scholarly journals Comparison Between Abdominoplasty Assisted by Liposuction Utilizing Classical (U) Incision Versus (W) Incision: A Randomized Controlled Study

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Abdrabo ◽  
M G Elsayed ◽  
A M A Kabeel
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Body Contouring ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Moderate Amount ◽  
Excess Skin ◽  
Objective Feedback ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Traditional abdominoplasty techniques, which use primarily transverse incisions, seem to be most beneficial for those patients whose abdominal contour is relatively normal with only a minimal to moderate amount of flaccid skin. Objective The aim of the study was to compare between the results of two different incisions used in abdominoplasty with liposuction, and to detect the morbidities and complications which may occur after the surgical procedures such as Aesthetic complication which occured in the form of asymmetry, dog ears, residual deformity, unsatisfactory umbilicus and unsatisfactory scarring (widened, thickened, hypertrophic or keloid) and Non-aesthetic complications which occurred in the form of seroma, wound infection, partial skin necrosis, and wound dehiscence. In addition to comparing the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods The contour of the abdomen is the backbone of body contouring surgery. Patients usually seek abdominoplasty for abdominal wall laxity, excess skin, striae, or diastasis of the rectus muscles. The inevitable end scar must be invisible as possible, symmetrical, and located in regions covered with the minimal clothing. The study included 30 patients divided into 2 groups (A) & (B) each group consist of 15 patients. This study was a prospective comparative study between Classic (U) incision abdominoplasty and (W) incision abdominoplasty; Group (A) undergone Classic (U) incision abdominoplasty, and Group (B) undergone (W) incision abdominoplasty. Results: received from both groups were compared to each other and the collected results were evaluated, and subjected to statistical analysis . Patient satisfaction was assessed by direct patient questioning and included subjective and objective feedback on the overall satisfaction following abdominoplasty, areas of dissatisfaction and patients satisfaction post different types of abdominoplasty. Conclusion Abdominoplasty with Liposuction provide high levels of patient satisfaction. The combined procedure is similar in discomfort level to abdominoplasty alone and produces the highest level of patient satisfaction and the patient satisfaction represents a golden goal in the practical work.

scholarly journals Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Lignocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Forearm and Hand Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moumita Roychowdhury ◽  
Anjum Naz
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Tourniquet Pain ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Fentanyl Consumption ◽  
Group B ◽  
Preservative Free

Objective: Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is an effective anesthetic technique for surgical procedures of short duration involving the distal parts of the limbs. Intraoperative tourniquet pain is the major restraint of this technique, and to overcome this limitation, various adjuvants to local anesthetics have been used. This study investigated the effect of a fixed low dose of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lignocaine on intraoperative tourniquet pain, onset of block, duration of block, and patient satisfaction. Methods: A total of 100 adult patients with ASA grade I and II who were scheduled for upper limb surgery of approximately 1 hour in duration were randomly divided into two groups (n=50 in each group). Group A received 35 mL of preservative-free lignocaine alone and Group B received 35 mL of preservative-free lignocaine along with 30 μg of dexmedetomidine. The incidence of tourniquet pain, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, duration of onset and recovery of sensory and motor block after tourniquet deflation, postoperative numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, duration of analgesia, and overall patient satisfaction were noted. Result: The incidence of tourniquet pain and intraoperative fentanyl consumption were significantly lower in Group B. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks were faster and longer, respectively, in Group B. Postoperative NPRS scores were lower, duration of analgesia was longer, and overall patient satisfaction was better in the dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine at a dose of 30 μg as a lignocaine adjuvant significantly reduces tourniquet pain and intraoperative fentanyl consumption in IVRA. Dexmedetomidine shortens the onset of block, prolongs the duration of block, and provides a more satisfactory anesthesia than lignocaine alone.

