scholarly journals The Relationship Between Vestibular Sensory Integration and Prosthetic Mobility in Community Ambulators With Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lučarević ◽  
Ignacio Gaunaurd ◽  
Sheila Clemens ◽  
Paulina Belsky ◽  
Lauren Summerton ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) is used to clinically assess vestibular sensory integration (VSI), the process by which the central nervous system integrates vestibular afference to maintain balance. The rate and effects of impaired VSI (IVSI) on prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation (LLA) is unknown. The objective of this study was to use the mCTSIB to classify VSI in active community ambulators with LLA and to examine the relationship between IVSI and prosthetic mobility, as measured by the Component Timed Up and Go (cTUG) test. Methods This was a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 130 community ambulators with unilateral LLA. Classification of VSI was determined based on a time-based pass/fail mCTSIB performance. Participants were classified as having normal sensory integration (NSI) if they could balance for 30 seconds in every mCTSIB condition. Participants who failed condition 4 exclusively were classified as IVSI. Prosthetic mobility, as measured by the cTUG, was compared between NSI and IVSI groups. Results Of the 130 participants, 29 (22%) were classified as IVSI and 95 (73%) were classified as having NSI. Prosthetic mobility significantly differed between IVSI and NSI groups, with IVSI participants performing all components of the cTUG significantly slower. Medium to large effect sizes were found between groups during cTUG. Conclusions These results suggest that 1 in 5 community ambulators with LLA have IVSI, with associated limitations in balance confidence and prosthetic mobility. Impact The ability to integrate vestibular information was found to have a strong relationship with prosthetic mobility in active community ambulators with LLA, especially with performing a 180-degree step turn. Physical therapists can use the mCTSIB to classify sensory integration during prosthetic rehabilitation and develop an appropriate balance intervention. Lay Summary Active adults with LLA can use information from their senses to maintain their standing balance. Adults with LLA who have difficulty balancing on foam with closed eyes were slower to get in and out of a chair, walk, and perform a 180-degree step turn.

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Gremeaux ◽  
Sabeur Damak ◽  
Odile Troisgros ◽  
Amine Feki ◽  
Davy Laroche ◽  
...  

Background:There is a lack of data and consensus concerning the most appropriate functional evaluation in clinical practice at the definitive prosthetic phase after lower limb amputation.Objectives:To determine among several selected functional tests the most pertinent to evaluate balance and prosthetic walking.Study Design:Validation of a diagnostic procedure.Methods:Sixty-four patients were included. Outcome measures: Timed Up and Go test, Functional Reach test (FRT), one-leg balance, tandem test, Modified Houghton Scale, Berg Balance Scale, two-minute walk test (2MW test). Correlations were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Principal Component Analysis. Score distribution was analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilk W normality test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to identify the best predictor for the function.Results:The clinical tests correlated highly with each other. Only 2MW test and FRT did not have either a floor/ceiling effect, or a bi-modal distribution. The 2MW test was the best predictor of prosthetic walking limitations (area under the curve 0.93 (0.83–0.97), the best threshold was between 130 and 150 meters), and FRT was best for balance.Conclusions:2MW test can be proposed as the first-line clinical test. The FRT can be indicated for the specific assessment of balance disorders.Clinical relevanceThis validation of a clinical evaluation of balance and walking capacity after lower limb amputation may be useful in everyday practice to ensure in a simple and standardized way the follow-up of patients and adapt treatments – especially prosthetics – at the definitive prosthetic phase.


1999 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 825-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanneke Schoppen ◽  
Annemarijke Boonstra ◽  
Johan W. Groothoff ◽  
Jaap de Vries ◽  
Ludwig N.H. Göeken ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Glemne ◽  
Nerrolyn Ramstrand ◽  
Jessica Crafoord ◽  
Linus Nygren

