surveillance has also highlighted how the public health surveillance system fails some communities, including sexual and gender minorities. This failure has come about because of the haphazard and disorganized way disease reporting data are collected, analyzed, and reported in the United States, and the structural homophobia, transphobia, and biphobia acting within these systems. We provide recommendations for addressing these concerns after examining experiences collecting race data in COVID-19 surveillance and attempts in Pennsylvania and California to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identity variables into their pandemic surveillance efforts. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 10, 2021: e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.3062727 )


Author(s):  
Cecilia T. Hardacker ◽  
Anna Baccellieri ◽  
Elizabeth R. Mueller ◽  
Linda Brubaker ◽  
Georgia Hutchins ◽  
...  

We appreciate your comments and concerns about our manuscript in IJERPH on Bladder Health Experiences, Perceptions and Knowledge of Sexual and Gender Minorities [...]


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Helene Schnall ◽  
Joseph (Jay) Roth ◽  
Lisa LaPlace Ekpo ◽  
Irene Guendel ◽  
Michelle Davis ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTwo Category 5 storms, Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Maria, hit the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) within 13 days of each other in September 2017. These storms caused catastrophic damage across the territory, including widespread loss of power, destruction of homes, and devastation of critical infrastructure. During large scale disasters such as Hurricanes Irma and Maria, public health surveillance is an important tool to track emerging illnesses and injuries, identify at-risk populations, and assess the effectiveness of response efforts. The USVI Department of Health (DoH) partnered with shelter staff volunteers to monitor the health of the sheltered population and help guide response efforts.MethodsShelter volunteers collect data on the American Red Cross Aggregate Morbidity Report form that tallies the number of client visits at a shelter’s health services every 24 hours. Morbidity data were collected at all 5 shelters on St. Thomas and St. Croix between September and October 2017. This article describes the health surveillance data collected in response to Hurricanes Irma and Maria.ResultsFollowing Hurricanes Irma and Maria, 1130 health-related client visits were reported, accounting for 1655 reasons for the visits (each client may have more than 1 reason for a single visit). Only 1 shelter reported data daily. Over half of visits (51.2%) were for health care management; 17.7% for acute illnesses, which include respiratory conditions, gastrointestinal symptoms, and pain; 14.6% for exacerbation of chronic disease; 9.8% for mental health; and 6.7% for injury. Shelter volunteers treated many clients within the shelters; however, reporting of the disposition (eg, referred to physician, pharmacist) was often missed (78.1%).ConclusionShelter surveillance is an efficient means of quickly identifying and characterizing health issues and concerns in sheltered populations following disasters, allowing for the development of evidence-based strategies to address identified needs. When incorporated into broader surveillance strategies using multiple data sources, shelter data can enable disaster epidemiologists to paint a more comprehensive picture of community health, thereby planning and responding to health issues both within and outside of shelters. The findings from this report illustrated that managing chronic conditions presented a more notable resource demand than acute injuries and illnesses. Although there remains room for improvement because reporting was inconsistent throughout the response, the capacity of shelter staff to address the health needs of shelter residents and the ability to monitor the health needs in the sheltered population were critical resources for the USVI DoH overwhelmed by the disaster. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:38-43)


2021 ◽  
pp. 124-141
Author(s):  
Luiz Paulo Ribeiro ◽  
Mariana Esteves da Costa ◽  
Isabella Campos Freitas D’Avila

