Religious Education Between the Traditions

Author(s):  
Eboo Patel ◽  
Noah Silverman

This chapter addresses how the continuity of individual and communal religious identity can be preserved in a modern context characterized by a rapid rise in religious diversity and a concomitant decline in traditional religious association. The chapter discusses various postures that religious communities can take in such a context. The authors advocate an intentional and engaged religious pluralism, achieved through “interfaith education.” This concept is defined and parsed into three activities in which religious communities should engage: developing a theology of interfaith cooperation, nurturing appreciative knowledge of shared values, and engaging in relationship-building activities. The chapter concludes with a brief consideration of how North American seminaries have been on the vanguard of adopting interfaith—sometimes referred to as multifaith or inter-religious—education.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yance Zadrak Rumahuru

The aims of this article is to provide a perspective on teaching Christian Religious Education (CRE/PAK) in the context of multi-religious society. The question for this paper is what made religious pluralism, diversity or learning context PAK. It is expected that the PAK learning in school and the Church does not ignore diversity, especially religious diversity in this paper referred to as a learning base PAK. Associated with it, it is necessary that the same conceptual understanding of pluralism and religious pluralism that can be used correctly to interpret the PAK learning in the community. This time there has been a paradigm shift from a religious teaching religious education to religious education and peace education, an education that is more contextual paradigm in Indonesian society and multireligious society in general.


Regula Fidei ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fransiskus Irwan Widjaja

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to see plurality and mission as a conceptual framework in Christian religious education. Building pluralism is an appeal to accept pluralism is an order of people who understand each other that in essence they are a unity in diversity. Pluralism is a condition  where  there  are  various  things.  Religious  pluralism  explain"all  religions  have  the right to exist and live. Socially, we must learn to be tolerant and even respect the faith or beliefs of   followers   of   other   religions.   Religious   communities   need   to   rethink   their   religious responsibilities to work together, and even in some cases act as agents of God's general grace in promoting  peaceful  and  harmonious  coexistence  among  people  of  all  religions.  Inthis  shell  of plurality andmission, the concept of pluralistic Christian religious educationdeveloped.Keywords: Pluralistic, Mission, Christian Religious Education, Plural SocietyAbstrak:Tujuan  dari  tulisan  ini  adalah  untuk  melihat  Pluralitas  dan  misi  sebagai  kerangka konseptual  dalam  pendidikan  agama  Kristen. Membangun  pluralisme  merupakan  imbauan menerima  kemajemukan  merupakan  sebuah  tatanan  masyarakat  yang  saling  mengerti  bahwa pada  hakekatnya  mereka  merupakan  kesatuan  dalam  kepelbagaian.  Pluralisme  adalah  suatu kondisi  dimana  adanya  keberadaan  sesuatu  yang  beragam.  Pluralisme agama berarti ”semua agama berhak untuk ada dan hidup”. Secara sosial, kita harus belajar untuk toleran dan bahkan menghormati  iman  atau  kepercayaan  dari  penganut  agama  lainnya. Komunitas  agama  perlu memikirkan  kembali  tanggung  jawab  agamanya  untuk  bekerja  sama,  dan  bahkan  dalam beberapa  hal  bertindak  sebagaiagen  rahmat  umum  Tuhan  dalam  mempromosikan  hidup berdampingan secara damai dan harmonis di antara orang-orang dari semua agama.Dalam kerang   pluralitas   dan   misi   inilah,   konsep   pendidikan   agama   Kristen   yang   majemuk dikembangkan.Kata Kunci:Pluralitas, Misi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, Masyarakat Majemuk


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Julita Lestari S.Ag

<p align="center">Abstrak</p><p>Keberagaman agama di satu sisi menjadikan perbedaan yang cenderung melahirkan perpecahan di kalangan umat beragama. Di sisi lain, keberagaman agama merupakan pemersatu umat karena saling menghargai perbedaan yang ada. Pluralisme yang melahirkan dua sisi ini menjadikan penting untuk dikaji. Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara yang menganut tidak hanya satu agama namun terdiri bermacam-macam agama, yaitu Islam, Kristen, Budha, Kong Hu chu, Hindudan agama-agama lainnya. Kepluralismean agama di Indonesia ini memiliki tantangan dan peluang tersendiri bagi keutuhan bangsa.  Tantangan terbesar Indonesia sebagai negara pluralisme adalah cenderung menimbulkan konflik. Dikarenakan setiap agama melakukan <em>truth claim</em> terhadap agamanya sendiri dan agama lain dianggap salah. Adapun peluang pluralisme agama di Indonesia bagi keutuhan bangsa yaitu lahirnya sikap toleran sesama umat karena mampu menghargai keragaman beragama.</p><p align="center">Abstract</p><p>Religious diversity on the one hand makes a difference that tends to give birth to divisions among religious communities. On the other hand, religious diversity is a unifying people because they respect each other's differences. Pluralism which gives birth to two sides makes it important to study. Indonesia is one country that adheres to not only one religion but consists of various religions, namely Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Confucianism, Hindudan and other religions. Religious pluralism in Indonesia has its own challenges and opportunities for national integrity. Indonesia's biggest challenge as a state of pluralism is that it tends to cause conflict. Because every religion makes truth claims against its own religion and other religions are considered wrong. The opportunity for religious pluralism in Indonesia for the integrity of the nation is the birth of a tolerant attitude among people because it is able to appreciate religious diversity.</p><p> </p><p> </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-49
Author(s):  
Aniela Różańska

In the article the question of religious pluralism is presented. The author gives the characteristics of this concept, which has changed its meaning over the recent years. The author brings into light some contemporary ways of perception of the religious pluralism and controversies they result in. The concept of inclusive pluralism by Jacques Dupuis has been recommended by the author as a model of religious pluralism which enables the opening of religious education on the inter-religious dimension. A proper understanding of religious pluralism plays an important role in forming an open religious identity which is one of the key tasks in education including early education.


Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Ayu Kristini Putri ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Sudiana ◽  
I Nyoman Yoga Segara

<p>Religious harmony in Indonesia and Bali was still a severe problem marked by the high potential for social conflicts with religious backgrounds. However, the people of Ekasari Village could maintain religious harmony in their area from generation to generation while at the same time providing space for every religious community to articulate their religious identity without pressure from other people. Religious harmony in Ekasari Village showed a strong relationship between education, social values, and religion. This study was conducted to analyze the education system for religious harmony in Ekasari Village from a sociological review of religious education based on the theory of structural functionalism, constructivism, and social action. The research was carried out by applying qualitative methods through observation, in-depth interviews, and document studies. The data were analyzed descriptivelyinterpretatively through three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and verification. This study found that the education system for religious harmony in Ekasari Village takes place in the realm of family, school, community, religious institutions, state, and civil society, as well as the mass media. This education system holistically encourages the internalization of knowledge, attitudes, and harmonious behaviour within religious communities.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-274
Author(s):  
Anne Mark Nielsen

AbstractThis article discusses the room for accommodating religious diversity offered by the particular configuration of secularity existing in Denmark. Theoretically, the article adopts Jose Casanova and Mark Chaves’ proposals to separate analytically between the core elements of secularisation, and to leave open for empirical analyses the development and potential connections between these in different geographical and geo-political contexts.From this perspective, the article discusses the conditions for accommodating religious diversity offered by the peculiar combination prevailing in Denmark of a low level of structural differentiation combined with a high level of rationalisation, generalisation, and privatisation of religion. The article argues that the legal inequality existing in Denmark between religious communities stemming from the existence of a state supported church (i.e. a low level of differentiation) matters less for the accommodation of religious diversity than do widely held and strongly embedded popular sentiments and imaginations of the public sphere as strictly secular (i.e. a high level of rationalisation, generalisation and privatisation of religion).


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 183-194
Author(s):  
Edmund Kee-Fook Chia

The phenomenon of religious pluralism is a fact that needs no further discussion. How society and institutions are negotiating its impact, however, certainly needs further scrutiny. Schreiter's call for the construction of local theologies invites us to explore how the preaching of the Gospel has to adapt to the realities of new situations. The present article focuses on Catholic educational institutions and how they are dealing with the multi-cultural and multi-religious communities that are now found not only outside of the schools and universities but also within them as well. Its concern is with how the identity and mission of these Catholic institutions are expressed and measured in the new contexts, taking seriously the teachings of the Church on the role they play in its evangelizing mission.


2021 ◽  
pp. 097226292199259
Author(s):  
Devika Rani Sharma ◽  
Balgopal Singh

Emergence of technology has not only boosted the growth of customer engagement but has also paved way for customers to become active co-creators with the firms. Customer engagement activities are taking over the customer relationship building activities in the present scenario. Customers’ experience with a particular brand has its impact on satisfaction levels and their repurchasing intention in future as well. According to Rosetta Consulting report an engaged customer is likely to buy 90% more frequently and may spend 300% more than other customers. Hence, the present has tried to understand the mediating role of satisfaction on customer engagement in retaining the customers or persuading the customers to repurchase. The results show that there exists a significant mediation effect of customer satisfaction in influencing their repeat purchase behaviour.


1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Nickel

The United States has never been culturally or religiously homogeneous, but its diversity has greatly increased over the last century. Although the U.S. was first a multicultural nation through conquest and enslavement, its present diversity is due equally to immigration. In this paper I try to explain the difference it makes for one area of thought and policy – equal opportunity – if we incorporate cultural and religious pluralism into our national self-image. Formulating and implementing a policy of equal opportunity is more difficult in diverse, pluralistic countries than it is in homogeneous ones. My focus is cultural and religious diversity in the United States, but my conclusions will apply to many other countries – including ones whose pluralism is found more in religion than in culture.


1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Kymlicka

AbstractIn his most recent work, John Rawls argues that political theory must recognize and accomodate the ‘fact of pluralism’, including the fact of religious diversity. He believes that the liberal commitment to individual rights provides the only feasible model for accomodating religious pluralism. In the paper, I discuss a second form of tolerance, based on group rights rather than individual rights. Drawing on historical examples, I argue that this is is also a feasible model for accomodating religious pluralism. While both models ensure tolerance between groups, only the former tolerates individual dissent within groups. To defend the individual rights model, therefore, liberals must appeal not only to the fact of social pluralism, but also to the value of individual autonomy. This may require abandoning Rawls’s belief that liberalism can and should be defended on purely ‘political’, rather than ‘comprehensive’ grounds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document