Background:Within the prosthetics profession, there is a lack of evidence to support many clinical practices. It is therefore important that clinicians systematically document and evaluate their daily practices.Objectives:To record preoperative characteristics and functional outcomes for patients with a lower limb amputation and to investigate variations between prosthetic users and non-prosthetic users.Study Design:Prospective cohort study.Methods:A total of 23 patients (mean age = 80 years, standard deviation = 7.3) who underwent a major lower limb amputation were assessed within 2 weeks of admission and 6 months post-operatively. Locomotor Capabilities Index-5, the Timed-Up-and-Go Test and prosthetic use were used to evaluate functional outcomes.Results:A total of 13 participants (57%) received a prosthesis within 6 months of amputation. Mean time to prosthetic fitting was 48 days (range = 28–97). No statistically significant difference was found between prosthetic users and non-prosthetic users regarding age, time to rehabilitation and Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (p > 0.05). Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 basic was significantly lower at 6 months than prior to amputation (p = 0.039).Conclusion:The functional outcome at 6 months indicates a sizable restriction in mobility among lower limb amputees. No variation in preoperative characteristics between prosthetic users and non-prosthetic users could be confirmed in this study.Clinical relevanceThis study highlights the need for prosthetists to better incorporate research findings into their daily practice and presents an example of how to implement a procedure for assessment and documentation of patients’ functional outcomes in a clinical setting. Results confirm difficulties in identifying amputees who will become prosthetic users based on preoperative characteristics.


Author(s):  
Sheila Clemens ◽  
Ignacio Gaunaurd ◽  
Jennifer Lucarevic ◽  
Glenn Klute ◽  
Neva Kirk-Sanchez ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION Studies suggest that brief bouts of activity consisting of sit-to-stand transitions, gait initiation, turning and negotiation of obstacles, are essential tasks of daily mobility, as well as prosthetic mobility1,2. Using outcome measures deemed reliable for use in the amputee population is ideal3,4. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of a component timed-up-and-go test (cTUG), using a mobile application (App), to evaluate basic prosthetic mobility tasks in people with lower limb amputation (LLA). The cTUG captures time required to perform the subtask components of sit to stand transitions, linear gait, and a 180˚ turn that are requisites of the standard TUG test. It was hypothesized that the cTUG would demonstrate test-retest reliability, differentiate between groups based on anatomical level of amputation, and exhibit convergent validity with other measures of prosthetic mobility and balance. Abstract PDF  Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32036/24452 How to cite: Clemens S, Gaunaurd I, Lucarevic J, Klute G, Kirk-Sanchez N, Bennett C, Gailey R. ESTABLISHING THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE COMPONENT TIMED-UP-AND-GO TEST TO DETERMINE BASIC PROSTHETIC MOBILITY IN PEOPLE WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION. CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, 2018; ABSTRACT, ORAL PRESENTATION AT THE AOPA’S 101ST NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, SEPT. 26-29, VANCOUVER, CANADA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32036 Abstracts were Peer-reviewed by the AOPA 2018 National Assembly Scientific Committee. 


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Kark ◽  
Anne Simmons

Background: Patient satisfaction is an important measurement in healthcare for administrators, clinicians and patients.Objectives: This study investigated the role of gait deviation in patient satisfaction following lower-limb amputation and prosthesis prescription.Study design: A cross-sectional study was done.Methods: Twenty community-based unilateral lower-limb amputees, 12 transtibial and 8 transfemoral, were recruited from support groups. Participants completed the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) with embedded satisfaction-related questions, the timed-up-and-go test and the six-minute walk test, and also underwent quantitative three-dimensional analysis. Kinematic deviation was summarized using the gait profile score (GPS).Results: Satisfaction levels were generally high (median 80 + /100). Sociodemographic variables did not correlate significantly with any of the satisfaction measures (−0.35 ≤  r ≤ 0.54). Satisfaction correlated strongly with the PEQ scales, particularly ambulation, prosthetic utility, frustration, perceived response and social burden ( r ≥ 0.70). By contrast, the relationships between satisfaction and performance-based outcome measures were not significant (−0.45 ≤  r ≤ 0.43), and the GPS did not correlate with any satisfaction measures (−0.23 ≤  r ≤ 0.15).Conclusions: In this study of high functioning amputees, gait deviation was unimportant to the amputee, while self-reported functional ability and attitudes toward the prosthesis were the strongest correlates of satisfaction following lower-limb amputation.Clinical relevance For the high functioning individuals with lower-limb amputation in this study, gait deviation was not a significant correlate of patient satisfaction. Results suggest that improving self-perceived functional ability and attitudes toward the prosthesis, rather than minimizing gait deviation, will improve patient satisfaction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila M. Clemens ◽  
Glenn K. Klute ◽  
Neva J. Kirk-Sanchez ◽  
Michele A. Raya ◽  
Kyoung Jae Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R Batten ◽  
Steven M McPhail ◽  
Allison M Mandrusiak ◽  
Paulose N Varghese ◽  
Suzanne S Kuys