La Educación es un derecho de todos y deber de la escuela, de la familia y de la sociedad sin embargo no siempre se muestra democrática cuando se trata de las minorías sexuales y de género. En Brasil las violencias y estigmatizaciones de estudiantes LGBTI ocasionan baja escolaridad y muchos otros desdoblamientos sociales. Pensando en ello, la población LGBTI, a través de movimientos políticos y sociales, ha procurado garantizar el derecho de acceso y permanencia en las escuelas. Así, este trabajo tiene como objetivo explicitar cómo las acciones del movimiento LGBTI han contribuido históricamente a las transformaciones en la educación. Consideramos que los cambios en la Educación suceden, entre otras, por medio de la influencia de esos sujetos, y por aquellos que entienden la importancia del respeto a la diversidad en las instituciones educativas, que se muestran como espacio hostil marcado, a veces, por la cisheteronormatividad. Por medio del concepto de minorías activas, buscamos comprender cómo los sujetos LGBTI se contraponen a las reglas y normas sociales impuestas por la mayoría e influyen en las transformaciones sociales. Entendemos que la reproducción de normas y patrones de comportamiento en el ambiente educativo tiende a una lógica antidemocrática, en la que los alumnos no son plenamente respetados cuando presentan identidades y sexualidades consideradas disidentes. Education is a right of all and a duty of school, family and society, however it is not always democratic when it comes to sexual and gender minorities. In Brazil, the violence and stigmatization of LGBTI students cause low schooling and many other social developments. Thinking about it, the LGBTI population has sought to guarantee the right of access and permanence in educational institutions through political and social movement. Thus, this work aims to clarify how the actions of the LGBTI movement has been contributing historically to the transformations in education. We consider that changes in Education happen, among others, through the influence of these subjects, and by those who understand the importance of respect for diversity in School, which shows itself as a hostile space marked, sometimes, by cis-heteronormativity. Through the concept of active minorities, we seek to understand how LGBTI individuals oppose the social rules and norms imposed by the majority and influence social transformations. We understand that the reproduction of rules and patterns of behavior in the educational environment tends to an anti-democratic logic, in which the students are not fully respected when they present identities and sexualities considered dissident. A Educação é um direito de todos e dever da escola, da família e da sociedade, entretanto nem sempre se mostra democrática quando se trata das minorias sexuais e de gênero. No Brasil, as violências e estigmatizações de estudantes LGBTI ocasionam baixa escolaridade e muitos outros desdobramentos sociais. Pensando nisso, a população LGBTI, através de movimentação política e social, tem buscado garantir o direito de acesso e permanência nas instituições de ensino. Assim, este trabalho tem como objetivo explicitar como as ações do movimento LGBTI têm contribuído historicamente para as transformações na educação. Consideramos que as mudanças na Educação acontecem, entre outros fatores, por meio da influência desses sujeitos, e por aqueles que entendem a importância do respeito à diversidade na Escola, que se mostra como um espaço hostil marcado, por vezes, pela cisheteronormatividade. Por meio do conceito de minorias ativas, buscamos compreender como os sujeitos LGBTI contrapõem-se às regras e normas sociais impostas pela maioria e influenciam as transformações sociais. Entendemos que a reprodução de regras e padrões de comportamento no ambiente educacional tendenciam uma lógica antidemocrática, na qual os educandos não são inteiramente respeitados quando apresentam identidades e sexualidades consideradas dissidentes.


Author(s):  
Joshua S. Jue ◽  
Mahmoud Alameddine

Our knowledge of voiding is derived from studies comprised of cisgender males and females, with relatively little known about the impact of sexual and gender minority status on voiding perceptions, symptoms, and function [...]


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester Darryl Geneviève ◽  
Andrea Martani ◽  
Tenzin Wangmo ◽  
Daniela Paolotti ◽  
Carl Koppeschaar ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED Advances in information technology are changing public health at an unprecedented rate. Participatory surveillance systems are contributing to public health by actively engaging digital (eg, Web-based) communities of volunteer citizens to report symptoms and other pertinent information on public health threats and also by empowering individuals to promptly respond to them. However, this digital model raises ethical issues on top of those inherent in traditional forms of public health surveillance. Research ethics are undergoing significant changes in the digital era where not only participants’ physical and psychological well-being but also the protection of their sensitive data have to be considered. In this paper, the digital platform of Influenzanet is used as a case study to illustrate those ethical challenges posed to participatory surveillance systems using digital platforms and mobile apps. These ethical challenges include the implementation of electronic consent, the protection of participants’ privacy, the promotion of justice, and the need for interdisciplinary capacity building of research ethics committees. On the basis of our analysis, we propose a framework to regulate and strengthen ethical approaches in the field of digital public health surveillance.