LIMBERG FLAP A BETTER METHOD OF CLOSURE OF LUMBAR MYELOMENINGOCELE DEFECTS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Prem Shanker ◽  
Raghavendra Gupta ◽  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Adiveeth Deb
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Direct Repair ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Myelomeningocele is the most common and complex congenital malformation of the central nervous system with an incidence of approximately 1 in 1000 live births. The lumbosacral area is the commonest site for defect. Early closure of a myelomeningocele defect is advocated because it reduces infection rates even though it is not associated with an improved neurological outcome. Aims & objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of direct repair and a Limberg ap repair for skin defects that occur in myelomeningocele. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. Material and methods: A tertiary care centre based, non-randomized, prospective, comparative study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, from January 2018 to October 2019, in 22 patients with lumbar myelomeningocele. 7 patients who underwent Limberg ap repair constituted Group A and 15 patients who underwent direct repair constituted Group B. Post operatively the outcomes were compared at 6 months, on the basis of cosmetic appearance and complications such as wound dehiscence, CSF leak, neurological decit, hydrocephalus, necrosis and wound infection. Results : Lesser complications and a better cosmetic outcome were seen post operatively at 6 months with Limberg ap technique compared to direct repair. Our study show better result with Limberg ap over direct repair of myelomeningocele defect closure up to the follow up period of 6 months. Conclusion: Because of various defect sizes and patient characteristics, no single protocol exists for the reconstruction of myelomeningocele defects. Most lumbar myelomeningocele defects can be managed by direct skin repair alone. In cases of large defects, in which direct repair is not possible, local aps may be used to cover the defect. Overall, Limberg ap is a better technique for closure in these patients.

scholarly journals Lumbodorsal flap for repair of meningomyelocele- a procedure matched controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1678
Author(s):  
Gungi Raghavendra Prasad ◽  
Deepak Sharma ◽  
J. V. Subba Rao ◽  
P. Siva Kumar ◽  
Amtul Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Fascial Flap ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Open neural tube defects have been approached by innumerable surgical techniques. Hitherto, excision of the exposed neural tube component, water tight closure of dura, approximation of paraspinal soft tissue and skin closure repair was stressed. Support of vertebral defect was not adequately addressed. Objectives were to introduce lumbodorsal/thoraco dorsal fascial flap as an effective answer to the vertebral defect component of MMC. To compare conventional paraspinal soft tissue closure with lumbodorsal/ thoracodorsal fascial flap.Methods: This was a procedure matched controlled study conducted from 1984-2015. A total of 121 procedures were performed by the same team formed the cohort of the study. Conventional muscle mobilization group A (n=50) and lumbodorsal flap group B (n=71) were the two groups. Demographic data, CSF leak, CSF collection, wound dehiscence, duration of drain and duration of surgery were the parameters evaluated with statistically blinded method.Results: The series mostly constituted lumbar (28%) and lumbo-sacral meningomyelocele (56%). Most of the children in both the groups are either at birth or <1 month. Only few patients in group B with lipo-meningocele presented beyond the age of 5 years (7%). 12% in group A had hydrocephalus, whereas 15.4% had in group B. The patients underwent similar technique at all sites of MMC. Grossly it appears that there is less wound dehiscence, less CSF leak, less hygroma formation in group B cases. Duration of surgery is similar in both the groups, most of them requiring 60 to 120 minutes. The duration of drainage was more than 7 days in group A (34%) as compared to group B (20%).Conclusions: Lumbodorsal/thoraco dorsal fascial flap adequately supports the vertebral defect and skin flaps. They seem to be superior in addressing the vertebral defect component.