Background: The relationship between gait speed and prosthetic potential (K-level classifications) and function has not been explored among people transitioning from hospital rehabilitation to the community. Objectives: To examine gait speed at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation among people prescribed a prosthetic leg after unilateral lower limb amputation, and associations between gait speed, prosthetic potential and functional ability. Study design: Cohort. Methods: Gait speed (10-m walk test), K-level (Amputee Mobility Predictor) and Functional Independence Measure motor were compared for 110 people (mean (standard deviation) age: 63 (13) years, 77% male, 71% transtibial amputation, 70% dysvascular causes). Results: Median (interquartile range) gait speed and Functional Independence Measure motor were 0.52 (0.37–0.67) m/s and 84 (81, 85), respectively. Median (IQR) gait speed scores for each K-level were as follows: K1 = 0.17 (0.15–0.19) m/s, K2 = 0.38 (0.25–0.54) m/s, K3 = 0.63 (0.50–0.71) m/s and K4 = 1.06 (0.95–1.18) m/s. Median (IQR) FIM-Motor scores for each K-level were as follows: K1 = 82 (69–84), K2 = 83 (79–84), K3 = 85 (83–87) and K4 = 87 (86–89). Faster gait speed was associated with higher K-level, higher FIM-Motor, being younger, male and having transtibial amputation with nonvascular aetiology. Conclusion: Gait speed was faster among each higher K-level classification. However, gait speeds observed across all K-levels were slower than healthy populations, consistent with values indicating high risk of morbidity and mortality. Clinical relevance Factors associated with faster gait speed are useful for clinical teams considering walking potential of people with lower limb prostheses and those seeking to refine prosthetic rehabilitation programmes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-289
Author(s):  
Rwth Stuckey ◽  
Pam Draganovic ◽  
Mohammad Mosayed Ullah ◽  
Ellie Fossey ◽  
Michael P Dillon

Background: Lower limb amputation due to workplace injury and motor vehicle accident is common in Bangladesh. Qualitative research may extend our understanding of how physical impairment and other factors, such as cultural norms, family roles and the built environment, facilitate or hinder work participation following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the experience of people in Bangladesh following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation to understand the facilitators and barriers to their work participation. Study Design: Qualitative interviews with thematic analysis. Methods: The Worker Role Interview was used to guide semi-structured interviews in a convenience sample of 10 adults living in Bangladesh following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation. Interviews were interpreted, and the themes that emerged were evidenced with first-person quotes. Results: Barriers and facilitators to work participation were synthesised into the following themes: spirituality, attitudes, meaning of work, planning for work participation, traditional gender roles, social support, mobility aids, environmental challenges and ergonomic adaptations. Conclusion: This qualitative approach identified barriers and facilitators to work participation, such as the role of spirituality and the effect of gender roles, that have not been well researched in this population. Being aware of their effects can help clinicians reduce barriers to work participation. Clinical relevance Greater awareness of the barriers and facilitators to work participation, such as the role of spirituality or the effect of gender roles, can assist clinicians to reduce barriers and help facilitate work participation for people living in Bangladesh following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation.


Author(s):  
Roghieh Gholsha ◽  
Zeynab Baylari ◽  
Mohammad Tajik ◽  
Ahmad Sohrabi ◽  
Maryam Montazeri

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common diseases in the world and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the main causes of mortality and morbidity. This study was done for the evaluation of prognostic risk factors in hospitalized patients with DFU. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the records of all patients with DFU referred to Sayyad Shirazi Hospital in Gorgan during 2018-2020 were reviewed to determine the demographic characteristics, paraclinical findings, and clinical features. All information of patients was entered into the checklist. Frequency, percentage, mean± standard deviation (SD) were used to describe the data. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to investigate the relationship between each. SPSS software version 20 was used for data analysis. Results: In this study 379 patient with DFU were studied that 54.1% were female. 62.3% of patients were in the age group of 45 -65 years.  In these patients, 64.9% had hypertension and 37.7% had cardiovascular disease. 6.8% and 21.2% were smokers and drug addicts, respectively and 17.7% had history of lower limb amputation .76% of patient had grade 2 and 3 Wagner’s DFUs. According to the statistical analysis, there was no significant relationship between insulin treatment, smoking and opium use, and patientchr('39')s age with the final outcome of discharge. The chi-square test showed the relationship between white blood cells (WBCs) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level and final outcome. Conclusion: DFU prognosis may be related to WBC and ESR, grading of DFU, and history of lower limb amputation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document