10.2196/23579 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e23579
Author(s):  
Caitlin Weiger ◽  
Katherine C Smith ◽  
Joanna E Cohen ◽  
Mark Dredze ◽  
Meghan Bridgid Moran

Background Companies use brand websites as a promotional tool to engage consumers on the web, which can increase product use. Given that some products are harmful to the health of consumers, it is important for marketing associated with these products to be subject to public health surveillance. However, terms of service (TOS) governing the use of brand website content may impede such important research. Objective The aim of this study is to explore the TOS for brand websites with public health significance to assess possible legal and ethical challenges for conducting research on consumer product websites. Methods Using Statista, we purposefully constructed a sample of 15 leading American tobacco, alcohol, psychiatric pharmaceutical, fast-food, and gun brands that have associated websites. We developed and implemented a structured coding system for the TOS on these websites and coded for the presence versus absence of different types of restriction that might impact the ability to conduct research. Results All TOS stated that by accessing the website, users agreed to abide by the TOS (15/15, 100%). A total of 11 out of 15 (73%) websites had age restrictions in their TOS. All alcohol brand websites (5/15, 33%) required users to enter their age or date of birth before viewing website content. Both websites for tobacco brands (2/15, 13%) further required that users register and verify their age and identity to access any website content and agree that they use tobacco products. Only one website (1/15, 7%) allowed users to display, download, copy, distribute, and translate the website content as long as it was for personal and not commercial use. A total of 33% (5/15) of TOS unconditionally prohibited or put substantial restrictions on all of these activities and/or failed to specify if they were allowed or prohibited. Moreover, 87% (13/15) of TOS indicated that website access could be restricted at any time. A total of 73% (11/15) of websites specified that violating TOS could result in deleting user content from the website, revoking access by having the user’s Internet Protocol address blocked, terminating log-in credentials, or enforcing legal action resulting in civil or criminal penalties. Conclusions TOS create complications for public health surveillance related to e-marketing on brand websites. Recent court opinions have reduced the risk of federal criminal charges for violating TOS on public websites, but this risk remains unclear for private websites. The public health community needs to establish standards to guide and protect researchers from the possibility of legal repercussions related to such efforts.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Adam Newman ◽  
Venkatesan Chakrapani ◽  
Charmaine Williams ◽  
Notisha Massaquoi ◽  
Suchon Tepjan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Existing data on COVID-19 disparities among vulnerable populations portend excess risk for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and other persons outside of heteronormative and cisgender identities (i.e., LGBT+). Owing to adverse social determinants of health, including pervasive HIV and sexual stigma, harassment, violence, barriers in access to healthcare, and existing health and mental health disparities, sexual and gender minorities in India and Thailand are at disproportionate risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease. Despite global health disparities among LGBT+ populations, there is a lack of coordinated, community-engaged interventions to address the expectable excess burden of COVID-19 and public health-recommended protective measures. OBJECTIVE We will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief, peer-delivered eHealth intervention to increase COVID-19 knowledge and public health-recommended protective behaviors and reduce psychological distress among LGBT+ people residing in Bangkok, Thailand, and Mumbai, India. Subsequent to the RCT, we will conduct exit interviews with purposively sampled subgroups, including those with no intervention effect. METHODS SafeHandsSafeHearts is a 2-site, parallel waitlist-controlled RCT to test the efficacy of a 3-session, peer counselor-delivered eHealth intervention based on motivational interviewing and psychoeducation. The study methods, online infrastructure and content were pilot tested with LGBT+ individuals in Toronto, Canada before adaptation and roll-out in the other contexts. The primary outcomes are COVID-19 knowledge (index based on U.S. CDC items), protective behaviors (index based on WHO and U.S. CDC guidelines), depression (PHQ-2) and anxiety (GAD-2). Secondary outcomes include loneliness, COVID-19 stress, and intended care-seeking. We will enroll N = 310 participants in each city, age 18 years and older, one-third cisgender gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, one-third cisgender lesbian, bisexual and other women who have sex with women, and one-third transfeminine, transmasculine and gender nonbinary people. Participants will be equally stratified in the immediate intervention and waitlist control group. Participants are mainly recruited from online social media accounts of community-based partner organizations. They can access the intervention on a computer, tablet, or mobile phone. SafeHandsSafeHearts has 3 sessions delivered weekly over three successive weeks. Exit interviews will be conducted online with 3 subgroups (n = 12 per group; N = 36 in each city) of purposively selected participants, to be informed by RCT outcomes and focal populations of concern. RESULTS The RCT was funded in 2020. The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04870723). The trials started recruitment as of August 1, 2021, and all RCT data collection will likely be completed by December 31, 2021. CONCLUSIONS The SafeHandsSafeHearts RCT will provide evidence about the effectiveness of a brief, peer-delivered e-Health intervention developed for LGBT+ populations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. If the intervention proves effective, it will provide a basis for future scale-up in India and Thailand, and other low- and middle-income countries. CLINICALTRIAL NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04870723; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04870723


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document