Pregabalin As A Premedicant To Attenuate Pressor Response In Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3418-3423
Author(s):  
Sweety Agrawal ◽  
Shubdha Bhagat ◽  
Pratibha Deshmukh ◽  
Amol Singham
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Pressor Response ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Co2 Insufflation ◽  
Ramsay Sedation Scale ◽  
Minute Interval ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Induction Of Anaesthesia

The present study was done to evaluate the ability of oral pregabalin to attenuate the pressor response to airway instrumentation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Sixty-four adult patients aged between 25-55 year of either gender belonging to ASA-1 or ASA2 physical status weighing 50-70 kg were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two patients each were randomized to group A, or group B. Patients in group A received tablet Pregabalin (150mg) and those in group B received placebo orally one hour before induction of anaesthesia. Heart rate, blood pressure, and sedation were assessed preoperatively before giving the tablets and after 30 minutes, and just before induction of anaesthesia. Intraoperative, pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, ECG in the lead II, SPO2 and ETCO2 were monitored. All the above parameters were noted during laryngoscopy and intubation, 3 minutes after CO2 insufflation, and then at every 10-minute interval till the end of surgery. These parameters were also recorded after extubating the patient. The Ramsay sedation scale was used to assess the sedation at the baseline, one hour after drug intake , one hour after extubation and 4 hour after surgery. Any adverse effects in the postoperative period were recorded. The result of our study shows that pre-emptive administration of oral pregabalin 150 mg significantly reduced the pressor response at the time of laryngoscopy and intubation, after CO2 insufflation and just after extubation. We conclude that oral pregabalin premedication is effective in successful attenuation of hemodynamic pressor response to laryngoscopy, intubation and pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

scholarly journals Intermittent Self Dilation – An Option For The Prevention of Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Filliform Follower Urethral Dilation

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
N M Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Urethral Stricture ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Urine Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stricture Recurrence ◽  
Urethral Dilation ◽  
Lower Urinary

Background: Urethral stricture and its recurrence is still a major problem in male. Several procedures are present for the treatment of the disease. Lapides introduced the concept of intermittent self dilatation (ISD) which has decreased the incidence of recurrence of urethral stricture if doing properly. The aim of the this study was to report the outcomes of ISD for the treatment of urethral stricture after Filliform follower urethral dilatation (FFUD).Method: This was a prospective comparative study, conducted in the department of surgery, urology unit from March 2013 to February 2016. Total of 49 patients were enrolled and were randomly divided into Group A and Group B. In Group A, all the patients were taught ISD with Nelaton Catheter after FFUD. In group B, all patients underwent only FFUD for urethral stricture. In both groups, Foley's catheter was removed after 2 weeks of FFUD. These patients who had difficulty In passing urine or having lower urinary tract syndrome after removal of catheter, were evaluated for urethral stricture recurrency by clinical symptoms, ultrasonography, urine test for culture and sensitivity, cystoscopy/urethrogram as necessarily.Result: In Group A, 4 patients out of 20(20%)developed urethral stricture recurrency where as in Group B,18 patients out of 23 (78.26%) developed urethral stricture recurrency. Therefore, the rate of urethral stricture recurrence is significantly more in group B than the Group A (p< 0.001).Conclusion: ISD is an effective way for the prevention of urethtral stricture recurrence after FFUD. JNGMC,  Vol. 14 No. 2 December 2016, Page: 38-40

scholarly journals Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed I. Refaat ◽  
Amr K. Elsamman ◽  
Adham Rabea ◽  
Mohamed I. A. Hewaidy
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Microsurgical Decompression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background The quest for better patient outcomes is driving to the development of minimally invasive spine surgical techniques. There are several evidences on the use of microsurgical decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spine stenosis; however, few of these studies compared their outcomes with the traditional laminectomy technique. Objectives The aim of our study was to compare outcomes following microsurgical decompression via unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) of the spinal canal to the standard open laminectomy for cases with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects and methods Cases were divided in two groups. Group (A) cases were operated by conventional full laminectomy; Group (B) cases were operated by (ULBD) technique. Results from both groups were compared regarding duration of surgery, blood loss, perioperative complication, and postoperative outcome and patient satisfaction. Results There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the improvement of visual pain analogue, while improvement of neurogenic claudication outcome score was significant in group (B) than group (A). Seventy-three percent of group (A) cases and 80% of group (B) stated that surgery met their expectations and were satisfied from the outcome. Conclusion Comparing ULBD with traditional laminectomy showed the efficacy of the minimally invasive technique in obtaining good surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the occurrence of complications The ULBD technique was found to respect the posterior spinal integrity and musculature, accompanied with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and shorter recovery periods than the open laminectomy technique.

scholarly journals Profile vs Tubular Plate in Unimalleolar or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Wound complications?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0015
Author(s):  
Paolo Ceccarini ◽  
Rosario Petruccelli ◽  
Michele Bisaccia ◽  
Giuseppe Rinonapoli ◽  
Auro Caraffa
Keyword(s):  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Group B

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare two types of plates, one third tubular plate and LCP distal fibula plate, evaluating the clinical outcome and the skin complications associated with their use. Methods: We collected the data of 122 consecutive unimalleolar or bimalleolar fractures treated by internal fixation for a closed, displaced distal closed fibular fracture. Exclusion criteria were: 1) open ankle fractures,2) trimalleolar fractures, 3) previous ankle fractures 4) severe venous insufficiency, 5) ankleosteoarthritis previous to surgery, 6) associated ankle dislocation. After this selection, 93 patients were included in our study and assigned in two groups, based on using of different implant: in group A48 patients were treated with one-third tubular and in group B 45 patients were treated with LCP distalfibula plate. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Patients received the same surgical procedure and the same post-operative care, then they were radiologically evaluated at1-3-12 months and clinical examination was made at 24 (range 15-36) months using AOFAS clinical rating system. All data were evaluated using chi-square test. Results: At the final 24-month follow-up a comparison between the two groups showed no statistical significant differences in reduction accuracy and bone union ratio at radiological examination. The wound complications rate of the overall study group was 7.6%. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups. There were no differences between both group in percentage of hardware removal at follow-up (overall 5.4%). In the group A occurred 1 deep infection, 2 superficial infection, no wound dehiscence; in group B occured 1 deep infection, 1 superficial infection and 2 wound dehiscence. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups (p=0.70; Fisher exact test). Conclusion: Our study has shown no difference in radiographic bone union rate, no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes, in time of bone reduction and wound complication rate between the LCP distalfibula plate and conventional one-third tubular plate. RCT or metanalasys are in this case useful to improve scientific evidence and give more information for the correct surgical treatment of ankle fractures.

Blind Comparative study between Silver nanoparticles dressings and Standard Moist Wound Dressings (SMWD) in management of diabetic foot ulcers

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelaal ◽  
Mostafa Soliman ◽  
Hany Rafik ◽  
Mohamed Emam ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Elsadek
Keyword(s):  
Silver Nanoparticles ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Wound Dressing ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are the main cause of hospitalization in diabetic patients and they are considered a major worldwide health problem. Thus, there is a need to evaluate various treatment modalities. In this study we will assess the clinical efficacy of Silver nanoparticles dressing vs Standard Moist Wound Dressing (SMWD) in management of diabetic foot ulcers. Objective To compare wound outcome, limb salvage, healing time of diabetes related foot ulcers and cost effectiveness in terms of duration of hospital stay between Silver nanotechnology dressings and Standard moist wound therapy (SMWT) in management of diabetic foot ulcers. Patients and Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled study involving 34 patients with active diabetic foot ulcers, in a high volume tertiary referral vascular center. They were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients (group A) were prescribed SMWD and the other 17 patients (group B) received Silver nanoparticles wound dressing. Results Our study correlates with the study conducted by K.Suhas et al. which had observed that Silver nanoparticles wound dressing was safe and effective treatment for complex diabetic foot wounds and could lead to higher proportion of healed wounds and faster healing rates. At the end of the study, group B promised a better outcome as compared to group A. Conclusion The role of Silver nanoparticles wound dressing in healing of diabetic foot ulcers has been proposed as a novel method of manipulating the chronic wound environment in a way that it reduces bacterial burden and chronic interstitial wound fluid, increases vascularity and cytokine expression and to an extent mechanically exploiting the viscoelasticity of peri wound tissues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document